scoresvideos
Intro to Epistemology
Table of Contents

A priori knowledge is gained through reasoning alone, not experience. It includes math and logic truths. In contrast, a posteriori knowledge comes from sensory experience. Analytic propositions are true by definition, while synthetic ones add new info.

Kant proposed synthetic a priori knowledge, combining features of both types. This sparked debate about whether all a priori knowledge is analytic or if Kant's category exists. A priori truths are often seen as necessary and universal, unlike contingent a posteriori facts.

Types of Knowledge

Defining A Priori and A Posteriori Knowledge

  • A priori knowledge acquired independently of experience
    • Stems from reasoning or intuition alone
    • Includes mathematical and logical truths
  • A posteriori knowledge derived from sensory experience or empirical observation
    • Requires interaction with the world to obtain
    • Encompasses scientific findings and personal experiences
  • Analytic propositions true by virtue of their meaning
    • Truth determined solely by analyzing the concepts involved
    • "All bachelors are unmarried men" exemplifies this type
  • Synthetic propositions add new information beyond what is contained in the subject
    • Truth determined by examining the world
    • "All bachelors are happy" requires empirical investigation

Distinguishing Between Proposition Types

  • Analytic a priori propositions self-evidently true
    • "All triangles have three sides" demonstrates this concept
  • Synthetic a posteriori propositions require experience to verify
    • "The sky is blue" illustrates this category
  • Kant's synthetic a priori propositions combine features of both
    • "Every event has a cause" represents Kant's novel category
  • Debate continues over the existence and nature of synthetic a priori knowledge
    • Some philosophers argue all a priori knowledge is analytic
    • Others defend Kant's view, citing examples from mathematics and metaphysics

Characteristics of A Priori Knowledge

Necessity and Universality

  • Necessity refers to the impossibility of being false
    • A priori truths hold in all possible worlds
    • "2 + 2 = 4" exemplifies necessary truth
  • Universality implies applicability across all contexts
    • A priori knowledge not limited by time or place
    • Laws of logic demonstrate universal applicability
  • Contrast with contingent and particular a posteriori knowledge
    • "It is raining today" illustrates contingent truth
    • "This apple is red" exemplifies particular knowledge

Kant's Synthetic A Priori

  • Kant proposed synthetic a priori knowledge bridges gap between analytic and synthetic
    • Adds new information while remaining knowable independently of experience
  • Argued certain metaphysical and mathematical truths fall into this category
    • "The shortest distance between two points is a straight line" illustrates Kant's concept
  • Synthetic a priori knowledge provides foundation for scientific inquiry
    • Enables formulation of universal laws of nature
  • Continues to spark philosophical debate over its validity and scope
    • Some argue Kant's examples reducible to analytic truths
    • Others defend synthetic a priori as crucial for understanding human cognition

Examples of A Priori Truths

Mathematical Truths

  • Arithmetic propositions demonstrate a priori knowledge
    • "7 + 5 = 12" knowable through pure reason
    • Multiplication tables learned through understanding, not memorization
  • Geometric truths accessible through rational intuition
    • "The sum of angles in a triangle equals 180 degrees" in Euclidean geometry
    • Non-Euclidean geometries challenge universality but remain a priori within their systems
  • Mathematical proofs rely on deductive reasoning from axioms
    • Pythagorean theorem derived logically from geometric principles
    • Prime number theory developed through abstract reasoning

Logical Truths

  • Laws of thought form basis of logical reasoning
    • Law of identity: A = A
    • Law of non-contradiction: Not both A and not-A
    • Law of excluded middle: Either A or not-A
  • Propositional logic truths knowable a priori
    • "If P implies Q, and P is true, then Q must be true" (modus ponens)
    • "Either it's raining or it's not raining" illustrates law of excluded middle
  • Syllogistic reasoning demonstrates a priori knowledge
    • "All men are mortal; Socrates is a man; therefore, Socrates is mortal"
  • Formal logic systems built on a priori foundations
    • Truth tables in propositional logic
    • Predicate logic extends a priori reasoning to quantified statements