Verified for the 2025 AP US Government exam•Citation:
America didn’t just declare independence with muskets and tea-dumping. It did it with documents. These texts weren’t just arguments—they were blueprints, battles, and bold visions of how a government should function. The College Board has selected a handful of these foundational documents to showcase key tensions in American political thought: liberty vs. order, federal power vs. state sovereignty, and majoritarianism vs. minority rights.
Let’s dive into these texts not just for what they said—but for what they meant, what they feared, and how they’ve shaped U.S. governance ever since.
Drafted by Thomas Jefferson, the Declaration was a revolutionary statement of political philosophy, modeled after Enlightenment thinkers like John Locke. It declared the 13 colonies’ independence from Britain.
⭐ The Declaration was not just a break-up letter with Britain—it was a philosophical blueprint for self-governance grounded in popular sovereignty.
America’s first constitution, drafted during the Revolutionary War, reflected deep fears of centralized power.
These weaknesses became painfully obvious during crises like Shays’ Rebellion, when the federal government proved too weak to respond effectively. Calls grew louder for a stronger central government, setting the stage for the Constitutional Convention of 1787.
⭐ Key Concept: The AoC prioritized state sovereignty over national unity. Its weaknesses demonstrated the need for a stronger federal structure.
Madison tackled the dangers of factions—groups united by common interests adverse to the rights of others.
Factions (groups with a common political interest) are inevitable in a free society—and dangerous.
⭐ Madison wasn’t saying factions were good—just that controlling their effects, not eliminating them, was the best strategy.
This essay focused on structural protections against tyranny, emphasizing how the Constitution's system of checks and balances preserves liberty.
How do you prevent any one branch from becoming too powerful?
⭐ Federalist 51 directly supports ideas like judicial review, bicameralism, veto power, and impeachment—all mechanisms to avoid tyranny.
Hamilton made the case for a single, energetic executive, arguing that a strong presidency would lead to decisive leadership and greater accountability.
The U.S. needs a single, energetic executive (aka: one strong president).
Weak leadership leads to legislative dominance (tyranny by slow committee).
Here, Hamilton defends the judiciary, especially judicial review, as a guardian of the Constitution.
⭐ This paper is the philosophical basis for Marbury v. Madison (1803), which established judicial review as precedent.
This Anti-Federalist paper opposed the new Constitution, warning that centralized power would erode state authority and threaten liberty.
Brutus advocated for decentralized democracy—small republics where leaders stay closely accountable to their constituents.
The U.S. Constitution replaced the Articles and established a more robust federal system with three co-equal branches. The Bill of Rights, added in 1791, placated Anti-Federalist concerns by protecting individual liberties.
⭐ The Constitution is a living document—amendable and open to interpretation—that balances order and liberty through institutional design.
Although written nearly 200 years after the founding, this letter embodies the moral vision behind American government and civil rights.
MLK was jailed for violating a court order banning protests in Birmingham, Alabama.
King invokes natural rights philosophy—echoing Jefferson—by asserting that unjust laws degrade human dignity and violate moral law.
Document | Author(s) | Main Ideas | AP Gov Themes |
---|---|---|---|
Declaration of Independence | Thomas Jefferson | Natural rights, social contract, right to revolution | Liberty, Popular Sovereignty |
Articles of Confederation | Continental Congress | Weak central government, state sovereignty | Federalism, Ineffective Government |
Federalist No. 10 | James Madison | Factions are inevitable; large republics prevent tyranny of the majority | Pluralism, Republicanism |
Federalist No. 51 | James Madison | Checks and balances; separation of powers | Limited Government, Federalism |
Federalist No. 70 | Alexander Hamilton | Need for a single, energetic executive | Strong Executive, Accountability |
Federalist No. 78 | Alexander Hamilton | Judicial independence; judicial review | Judicial Power, Rule of Law |
Brutus No. 1 | Anonymous (Anti-Fed) | Anti-Constitution; feared tyranny from large republics and federal overreach | Anti-Federalism, Liberty |
U.S. Constitution | Founding Fathers | Framework for government; separation of powers, checks, federalism | Constitutional Design, Federalism |
Bill of Rights | James Madison | First 10 Amendments; protects civil liberties | Civil Liberties, Limited Government |
Letter from Birmingham Jail | Dr. Martin Luther King | Civil disobedience, moral duty to oppose unjust laws, nonviolent resistance | Civil Rights, Justice, Liberty |
These documents aren’t just dead parchment—they’re alive in every SCOTUS ruling, every protest, every heated congressional debate. They shaped the structure, values, and conflicts that define the American political system.
Whether you're citing Madison’s war on factions, Brutus's fear of big government, or MLK's call to conscience—these founding texts give you the language and logic to understand democracy in motion.