study guides for every class

that actually explain what's on your next test

Military subordination

from class:

Latin American Politics

Definition

Military subordination refers to the principle that the armed forces operate under the authority and control of civilian leadership in a democratic society. This relationship ensures that military actions and policies align with the interests and will of the civilian population, preventing military coups or undue influence on governance.

congrats on reading the definition of military subordination. now let's actually learn it.

ok, let's learn stuff

5 Must Know Facts For Your Next Test

  1. In democratic contexts, military subordination is essential to prevent military leaders from acting independently or against civilian interests.
  2. Successful military subordination fosters trust between the armed forces and the public, reinforcing legitimacy in democratic institutions.
  3. Countries with strong military subordination tend to experience fewer coups and greater political stability compared to those with weak civilian control.
  4. The process of establishing military subordination often involves reforms in military education and training to emphasize loyalty to democratic values.
  5. Challenges to military subordination can arise from internal divisions within the military or external pressures, threatening the balance of power in a democracy.

Review Questions

  • How does military subordination contribute to maintaining democracy in a society?
    • Military subordination plays a crucial role in preserving democracy by ensuring that armed forces are accountable to elected civilian leaders rather than operating independently. This relationship prevents military coups and protects against potential abuses of power by the military. When the military recognizes its subordinate position, it reinforces democratic governance, ensuring that policies reflect the will of the people and upholding civil liberties.
  • What are some historical examples where a lack of military subordination led to political instability?
    • Historically, countries like Chile during the 1973 coup saw significant political instability due to a lack of military subordination. The military acted independently of civilian control, overthrowing a democratically elected government. In contrast, nations that have successfully maintained military subordination, like Costa Rica, enjoy relative political stability and strong democratic institutions, demonstrating the importance of civilian oversight over military power.
  • Evaluate the implications of weak military subordination on civil-military relations in emerging democracies.
    • Weak military subordination in emerging democracies can lead to detrimental consequences for civil-military relations. Without clear civilian authority, militaries may become politicized or attempt to influence governance, risking a return to authoritarianism. This situation undermines public trust in both the government and military institutions, potentially inciting conflict between civilian leaders and military factions. Establishing strong frameworks for military subordination is vital for fostering resilient democracies and ensuring respect for human rights.

"Military subordination" also found in:

© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.