Glossary

Mediation is a crucial alternative dispute resolution method in the U.S. legal system. It offers a voluntary, confidential process for resolving conflicts, emphasizing collaborative problem-solving and autonomy. This approach aligns with American legal principles and helps reduce court backlogs.

The mediation process involves several stages, from pre-mediation preparation to closing agreements. Mediators play a pivotal role, facilitating communication and guiding towards resolution. This reflects the growing importance of neutral third-party facilitators in the U.S. legal system's approach to dispute resolution.

Definition and purpose

  • Mediation serves as a crucial alternative dispute resolution method in the United States legal system, offering parties a voluntary and confidential process to resolve conflicts
  • Emphasizes collaborative problem-solving and self-determination, aligning with the American legal principle of party autonomy in dispute resolution
  • Plays a significant role in reducing court backlogs and promoting efficient resolution of legal disputes across various practice areas

Key elements of mediation

Top images from around the web for Key elements of mediation

  • Key Elements of Effective Organizations: Bridgespan’s Organization Wheel | Bridgespan View original

    Is this image relevant?

  • Introduction to Problem Solving Skills | CCMIT View original

    Is this image relevant?

  • Key Elements of Effective Organizations: Bridgespan’s Organization Wheel | Bridgespan View original

    Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Key elements of mediation

  • Key Elements of Effective Organizations: Bridgespan’s Organization Wheel | Bridgespan View original

    Is this image relevant?

  • Introduction to Problem Solving Skills | CCMIT View original

    Is this image relevant?

  • Key Elements of Effective Organizations: Bridgespan’s Organization Wheel | Bridgespan View original

    Is this image relevant?

1 of 3
  • Voluntary participation allows parties to engage in the process willingly, enhancing commitment to resolution
  • protects sensitive information shared during sessions, encouraging open communication
  • Neutral third-party facilitator guides the process without imposing decisions
  • Flexibility in process and outcomes enables tailored solutions to unique disputes
  • Focus on interests rather than positions promotes creative problem-solving

Mediation vs other ADR methods

  • Distinguishes from arbitration by lacking a binding decision imposed by a third party
  • Differs from negotiation through the presence of a neutral facilitator to guide discussions
  • Contrasts with litigation by offering a less formal, more collaborative approach to dispute resolution
  • Provides more control over the outcome compared to judge-led settlement conferences
  • Often more cost-effective and time-efficient than traditional litigation or arbitration

Mediation process

  • Structured yet flexible process designed to guide parties from conflict to resolution in a systematic manner
  • Reflects the American legal system's emphasis on procedural fairness and due process, even in alternative dispute resolution methods
  • Typically involves several stages, each serving a specific purpose in facilitating communication and problem-solving

Pre-mediation preparation

  • conducts intake interviews to gather background information and assess suitability for mediation
  • Parties prepare mediation statements outlining their positions, interests, and desired outcomes
  • Logistical arrangements include selecting a neutral venue and determining participant roles
  • Mediator may provide pre-mediation coaching to ensure parties understand the process and expectations
  • Consideration of any power imbalances or special needs to ensure a fair process

Opening statements

  • Mediator introduces the process, establishes ground rules, and clarifies roles and expectations
  • Each party presents their perspective on the dispute without interruption
  • Opportunity for parties to hear each other's views directly, often for the first time
  • Sets the tone for collaborative problem-solving and identifies key issues for discussion
  • Mediator summarizes and reframes key points to ensure mutual understanding

Joint sessions vs caucuses

  • Joint sessions involve all parties discussing issues together, promoting direct communication
  • Caucuses allow private meetings between mediator and individual parties to explore sensitive issues
  • Mediator strategically alternates between joint and private sessions to maintain momentum
  • Joint sessions foster transparency and shared understanding of the dispute
  • Caucuses provide opportunities for reality-testing and exploring settlement options confidentially

Closing and agreement

  • Parties work together to draft a mutually acceptable agreement, if resolution is reached
  • Mediator ensures all terms are clear, specific, and enforceable
  • Review of agreement terms to confirm understanding and commitment from all parties
  • Discussion of next steps, including implementation of the agreement and any necessary legal formalities
  • In cases without full resolution, mediator helps parties identify areas of agreement and plan future steps

Role of the mediator

  • Mediators play a pivotal role in facilitating communication and guiding parties towards resolution
  • Reflects the growing importance of neutral third-party facilitators in the U.S. legal system's approach to dispute resolution
  • Requires a unique skill set combining legal knowledge, communication skills, and conflict resolution expertise

Mediator neutrality

  • ensures fair treatment of all parties throughout the mediation process
  • Mediators disclose any potential conflicts of interest before accepting a case
  • extends to process management, avoiding bias in allocating speaking time or attention
  • Balances power dynamics to ensure all parties have equal opportunity to participate
  • Refrains from imposing personal opinions or judgments on the dispute or its resolution

Facilitative vs evaluative approaches

  • Facilitative approach focuses on guiding parties to their own solutions without offering opinions
  • Evaluative approach involves providing assessments of case strengths and weaknesses
  • Choice of approach depends on mediator style, nature of dispute, and parties' preferences
  • Facilitative mediators use questioning techniques to help parties explore interests and options
  • Evaluative mediators may offer predictions about likely court outcomes to encourage settlement

Mediator qualifications and ethics

  • Varies by state, but often includes training in mediation techniques and conflict resolution
  • Many mediators have legal backgrounds, especially in court-connected mediation programs
  • Professional organizations (American Arbitration Association) offer certification programs
  • Ethical standards emphasize confidentiality, impartiality, and informed consent
  • Continuing education requirements ensure mediators stay current with best practices and legal developments
  • Mediation operates within a complex legal framework in the United States, balancing flexibility with legal protections
  • Reflects the interplay between federal and state law characteristic of the U.S. legal system
  • Aims to provide consistency and predictability in mediation practice while preserving its adaptability

Uniform Mediation Act

  • Provides a standardized approach to mediation law across adopting states
  • Establishes privilege for mediation communications to encourage open dialogue
  • Defines scope of confidentiality and exceptions (threats of bodily harm, criminal activity)
  • Outlines mediator's disclosure requirements regarding conflicts of interest
  • Promotes interstate consistency in mediation practice and enforcement of mediated agreements

State-specific mediation laws

  • Vary in requirements for mediator qualifications and certification
  • Determine scope of mediation confidentiality and privileges beyond UMA provisions
  • Establish procedures for court-connected mediation programs
  • Define enforceability standards for mediated settlement agreements
  • May include specific provisions for mediation in certain practice areas (family law, employment disputes)

Confidentiality in mediation

  • Protects communications made during the mediation process from future disclosure
  • Encourages candid discussions by assuring parties their statements won't be used against them
  • Exceptions typically include child abuse, criminal activity, or professional misconduct
  • Extends to documents prepared specifically for mediation purposes
  • Balances need for openness in mediation with public policy concerns and legal requirements

Types of mediation

  • Diverse forms of mediation cater to different dispute types and party needs within the U.S. legal landscape
  • Reflects the adaptability of mediation as an alternative dispute resolution method
  • Demonstrates how mediation has evolved to address various legal and social contexts

Court-ordered vs voluntary mediation

  • mandated by judges to encourage settlement before trial
  • initiated by parties seeking to resolve disputes outside formal litigation
  • Court-ordered programs often have specific procedures and reporting requirements
  • Voluntary mediation allows for more flexibility in process and timing
  • Both types aim to reduce court caseloads and promote efficient dispute resolution

Community vs commercial mediation

  • focuses on neighborhood disputes, small claims, and family conflicts
  • addresses business-to-business disputes, often with high financial stakes
  • Community mediation often utilizes volunteer mediators and emphasizes relationship repair
  • Commercial mediation frequently involves complex legal and financial issues requiring specialized expertise
  • Both types adapt mediation principles to suit the specific needs and dynamics of their contexts

Online mediation

  • Utilizes video conferencing and other digital tools to conduct mediation remotely
  • Offers increased accessibility and convenience, especially for geographically dispersed parties
  • Presents unique challenges in building rapport and managing non-verbal communication
  • Requires specific skills in managing technology and ensuring confidentiality in digital environments
  • Gaining prominence, especially in the wake of global events necessitating remote dispute resolution

Mediation techniques

  • Encompasses a range of skills and strategies mediators employ to facilitate effective communication and problem-solving
  • Draws on principles from psychology, negotiation theory, and conflict resolution studies
  • Reflects the interdisciplinary nature of mediation practice within the U.S. legal system

Active listening and reframing

  • Involves fully concentrating on, understanding, and responding to parties' statements
  • Mediators use paraphrasing and summarizing to confirm understanding and clarify issues
  • Reframing negative statements into neutral or positive language helps de-escalate conflicts
  • Encourages parties to hear different perspectives on the dispute
  • Builds trust between parties and mediator by demonstrating genuine interest and understanding

Interest-based negotiation

  • Focuses on identifying underlying interests rather than fixed positions
  • Encourages parties to explore mutual gains and creative solutions
  • Utilizes techniques like brainstorming to generate multiple options for resolution
  • Helps parties move beyond zero-sum thinking to find win-win outcomes
  • Aligns with modern negotiation theory emphasizing collaborative problem-solving

Dealing with impasse

  • Recognizes impasse as a normal part of the mediation process, not a failure
  • Employs to help parties evaluate their alternatives to a negotiated agreement
  • Uses hypothetical scenarios to explore potential outcomes and encourage flexibility
  • May suggest caucuses to address emotional barriers or explore sensitive issues privately
  • Considers bringing in neutral experts to provide information on technical or legal issues

Advantages and limitations

  • Evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of mediation as a dispute resolution method in the U.S. legal context
  • Considers how mediation aligns with or challenges traditional legal processes and values
  • Examines the broader impact of mediation on access to justice and legal culture

Benefits of mediation

  • Offers faster and more cost-effective resolution compared to traditional litigation
  • Provides parties with greater control over the outcome and process
  • Preserves relationships by focusing on collaborative problem-solving
  • Allows for creative, tailored solutions not limited by legal remedies
  • Enhances parties' understanding of the dispute and each other's perspectives

Challenges and criticisms

  • Power imbalances between parties may lead to unfair outcomes if not properly managed
  • Lack of formal discovery process can limit information available for decision-making
  • Confidentiality may sometimes conflict with public interest in transparency
  • Voluntary nature means uncooperative parties can derail the process
  • Quality of mediation heavily dependent on mediator's skills and approach

Mediation agreements

  • Represents the culmination of the mediation process, translating negotiated resolutions into legally binding documents
  • Reflects the intersection of contract law and alternative dispute resolution in the U.S. legal system
  • Emphasizes the importance of clear, comprehensive documentation in ensuring durable resolutions

Enforceability of mediated settlements

  • Generally treated as binding contracts if they meet basic contract formation requirements
  • Many states have specific statutes governing enforcement of mediated agreements
  • Courts typically uphold mediated settlements absent fraud, duress, or unconscionability
  • Some jurisdictions allow mediated agreements to be converted into court orders for easier enforcement
  • Parties should consider including specific enforcement mechanisms within the agreement

Drafting mediation clauses

  • Pre-dispute mediation clauses in contracts specify mediation as a first step in conflict resolution
  • Key elements include process for selecting a mediator and initiating mediation
  • Specifies time frames, cost allocation, and confidentiality requirements
  • May include escalation clauses outlining next steps if mediation is unsuccessful
  • Balances specificity with flexibility to accommodate various types of potential disputes

Mediation in specific contexts

  • Examines how mediation principles are applied and adapted in various legal practice areas
  • Demonstrates the versatility of mediation in addressing diverse types of disputes
  • Highlights the specialized knowledge and skills required for mediating in specific legal contexts

Family law mediation

  • Addresses divorce, child custody, and property division disputes
  • Emphasizes preserving family relationships and co-parenting arrangements
  • Often involves emotional dynamics requiring specialized mediator training
  • May include child specialists or financial experts in the mediation process
  • Subject to specific legal requirements regarding child welfare and financial disclosures

Employment dispute mediation

  • Resolves conflicts between employers and employees or among coworkers
  • Covers issues like discrimination, wrongful termination, and workplace harassment
  • Balances power dynamics between individual employees and organizational representatives
  • Often involves complex legal considerations (employment laws, company policies)
  • May require industry-specific knowledge to understand workplace contexts and norms

International mediation

  • Addresses disputes involving parties from different countries or cross-border issues
  • Navigates complexities of differing legal systems, cultural norms, and business practices
  • May involve choice of law and jurisdiction issues in crafting enforceable agreements
  • Often utilizes co-mediation with mediators from different cultural or legal backgrounds
  • Considers impact of international conventions and treaties on dispute resolution process

Ethical considerations

  • Explores the ethical dimensions of mediation practice within the U.S. legal and professional context
  • Reflects the growing emphasis on ethical conduct in alternative dispute resolution processes
  • Addresses challenges in balancing mediator with ensuring fair and just outcomes

Mediator impartiality

  • Requires mediators to avoid favoritism or bias towards any party
  • Includes disclosing any potential conflicts of interest before accepting a case
  • Challenges arise when mediators have relevant subject matter expertise that could influence the process
  • Impartiality extends to process management, ensuring equal opportunity for all parties to participate
  • May require mediators to withdraw if their impartiality is compromised or questioned

Power imbalances in mediation

  • Recognizes disparities in resources, knowledge, or emotional capacity between parties
  • Mediators must identify and address power imbalances to ensure fair process and outcomes
  • Techniques include encouraging use of attorneys or advisors, providing information resources
  • Balancing act between maintaining neutrality and preventing exploitation of weaker parties
  • May necessitate terminating mediation if power imbalances cannot be adequately addressed

Confidentiality and disclosure

  • Protects the integrity of the mediation process by ensuring open communication
  • Exceptions may include mandatory reporting of child abuse or imminent threats of harm
  • Challenges arise when public interest conflicts with confidentiality (public entity disputes)
  • Mediators must clearly explain confidentiality rules and exceptions to all parties
  • Ethical dilemmas may occur when mediators become aware of illegal activities during mediation

Future of mediation

  • Examines emerging trends and innovations shaping the future of mediation practice in the United States
  • Considers how technological advancements and changing social norms impact dispute resolution processes
  • Reflects on the evolving role of mediation within the broader landscape of the U.S. legal system

Technology in mediation

  • Online dispute resolution platforms facilitate remote mediation sessions
  • Artificial intelligence tools assist in case management and preliminary issue identification
  • Virtual reality applications explore new ways to conduct role-playing and perspective-taking exercises
  • Blockchain technology offers potential for creating smart contracts from mediated agreements
  • Raises new ethical considerations regarding data privacy and digital divide issues
  • Increasing integration of mediation into court systems and legal education curricula
  • Growing emphasis on specialized mediation training for specific practice areas or dispute types
  • Exploration of hybrid processes combining elements of mediation with other ADR methods
  • Rising interest in restorative justice approaches, particularly in criminal and community contexts
  • Expanding use of mediation in complex, multi-party disputes (environmental conflicts, mass torts)

Key Terms to Review (30)

Active listening: Active listening is a communication technique that involves fully focusing, understanding, and responding to a speaker with the intent of comprehending their message. This skill goes beyond simply hearing words; it encompasses engaging with the speaker through verbal and non-verbal cues, such as nodding, maintaining eye contact, and providing feedback. Active listening fosters trust and respect, which are crucial for successful interactions in conflict resolution settings.
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Statutes: Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) statutes are laws designed to encourage and facilitate methods of resolving disputes outside of traditional court litigation. These statutes often promote techniques such as mediation, arbitration, and negotiation, providing parties with more flexible, cost-effective, and quicker means to reach agreements. By outlining the legal framework for these processes, ADR statutes aim to reduce court congestion and promote amicable resolutions between conflicting parties.
Alternative Dispute Resolution Act: The Alternative Dispute Resolution Act is legislation that encourages the use of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) methods, such as mediation and arbitration, to resolve legal disputes without going to trial. This act promotes efficiency and cost-effectiveness in the legal system by providing parties with options that can lead to quicker resolutions, reducing the burden on courts and helping to foster amicable settlements.
Commercial mediation: Commercial mediation is a form of alternative dispute resolution where a neutral third party helps disputing parties reach a voluntary agreement in a business context. This process emphasizes collaboration and communication, allowing parties to discuss their issues openly and work towards a mutually beneficial resolution without resorting to litigation. It’s often favored for its efficiency and confidentiality compared to traditional court proceedings.
Community mediation: Community mediation is a process where neutral third-party mediators facilitate discussions between individuals or groups in a community to help them resolve disputes amicably. This approach emphasizes collaboration and communication, allowing parties to work together towards a mutually beneficial solution without resorting to formal legal actions. Community mediation often focuses on enhancing relationships and fostering understanding, which can lead to more sustainable resolutions.
Confidentiality: Confidentiality refers to the ethical and legal obligation to protect private information from unauthorized disclosure. This principle is crucial in various legal contexts, as it builds trust between parties and ensures that sensitive information is kept secure, especially in legal communications, negotiations, and alternative dispute resolution settings.
Cost-effectiveness: Cost-effectiveness refers to the evaluation of the relative costs and outcomes of different actions or interventions, helping to determine the best approach to achieve desired results while minimizing expenses. This concept is crucial in decision-making processes, especially when considering alternative dispute resolution methods that aim to provide efficient solutions without incurring excessive costs. By analyzing the costs and benefits associated with various strategies, stakeholders can make informed choices that balance financial considerations with effective outcomes.
Court-ordered mediation: Court-ordered mediation is a process where a court mandates the parties involved in a dispute to engage in mediation to resolve their issues before proceeding to trial. This type of mediation aims to encourage settlement and reduce the burden on the court system, providing an opportunity for parties to reach mutually acceptable agreements with the help of a neutral third party. It promotes collaboration and can lead to faster resolutions compared to traditional litigation.
Evaluative mediation: Evaluative mediation is a type of mediation where the mediator takes an active role in assessing the strengths and weaknesses of each party's case and offers opinions on possible outcomes. This approach can help parties understand the likely results if they were to proceed to trial, often guiding them toward a settlement. Evaluative mediation emphasizes the mediator's expertise in legal and factual issues, creating a structured environment where parties can make informed decisions.
Facilitated mediation: Facilitated mediation is a structured process where a neutral third party assists disputing parties in reaching an agreement through open communication and negotiation. This method focuses on enhancing dialogue, allowing both sides to express their perspectives and work collaboratively towards a mutually acceptable resolution. It combines elements of traditional mediation with a more active role for the facilitator, who helps manage the conversation and keep the parties on track.
Family disputes: Family disputes refer to conflicts that arise within familial relationships, often involving disagreements over issues such as property, custody, inheritance, or personal values. These disputes can create emotional turmoil and lead to legal challenges, requiring mechanisms for resolution that prioritize family dynamics and the well-being of all parties involved.
Impartiality: Impartiality refers to the principle of fairness and neutrality, ensuring that decisions are made without bias or favoritism. This concept is crucial in legal contexts, as it fosters trust in the judicial process and dispute resolution mechanisms. Upholding impartiality helps ensure that all parties receive equal treatment and that outcomes are based on facts and evidence rather than personal opinions or external influences.
Informality: Informality refers to the relaxed and non-binding nature of certain processes or interactions, especially in contexts like conflict resolution. This approach often emphasizes open communication, flexibility, and the absence of rigid rules or formal procedures, making it easier for parties to express their needs and concerns without the pressure of legal constraints.
Interest-based negotiation: Interest-based negotiation is a collaborative approach to resolving disputes where the focus is on the underlying interests of the parties rather than their positions. This method encourages open communication and problem-solving, allowing negotiators to find mutually beneficial solutions while addressing the needs and concerns of everyone involved.
Mediated resolution: Mediated resolution refers to a conflict resolution process in which a neutral third party, known as a mediator, facilitates communication and negotiation between disputing parties to help them reach a mutually acceptable agreement. This approach emphasizes collaboration and understanding, allowing parties to express their perspectives while working towards a solution that satisfies both sides, often avoiding the need for more adversarial methods like litigation.
Mediator: A mediator is a neutral third party who facilitates communication and negotiation between disputing parties to help them reach a voluntary resolution. The role of a mediator is crucial as they assist in clarifying issues, exploring interests, and generating options without having the authority to impose a solution. Mediators promote understanding and collaboration, making them vital in negotiation processes, mediation settings, and during settlement conferences.
Memorandum of Understanding: A memorandum of understanding (MOU) is a formal agreement between two or more parties that outlines their intentions, roles, and responsibilities in a collaborative effort. While it is not legally binding like a contract, an MOU provides clarity on the expectations and objectives of the parties involved, making it an important tool for facilitating negotiations and partnerships.
Narrative mediation: Narrative mediation is a conflict resolution approach that emphasizes storytelling and the exploration of personal narratives to facilitate understanding and communication between disputing parties. By focusing on the stories that individuals tell about their experiences and perceptions, this method seeks to uncover underlying interests and emotions, helping participants to reframe their perspectives and find common ground. This technique aims to transform conflicts into opportunities for collaboration and mutual understanding.
Neutrality: Neutrality is the principle of not taking sides or intervening in disputes or conflicts, ensuring impartiality in a given situation. In the context of mediation, it emphasizes the mediator's role in remaining unbiased and facilitating communication between parties without favoring one side over the other. This impartial stance is crucial for creating a safe environment where all parties feel heard and respected.
Neutrality: Neutrality refers to the principle of impartiality and non-partisanship, where a mediator remains unbiased and does not take sides in a dispute. This concept is crucial in conflict resolution, particularly in mediation, as it ensures that all parties feel heard and respected, leading to a more effective and fair process.
Online mediation: Online mediation is a form of alternative dispute resolution where a neutral third party facilitates communication and negotiation between disputing parties through digital platforms. This method allows parties to resolve conflicts remotely, making it more accessible and convenient, particularly for those who may face geographical or logistical barriers. Online mediation often incorporates various tools like video conferencing, chat rooms, and shared documents to enhance the process.
Parties: In legal contexts, 'parties' refer to the individuals or groups involved in a legal dispute or negotiation. These can include plaintiffs, defendants, and any third parties that may have an interest in the outcome of the case. Understanding who the parties are is crucial as it defines the roles and responsibilities each entity has during proceedings such as mediation or settlement conferences.
Party: In the context of mediation, a party refers to an individual or entity involved in a dispute who seeks resolution through negotiation and compromise. Each party brings their interests, perspectives, and goals to the mediation process, which is facilitated by a neutral third party known as the mediator. Understanding the dynamics between parties is crucial as it shapes the mediation outcomes and influences how agreements are reached.
Position-based negotiation: Position-based negotiation is a method where parties hold firm to their stated positions and focus on achieving a specific outcome, often leading to a competitive approach to conflict resolution. This style emphasizes the importance of winning or achieving specific goals rather than finding common ground. In mediation, it can create challenges as parties may become entrenched in their demands, making collaboration difficult.
Reality Testing: Reality testing is a psychological process that involves assessing and distinguishing between one's perceptions, thoughts, and the actual state of the external world. This concept is crucial in various contexts, particularly in mediation, where individuals must evaluate their positions, interests, and the likelihood of achieving their desired outcomes. Effective reality testing helps parties in conflict recognize the underlying issues and promotes informed decision-making throughout the negotiation process.
Settlement agreement: A settlement agreement is a legally binding contract where parties to a dispute agree to resolve their differences without going to trial. These agreements often outline the terms of the settlement, such as payment amounts, actions to be taken, and timelines for compliance. They play a crucial role in various dispute resolution methods, including negotiation, mediation, collaborative law, and settlement conferences, providing an efficient way for parties to avoid the uncertainty of litigation.
Transformative mediation: Transformative mediation is a conflict resolution process that focuses on empowering the parties involved and recognizing their needs and interests, rather than solely seeking a compromise or settlement. This approach emphasizes the transformation of the relationship between the parties, encouraging them to communicate more effectively and understand each other's perspectives. By prioritizing personal growth and mutual understanding, transformative mediation seeks to create lasting solutions that go beyond mere agreement.
Uniform Mediation Act: The Uniform Mediation Act (UMA) is a legislative framework designed to provide consistency and clarity in the mediation process across various jurisdictions in the United States. It aims to encourage the use of mediation as an effective dispute resolution method by establishing rules about confidentiality, mediator qualifications, and the enforceability of mediation agreements. The UMA plays a crucial role in enhancing the mediation landscape by promoting fair practices and ensuring that mediators can facilitate discussions effectively.
Voluntariness: Voluntariness refers to the quality of being done with one's free will and consent, without coercion or undue influence. This concept is crucial in various legal contexts as it ensures that parties are entering agreements, such as plea bargains or mediation, based on their own choices rather than external pressure. In situations like early neutral evaluation, ensuring voluntariness fosters a fair process where all parties can engage freely and make informed decisions.
Voluntary mediation: Voluntary mediation is a process where parties in conflict choose to engage a neutral third-party mediator to help them reach a mutually satisfactory resolution. This approach emphasizes cooperation and communication, allowing the parties to retain control over the outcome, rather than relying on a judge or arbitrator. It often fosters better relationships between the disputing parties since it is a consensual process focused on finding common ground.
© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.
Back
Practice QuizGlossary
Practice QuizGlossary
Next guide