8.4 Elimination by aspects
4 min read•august 15, 2024
is a decision-making strategy that cuts options based on specific criteria. It's quick and useful when you have clear preferences, but it can oversimplify complex choices by ignoring trade-offs between different aspects.
This strategy fits into the broader discussion of decision-making models by showing how we can narrow down choices efficiently. However, it's important to consider its limitations and compare it to other strategies for making well-rounded decisions.
Elimination by Aspects
Definition and Characteristics
Top images from around the web for Definition and Characteristics
Cognitive Biases - Sensemaking Resources, Education, and Community View original
Is this image relevant?
20 Cognitive Biases - [INFOGRAPHIC] View original
Is this image relevant?
Raconteur – Cognitive Bias View original
Is this image relevant?
Cognitive Biases - Sensemaking Resources, Education, and Community View original
Is this image relevant?
20 Cognitive Biases - [INFOGRAPHIC] View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Top images from around the web for Definition and Characteristics
Cognitive Biases - Sensemaking Resources, Education, and Community View original
Is this image relevant?
20 Cognitive Biases - [INFOGRAPHIC] View original
Is this image relevant?
Raconteur – Cognitive Bias View original
Is this image relevant?
Cognitive Biases - Sensemaking Resources, Education, and Community View original
Is this image relevant?
20 Cognitive Biases - [INFOGRAPHIC] View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
- Elimination by aspects () is a decision-making strategy that involves eliminating options based on specific criteria or aspects until only one option remains
- EBA is a meaning that a high score on one aspect cannot compensate for a low score on another aspect
- The decision-maker identifies the most important aspect and eliminates all options that do not meet the for that aspect
- The process is repeated with the next most important aspect until only one option remains
- EBA is useful when there are many options to consider and the decision-maker has clear preferences for certain aspects (car purchase, job search)
Advantages and Disadvantages
- EBA can help narrow down a large set of options quickly by focusing on the most important aspects first
- It is an effective strategy when the decision-maker has clear preferences and can easily identify the key aspects
- However, EBA may oversimplify complex decisions by ignoring potential trade-offs between aspects
- It may lead to suboptimal decisions if the minimum thresholds are set too high or low, or if the aspects are not ranked correctly
- EBA is less effective when the decision-maker has conflicting preferences or when aspects are difficult to compare directly
Eliminating Options by Criteria
Identifying and Ranking Aspects
- The decision-maker identifies the aspects or criteria that are important for the decision, such as price, quality, features, or personal preferences
- These aspects are then ranked in order of importance, with the most critical aspect being considered first
- For example, when choosing a new smartphone, aspects might include price, battery life, camera quality, and storage capacity
- The decision-maker would rank these aspects based on their individual needs and priorities
Setting Thresholds and Eliminating Options
- The decision-maker sets a minimum threshold or cutoff value for each aspect
- All options that do not meet the minimum threshold for the most important aspect are eliminated
- The process is repeated with the next most important aspect, eliminating options that do not meet the threshold
- This elimination process continues until only one option remains, which is the final decision
- For instance, when selecting a smartphone, the decision-maker might set a maximum price threshold of $1,000 and eliminate all options above that price
- They would then move on to the next aspect, such as battery life, and eliminate phones that do not meet their minimum requirement (e.g., at least 10 hours of use)
Effectiveness of Elimination by Aspects
Contexts Where EBA is Effective
- EBA is effective when the decision-maker has clear preferences and can easily identify the most important aspects
- It is useful for narrowing down a large set of options quickly, as options are eliminated based on a single aspect at a time
- EBA works well in situations where the decision-maker has non-negotiable criteria that must be met (minimum salary for a job, maximum price for a product)
- It can be an efficient strategy when time is limited, and a decision needs to be made quickly
Limitations and Potential Drawbacks
- EBA may not be effective when the decision-maker has conflicting preferences or when the aspects are not easily comparable
- In complex decision-making contexts, EBA may oversimplify the decision by focusing on a limited set of aspects and ignoring potential trade-offs between aspects
- EBA may lead to suboptimal decisions if the decision-maker sets the minimum thresholds too high or too low, or if the aspects are not ranked correctly
- It can result in the elimination of potentially good options if they fail to meet the threshold for a single aspect, even if they perform well on other aspects
Elimination by Aspects vs Other Strategies
Comparison with Compensatory Strategies
- EBA is a non-compensatory strategy, while other strategies like the are compensatory, allowing high scores on one aspect to compensate for low scores on another
- consider the overall performance of an option across all aspects, while EBA focuses on individual aspects in isolation
- Compensatory strategies may be more appropriate when aspects are of similar importance or when trade-offs between aspects need to be considered
Comparison with Other Non-Compensatory Strategies
- EBA focuses on eliminating options based on a single aspect at a time, while other strategies like the consider multiple aspects simultaneously
- The lexicographic rule compares options based on the most important aspect and only considers the next aspect if there is a tie, while EBA eliminates options that do not meet the threshold for each aspect
- EBA is useful for quickly narrowing down a large set of options, while other strategies like the may be more appropriate for comparing a smaller set of options in detail
Differences in Outcomes and Decision-Maker Characteristics
- EBA relies on the decision-maker's ability to identify and rank the most important aspects, while other strategies like the recognition heuristic rely on the decision-maker's familiarity with the options
- EBA may lead to different decisions than other strategies, depending on the specific aspects and thresholds used, as well as the order in which the aspects are considered
- The effectiveness of EBA compared to other strategies may depend on the decision-maker's , , and the complexity of the decision problem
Key Terms to Review (21)
Amos Tversky: Amos Tversky was a pioneering cognitive psychologist known for his groundbreaking work on decision-making and cognitive biases. His collaboration with Daniel Kahneman led to the development of prospect theory, which describes how people make choices in uncertain situations, highlighting systematic deviations from rationality that impact decision-making.
Attribute evaluation: Attribute evaluation is the process of assessing and ranking the features or characteristics of options available to make a decision. This approach often involves comparing the attributes of different alternatives based on their perceived importance and desirability, helping individuals to eliminate choices that do not meet their criteria. By focusing on key attributes, people can streamline their decision-making process, which is especially relevant in scenarios involving multiple options and complex evaluations.
Attribute-based decision making: Attribute-based decision making refers to a cognitive process where individuals evaluate options based on specific attributes or characteristics, allowing them to make choices that align with their preferences and priorities. This method often involves weighing the importance of different attributes, leading to a selection based on the features that matter most to the decision-maker. It emphasizes how various factors influence decisions and how people tend to simplify complex choices by focusing on key aspects.
Cognitive style: Cognitive style refers to an individual's preferred way of processing information, making decisions, and approaching problems. It reflects the unique patterns of thinking and perceiving that can influence how one interacts with the world and tackles challenges. Understanding cognitive style is crucial in decision-making contexts, as it can determine how options are evaluated and which alternatives are favored based on personal preferences.
Compensatory Strategies: Compensatory strategies are decision-making processes where a decision-maker evaluates alternatives by balancing positive and negative attributes to arrive at the best overall choice. This approach allows for the trade-off of lower scores in one area with higher scores in another, making it particularly useful in scenarios where multiple criteria are considered important.
Complex decision problem: A complex decision problem involves multiple factors, alternatives, and potential consequences that complicate the decision-making process. These problems require careful evaluation of various criteria and trade-offs, often leading to uncertainty and the potential for cognitive biases to influence the outcome. Complex decision problems are characterized by their multidimensional nature, where the interplay of various elements creates challenges in arriving at an optimal solution.
Consumer Choice: Consumer choice refers to the decisions individuals make regarding the purchase of goods and services based on their preferences, needs, and budget constraints. This concept highlights how consumers evaluate different options and select products that maximize their utility, often influenced by various factors such as price, quality, and personal taste. Understanding consumer choice is crucial for businesses as it helps in predicting purchasing behavior and tailoring marketing strategies.
Daniel Kahneman: Daniel Kahneman is a renowned psychologist and Nobel laureate known for his groundbreaking work in the field of behavioral economics, particularly regarding how cognitive biases affect decision-making. His research has profoundly influenced the understanding of human judgment and choices in business contexts, highlighting the systematic errors people make when processing information.
Decision-maker characteristics: Decision-maker characteristics refer to the personal attributes, traits, and biases that influence how individuals make choices in various situations. These characteristics can include cognitive styles, emotional states, experience levels, and personal values, all of which shape the decision-making process and outcomes. Understanding these traits helps in predicting how different individuals might approach problem-solving and evaluate alternatives.
EBA: EBA, or Elimination by Aspects, is a decision-making strategy where individuals evaluate options by systematically eliminating those that do not meet certain criteria or aspects. This process involves identifying the most important features of the alternatives and progressively discarding options that fall short, allowing for a more focused and efficient decision-making process.
Elimination by aspects: Elimination by aspects is a decision-making strategy where individuals make choices by gradually eliminating options based on specific features or criteria. This method involves setting a hierarchy of attributes that are deemed important, and eliminating alternatives that do not meet the necessary criteria until a final choice remains. It highlights how people often simplify complex decisions by focusing on a limited set of aspects.
Employee selection: Employee selection is the process of evaluating and choosing candidates for specific job roles within an organization. This process aims to identify individuals who not only possess the required skills and qualifications but also align with the company’s culture and values. Effective employee selection is crucial for enhancing workforce performance and ensuring organizational success.
Equal Weight Heuristic: The equal weight heuristic is a cognitive shortcut used in decision-making where individuals give equal importance to all available options rather than weighing them based on their perceived value or relevance. This approach often leads to simplifying complex decisions, but can result in suboptimal choices as it ignores the varying significance of different attributes that may influence outcomes.
Lexicographic rule: The lexicographic rule is a decision-making process where options are ranked based on the most important criteria, and the option that scores the highest on this criterion is chosen, regardless of how other criteria are evaluated. This rule emphasizes a strict prioritization of attributes, leading to potentially irrational decisions if the chosen attribute does not align with overall preferences.
Minimum threshold: The minimum threshold refers to the least acceptable level of a criterion that must be met for a decision or choice to be considered viable. This concept is crucial in decision-making processes as it helps individuals filter options based on specific standards, influencing how alternatives are evaluated and selected.
Non-compensatory strategy: A non-compensatory strategy is a decision-making approach where certain criteria are set as 'must-haves' and if an option fails to meet those criteria, it is eliminated from consideration, regardless of its strengths in other areas. This strategy emphasizes the importance of certain attributes, making it particularly useful in situations where trade-offs are not acceptable, ensuring that the decision-maker prioritizes essential features over overall benefits.
Satisficing: Satisficing is a decision-making strategy that aims for a satisfactory or adequate result, rather than an optimal one. This approach recognizes the limitations of human rationality, suggesting that individuals often settle for a solution that meets their needs rather than exhaustively searching for the best possible outcome. Satisficing reflects the balance between the desire for efficiency in decision-making and the inherent constraints of bounded rationality, where time, information, and cognitive resources are limited.
Sequential Elimination: Sequential elimination is a decision-making process where alternatives are evaluated one at a time based on specific criteria, and options that do not meet the minimum threshold are discarded. This method allows decision-makers to systematically reduce their choices, focusing on the most relevant aspects until a satisfactory option is identified. It connects to the idea of prioritizing attributes and making decisions in a structured manner.
Suboptimal Decision: A suboptimal decision is a choice made that does not lead to the best possible outcome, often due to limitations in information, cognitive biases, or flawed reasoning processes. These decisions can arise when individuals fail to evaluate all options thoroughly or neglect to consider certain aspects that are crucial for achieving the best result. Understanding how suboptimal decisions occur can help in developing strategies to mitigate their impact in various scenarios.
Time Constraints: Time constraints refer to the limitations placed on the duration available to make decisions or complete tasks. These constraints can significantly impact how individuals approach decision-making processes, often leading to quicker, sometimes less thorough evaluations of options.
Weighted Additive Rule: The weighted additive rule is a decision-making process where various options are evaluated based on multiple attributes, each assigned a specific weight according to its importance. This method involves scoring each option against the attributes and calculating a total score by summing the weighted scores. It allows for a systematic comparison of alternatives, taking into account both the significance of each attribute and the performance of each alternative on those attributes.