Native Americans have faced a long history of land disputes with the U.S. government. From forced removals to allotment policies, tribes lost millions of acres. These conflicts continue today, with ongoing legal battles over treaty rights and sacred sites.
Recent policies have aimed to support tribal sovereignty and self-determination. However, challenges persist in protecting Native lands and cultural resources. Many tribes are still fighting to reclaim ancestral territories and preserve sacred places.
Legislation and Policies
Indian Removal and Allotment Policies
- Indian Removal Act of 1830 authorized forced relocation of Native American tribes from southeastern United States to territories west of the Mississippi River
- Resulted in the infamous Trail of Tears where thousands of Cherokee died during forced march
- Opened up millions of acres of Native lands for white settlement and exploitation
- Dawes Act of 1887 divided tribal lands into individual allotments
- Aimed to assimilate Native Americans into mainstream American society by promoting individual land ownership
- Reduced Native American land holdings from 138 million acres to 48 million acres by 1934
- Allotment process broke up communal tribal lands into individual parcels
- Assigned 160 acres to each family head and 80 acres to each single person over 18
- Excess lands sold to non-Native settlers, further diminishing tribal land base
- Led to checkerboard pattern of land ownership on many reservations
Termination and Self-Determination Eras
- Termination policy of 1940s-1960s sought to end federal recognition of tribes
- Aimed to assimilate Native Americans into mainstream society by eliminating their special status
- Resulted in loss of federal services and protections for terminated tribes
- Over 100 tribes terminated, including Menominee and Klamath
- Self-determination policy emerged in 1970s as a reversal of termination
- Emphasized tribal autonomy and control over their own affairs
- Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act of 1975 allowed tribes to manage federal programs
- Enabled tribes to develop their own education, health, and economic development programs
- Fostered resurgence of tribal governments and cultural preservation efforts
Tribal Rights and Sovereignty
Concepts of Tribal Sovereignty and Treaty Rights
- Tribal sovereignty refers to inherent authority of indigenous tribes to govern themselves
- Recognized in U.S. Constitution and affirmed by Supreme Court decisions
- Allows tribes to form their own governments, make laws, and enforce them on tribal lands
- Limited by Congress's plenary power over Indian affairs
- Treaty rights stem from nation-to-nation agreements between tribes and U.S. government
- Guarantee certain rights and protections to tribes in exchange for land cessions
- Often include hunting, fishing, and gathering rights on ceded territories
- Canons of construction require treaties to be interpreted as tribes would have understood them
- Many treaty rights continue to be litigated and enforced today (fishing rights in Pacific Northwest)
Land Claims and Reservation System
- Land claims involve legal actions by tribes to reclaim territories lost through unfair or illegal means
- Maine Indian Claims Settlement Act of 1980 returned 300,000 acres to Passamaquoddy and Penobscot
- Ongoing claims include Black Hills in South Dakota, sacred to Lakota Sioux
- Reservation system established designated lands for exclusive use by tribes
- Created through treaties, executive orders, or acts of Congress
- Intended to provide land base for tribes after widespread dispossession
- Vary greatly in size, from small rancherias to large reservations (Navajo Nation)
- Many reservations face challenges of poverty, limited economic opportunities, and jurisdictional issues
Cultural and Sacred Sites
Protection of Sacred Sites and Cultural Resources
- Sacred sites hold religious, spiritual, or cultural significance for Native American tribes
- Include natural features (mountains, rivers, caves) and human-made structures (burial grounds, ceremonial sites)
- Often located on federal or private lands, creating challenges for access and protection
- American Indian Religious Freedom Act of 1978 protects Native American religious practices
- Requires federal agencies to consider impacts on sacred sites in decision-making processes
- Does not provide absolute protection, as demonstrated in Lyng v. Northwest Indian Cemetery Protective Association case
- Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA) of 1990 addresses cultural artifacts and human remains
- Requires federal agencies and institutions receiving federal funding to return Native American cultural items to tribes
- Includes provisions for protection of burial sites on federal and tribal lands
- Executive Order 13007 directs federal agencies to accommodate access to sacred sites
- Requires agencies to avoid adversely affecting physical integrity of these sites
- Challenges remain in balancing protection with other land uses (mining, development, recreation)