11.1 Fundamentals of game theory in biological contexts

2 min readjuly 25, 2024

Game theory in offers a powerful framework for analyzing strategic interactions between organisms. It models how different behavioral strategies impact fitness and survival, helping predict evolutionary outcomes in various scenarios.

Key concepts include (organisms), strategies (traits or behaviors), and (fitness consequences). Understanding Nash equilibria and evolutionary stable strategies is crucial for grasping how certain traits persist in populations over time.

Game Theory Fundamentals in Evolutionary Biology

Game theory in evolutionary biology

Top images from around the web for Game theory in evolutionary biology
Top images from around the web for Game theory in evolutionary biology
  • Mathematical framework analyzes strategic interactions between individuals modeling and predicting evolutionary outcomes
  • Players represent individuals or groups of organisms competing for resources (food, mates)
  • Strategies encompass behavioral or phenotypic traits adaptable to environment (aggression, cooperation)
  • Payoffs quantify fitness consequences of different strategy combinations affecting survival and reproduction
  • Nash equilibrium signifies stable state where no player can unilaterally improve their payoff maintaining evolutionary stability
  • Evolutionary stable strategy (ESS) resists invasion by alternative strategies remaining dominant over time (camouflage in prey species)

Fitness in evolutionary games

  • Fitness measures organism's reproductive success determined by survival and reproduction rates
  • Serves as payoff in game-theoretic models with higher fitness indicating greater evolutionary success
  • quantifies total number of offspring produced by an individual or genotype
  • compares fitness between different strategies within a population
  • Fitness landscapes visualize fitness values across different trait combinations identifying optimal strategies (antibiotic resistance in bacteria)

Two-player games and payoffs

  • tabulates fitness outcomes for different strategy combinations with rows and columns representing player strategies
  • models cooperation vs. defection illustrating conflict between individual and collective interests (mutualism in cleaner fish and clients)
  • explores aggressive vs. passive strategies modeling competition for limited resources (territorial disputes in animals)
  • examines cooperation under asymmetric costs also known as Chicken game (nest defense in birds)
  • Analyzing games involves identifying determining Nash equilibria and evaluating stability of equilibria

Modeling evolutionary scenarios

  1. Identify relevant traits or behaviors as strategies (body size, mating calls)
  2. Determine fitness payoffs for different strategy combinations
  3. Construct payoff matrix
  4. Analyze equilibria and stability
  • influences strategy success based on its prevalence in population
  • occur when multiple strategies coexist in stable proportions
  • track population changes over time as strategies compete
  • Applications include mating strategies predator-prey interactions and host-parasite coevolution
  • Limitations involve simplifying assumptions in models necessitating empirical validation and consideration of genetic and environmental factors

Key Terms to Review (15)

Absolute fitness: Absolute fitness refers to the total number of offspring that an individual organism produces throughout its lifetime, relative to others in the population. It provides a measure of an organism's success in passing on its genes, and is often influenced by factors such as survival rates, reproductive strategies, and environmental conditions. In biological contexts, understanding absolute fitness helps in analyzing how organisms adapt and compete within ecosystems.
Dominant strategies: Dominant strategies are the best course of action for a player in a game, regardless of what the other players do. In biological contexts, this concept helps to explain how certain behaviors or traits can become prevalent within a population due to their ability to yield better outcomes than alternatives. The presence of a dominant strategy can influence evolutionary stability and can be pivotal in understanding competition and cooperation among species.
Evolutionarily stable strategy: An evolutionarily stable strategy (ESS) is a strategy that, if adopted by a population, cannot be invaded by any alternative strategy that is initially rare. This concept helps explain how certain behaviors or traits can persist in a population over time, as they confer a selective advantage against any competing strategies. ESS is crucial in understanding the dynamics of cooperation, competition, and conflict within biological systems.
Evolutionary biology: Evolutionary biology is the branch of biology that studies the processes and mechanisms that drive the evolution of organisms over time. It seeks to understand how genetic variations, natural selection, and environmental factors contribute to the diversity of life on Earth. This field is crucial for exploring how mathematical models can help predict evolutionary outcomes and assess the strategies organisms employ in their survival and reproduction.
Evolutionary dynamics: Evolutionary dynamics refers to the study of how evolutionary processes, including natural selection, mutation, and genetic drift, influence the changes in allele frequencies within populations over time. This field integrates mathematical models and game theory to understand the behavior of biological systems and the interactions between different strategies employed by organisms in a population.
Fitness landscape: A fitness landscape is a conceptual model that represents the relationship between genotypes (or phenotypes) and their reproductive success, or 'fitness'. It visualizes how different genetic variations can lead to varying levels of fitness within a population, illustrating peaks (high fitness) and valleys (low fitness) that signify the adaptive potential of different traits in a given environment.
Frequency-dependent selection: Frequency-dependent selection is an evolutionary process where the fitness of a phenotype depends on its frequency relative to other phenotypes in a given population. This concept highlights how interactions between different species or individuals can change the success of a trait based on how common or rare it is, influencing competition, cooperation, and strategic interactions among organisms.
Hawk-dove game: The hawk-dove game is a fundamental model in game theory that describes the conflict between two types of strategies employed by individuals when competing for resources: aggressive (hawk) and passive (dove). This model illustrates how the costs of fighting versus the benefits of sharing resources can shape the behaviors and evolutionary strategies of species. By analyzing the interactions between hawks and doves, this game reveals insights into animal behavior, population dynamics, and evolutionary stability.
Mixed strategy equilibria: Mixed strategy equilibria occur in game theory when players randomize their strategies to keep opponents uncertain about their next move. This concept is crucial in understanding how individuals or species behave in competitive situations, where pure strategies may not yield a stable outcome. By employing mixed strategies, players can effectively respond to the unpredictability of their rivals, leading to a balance where no player can benefit from changing their strategy unilaterally.
Payoff matrix: A payoff matrix is a table that displays the potential outcomes of a strategic interaction between two or more players, representing their choices and the resulting payoffs for each combination of strategies. It serves as a critical tool in game theory, especially in biological contexts where individuals or species interact and make decisions based on their expected outcomes. Understanding the payoff matrix helps illustrate how various strategies can lead to different evolutionary outcomes, including the concept of evolutionary stable strategies.
Payoffs: Payoffs represent the outcomes or rewards that individuals receive from their choices in a game, crucial in determining strategies and behaviors in competitive scenarios. In biological contexts, payoffs help explain how organisms adapt their behaviors based on the potential benefits they could gain from interactions with others, whether through cooperation or competition. Understanding payoffs allows researchers to analyze how different strategies can lead to success or failure in evolutionary terms.
Players: In game theory, 'players' are the individuals or entities involved in a strategic interaction where their decisions affect each other's outcomes. Each player aims to maximize their own payoff, which can lead to various competitive or cooperative dynamics, depending on the situation. Understanding the role of players is crucial in biological contexts as it helps explain how organisms interact and adapt in their environments, influencing evolutionary strategies and survival.
Prisoner's dilemma: The prisoner's dilemma is a fundamental concept in game theory that illustrates a situation where two individuals can either cooperate or betray each other, with their outcomes dependent on the choice made by both. It highlights the conflict between individual rationality and collective benefit, demonstrating how personal incentives can lead to suboptimal outcomes for both parties. This scenario is widely applicable in biological contexts, such as understanding cooperation among organisms and evolutionary strategies.
Relative fitness: Relative fitness is a measure of an individual's genetic contribution to the next generation compared to others in the population. It reflects how well an organism's traits contribute to its survival and reproduction, factoring in the competition and environmental challenges it faces. Understanding relative fitness helps clarify how certain traits may become more or less common in a population over time, highlighting the dynamics of natural selection.
Snowdrift game: The snowdrift game is a model in game theory that illustrates the conflict between cooperation and competition, often represented by two drivers stuck in snow, where they must decide whether to shovel snow (cooperate) or wait for the other to do it (defect). This scenario highlights the strategic interactions that occur when individuals face decisions that impact their own outcome while also affecting others. The snowdrift game is often discussed in relation to evolutionary biology, as it helps explain how cooperative behaviors can evolve in populations despite individual incentives to defect.
© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.