Argumentative discourse

Definition

Argumentative discourse refers to a form of communication aimed at persuading an audience of a specific viewpoint through the use of reasoning, evidence, and logical structure. This type of discourse is essential in academic settings as it fosters critical thinking and helps individuals articulate and defend their ideas effectively. It often involves presenting claims, counterclaims, and rebuttals, encouraging engagement with diverse perspectives.

5 Must Know Facts For Your Next Test

1. Argumentative discourse encourages the use of evidence and logical reasoning to support claims, making it essential for effective communication in academic writing.
2. Engaging with counterarguments allows speakers or writers to strengthen their own positions by addressing potential weaknesses in their arguments.
3. In argumentative discourse, understanding the audience's perspective is crucial for tailoring arguments that resonate and persuade effectively.
4. This form of discourse often follows a structured format, such as the Toulmin model, which includes elements like claim, evidence, warrant, and backing.
5. Argumentative discourse is not limited to written forms; it is also present in spoken formats such as debates, discussions, and presentations.

Review Questions

• How does argumentative discourse promote critical thinking among students?
  • Argumentative discourse promotes critical thinking by requiring students to analyze different viewpoints, evaluate evidence, and construct well-reasoned arguments. This process encourages them to question assumptions and understand various perspectives, enhancing their ability to think independently and make informed decisions. Engaging in this type of discourse fosters a deeper understanding of the material and improves analytical skills.
• In what ways does incorporating counterarguments enhance the effectiveness of argumentative discourse?
  • Incorporating counterarguments enhances the effectiveness of argumentative discourse by demonstrating the speaker's or writer's awareness of opposing views. This approach not only strengthens the original argument by addressing potential criticisms but also builds credibility with the audience. By acknowledging and refuting counterarguments, communicators show that they have considered multiple angles of the issue, which can lead to more persuasive and convincing discourse.
• Evaluate the impact of rhetorical appeals on the persuasiveness of argumentative discourse in academic settings.
  • Rhetorical appeals significantly impact the persuasiveness of argumentative discourse by engaging the audience on different levels. Ethos establishes credibility, making the argument more trustworthy; pathos evokes emotions that can connect with the audience personally; and logos provides logical reasoning that appeals to rational thought. When effectively balanced, these appeals enhance the overall persuasiveness of arguments presented in academic contexts, helping students convey their ideas more compellingly.

Related terms

claim: A statement or assertion put forth in an argument that is intended to be proven or supported with evidence.

counterargument: An opposing viewpoint or argument presented in response to the original claim, intended to challenge or refute it.

rhetorical appeals: Persuasive techniques used in discourse, including ethos (credibility), pathos (emotional appeal), and logos (logical reasoning).