The no-miracles argument is a philosophical reasoning that supports scientific realism, positing that the success of science in making accurate predictions and providing coherent explanations is best understood as evidence that our scientific theories are true or approximately true. This argument suggests that if scientific theories were not true, it would be miraculous that they could yield such reliable results, hence the term 'no miracles.' It underlines the idea that the success of scientific inquiry points to a reality that these theories describe.
congrats on reading the definition of no-miracles argument. now let's actually learn it.