Verified for the 2025 AP US Government exam•Citation:
The Articles of Confederation, adopted in 1777 during the Revolutionary War and ratified in 1781, served as the first constitution of the United States. Designed to unite the newly independent states while avoiding tyranny, the Articles created a weak central government and granted significant power to individual states. However, the limitations of this structure soon became apparent. The federal government had no power to tax, no authority over interstate commerce, and lacked both an executive branch to enforce laws and a national judiciary to resolve disputes. These structural flaws led to widespread economic disarray, political instability, and an inability to respond to national crises—culminating in the Constitutional Convention of 1787.
The Articles reflected the colonists’ fear of centralized power, but the resulting system was too weak to govern effectively. Several key limitations illustrate why the Articles ultimately failed:
Weakness | Description |
---|---|
No power to tax | Congress could request funds but not compel states to pay. |
No executive branch | No president or national leader to enforce laws. |
No national judiciary | No courts to resolve disputes between states or interpret national law. |
No regulation of interstate commerce | States taxed one another and printed their own money, creating confusion. |
Unanimous amendment process | All 13 states had to approve changes—making reform nearly impossible. |
No standing army | Congress could not raise a national army to respond to internal threats. |
The Articles of Confederation created a fragile system of government, prioritizing state sovereignty over national unity. The result was a federal government too weak to function effectively. The following five weaknesses, highlighted by real-world incidents and legal challenges, played a major role in prompting the drafting of the U.S. Constitution.
Congress lacked the authority to maintain a standing army or compel states to contribute troops. When internal conflict erupted, the national government was powerless to respond.
⭐ Why it matters: The absence of military power undermined the government's ability to protect its citizens and enforce laws during times of crisis.
Under the Articles, there was no executive branch—no president or centralized authority to implement and enforce the laws passed by Congress.
⭐ Why it matters: Laws without enforcement are meaningless; the government could make decisions but had no means to carry them out.
The Articles provided no national judiciary to interpret laws or resolve disputes between states.
⭐ Why it matters: Without a court system, there was no legal mechanism to settle disputes or clarify the law—each state interpreted its own rules.
Congress could not regulate trade between states or with foreign nations.
⭐ Why it matters: A fragmented economic system weakened national unity and stifled the growth of a cohesive American market.
Both the national government and the states retained the power to coin currency, leading to economic instability.
⭐ Why it matters: Competing currencies and inflation weakened public confidence and disrupted trade, both domestically and internationally.
In 1786–87, a series of armed protests in western Massachusetts—known as Shays’ Rebellion—revealed the profound weaknesses of the Articles. Led by Daniel Shays, a former Revolutionary War captain, poor farmers and veterans rose up against high taxes, foreclosures, and economic injustice.
The Massachusetts government struggled to respond due to the absence of a federal military. The rebellion was ultimately crushed by state militias, but it alarmed national leaders.
⭐ Why it matters: The inability of the national government to suppress the rebellion underscored the need for a stronger federal system.
The shortcomings of the Articles led many leaders—including George Washington, Alexander Hamilton, and James Madison—to call for a Constitutional Convention. Held in Philadelphia in 1787, the convention aimed to replace, not merely revise, the Articles.
The new U.S. Constitution created:
This new framework addressed nearly every failing of the Articles and established a lasting foundation for American governance.
Challenge | Example/Impact |
---|---|
Lack of military power | Shays’ Rebellion exposed inability to suppress uprisings. |
No executive enforcement | Congress couldn’t enforce its own laws or treaties. |
No national court system | Legal conflicts between states went unresolved. |
Economic disunity | Trade barriers and varied currencies caused economic hardship. |
Amendment rigidity | Needed unanimous consent—reforms were nearly impossible to enact. |
Each of these issues illustrated how the Articles failed to provide a functioning national government. These failures ultimately justified the drastic changes enacted under the Constitution.