5.3 Multiple Shooting Methods

Multiple shooting methods are a game-changer for solving tricky boundary value problems. They break down complex equations into smaller, more manageable chunks, making them easier to solve and more stable than single shooting methods.

These methods shine when dealing with nonlinear or stiff problems. By dividing the interval and introducing additional unknowns, they improve stability and convergence, making them a go-to choice for tackling challenging differential equations.

Concept of multiple shooting methods

Motivation and advantages

Top images from around the web for Motivation and advantages

• 

  Stability and Boundedness of Solutions of Certain Non-Autonomous Third Order Nonlinear ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  differential equations - Multiple solutions using the shooting method - Mathematica Stack Exchange View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Lyapunov Stability Analysis of Certain Third Order Nonlinear Differential Equations View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Stability and Boundedness of Solutions of Certain Non-Autonomous Third Order Nonlinear ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  differential equations - Multiple solutions using the shooting method - Mathematica Stack Exchange View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Motivation and advantages

• 

  Stability and Boundedness of Solutions of Certain Non-Autonomous Third Order Nonlinear ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  differential equations - Multiple solutions using the shooting method - Mathematica Stack Exchange View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Lyapunov Stability Analysis of Certain Third Order Nonlinear Differential Equations View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Stability and Boundedness of Solutions of Certain Non-Autonomous Third Order Nonlinear ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  differential equations - Multiple solutions using the shooting method - Mathematica Stack Exchange View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Multiple shooting methods are a class of numerical techniques used to solve boundary value problems (BVPs) for ordinary differential equations (ODEs)
• Overcome limitations of single shooting methods, which can suffer from instability and convergence issues, especially for nonlinear or stiff BVPs
• Divide the interval of interest into smaller subintervals and solve the BVP on each subinterval independently, introducing additional unknowns at the subinterval boundaries
• Handle more complex and nonlinear problems compared to single shooting (highly nonlinear systems, stiff equations)
• Improve stability and convergence properties by reducing sensitivity to initial guesses and error propagation

Methodology overview

• Divide the BVP into smaller subintervals by introducing multiple shooting points
• Treat the values of the solution and its derivatives at each shooting point as unknown variables
• Integrate the ODE system independently on each subinterval, starting from the initial conditions at the shooting points
• Impose continuity conditions at the shooting points to ensure solution and derivatives match at subinterval boundaries
• Incorporate the boundary conditions of the original BVP into the system of equations
• Solve the resulting nonlinear system of equations using iterative methods (Newton's method, quasi-Newton methods)

Formulation with multiple shooting points

Problem division and unknowns

• Divide the BVP into smaller subintervals by introducing multiple shooting points
• Treat the values of the solution and its derivatives at each shooting point as unknown variables
• Define the shooting points as $t_0 < t_1 < \ldots < t_N$, where $t_0$ and $t_N$ are the endpoints of the original interval
• Denote the unknown values of the solution and its derivatives at the shooting points as $y_i$ and $y'_i$, respectively

Independent integration and continuity conditions

• Integrate the ODE system independently on each subinterval $[t_i, t_{i+1}]$, starting from the initial conditions $(y_i, y'_i)$ at the shooting points
• Ensure continuity of the solution and its derivatives at the shooting points by imposing continuity conditions
• Continuity conditions require that the solution and its derivatives match at the subinterval boundaries
• Mathematically, the continuity conditions are expressed as $y_i(t_{i+1}) = y_{i+1}(t_{i+1})$ and $y'_i(t_{i+1}) = y'_{i+1}(t_{i+1})$

Boundary conditions and system of equations

• Incorporate the boundary conditions of the original BVP into the system of equations
• Boundary conditions can be of various types (Dirichlet, Neumann, Robin) and involve the solution and its derivatives at the endpoints
• Combine the initial conditions at the shooting points, the continuity conditions, and the boundary conditions to form a system of nonlinear equations
• The resulting system of equations is typically solved using iterative methods like Newton's method or quasi-Newton methods

Implementation of multiple shooting algorithms

Discretization and numerical integration

• Discretize the interval of interest and define the shooting points
• Choose a suitable numerical integration method to integrate the ODE system on each subinterval (Runge-Kutta methods, collocation methods)
• Treat the initial conditions at the shooting points as unknowns and update them iteratively
• Implement the numerical integration method to compute the solution and its derivatives on each subinterval, starting from the initial conditions at the shooting points

Formulation of continuity and boundary conditions

• Formulate the continuity conditions and boundary conditions as a system of nonlinear equations
• Continuity conditions ensure that the solution and its derivatives match at the subinterval boundaries
• Boundary conditions are imposed based on the specific requirements of the BVP (fixed values, derivatives, mixed conditions)
• Assemble the system of equations by combining the continuity conditions, boundary conditions, and any additional constraints

Iterative solution and convergence criteria

• Solve the system of nonlinear equations using iterative methods like Newton's method
• Newton's method requires the calculation of the Jacobian matrix, which represents the sensitivity of the continuity and boundary conditions with respect to the unknown variables at the shooting points
• Update the unknown variables at the shooting points iteratively based on the solution of the linear system in each Newton iteration
• Define a convergence criterion to terminate the iterative process (norm of the residual, relative change in the solution)
• Check the convergence criterion after each iteration and stop the process when the desired tolerance is met

Solution reconstruction and output

• Once the iterative process converges, the values of the solution and its derivatives at the shooting points are obtained
• Reconstruct the solution on the entire interval by integrating the ODE system using the converged values at the shooting points as initial conditions
• Interpolate the solution between the shooting points if necessary to obtain a continuous representation
• Output the solution, its derivatives, and any other relevant quantities (error estimates, convergence information) for analysis and interpretation

Convergence and stability analysis

Factors affecting convergence and stability

• The convergence and stability of multiple shooting methods depend on several factors:
  • Choice of shooting points (number and distribution)
  • Numerical integration method used on each subinterval
  • Iterative solver employed (Newton's method, quasi-Newton methods)
  • Initial guesses for the unknown variables at the shooting points
• Properly placed shooting points can improve the conditioning of the system and enhance convergence
• The accuracy and stability of the numerical integration method directly impact the overall accuracy and stability of the multiple shooting solution

Comparison with single shooting

• Multiple shooting methods generally exhibit better stability compared to single shooting
• Integration is performed on smaller subintervals, reducing error propagation and sensitivity to initial conditions
• Single shooting methods integrate the ODE system over the entire interval, leading to error accumulation and potential instability, especially for nonlinear or stiff problems
• Multiple shooting divides the problem into smaller subproblems, improving the conditioning and robustness of the numerical solution

Convergence rate and adaptive techniques

• Multiple shooting methods typically achieve superlinear convergence, provided that the Jacobian matrix is accurately computed and the iterative solver converges
• The convergence rate can be further improved by using higher-order numerical integration methods or adaptive step-size control
• Adaptive step-size control adjusts the step size based on local error estimates to maintain a desired level of accuracy and efficiency
• Error estimation techniques, such as embedded Runge-Kutta methods or Richardson extrapolation, can be employed to assess the quality of the numerical solution

Robustness and continuation methods

• The convergence of the iterative solver (Newton's method) depends on the initial guesses for the unknown variables at the shooting points
• Poor initial guesses can lead to slow convergence or even divergence of the iterative process
• Continuation methods or homotopy techniques can be used to improve the robustness and convergence of the iterative solver
• Continuation methods gradually transform the problem from a simpler one (with known solution) to the original problem, providing better initial guesses along the way
• Homotopy techniques introduce a parameter that smoothly deforms the problem, allowing for a more controlled and robust convergence process

Multiple shooting vs other methods

Advantages over single shooting

• Multiple shooting offers several advantages over single shooting for solving BVPs:
  • Better stability and convergence properties, particularly for nonlinear and stiff problems
  • Reduced error propagation and sensitivity to initial guesses by dividing the interval into subintervals
  • Ability to handle more complex and general boundary conditions
  • Improved conditioning of the problem and robustness of the numerical solution
• Single shooting methods integrate the ODE system over the entire interval, which can lead to error accumulation and numerical instabilities

Comparison with finite difference methods

• Multiple shooting methods can achieve higher accuracy compared to finite difference methods
• Finite difference methods discretize the ODE system directly using finite difference approximations, which may suffer from accuracy limitations
• Multiple shooting methods can handle more general boundary conditions and complex problems than finite difference methods
• Finite difference methods, such as the shooting method with finite differences, can be simpler to implement but may have difficulty with certain types of boundary conditions
• Multiple shooting methods require the integration of the ODE system on each subinterval, which can be computationally more expensive than finite difference methods

Trade-offs and selection criteria

• The choice between multiple shooting, single shooting, and finite difference methods depends on several factors:
  • Specific characteristics of the problem (nonlinearity, stiffness, boundary conditions)
  • Desired accuracy and reliability of the numerical solution
  • Computational resources available and efficiency requirements
  • Ease of implementation and available software libraries or tools
• Multiple shooting methods are often preferred for solving complex and nonlinear BVPs due to their stability, convergence properties, and ability to handle general boundary conditions
• Single shooting methods may be sufficient for simpler problems or when the ODE system is not highly sensitive to initial conditions
• Finite difference methods can be a good choice for problems with simple boundary conditions and when computational efficiency is a priority