Warrant

Definition

A warrant in the context of logical argumentation is a statement that connects the evidence presented to the claim being made. It serves as the underlying justification that explains why the evidence supports the claim, making it essential for a convincing argument. Without a warrant, an argument can appear weak or unconvincing as it lacks the necessary reasoning that ties everything together.

5 Must Know Facts For Your Next Test

1. A warrant is crucial because it clarifies how evidence supports a claim, enhancing the overall strength of an argument.
2. Warrants can vary in complexity; some may be simple logical connections while others involve more nuanced reasoning.
3. Effective warrants not only link evidence to claims but also anticipate counterarguments by addressing potential weaknesses.
4. Identifying warrants helps strengthen argumentative writing by ensuring all components of an argument are clearly articulated and interconnected.
5. In persuasive writing, strong warrants can significantly impact the reader's understanding and acceptance of the argument being presented.

Review Questions

• How does a warrant function in an argument, and why is it important for connecting evidence to a claim?
  • A warrant functions as the reasoning that links evidence to a claim, explaining how the provided evidence supports the assertion being made. It's important because it provides clarity and justification, allowing the audience to understand the relationship between what is being claimed and the evidence backing it. Without a solid warrant, an argument may seem disconnected or lacking in depth, which could weaken its overall persuasiveness.
• Discuss how effective use of warrants can strengthen persuasive writing and improve the overall quality of arguments.
  • Effective use of warrants strengthens persuasive writing by ensuring that each piece of evidence is clearly tied to its respective claim, thereby enhancing logical coherence. When writers articulate strong warrants, they provide clarity for their audience and address potential counterarguments, which bolsters credibility. This thoughtful connection helps persuade readers more effectively by making arguments easier to follow and understand, ultimately leading to more convincing outcomes.
• Evaluate the role of backing in relation to warrants within argumentative structures and its significance in crafting effective arguments.
  • Backing plays a crucial role in reinforcing warrants by providing additional support and justification for why the evidence connects to the claim. When writers include backing alongside their warrants, they create a more robust argumentative structure that anticipates challenges and objections. This combination not only solidifies the link between claims and evidence but also enhances overall credibility, making arguments stronger and more persuasive by addressing potential weaknesses before they are raised by critics.

Related terms

Claim: A claim is a statement or assertion that something is true, which can be supported or challenged through argumentation.

Evidence: Evidence consists of the data, facts, or information used to support a claim in an argument.

Backing: Backing refers to additional support or reasoning that strengthens the warrant, providing further justification for the connection between the claim and the evidence.