Judicial activism refers to the practice where judges interpret the law and the Constitution in ways that reflect their personal views or social considerations, often leading to significant changes in public policy. This approach often contrasts with judicial restraint, where judges strictly adhere to the original text of the law. Judicial activism can be seen in landmark Supreme Court decisions that influence social issues and political landscape by interpreting the Constitution as a living document.
congrats on reading the definition of judicial activism. now let's actually learn it.