Hirst v. United Kingdom is a landmark case decided by the European Court of Human Rights in 2005, which ruled that the UK government's blanket ban on voting rights for prisoners violated the European Convention on Human Rights. This case highlighted the tension between national laws and international human rights standards, illustrating the impact of the Human Rights Act 1998 on UK law and governance.
congrats on reading the definition of Hirst v. United Kingdom. now let's actually learn it.