study guides for every class

that actually explain what's on your next test

Planned Parenthood v. Casey

from class:

Feminist Political Thought

Definition

Planned Parenthood v. Casey is a landmark Supreme Court case from 1992 that upheld the constitutional right to have an abortion established in Roe v. Wade while allowing states to impose certain regulations. The decision reinforced the idea of 'undue burden,' meaning that states cannot place significant obstacles in the path of women seeking abortions before fetal viability. This case is essential for understanding both the historical and ongoing debates surrounding reproductive rights and the regulatory landscape surrounding them.

congrats on reading the definition of Planned Parenthood v. Casey. now let's actually learn it.

ok, let's learn stuff

5 Must Know Facts For Your Next Test

  1. Planned Parenthood v. Casey reaffirmed Roe v. Wade, stating that the right to choose to have an abortion is constitutionally protected.
  2. The case introduced the 'undue burden' standard, which allows for certain state restrictions on abortion as long as they do not place significant obstacles in front of women.
  3. The Supreme Court's ruling allowed states to implement regulations such as waiting periods and parental consent laws without overturning the fundamental right to abortion.
  4. The case highlighted the ongoing struggle between state interests in regulating abortions and women's rights to make decisions about their own bodies.
  5. The decision has been influential in shaping contemporary debates about reproductive rights and access to healthcare services across the United States.

Review Questions

  • How did Planned Parenthood v. Casey influence the legal framework surrounding reproductive rights following Roe v. Wade?
    • Planned Parenthood v. Casey significantly influenced the legal landscape by reaffirming the core holding of Roe v. Wade while introducing the 'undue burden' standard for evaluating state regulations on abortion. This meant that while states could regulate abortions, they could not impose significant obstacles that would hinder a woman's right to choose before fetal viability. This case solidified the legal basis for many reproductive rights movements, emphasizing both protection and regulation within a constitutional framework.
  • Discuss how the 'undue burden' standard established in Planned Parenthood v. Casey has impacted state legislation regarding abortion.
    • The 'undue burden' standard established in Planned Parenthood v. Casey has had a profound effect on state legislation regarding abortion by allowing states some leeway to regulate the procedure but also ensuring that any regulations do not create substantial obstacles for women seeking abortions. As a result, numerous states have attempted to implement various laws, such as mandatory waiting periods and parental consent requirements, which courts have evaluated under this standard. This has led to a patchwork of regulations across states, significantly impacting women's access to abortion services depending on where they live.
  • Evaluate the implications of Planned Parenthood v. Casey on contemporary debates around reproductive health policies in light of recent challenges to abortion rights.
    • Planned Parenthood v. Casey continues to play a critical role in contemporary debates surrounding reproductive health policies, especially as various states push for more restrictive abortion laws in light of shifting political landscapes. The ruling's establishment of the 'undue burden' standard allows courts to scrutinize new legislation closely, but recent challenges have demonstrated how vulnerable reproductive rights can be in a changing legal environment. This case serves as both a protective precedent and a battleground for advocates and opponents of abortion rights, influencing ongoing discussions about women's autonomy, healthcare access, and state power.
© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.