Infinitarian paralysis

Definition

Infinitarian paralysis refers to a state where an individual feels overwhelmed by the infinite possibilities and moral obligations of decision-making, particularly in the context of utilitarianism. This phenomenon can lead to inaction or indecisiveness, as one grapples with the ethical implications of various choices that could maximize overall happiness. In the realm of utilitarianism, this paralysis highlights the challenges faced by individuals when trying to evaluate actions based on their consequences for the greater good.

5 Must Know Facts For Your Next Test

1. Infinitarian paralysis can occur when individuals are faced with complex moral dilemmas where numerous options exist, each with different potential outcomes.
2. This concept underscores a criticism of utilitarianism, suggesting that an emphasis on maximizing happiness can lead to overwhelming feelings about making the 'right' choice.
3. In practice, infinitarian paralysis may result in people deferring decisions or avoiding ethical action altogether due to fear of making the wrong choice.
4. The term illustrates how utilitarianism's demand for assessing every possible consequence can complicate moral reasoning and hinder effective decision-making.
5. Understanding infinitarian paralysis is essential for evaluating how ethical theories, like utilitarianism, may lead to unintended psychological effects on individuals faced with significant moral decisions.

Review Questions

• How does infinitarian paralysis illustrate a limitation of utilitarianism in ethical decision-making?
  • Infinitarian paralysis showcases a limitation of utilitarianism by highlighting how the theory's focus on maximizing overall happiness can overwhelm individuals. When faced with numerous options and potential outcomes, the complexity can lead to indecision and inaction. This suggests that while utilitarianism provides a framework for evaluating actions, it may inadvertently complicate moral reasoning by making individuals feel paralyzed by their obligations.
• In what ways can infinitarian paralysis affect an individual's ability to fulfill their moral obligations according to utilitarian principles?
  • Infinitarian paralysis can significantly hinder an individual's ability to meet their moral obligations as prescribed by utilitarian principles. When confronted with the need to assess every possible consequence of their actions, individuals may become so overwhelmed that they fail to act entirely. This paralysis not only delays decision-making but may also lead to missed opportunities for promoting overall happiness and welfare, ultimately contradicting the core aim of utilitarian ethics.
• Evaluate the implications of infinitarian paralysis on real-world applications of utilitarianism in policy-making and social ethics.
  • The implications of infinitarian paralysis in real-world applications of utilitarianism can be profound, especially in policy-making and social ethics. Policymakers might struggle to make timely decisions due to being paralyzed by the vast range of possible consequences their choices could entail. This indecision can lead to ineffective policies or missed opportunities for impactful social change. Consequently, addressing infinitarian paralysis may require incorporating frameworks that simplify ethical decision-making or support individuals in navigating complex moral landscapes more effectively.

Related terms

Utilitarianism: A moral theory that suggests that the best action is the one that maximizes overall happiness or utility.

Consequentialism: The ethical theory that judges whether an action is right or wrong based solely on its outcomes or consequences.

Moral obligation: A duty or responsibility to act in a way that is considered ethically right, often evaluated in terms of potential impacts on others.