Edinburgh Review

Definition

The Edinburgh Review was a prominent literary and cultural periodical established in 1802, known for its influential critiques of literature, politics, and society. It played a significant role in shaping public opinion during the early 19th century and contributed to the development of the Victorian periodical press by providing a platform for emerging writers and ideas.

5 Must Know Facts For Your Next Test

1. The Edinburgh Review was co-founded by Francis Jeffrey, Sydney Smith, and Henry Brougham, who were key figures in the Scottish Enlightenment.
2. The publication was known for its rigorous standards of criticism and analysis, which influenced both literary tastes and the political landscape of its time.
3. It featured reviews of major literary works, as well as discussions on philosophy, science, and current affairs, making it a comprehensive source for readers.
4. The Edinburgh Review was instrumental in promoting the works of emerging writers such as Lord Byron and John Keats during the Romantic period.
5. Its impact extended beyond literature; it fostered debates on social reform and political issues, contributing to the broader discourse of Victorian society.

Review Questions

• How did the Edinburgh Review influence the development of literary criticism in the early 19th century?
  • The Edinburgh Review set high standards for literary criticism by emphasizing thorough analysis and critical engagement with texts. Its reviews often highlighted not only literary merit but also social and political implications, encouraging a more reflective approach to reading. This influence helped to establish a more serious tone in literary criticism during the early 19th century and inspired other publications to adopt similar methodologies.
• Compare and contrast the editorial approach of the Edinburgh Review with that of its contemporary, the Quarterly Review.
  • While both the Edinburgh Review and the Quarterly Review served as important platforms for literary critique, their editorial approaches differed significantly. The Edinburgh Review was known for its liberal stance and support of progressive social reforms, often championing new ideas and emerging writers. In contrast, the Quarterly Review tended to have a more conservative viewpoint, frequently defending traditional values and established authors. This divergence in perspectives allowed readers to engage with a broader spectrum of ideas within Victorian literary culture.
• Evaluate the lasting legacy of the Edinburgh Review in shaping modern literary criticism and public discourse.
  • The Edinburgh Review's legacy is evident in its influence on contemporary literary criticism and public discourse. By establishing rigorous standards for critique and encouraging discussions on a wide range of topics, it laid the groundwork for future periodicals that prioritize analytical depth. Moreover, its commitment to social reform paved the way for literature to be seen as a vehicle for change. This melding of literature with critical thought continues to resonate today, as modern critics often explore broader societal implications within their analyses.

Related terms

Periodical Literature: Publications released at regular intervals that cover various topics, often including essays, critiques, and reviews, contributing to public discourse.

Romanticism: An artistic and literary movement that emphasized emotion, individualism, and nature, which influenced the content published in periodicals like the Edinburgh Review.

Quarterly Review: Another influential literary periodical founded in 1809 that provided critical reviews and essays, often contrasting with the perspectives presented in the Edinburgh Review.