9.3 Avoiding Conflicts of Interest and Maintaining Objectivity on Social Media
6 min read•august 15, 2024
Social media blurs the lines between personal and professional life for journalists. This presents unique ethical challenges in maintaining objectivity and avoiding conflicts of interest. Journalists must navigate these waters carefully to preserve their credibility and integrity.
Maintaining impartiality on social media requires conscious effort. Journalists should diversify their sources, fact-check information before sharing, and be transparent about their identity and intentions. They must also respect privacy and protect sources while balancing the public's right to know.
Conflicts of Interest on Social Media
Identifying Conflicts of Interest
Top images from around the web for Identifying Conflicts of Interest
Conflict of Interest - Free of Charge Creative Commons Typewriter image View original
Is this image relevant?
Wikipedia Lesson: Avoid Conflicts of Interest | Wikipedia le… | Flickr View original
Is this image relevant?
Ethics and Rules - Social Media: Law, Ethics and Current Awareness - Research Guides at Florida ... View original
Is this image relevant?
Conflict of Interest - Free of Charge Creative Commons Typewriter image View original
Is this image relevant?
Wikipedia Lesson: Avoid Conflicts of Interest | Wikipedia le… | Flickr View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Top images from around the web for Identifying Conflicts of Interest
Conflict of Interest - Free of Charge Creative Commons Typewriter image View original
Is this image relevant?
Wikipedia Lesson: Avoid Conflicts of Interest | Wikipedia le… | Flickr View original
Is this image relevant?
Ethics and Rules - Social Media: Law, Ethics and Current Awareness - Research Guides at Florida ... View original
Is this image relevant?
Conflict of Interest - Free of Charge Creative Commons Typewriter image View original
Is this image relevant?
Wikipedia Lesson: Avoid Conflicts of Interest | Wikipedia le… | Flickr View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
- Conflicts of interest arise when a journalist's personal, financial, political, or other interests could compromise their ability to report fairly and objectively on a story or topic
- Accepting gifts, favors, payments, or special access from sources or story subjects in exchange for favorable coverage on social media is a conflict of interest
- Journalists promoting products, services, or causes on social media that they also cover in their reporting creates a conflict of interest
- Using social media to express strong personal opinions on controversial issues or political alignments that a journalist also reports on presents a conflict of interest in terms of perceived objectivity
- Engaging in social media relationships or interactions with sources that go beyond professional boundaries, such as close friendships or romantic involvement, can lead to conflicts of interest
Ethical Implications of Accepting Favors
- Accepting "freebies" from companies or sources, such as merchandise, travel junkets, exclusive event invites or expensive meals, in exchange for social media coverage is considered an unethical quid pro quo or "pay for play" arrangement
- Even if the intent is not to influence coverage, accepting gifts over a certain monetary value from entities a journalist covers creates the appearance of a conflict of interest that can undermine credibility
- Journalists offered special access to a newsmaker or source, such as a private interview or tour, in exchange for favorable mentions on social media, may feel pressured to skew their reporting
- Promising sources that they will receive flattering social media posts about them or their company in exchange for inside information is an unethical tactic that turns journalists into PR agents or advertisers
- Social media "influencers" who accept payment to endorse products, and then use their journalism platforms to promote those products without disclosing the financial arrangement to their audience, are committing an ethical violation
- Journalists should disclose to their employers any gifts, favors, or special treatment they are offered through social media interactions, and get guidance on if it is appropriate to accept (free concert tickets from a band they are reviewing, an all-expenses paid trip to tour a resort they are writing about)
Objectivity vs Personal Opinions
Impact of Personal Bias on Objectivity
- Journalists are expected to maintain objectivity, impartiality and fairness in their reporting to uphold ethical standards and credibility with the public. Expressing strong personal views on social media can undermine the perception of objectivity
- , in which individuals seek out and favor information that confirms their preexisting beliefs while discounting contradictory evidence, can influence how journalists engage with stories and sources on social media in ways that compromise objective reporting
- Journalists who use social media to criticize, argue with or "troll" those they disagree with about issues they cover can be seen as exhibiting bias and taking sides, damaging their professional credibility (a political reporter getting into heated debates with supporters of a candidate, a sports writer trash-talking fans of a rival team)
- Responding to critics or detractors on social media with emotional, hostile or defensive language can convey a lack of objectivity and make the journalist appear unprofessional
- Because social media posts can be searched and scrutinized, a journalist's past opinions and statements, even if their views have evolved, can be used to accuse them of bias in their current work (old tweets expressing partisan views)
Separating the Professional from the Personal
- Journalists should keep their professional and personal social media activities separate, using different accounts for work and private interactions to avoid blurring boundaries
- Social media posts and interactions about stories a journalist is covering should be fact-based, neutral in tone, and free of opinionated, biased or leading language that could be seen as "taking sides"
- If a journalist makes an assertion or argument on social media, they should support it with facts, authoritative sources, and data, not just personal anecdotes or opinions
- Journalists should disclose relevant personal information or experiences that may influence their perspective on a story they post about on social media (if they have a family member who suffered from an illness they are reporting on)
- Journalists should make it clear when the views they express on social media are their own opinions and not reflective of their employer's stance
Maintaining Impartiality on Social Media
Diversifying Sources and Perspectives
- Journalists should follow, cite and engage with credible sources and data from different perspectives on social media to get a well-rounded view of stories and avoid "filter bubbles" of one-sided information
- When using social media for crowdsourcing, soliciting story ideas, or finding sources, journalists should cast a wide net and not just seek input from audiences likely to confirm their existing point of view
- Journalists should make an effort to follow and interact with people on social media who don't necessarily share their background or views in order to be exposed to diverse voices and opinions
- Social media that show users more of what they already interact with can reinforce a journalist's biases, so they need to consciously seek out alternative perspectives
Vetting Information Before Sharing
- Journalists should refrain from sharing or commenting on unconfirmed rumors, speculation, or allegations they see on social media, and should wait to weigh in until information is properly vetted and corroborated
- Journalists should fact-check claims or stories that emerge on social media with authoritative sources before treating them as credible or amplifying them to their followers
- Applying traditional journalism verification standards to viral social media content, such as investigating sources, seeking documentation, and getting input from credible experts, can help maintain objectivity
- Journalists should be transparent about what information they share on social media is confirmed fact vs. unverified reports to avoid confusing or misleading their audience (labeling a post as "breaking news" when the details are still unclear)
Ethics of Social Media Access
Transparency in Social Media Interactions
- Journalists should be transparent about their identity and professional affiliation in their social media bios, profiles and posts so sources and audiences know where they are coming from
- When contacting a source through social media, journalists should clearly introduce themselves, state their purpose, and not use deception to elicit information or access
- Journalists should not use fake social media accounts or "sockpuppets" to misrepresent who they are in order to connect with a source or infiltrate online groups
- If a journalist joins a closed social media group, community or platform for a story, they should be open about their intentions and get permission from moderators or administrators
Respecting Privacy and Protecting Sources
- Journalists should treat the privacy of their social media connections with the same discretion as offline sources, and not report private details or communications without permission
- Reposting or excerpting personal photos, videos or messages sent one-on-one or in a closed social media group can violate the trust of sources and raise ethical issues, even if the material is technically accessible
- Journalists should consider the potential professional and personal impacts on a source's life before identifying or quoting them from social media, especially if the source is not a public figure
- Journalists should weigh the newsworthiness and public interest of revealing a source who shares newsworthy information on social media vs. the ethics of protecting their identity if the source did not intend to be quoted (a whistleblower direct messaging a journalist sensitive documents)
Key Terms to Review (18)
Algorithms: Algorithms are sets of rules or instructions designed to perform a specific task or solve a problem, often used in computing and data processing. In the context of social media, algorithms play a crucial role in determining what content users see based on their preferences, interactions, and behaviors. This can lead to biases in information exposure and challenges in maintaining objectivity and transparency.
Balanced Reporting: Balanced reporting is a journalistic practice that ensures all relevant viewpoints are represented fairly and impartially in a news story. This approach fosters credibility and trust, as it allows audiences to see multiple sides of an issue and promotes a more nuanced understanding of events. In the context of social media, balanced reporting is crucial for maintaining objectivity and avoiding the pitfalls of bias that can arise from personal opinions and conflicts of interest.
Commercial Bias: Commercial bias refers to the tendency of media outlets to prioritize their financial interests over journalistic integrity and objectivity, often resulting in content that favors advertisers or sponsors. This bias can skew news coverage and influence the portrayal of events, as media companies may cater to commercial interests instead of presenting an unbiased account. Understanding commercial bias is essential for evaluating the reliability of information presented on social media and traditional news platforms.
Confirmation bias: Confirmation bias is the tendency to search for, interpret, and remember information in a way that confirms one's preexisting beliefs or hypotheses. This cognitive bias can lead individuals to give disproportionate weight to evidence that supports their views while disregarding or minimizing evidence that contradicts them. Such behavior can significantly impact how information is consumed and shared, especially in environments influenced by social media and journalism.
Content moderation: Content moderation refers to the process of monitoring, reviewing, and managing user-generated content on social media platforms to ensure compliance with community guidelines and legal standards. This practice is essential for maintaining a safe online environment and preventing harmful or inappropriate content from spreading. Effective content moderation balances the need for free expression with the responsibility to protect users from harmful material.
Disclosure: Disclosure refers to the act of making information known, particularly in a way that promotes transparency and accountability. In the context of social media and journalism, it is essential for maintaining trust and credibility with audiences, especially when it comes to advertising practices, sponsored content, and potential conflicts of interest. By clearly indicating when content is paid for or influenced by external parties, organizations can uphold ethical standards and ensure that their audience is fully informed about the nature of the content they consume.
Echo Chambers: Echo chambers are environments, often on social media, where individuals are exposed only to information and opinions that reinforce their existing beliefs, leading to a lack of exposure to differing viewpoints. This phenomenon significantly impacts the spread of information, shaping public discourse and influencing journalistic practices.
Editorial oversight: Editorial oversight refers to the process of reviewing and approving content to ensure it meets established standards for quality, accuracy, and objectivity before publication. This practice is essential in maintaining credibility and preventing conflicts of interest, especially in the realm of social media where information can spread rapidly and unchecked. Strong editorial oversight helps protect the integrity of the information being shared and ensures that content aligns with ethical journalism practices.
Edward R. Murrow: Edward R. Murrow was a pioneering American broadcast journalist who became famous for his work during World War II and his contributions to television journalism in the 1950s. He is known for his commitment to journalistic integrity, objectivity, and the responsibility of the media to inform the public, which is crucial for avoiding conflicts of interest and maintaining objectivity in social media.
Fact-checking: Fact-checking is the process of verifying the accuracy of information, claims, and statements, particularly in the context of journalism and media. It plays a crucial role in maintaining the integrity of news reporting and combating misinformation, especially as social media continues to influence how news is gathered and shared.
Journalistic integrity: Journalistic integrity refers to the commitment to ethical principles and standards in journalism, including truthfulness, accuracy, fairness, and accountability. This principle is vital for maintaining public trust and ensuring that information disseminated through media is reliable and credible.
Neutrality: Neutrality refers to the practice of remaining impartial and unbiased, particularly in contexts where conflicts of interest may arise. In social media and journalism, maintaining neutrality is crucial to ensure that information is presented fairly and without favoritism, which helps to build trust with audiences. This principle plays a significant role in avoiding the influence of personal beliefs or external pressures on the information being shared.
Pew Research Center: The Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan American think tank that conducts research and provides insights on social issues, public opinion, and demographic trends. It plays a crucial role in shaping understanding of the digital landscape and public attitudes towards social media, making its findings essential for addressing challenges like negative feedback, advertising strategies for news organizations, and maintaining objectivity in journalism.
Public trust: Public trust refers to the confidence that the public has in the integrity, reliability, and impartiality of institutions, organizations, and individuals, especially those in positions of authority. This concept is vital for fostering open communication and engagement, and it underscores the importance of ethical behavior and transparency, particularly in the realm of social media and journalism.
Society of Professional Journalists Code of Ethics: The Society of Professional Journalists (SPJ) Code of Ethics is a set of guidelines that provides ethical principles and standards for journalists to ensure integrity, accuracy, and fairness in their reporting. It emphasizes the importance of avoiding conflicts of interest, being objective, and maintaining transparency, especially in the context of social media where information can spread rapidly and without verification. This code serves as a crucial framework for ethical journalism, guiding professionals on how to navigate complex situations in a digital landscape.
Source verification: Source verification is the process of confirming the credibility and reliability of information sources before using their content in news reporting. This practice is crucial for ensuring that the news shared with the public is accurate and trustworthy, which ultimately upholds the integrity of journalism.
Transparency: Transparency in social media journalism refers to the practice of being open and honest about the sources of information, methods of reporting, and potential biases that may influence content. It involves providing audiences with clear insights into how stories are created and ensuring that the journalistic process is visible and accountable, which helps to build trust and credibility with the audience.
Viral content: Viral content refers to any piece of media that rapidly gains popularity and spreads across the internet through sharing on social media platforms. This phenomenon is often driven by engaging, relatable, or shocking elements that resonate with audiences, leading them to share it with their networks, which amplifies its reach and visibility.