crams
Mathematical Methods for Optimization
Table of Contents

Cutting plane methods are a powerful tool in integer programming, slicing through the solution space to find optimal answers. They work by adding constraints to the linear programming relaxation, gradually tightening the feasible region until an integer solution emerges.

These methods can stand alone or team up with branch and bound techniques for a one-two punch. By generating cuts based on problem structure, they help solve tricky issues in areas like vehicle routing and production planning.

Cutting Plane Methods in Integer Programming

Concept and Purpose

  • Cutting plane methods solve integer programming problems by adding constraints (cuts) to the linear programming relaxation
  • Tighten the feasible region of the linear programming relaxation bringing it closer to the convex hull of integer solutions
  • Identify and eliminate fractional solutions not feasible for the integer program
  • Gomory cutting plane algorithm generates cuts based on the simplex tableau of the linear programming relaxation
  • Used as standalone algorithms or combined with techniques like branch and bound for efficient problem-solving
  • Effectiveness depends on strength and relevance of generated cuts as well as problem structure
  • Iterative process refines the solution space until an optimal integer solution emerges

Applications and Variations

  • Applied to various integer programming problems (vehicle routing, facility location, production planning)
  • Fractional cutting planes derived from optimal simplex tableau basic variables
  • Gomory mixed-integer cuts handle problems with both integer and continuous variables
  • Lift-and-project cuts strengthen valid inequalities by exploiting problem structure
  • Disjunctive cuts leverage logical relationships between variables
  • Cutting plane methods adapt to specific problem classes (network flow, set covering, knapsack problems)
  • Implementation in commercial solvers (CPLEX, Gurobi) enhances performance for large-scale problems

Valid Inequalities and Cutting Planes

Types of Cuts

  • Valid inequalities satisfied by all feasible integer solutions cut off some fractional solutions of linear programming relaxation
  • Gomory fractional cuts derived from fractional parts of basic variables in optimal simplex tableau
  • Lift-and-project cuts generated by lifting valid inequalities from lower-dimensional to higher-dimensional spaces
  • Chvátal-Gomory cuts obtained by taking non-negative linear combinations of constraints and rounding down right-hand side
  • Knapsack cuts derived from knapsack constraints in many integer programming problems
  • Clique cuts and odd-hole cuts based on constraint matrix structure useful for set packing and partitioning problems
  • Mixed-integer rounding cuts combine continuous and integer variables to generate strong inequalities

Cut Strength and Generation

  • Cut strength measured by ability to separate fractional solutions from convex hull of integer solutions
  • Strong cuts significantly reduce the feasible region of linear programming relaxation
  • Weak cuts may have minimal impact on solution quality or convergence speed
  • Cut generation algorithms identify violated inequalities efficiently
  • Separation problem solves optimization problem to find most violated inequality
  • Heuristic methods quickly generate cuts sacrificing guaranteed optimality
  • Cut strengthening techniques improve effectiveness of generated inequalities
  • Dynamic cut generation adapts to evolving problem structure during solution process

Cutting Planes and Branch and Bound

Branch-and-Cut Algorithm

  • Integration of cutting plane methods with branch and bound algorithms creates branch-and-cut hybrid approach
  • Cutting planes generated at each node of branch and bound tree tighten linear programming relaxation before branching
  • Decision to generate cuts or branch based on criteria (objective function improvement, node depth, computational time)
  • Local cuts generated and applied to specific nodes in branch and bound tree
  • Global cuts valid for entire problem applied to all nodes
  • Cut management strategies balance benefits of adding cuts with increased computational complexity
  • Effectiveness depends on interplay between branching decisions and cut generation as well as problem-specific characteristics

Implementation Strategies

  • Dynamic cut generation determines when and where to apply cuts in branch and bound tree
  • Cut pool management stores and reuses effective cuts across multiple nodes
  • Primal heuristics incorporated to find feasible integer solutions quickly
  • Branching strategies (strong branching, pseudocost branching) complement cutting plane generation
  • Parallel implementations exploit multi-core processors for simultaneous cut generation and branching
  • Warm starting techniques leverage information from previous solutions to accelerate convergence
  • Hybrid approaches combine branch-and-cut with other metaheuristics (genetic algorithms, tabu search)

Cutting Plane Strategy Effectiveness

Performance Metrics

  • Effectiveness measured by ability to reduce integrality gap and accelerate convergence to optimal integer solution
  • Metrics include number of cuts generated improvement in objective function value reduction in branch and bound nodes explored
  • Computational overhead of generating and managing cuts balanced against benefits of tightening linear programming relaxation
  • Problem-specific cut generation strategies often outperform generic methods for certain integer programming classes
  • Order of different cut types generation and addition significantly impacts overall cutting plane method performance
  • Strategies focusing on generating small number of strong cuts often more effective than those generating many weak cuts
  • Effectiveness varies depending on problem structure size and characteristics necessitating careful selection and tuning

Advanced Considerations

  • Cut separation time versus linear programming solve time trade-off analysis
  • Impact of cut density on linear programming solver performance
  • Interaction between cutting planes and preprocessing techniques
  • Effectiveness of cutting planes in presence of symmetry in problem formulation
  • Robustness of cutting plane strategies across different problem instances
  • Learning algorithms to predict most effective cutting plane strategy for given problem
  • Theoretical guarantees on convergence and solution quality for specific cutting plane methods