Glossary

12.9 International arbitration

13 min read•august 21, 2024

is a crucial mechanism for resolving cross-border commercial disputes. It offers a neutral forum, flexible procedures, and enforceable decisions, making it an attractive alternative to traditional for global businesses.

This topic explores the legal framework, key features, and processes of international arbitration. It covers arbitration agreements, , procedural aspects, and the and enforcement of awards, highlighting both advantages and potential drawbacks.

Definition of international arbitration

  • International arbitration serves as a dispute resolution mechanism for cross-border commercial conflicts, providing an alternative to traditional court litigation
  • Plays a crucial role in United States Law and Legal Analysis by facilitating global trade and investment through a neutral forum for resolving international disputes
  • Combines elements of both common law and civil law systems, reflecting its international nature and adaptability to different legal cultures

Key features of arbitration

Top images from around the web for Key features of arbitration

  • Arbitration Hearing - Free of Charge Creative Commons Legal 1 image View original

    Is this image relevant?

  • Arbitration Hearing - Tablet Dictionary image View original

    Is this image relevant?

  • Arbitration Hearing - Free of Charge Creative Commons Legal 1 image View original

    Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Key features of arbitration

  • Arbitration Hearing - Free of Charge Creative Commons Legal 1 image View original

    Is this image relevant?

  • Arbitration Hearing - Tablet Dictionary image View original

    Is this image relevant?

  • Arbitration Hearing - Free of Charge Creative Commons Legal 1 image View original

    Is this image relevant?

1 of 3
  • Consensual process based on agreement between parties to submit disputes to arbitration
  • Neutral forum selected by parties, often outside their respective home jurisdictions
  • Flexible procedures tailored to specific needs of the dispute and parties involved
  • (awards) enforceable in multiple countries under international conventions
  • Confidentiality of proceedings and outcomes, unless parties agree otherwise

Differences from litigation

  • in selecting arbitrators, venue, and applicable rules
  • Less formal procedures compared to court litigation, allowing for expedited resolution
  • Limited discovery and evidentiary rules, potentially reducing time and costs
  • Finality of awards with restricted grounds for appeal or judicial review
  • Greater ease of enforcement across international borders due to treaty frameworks
  • International arbitration operates within a complex legal framework comprising treaties, model laws, and national legislation
  • United States Law and Legal Analysis emphasizes the interplay between international conventions and domestic arbitration laws
  • This framework ensures consistency and predictability in arbitration proceedings across different jurisdictions

New York Convention

  • Formally known as the (1958)
  • Ratified by over 160 countries, including the United States
  • Requires member states to recognize and enforce foreign arbitral awards
  • Establishes limited grounds for refusing enforcement, promoting international trade and investment
  • Allows parties to rely on arbitration agreements in international contracts

UNCITRAL Model Law

  • Developed by the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law
  • Provides a template for national arbitration laws to harmonize international arbitration practices
  • Adopted in whole or in part by numerous countries, including some U.S. states
  • Covers all stages of arbitration process, from agreement to enforcement of awards
  • Promotes uniformity in arbitration laws across jurisdictions, enhancing predictability

National arbitration laws

  • Govern arbitration proceedings within specific countries or states
  • In the United States, includes the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) and state arbitration laws
  • May supplement or modify provisions of international conventions and model laws
  • Address issues such as , court intervention, and enforcement procedures
  • Vary in their approach to international arbitration, with some being more arbitration-friendly than others

Arbitration agreements

  • Arbitration agreements form the foundation of the arbitration process in international commercial disputes
  • United States Law and Legal Analysis emphasizes the importance of well-drafted arbitration clauses to ensure enforceability
  • These agreements determine the scope and parameters of the arbitration, influencing the entire proceedings

Validity requirements

  • Must be in writing, typically as a clause in a commercial contract or a separate agreement
  • Parties must have legal capacity to enter into the agreement
  • Subject matter of the dispute must be arbitrable under applicable law
  • Agreement must not be unconscionable or against public policy
  • Clear intention to submit disputes to arbitration must be evident

Scope of agreements

  • Defines types of disputes covered by the (contractual, tort, statutory)
  • May include broad language covering "all disputes arising out of or relating to" the contract
  • Can specify certain matters to be excluded from arbitration
  • Determines whether related parties or non-signatories can be bound by the agreement
  • May address consolidation of related disputes or joinder of additional parties

Separability doctrine

  • Treats arbitration clause as a separate agreement from the main contract
  • Allows arbitration clause to survive even if the main contract is found to be invalid
  • Enables arbitrators to rule on their own jurisdiction (competence-competence principle)
  • Prevents parties from avoiding arbitration by simply alleging invalidity of the entire contract
  • Recognized in most jurisdictions, including the United States, as a fundamental principle of arbitration law

Arbitral tribunals

  • Arbitral tribunals serve as the decision-making body in international arbitration proceedings
  • In United States Law and Legal Analysis, understanding the composition and selection of tribunals is crucial for effective representation in arbitration
  • The structure and qualities of the tribunal significantly impact the fairness and efficiency of the arbitration process

Composition of tribunals

  • Typically consists of one or three arbitrators, depending on case complexity and parties' agreement
  • Sole often chosen for smaller disputes or when parties prioritize cost-efficiency
  • Three-member panels common for larger, more complex cases to ensure diverse expertise
  • Parties may specify required qualifications or backgrounds for arbitrators in their agreement
  • Balanced composition crucial for ensuring neutrality and fairness in decision-making

Arbitrator selection process

  • Parties may directly appoint arbitrators or use an appointing authority
  • In three-member tribunals, each party often selects one arbitrator, with the chair chosen by agreement or a neutral body
  • Institutional rules may provide default selection mechanisms if parties fail to agree
  • Consideration of potential conflicts of interest and impartiality during selection
  • Challenge procedures available if doubts arise about an arbitrator's independence or impartiality

Arbitrator qualifications

  • Legal expertise often required, particularly in the chair or sole arbitrator role
  • Industry-specific knowledge valuable for complex technical or specialized disputes
  • Language proficiency important for international cases with multilingual documents and witnesses
  • Cultural sensitivity and understanding of different legal systems beneficial
  • Reputation for impartiality and ethical conduct essential for maintaining integrity of the process

Arbitration procedure

  • Arbitration procedures provide the framework for conducting international arbitration proceedings
  • United States Law and Legal Analysis emphasizes the flexibility of arbitration procedures compared to traditional litigation
  • Understanding these procedures is essential for effective participation in international arbitration

Initiation of proceedings

  • Begins with notice of arbitration sent by claimant to respondent
  • Notice typically includes details of the dispute, relief sought, and proposed arbitrator
  • Respondent files an answer, often including counterclaims if any
  • Parties may engage in pre-hearing conferences to establish procedural rules and timetables
  • Tribunal is constituted, and terms of reference or procedural orders may be issued

Hearings and evidence

  • Flexibility in scheduling and conducting hearings, often held at neutral locations
  • Written submissions (memorials) usually exchanged before oral hearings
  • Witness testimony may be presented through written statements and cross-examination
  • Expert evidence often crucial in technical or complex commercial disputes
  • Document production typically more limited than in U.S. litigation discovery
  • Tribunal has discretion in admitting and weighing evidence, with less strict rules than courts

Interim measures

  • Arbitral tribunals may grant interim relief to preserve evidence or assets
  • Measures can include orders to maintain status quo or provide security for costs
  • procedures available in some institutions for urgent relief before tribunal formation
  • Courts may also grant in support of arbitration
  • Enforceability of tribunal-ordered interim measures varies by jurisdiction

Choice of law

  • Choice of law issues are central to international arbitration, affecting both substance and procedure
  • United States Law and Legal Analysis emphasizes the importance of understanding conflict of laws principles in international disputes
  • Proper selection and application of applicable laws significantly impact the outcome of arbitration proceedings

Substantive law

  • Governs the merits of the dispute and interpretation of the contract
  • Parties may explicitly choose the applicable law in their contract
  • In absence of choice, arbitrators determine applicable law using conflict of laws rules
  • May include national laws, international conventions, or general principles of law (lex mercatoria)
  • Choice of substantive law can significantly affect rights and obligations of parties

Procedural law

  • Governs the conduct of the arbitration proceedings
  • Often the law of the seat of arbitration, unless parties agree otherwise
  • Determines issues such as arbitrability, interim measures, and court intervention
  • May impact the enforceability of the award in different jurisdictions
  • Interaction between procedural law and institutional rules must be considered

Conflict of laws issues

  • Arise when multiple legal systems potentially apply to different aspects of the dispute
  • Arbitrators must navigate complex choice of law rules to determine applicable laws
  • May involve considerations of mandatory laws of relevant jurisdictions
  • Public policy concerns can override in choice of law
  • Renvoi (referring back to another legal system) generally avoided in international arbitration

Arbitral awards

  • Arbitral awards represent the final decision of the arbitral tribunal in resolving the dispute
  • In United States Law and Legal Analysis, understanding the nature and enforcement of arbitral awards is crucial for assessing the effectiveness of arbitration
  • The enforceability of awards across borders is a key advantage of international arbitration

Types of awards

  • Final awards conclude the entire arbitration and resolve all issues in dispute
  • Partial or interim awards decide specific issues or claims within the larger dispute
  • Consent awards record settlements agreed upon by parties during arbitration
  • Default awards issued when a party fails to participate in the arbitration
  • Awards on costs allocate arbitration expenses between parties

Recognition and enforcement

  • provides framework for enforcement in member countries
  • Enforcing party must submit original award and to local court
  • Courts generally take a pro-enforcement approach, with limited grounds for refusal
  • Enforcement process typically simpler and faster than for foreign court judgments
  • Some countries allow summary procedures for enforcement of arbitral awards

Grounds for refusal

  • Limited grounds under New York Convention Article V
  • Include invalidity of arbitration agreement or incapacity of parties
  • Lack of proper notice or inability to present case
  • Award beyond scope of submission to arbitration
  • Improper composition of tribunal or procedural irregularities
  • Subject matter not arbitrable under law of enforcing country
  • Award contrary to public policy of enforcing country

Challenges to awards

  • Challenges to arbitral awards provide limited recourse for dissatisfied parties
  • United States Law and Legal Analysis emphasizes the finality of arbitration awards and restricted grounds for challenge
  • Understanding the challenge process is crucial for assessing the risks and benefits of arbitration

Annulment proceedings

  • Conducted in courts of the seat of arbitration
  • Grounds for annulment typically mirror those for refusing enforcement under New York Convention
  • Time limits for filing annulment applications vary by jurisdiction
  • Successful annulment may render award unenforceable in other jurisdictions
  • Partial annulment possible, preserving unchallenged portions of the award

Judicial review limitations

  • Most jurisdictions restrict scope of judicial review to procedural issues
  • Courts generally do not review merits or factual findings of arbitral awards
  • Some countries allow expanded review if parties explicitly agree (less common)
  • U.S. courts historically limited to grounds in Federal Arbitration Act
  • Recent trends in some jurisdictions towards slightly expanded review for legal errors

Institutional vs ad hoc arbitration

  • The choice between institutional and ad hoc arbitration significantly impacts the arbitration process
  • United States Law and Legal Analysis considers the advantages and disadvantages of each approach
  • Understanding these differences is crucial for effective arbitration clause drafting and dispute resolution strategy

Major arbitration institutions

  • ###International_Chamber_of_Commerce_()_0### known for complex, high-value disputes
  • American Arbitration Association (AAA) and its international division (ICDR) popular for U.S.-related cases
  • London Court of International Arbitration () favored for financial and commercial disputes
  • Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC) prominent in Asia-Pacific region
  • Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) specializes in investor-state and state-to-state disputes

Rules and procedures

  • Institutional rules provide comprehensive framework for arbitration proceedings
  • Include provisions for appointment of arbitrators, case management, and fee schedules
  • Ad hoc arbitration relies on parties to agree on all procedural aspects
  • UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules often used as basis for ad hoc proceedings
  • Institutions offer administrative support, while ad hoc requires more party management

Confidentiality in arbitration

  • Confidentiality is often cited as a key advantage of international arbitration over litigation
  • United States Law and Legal Analysis examines the scope and limitations of confidentiality in arbitration
  • Understanding confidentiality provisions is crucial for protecting sensitive business information in disputes

Extent of confidentiality

  • Varies depending on applicable laws, institutional rules, and party agreement
  • Generally covers existence of arbitration, pleadings, evidence, and hearings
  • Award may be confidential unless disclosure required for enforcement
  • Parties, arbitrators, and institutions typically bound by confidentiality obligations
  • Witnesses and experts may need to sign confidentiality agreements

Exceptions and limitations

  • Disclosure may be required by law or court order
  • Public policy considerations may limit confidentiality in some jurisdictions
  • Investor-state arbitrations often subject to greater transparency requirements
  • Parties may agree to waive confidentiality or disclose certain information
  • may necessitate disclosure of award and key details

Cost considerations

  • Cost is a significant factor in international arbitration and can impact dispute resolution strategy
  • United States Law and Legal Analysis emphasizes the importance of understanding and managing arbitration costs
  • Proper and control can significantly affect the efficiency and fairness of the arbitration process

Arbitrator fees

  • May be calculated based on hourly rates or ad valorem (percentage of amount in dispute)
  • Vary widely depending on arbitrator experience and complexity of case
  • Institutional rules often provide fee schedules or caps
  • Sole arbitrator generally less expensive than three-member tribunal
  • Interim activities and award drafting can significantly impact total fees

Administrative expenses

  • Include fees charged by arbitral institutions for case management
  • Cover costs of hearing facilities, transcription services, and interpreters
  • May include expenses for document management and virtual hearing platforms
  • Travel and accommodation costs for arbitrators and parties if in-person hearings required
  • Can be substantial in complex, long-running cases

Cost allocation

  • Tribunals have discretion to allocate costs between parties in
  • "Costs follow the event" principle often applied, with losing party bearing majority of costs
  • Parties' conduct during proceedings may influence cost allocation decisions
  • Some jurisdictions and rules allow for separate cost submissions after main award
  • Security for costs may be ordered to ensure losing party can pay

Advantages of international arbitration

  • International arbitration offers several key advantages over traditional litigation for cross-border disputes
  • United States Law and Legal Analysis recognizes these benefits in promoting arbitration as a preferred method of dispute resolution
  • Understanding these advantages is crucial for effective dispute resolution clause drafting and strategy

Neutrality and flexibility

  • Allows parties to select neutral forum and arbitrators, avoiding "home court" advantage
  • Flexible procedures can be tailored to specific needs of dispute and parties
  • Choice of language, venue, and applicable laws enhances party autonomy
  • Ability to combine different legal traditions and practices
  • Scheduling flexibility often results in faster resolution than court litigation

Enforceability of awards

  • New York Convention ensures widespread recognition and enforcement of awards
  • Easier to enforce arbitral awards internationally compared to foreign court judgments
  • Limited grounds for refusing enforcement promote finality of decisions
  • Avoids complexities of navigating multiple national court systems
  • Particularly valuable for disputes involving parties from non-Convention countries

Expertise of arbitrators

  • Parties can select arbitrators with specific industry or technical knowledge
  • Specialized expertise can lead to more informed and appropriate decisions
  • Reduces need for extensive expert testimony and associated costs
  • Arbitrators often have experience in international business practices
  • Can result in more predictable outcomes in complex commercial disputes

Disadvantages of international arbitration

  • While offering many benefits, international arbitration also has potential drawbacks
  • United States Law and Legal Analysis examines these disadvantages to provide a balanced view of arbitration as a dispute resolution mechanism
  • Understanding these limitations is crucial for informed decision-making in dispute resolution planning

Limited discovery

  • Restricted document production compared to U.S.-style discovery
  • May hinder ability to fully develop case or uncover crucial evidence
  • Parties from different legal traditions may have conflicting expectations about disclosure
  • Tribunals have discretion in managing document requests, leading to uncertainty
  • Can potentially disadvantage parties with less access to relevant information

Potential for increased costs

  • Arbitrator and institutional fees can be substantial, especially in complex cases
  • Parties bear costs of hearing facilities and administrative support
  • Multiple rounds of written submissions may increase legal fees
  • Travel and accommodation expenses for international hearings
  • Cost-saving advantages may diminish in lengthy, document-heavy arbitrations

Finality of decisions

  • Limited grounds for appeal or review of arbitral awards
  • Errors of law or fact generally not correctable
  • Risk of being bound by unfavorable decision with little recourse
  • May be problematic in high-stakes disputes or novel legal issues
  • Some jurisdictions allow expanded review by agreement, but this is uncommon
  • International arbitration continually evolves to meet changing business needs and legal landscapes
  • United States Law and Legal Analysis tracks these developments to ensure effective representation in international disputes
  • Understanding current trends is crucial for staying competitive in the global arbitration market

Third-party funding

  • Growing acceptance of external funding for arbitration costs
  • Allows parties with limited resources to pursue meritorious claims
  • Raises ethical concerns about conflict of interest and control of proceedings
  • Some institutions and jurisdictions require disclosure of third-party funding arrangements
  • Impacts cost allocation decisions and security for costs applications

Use of technology

  • Increased adoption of virtual hearings and online case management platforms
  • Artificial intelligence tools for document review and legal research
  • Cybersecurity concerns in protecting confidential arbitration data
  • Blockchain technology explored for smart contracts and automated dispute resolution
  • Enhanced use of data analytics for case strategy and arbitrator selection

Transparency initiatives

  • Growing pressure for greater transparency, especially in investor-state arbitration
  • UNCITRAL Transparency Rules provide framework for public access to proceedings
  • Some institutions introducing opt-in transparency rules
  • Publication of sanitized or redacted awards becoming more common
  • Balancing confidentiality with public interest in certain types of disputes

Key Terms to Review (40)

Annulment proceedings: Annulment proceedings are legal processes that declare a marriage null and void, treating it as though it never existed. Unlike divorce, which ends a valid marriage, annulment addresses marriages that are considered invalid from the beginning due to specific reasons such as fraud, coercion, or incapacity. This distinction is significant as it can affect issues like property division and the legitimacy of children.
Arbitrability: Arbitrability refers to the ability of a dispute to be resolved through arbitration rather than litigation. It essentially determines whether a particular issue or claim can be arbitrated based on legal standards, contractual agreements, or public policy considerations. Understanding arbitrability is crucial as it influences the scope of arbitration agreements and the enforceability of arbitration decisions, especially in different jurisdictions.
Arbitration agreement: An arbitration agreement is a contract in which two or more parties agree to resolve their disputes outside of court, typically by submitting them to a neutral third party, known as an arbitrator. This agreement can be made before any dispute arises or after a conflict has occurred. It’s an essential element of international arbitration, as it establishes the framework for how disputes will be handled, often specifying the rules and procedures to be followed.
Arbitration clause: An arbitration clause is a provision in a contract that requires the parties to resolve their disputes through arbitration instead of litigation in court. This clause outlines the agreement to arbitrate and may specify details like the rules of arbitration, the location, and the number of arbitrators, ultimately promoting a faster and more efficient resolution process while reducing court costs and maintaining confidentiality.
Arbitrator: An arbitrator is a neutral third party who is appointed to resolve disputes outside of the court system, typically in an arbitration setting. The arbitrator listens to both sides, reviews evidence, and makes a binding decision, known as an award, which the parties are required to follow. This process offers a more private and often faster resolution compared to traditional litigation.
Arbitrator impartiality: Arbitrator impartiality refers to the obligation of an arbitrator to remain neutral and unbiased when resolving disputes between parties. This concept is crucial in international arbitration, where the legitimacy and acceptance of the arbitration process hinge on the belief that the arbitrator will make decisions without favoritism or prejudice toward either side.
Arbitrator qualifications: Arbitrator qualifications refer to the specific skills, experience, and attributes required for an individual to serve as an arbitrator in dispute resolution processes, particularly in international arbitration. These qualifications ensure that arbitrators have the necessary expertise and impartiality to effectively manage disputes between parties from different jurisdictions. The selection of qualified arbitrators is crucial for maintaining the integrity and efficiency of the arbitration process.
Binding decisions: Binding decisions refer to rulings made by an authority, such as an arbitrator or tribunal, that must be accepted by the parties involved and cannot be appealed or disregarded. These decisions carry legal weight and are enforceable, meaning that the parties must comply with the outcomes as determined by the arbitration process. This concept is crucial in international arbitration, where different legal systems and jurisdictions may have competing interests.
Commercial arbitration: Commercial arbitration is a method of resolving disputes outside of the courts, where parties agree to submit their conflicts to one or more arbitrators who make a binding decision. This process is often preferred in business dealings because it can be faster and less formal than litigation, and it allows parties to select arbitrators with specific expertise relevant to their disputes. Additionally, commercial arbitration can provide privacy and confidentiality, which are crucial for businesses that want to protect sensitive information during the resolution process.
Consent Award: A consent award is a legally binding decision made by an arbitration panel that results from an agreement between the parties involved in a dispute. This type of award typically arises when both parties agree to the terms and conditions laid out in the arbitration process, thus eliminating the need for a contentious hearing. Consent awards highlight the collaborative nature of arbitration, allowing parties to resolve disputes amicably while still obtaining a formal resolution.
Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards: The Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, also known as the New York Convention, is an international treaty that provides a framework for the recognition and enforcement of arbitration agreements and awards across borders. This treaty aims to facilitate international trade by ensuring that arbitration awards made in one country can be enforced in another, reducing the risks of legal disputes and fostering a more reliable dispute resolution mechanism.
Cost Allocation: Cost allocation is the process of distributing indirect costs to different departments, projects, or business units based on predetermined criteria. This method ensures that each segment of an organization bears its fair share of expenses, which is vital for accurate budgeting and financial reporting. Effective cost allocation not only impacts financial statements but also influences decision-making and resource management across various divisions.
Default award: A default award is a decision made by an arbitrator when one party fails to participate in the arbitration process, either by not appearing or not responding to claims. This type of award serves as a mechanism to ensure that the arbitration process can continue efficiently even when one party does not fulfill its obligations, thus providing a means for resolution. Default awards help maintain the integrity and timeliness of arbitration proceedings, ensuring that parties cannot simply evade their responsibilities.
Due Process: Due process is a constitutional guarantee that ensures fair treatment through the judicial system, safeguarding individuals' rights and ensuring that legal proceedings are conducted according to established rules and principles. This concept is integral to the legal system, providing protection against arbitrary denial of life, liberty, or property and connecting closely with individual rights and procedural safeguards in various legal contexts.
Emergency arbitrator: An emergency arbitrator is a type of adjudicator appointed to make urgent decisions in arbitration proceedings before the formation of the tribunal. This role is crucial when immediate relief is needed to prevent harm or preserve rights while the full arbitration process is being established. The emergency arbitrator typically has the authority to grant interim measures, which can be essential in protecting the interests of parties involved in international arbitration.
Enforcement challenges: Enforcement challenges refer to the difficulties encountered when trying to ensure compliance with laws, regulations, or decisions, particularly in the context of international agreements and arbitration. These challenges can arise due to jurisdictional issues, varying legal standards across countries, and the reluctance of parties to comply with arbitral awards. As international arbitration increasingly becomes a preferred method for dispute resolution, understanding these challenges is crucial for effective enforcement.
Enforcement proceedings: Enforcement proceedings refer to the legal processes undertaken to ensure compliance with a judgment or arbitration award. These proceedings are essential for translating arbitral decisions into enforceable outcomes, especially in the international context, where differing legal systems may pose challenges. Effective enforcement is crucial for maintaining the integrity of international arbitration as it helps uphold the decisions made by arbitral tribunals and provides assurance to parties involved in cross-border transactions.
Final award: A final award is a decision made by an arbitral tribunal that resolves all issues presented in an arbitration case, concluding the proceedings. This award is binding on the parties involved and typically represents the final resolution of disputes without any further recourse to court unless specific conditions are met. The final award often addresses the merits of the case, including damages, obligations, and the allocation of costs.
Final Award: A final award is the definitive decision made by an arbitrator or arbitration panel that resolves the disputes between the parties involved in arbitration. It is binding and conclusive, meaning the parties must adhere to its terms, and it typically includes determinations on liability and any compensation or remedies to be provided. The final award marks the end of the arbitration process, ensuring that disputes are resolved efficiently and effectively, without further recourse to litigation in court.
Gary Born: Gary Born is a prominent figure in the field of international arbitration, recognized for his expertise as a lawyer, academic, and author. He has played a significant role in shaping international arbitration practices through his contributions to legal scholarship and his involvement in high-profile arbitration cases. His work emphasizes the importance of effective dispute resolution mechanisms in global commerce and international relations.
ICC: The ICC, or International Chamber of Commerce, is a global business organization that promotes international trade and investment by providing a forum for businesses to resolve disputes through arbitration. It plays a significant role in the field of international arbitration, offering rules and procedures that facilitate the resolution of commercial conflicts between parties from different countries. The ICC aims to enhance the trust and efficiency of global commerce by ensuring a fair and impartial arbitration process.
Interim award: An interim award is a temporary decision made by an arbitration panel during the course of proceedings, often intended to address urgent issues that arise before the final resolution of the dispute. This type of award can cover various matters, including provisional measures, financial compensation, or directions regarding the conduct of the arbitration. Interim awards are significant because they help manage disputes efficiently and can provide immediate relief or protection for parties involved.
Interim measures: Interim measures are temporary actions ordered by an arbitration tribunal to protect the rights of parties involved in a dispute while the arbitration proceedings are ongoing. These measures aim to prevent harm, ensure the effectiveness of the arbitration process, and maintain the status quo until a final decision is made. They can take various forms, including freezing assets, suspending actions, or preserving evidence.
International arbitration: International arbitration is a method of resolving disputes between parties from different countries through an impartial third-party arbitrator or panel. It offers a private and binding alternative to litigation in national courts, allowing parties to agree on procedural rules and select arbitrators who are experts in the relevant field. This process is recognized globally and aims to provide an efficient resolution while respecting the sovereignty of nations involved.
International Chamber of Commerce (ICC): The International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) is a global business organization that promotes international trade, responsible business conduct, and a global approach to sustainable development. It serves as a crucial forum for businesses to discuss and address issues related to international commerce, including arbitration and dispute resolution.
Investment arbitration: Investment arbitration is a legal process in which disputes between foreign investors and host states are resolved through arbitration, rather than through national courts. This mechanism is often employed to protect investors' rights under international investment agreements, allowing them to seek compensation for unfair treatment or violations of agreements by the host country.
Jan Paulsson: Jan Paulsson is a prominent figure in international arbitration, known for his extensive expertise in international law and his contributions to the field as a practitioner and scholar. He has served as an arbitrator in numerous high-profile cases and is recognized for his writings that address the complexities and nuances of arbitration, particularly in the context of investment disputes. His work has significantly shaped the development of arbitration practices and principles globally.
Jurisdictional issues: Jurisdictional issues refer to the legal authority of a court or tribunal to make decisions and enforce laws in a particular case. These issues become critical when determining which legal framework applies and where a dispute should be resolved, especially in international arbitration, where multiple jurisdictions may be involved. Understanding jurisdictional issues helps clarify the extent of a tribunal's power and the enforceability of its decisions across different legal systems.
LCIA: The London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA) is a prominent international arbitration institution that provides services for the resolution of disputes through arbitration and mediation. It is known for its flexible procedures and neutrality, often chosen by parties engaged in international commercial disputes. The LCIA aims to facilitate efficient and fair resolutions while maintaining confidentiality and allowing parties to tailor the process to their specific needs.
Litigation: Litigation is the process of taking legal action or resolving disputes through the court system. It encompasses various stages, including filing a complaint, pre-trial motions, trial, and potentially appeals. Litigation can involve individuals, corporations, or government entities and is often characterized by formal procedures and rules governed by law.
Mediation: Mediation is a form of alternative dispute resolution where a neutral third party, known as the mediator, facilitates communication between disputing parties to help them reach a mutually acceptable agreement. It serves as a less adversarial option compared to litigation, allowing for more flexibility and confidentiality in resolving conflicts.
National courts: National courts are legal institutions established by a sovereign state to adjudicate disputes, interpret laws, and enforce justice within its jurisdiction. They serve as the backbone of a country's legal system, handling various cases ranging from civil disputes to criminal prosecutions. National courts are essential for maintaining order and upholding the rule of law, especially when it comes to resolving international arbitration cases that involve parties from different countries.
New York Convention: The New York Convention, formally known as the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, is an international treaty established in 1958 that aims to facilitate the recognition and enforcement of arbitration agreements and awards across borders. This convention is vital in promoting international arbitration as it provides a uniform legal framework that countries can adopt to ensure that arbitral awards made in one country are recognized and enforceable in others, fostering international trade and investment.
Partial award: A partial award is a decision made by an arbitration tribunal that resolves some, but not all, of the issues presented in a dispute. This type of award allows for a prompt resolution on specific matters while leaving other claims or issues to be addressed later. It serves as a way to streamline arbitration proceedings and can provide relief to parties before the entire case is finalized.
Party autonomy: Party autonomy refers to the principle that parties involved in a legal agreement or dispute have the freedom to determine the terms and conditions that govern their relationship, including the choice of law and forum for dispute resolution. This concept is particularly significant in international arbitration, as it allows parties from different legal systems to create tailored solutions that best suit their needs, thereby promoting fairness and efficiency in resolving disputes.
Party autonomy: Party autonomy refers to the principle that parties in a legal relationship have the freedom to determine the rules and conditions that will govern their relationship, including the choice of applicable law and the resolution of disputes. This principle is essential in international arbitration as it respects the preferences of the parties involved, allowing them to shape their own legal framework and process for resolving disputes.
Recognition: Recognition refers to the formal acknowledgment of a legal entity's status, particularly in the context of international law and relations. It serves as an essential mechanism for establishing diplomatic ties and legitimizing governmental authority, enabling entities to engage in agreements and interactions on the global stage. Recognition can occur at various levels, such as state recognition or the acknowledgment of international treaties, and it carries significant implications for the legal rights and obligations of the recognized parties.
Tribunal selection: Tribunal selection refers to the process of choosing the arbiters or decision-makers in an arbitration proceeding, which is crucial in international arbitration. The selection of a tribunal impacts the impartiality, expertise, and efficiency of the arbitration process. An effective tribunal can significantly influence the outcome of disputes, reflecting the parties' trust in the arbitration system.
UNCITRAL Model Law: The UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration is a framework established by the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law to facilitate fair and efficient arbitration processes across countries. It provides a set of guidelines that nations can adopt to harmonize their arbitration laws, promoting consistency and predictability in resolving international commercial disputes.
United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL): The United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) is a legal body established by the United Nations to promote the progressive harmonization and unification of international trade law. It plays a crucial role in fostering international cooperation by developing legal standards, treaties, and conventions that facilitate global commerce, particularly in areas such as arbitration, contracts, and trade financing.
© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.
Back
Practice QuizGlossary
Practice QuizGlossary
Next guide