Planned Parenthood v. Casey

Definition

Planned Parenthood v. Casey is a landmark Supreme Court case decided in 1992 that reaffirmed the constitutional right to have an abortion while allowing states to impose certain regulations. The ruling upheld parts of Pennsylvania's Abortion Control Act, including a 24-hour waiting period and informed consent requirements, but struck down spousal notification requirements. This case is significant in the ongoing debate over reproductive rights and the extent of state regulation.

5 Must Know Facts For Your Next Test

1. The Supreme Court's decision in Planned Parenthood v. Casey reaffirmed the central holding of Roe v. Wade, maintaining that women have the right to choose to have an abortion.
2. The ruling introduced the 'undue burden' standard, which means that states cannot place substantial obstacles in the path of a woman seeking an abortion before fetal viability.
3. The case was significant in that it allowed states to implement regulations like waiting periods and parental consent laws, as long as they do not create an undue burden on access to abortion.
4. The court's opinion emphasized the importance of a woman's autonomy and her right to make decisions regarding her body and reproductive health.
5. This case has influenced subsequent legal challenges and legislative efforts concerning abortion rights across the United States.

Review Questions

• How did Planned Parenthood v. Casey change the legal landscape for abortion rights established by Roe v. Wade?
  • Planned Parenthood v. Casey affirmed the constitutional right to have an abortion established in Roe v. Wade while introducing the 'undue burden' standard for state regulations. This meant that states could impose certain restrictions on abortions, like waiting periods or informed consent laws, as long as they did not create substantial obstacles for women seeking abortions before fetal viability. This ruling significantly shaped how states can regulate abortions without completely overturning the right recognized in Roe.
• What specific regulations from Pennsylvania's Abortion Control Act were upheld by the Supreme Court in Planned Parenthood v. Casey, and why were they considered acceptable?
  • The Supreme Court upheld several provisions from Pennsylvania's Abortion Control Act, including a 24-hour waiting period and informed consent requirements. These regulations were deemed acceptable because they did not impose an undue burden on a woman's right to choose an abortion; instead, they aimed to ensure that women were fully informed before making a decision about their reproductive health. The spousal notification requirement was struck down as it imposed an undue burden.
• Evaluate the impact of Planned Parenthood v. Casey on future legislative efforts regarding reproductive rights at both state and federal levels.
  • Planned Parenthood v. Casey had a profound impact on reproductive rights legislation by establishing the 'undue burden' standard, which allowed states to regulate abortions more than before while still protecting a woman's right to choose. This ruling led to a wave of new state laws aimed at regulating abortions under this standard, often prompting legal challenges that continue to shape reproductive health policies today. The case also galvanized advocacy groups on both sides of the debate, influencing public opinion and political strategies surrounding reproductive rights at both state and federal levels.

Related terms

Roe v. Wade: A 1973 Supreme Court decision that established a woman's legal right to have an abortion under the right to privacy.

Informed Consent: A process by which a patient is educated about the risks, benefits, and alternatives of a medical procedure, including abortion.

Abortion Control Act: A Pennsylvania law passed in 1989 that included various provisions related to abortion, which were challenged in Planned Parenthood v. Casey.