🧠Business Cognitive Bias Unit 8 – Decision-Making Models & Strategies

Decision-making models provide structured approaches to problem-solving, while cognitive biases can lead to systematic errors in thinking. These concepts are crucial in understanding how individuals and organizations make choices, balancing rational analysis with intuitive judgments. Various decision-making strategies, such as satisficing and maximizing, offer different approaches to finding solutions. Tools like SWOT analysis and decision matrices help evaluate alternatives, while real-world applications range from business strategy to medical diagnosis, highlighting the broad relevance of these concepts.

Key Concepts

  • Decision-making models provide structured approaches to analyze and solve problems
  • Cognitive biases are systematic errors in thinking that influence decision-making
  • Rational decision-making involves logical analysis of available information to make optimal choices
  • Intuitive decision-making relies on gut feelings, past experiences, and instincts
  • Decision-making strategies include satisficing, maximizing, and optimizing
    • Satisficing involves choosing the first acceptable option rather than seeking the best
    • Maximizing aims to find the best possible solution by evaluating all alternatives
    • Optimizing balances the benefits and costs to find the most efficient solution
  • Heuristics are mental shortcuts used to simplify complex decisions (rule of thumb)
  • Bounded rationality recognizes the limitations of human cognitive abilities in decision-making

Types of Decision-Making Models

  • Normative models prescribe how decisions should be made based on rational principles
  • Descriptive models explain how people actually make decisions in real-world situations
  • Prescriptive models combine normative and descriptive approaches to guide decision-making
  • Rational choice model assumes individuals make decisions based on maximizing utility
  • Bounded rationality model acknowledges cognitive limitations and the use of heuristics
  • Prospect theory explains how people make decisions under risk and uncertainty
    • Emphasizes the importance of framing effects and reference points
  • Garbage can model describes decision-making in ambiguous and complex situations

Cognitive Biases in Decision-Making

  • Confirmation bias leads individuals to seek information that confirms their existing beliefs
  • Anchoring bias occurs when initial information disproportionately influences subsequent judgments
  • Availability bias overestimates the likelihood of events that are easily remembered or imagined
  • Framing effect shows how presenting information in different ways influences decisions
  • Sunk cost fallacy is the tendency to continue investing in a decision due to past investments
  • Overconfidence bias leads individuals to overestimate their abilities and knowledge
  • Hindsight bias is the tendency to perceive past events as more predictable than they actually were
    • Leads to overestimating the ability to have foreseen outcomes

Rational vs. Intuitive Decision-Making

  • Rational decision-making involves systematic analysis of alternatives based on predefined criteria
    • Emphasizes the use of logic, data, and evidence to make optimal choices
    • Suitable for complex decisions with clear objectives and available information
  • Intuitive decision-making relies on instincts, gut feelings, and past experiences
    • Useful in situations requiring quick decisions or when information is limited
    • Influenced by emotions, biases, and heuristics
  • Effective decision-making often involves a combination of rational and intuitive approaches
  • Intuition can provide valuable insights, but should be balanced with rational analysis
  • Rational decision-making can be time-consuming and may not always lead to the best outcomes

Decision-Making Strategies

  • Elimination by aspects involves progressively eliminating alternatives based on essential criteria
  • Lexicographic strategy chooses the alternative that performs best on the most important criterion
  • Satisficing selects the first option that meets the minimum acceptable criteria
  • Maximizing exhaustively searches for the best possible alternative
  • Optimizing balances the benefits and costs to find the most efficient solution
  • Decision trees visually represent the structure of a decision problem and its potential outcomes
  • Influence diagrams combine decision trees with probabilistic relationships between variables

Tools and Techniques

  • SWOT analysis evaluates the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats of a decision
  • Cost-benefit analysis compares the expected costs and benefits of different alternatives
  • Decision matrices organize and evaluate alternatives based on weighted criteria
  • Sensitivity analysis assesses how changes in key variables affect the outcome of a decision
  • Scenario planning explores different possible future scenarios to inform decision-making
  • Monte Carlo simulation models the probability of different outcomes in uncertain situations
  • Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) systematically evaluates alternatives based on multiple criteria
    • Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is a popular MCDA method that uses pairwise comparisons

Real-World Applications

  • Business strategy development and resource allocation decisions
  • Investment portfolio management and financial decision-making
  • Medical diagnosis and treatment planning
  • Public policy formulation and evaluation
  • Project management and risk assessment
  • Consumer behavior and marketing strategies
  • Operations management and supply chain optimization
  • Human resource management and employee selection

Challenges and Limitations

  • Incomplete or inaccurate information can lead to suboptimal decisions
  • Time constraints and pressure may hinder the ability to make well-informed decisions
  • Cognitive biases and heuristics can distort decision-making processes
  • Complex and dynamic environments make it difficult to predict outcomes accurately
  • Conflicting objectives and stakeholder interests can complicate decision-making
  • Overreliance on quantitative models may overlook important qualitative factors
  • Resistance to change and organizational inertia can impede the implementation of decisions
  • Ethical considerations and value judgments may not be adequately captured by decision models


© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.

© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.