4.3 Executive compensation
9 min read•august 19, 2024
Executive compensation is a complex and critical aspect of corporate governance. It involves designing pay packages that align executive interests with company goals and shareholder value. From cash salaries to equity awards, compensation structures aim to motivate top performance while balancing short-term and long-term incentives.
Accounting for executive pay impacts financial statements and disclosures. Governance bodies like oversee pay practices, while shareholders have increasing say through votes and activism. International variations, controversies over excessive pay, and emerging trends like ESG-linked compensation further shape this evolving field.
Types of executive compensation
- Executive compensation refers to the financial payments and non-monetary benefits provided to an organization's senior management in exchange for their work on behalf of the organization
- The structure and design of executive compensation packages can have significant implications for a company's financial performance, accounting practices, and corporate governance
Cash compensation
Top images from around the web for Cash compensation
Mo Money, Mo Problems: When and Why Financial Incentives Backfire View original
Is this image relevant?
The determinants and effects of CEO-employee pay ratios - Journalist's Resource View original
Is this image relevant?
Managing Employees | Boundless Business View original
Is this image relevant?
Mo Money, Mo Problems: When and Why Financial Incentives Backfire View original
Is this image relevant?
The determinants and effects of CEO-employee pay ratios - Journalist's Resource View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Top images from around the web for Cash compensation
Mo Money, Mo Problems: When and Why Financial Incentives Backfire View original
Is this image relevant?
The determinants and effects of CEO-employee pay ratios - Journalist's Resource View original
Is this image relevant?
Managing Employees | Boundless Business View original
Is this image relevant?
Mo Money, Mo Problems: When and Why Financial Incentives Backfire View original
Is this image relevant?
The determinants and effects of CEO-employee pay ratios - Journalist's Resource View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
- Includes base , which is a fixed amount paid regularly (usually annually) to executives
- Annual bonuses or short-term incentive plans (STIPs) provide variable pay based on achievement of specific performance targets (revenue growth, profitability)
- Long-term incentive plans (LTIPs) offer cash awards for meeting longer-term performance goals (3-5 years) aligned with company strategy
- Signing bonuses may be offered to attract top talent when hiring new executives
Equity-based compensation
- grant executives the right to purchase company shares at a predetermined price (strike price) over a specified period, allowing them to benefit from share price appreciation
- Restricted stock units (RSUs) are promises to issue shares to executives upon achievement of certain conditions (time-based vesting, performance targets)
- are awarded based on meeting specific long-term performance criteria (total shareholder return, earnings per share growth)
- Equity-based compensation aligns executive interests with those of shareholders and encourages long-term value creation
Perquisites and benefits
- Executive perks may include company cars, housing allowances, personal security, financial planning services, and club memberships
- Supplemental executive retirement plans (SERPs) provide additional retirement benefits beyond those available to other employees
- Generous severance packages (golden parachutes) may be offered to executives in the event of termination or change in control
- Perquisites and benefits are often used to attract and retain top executive talent but can be controversial if deemed excessive
Designing executive compensation packages
- Effective executive compensation design requires careful consideration of various factors to ensure alignment with company goals, market competitiveness, and stakeholder interests
Aligning with company strategy
- Compensation plans should be tailored to support the organization's strategic objectives (growth, profitability, innovation)
- Performance metrics and targets should be selected to drive desired behaviors and outcomes consistent with company strategy
- Long-term incentives should be structured to encourage executives to make decisions that create sustainable value
Balancing short-term vs long-term incentives
- An appropriate mix of short-term and long-term incentives is necessary to motivate executives to achieve both near-term goals and long-term success
- Overemphasis on short-term rewards can lead to myopic decision-making and excessive risk-taking
- Long-term incentives should constitute a significant portion of total compensation to promote a strategic focus and alignment with shareholder interests
Considering market benchmarks
- Compensation committees often use market data and peer group benchmarking to ensure executive pay is competitive within the industry
- Factors such as company size, complexity, performance, and executive role are considered when selecting appropriate peer groups
- While market data provides valuable insights, it should not be the sole determinant of executive pay levels, as it can contribute to an upward ratchet effect
Accounting for executive compensation
- The accounting treatment of executive compensation can have significant implications for a company's financial statements, disclosure requirements, and tax obligations
Expensing stock options
- Under and , companies must recognize the fair value of stock options granted to executives as a compensation expense over the vesting period
- The fair value is typically determined using option pricing models (Black-Scholes, binomial), which consider factors such as stock price volatility, dividend yield, and risk-free interest rates
- Expensing stock options can have a material impact on a company's reported earnings and requires careful consideration in financial planning and reporting
Disclosure requirements
- Regulators require detailed disclosure of executive compensation arrangements in annual reports and
- Disclosure includes a summary compensation table, which breaks down the various components of executive pay (salary, , equity awards, perquisites)
- Narrative disclosures explain the rationale behind compensation decisions, performance metrics used, and how pay aligns with company strategy and shareholder interests
- Transparent disclosure helps stakeholders assess the appropriateness and effectiveness of executive compensation practices
Tax implications
- Executive compensation arrangements can have significant tax consequences for both the company and the individual executives
- In many jurisdictions, there are limits on the tax deductibility of executive compensation above certain thresholds (e.g., $1 million in the U.S.)
- Deferred compensation plans allow executives to postpone income tax liability until the funds are withdrawn, but are subject to specific rules (IRC Section 409A in the U.S.)
- Companies must carefully design compensation plans to optimize tax efficiency while ensuring compliance with relevant tax laws and regulations
Governance and oversight
- Effective governance and oversight are critical to ensuring that executive compensation practices are fair, transparent, and aligned with stakeholder interests
Role of compensation committees
- Board-level compensation committees are responsible for designing, implementing, and monitoring executive compensation plans
- Committees typically consist of independent directors with relevant expertise in compensation, finance, and human resources
- Key responsibilities include setting performance targets, evaluating executive performance, and making recommendations to the full board for approval
- Compensation committees must strike a balance between offering competitive pay packages and avoiding excessive or unjustified compensation
Say-on-pay votes
- Many jurisdictions have introduced say-on-pay legislation, which gives shareholders a non-binding vote on executive compensation at annual meetings
- Say-on-pay votes provide a mechanism for shareholders to express their approval or disapproval of executive pay practices
- While non-binding, negative say-on-pay votes can lead to reputational damage and increased pressure on boards to address compensation concerns
- Companies should proactively engage with shareholders to understand their perspectives on executive compensation and incorporate feedback into their practices
Clawback provisions
- Clawback policies allow companies to recover incentive-based compensation from executives in the event of financial restatements, misconduct, or other specified triggers
- Clawbacks aim to discourage executives from engaging in fraudulent or unethical behavior and to align their interests with long-term shareholder value
- The in the U.S. mandated the adoption of clawback policies for public companies, although implementation has been delayed
- Effective should be clearly defined, enforceable, and communicated to executives as part of their compensation agreements
International considerations
- Executive compensation practices vary significantly across countries due to differences in regulatory frameworks, cultural norms, and market conditions
Variations in pay practices
- The mix of compensation components (fixed vs. variable, cash vs. equity) can differ across countries based on local preferences and traditions
- In some countries (Japan, Germany), there is a greater emphasis on fixed salaries and seniority-based pay, while others (U.S., U.K.) rely more heavily on performance-based incentives
- The use of long-term incentives, such as stock options and performance shares, is more prevalent in countries with well-developed capital markets and a strong shareholder orientation
Regulatory differences
- Countries have varying levels of regulation and disclosure requirements related to executive compensation
- In the U.S., the SEC requires extensive disclosure of executive pay arrangements, while in other countries (China, Russia), disclosure requirements may be more limited
- Some countries have introduced specific regulations to curb excessive pay practices, such as the bonus cap for bankers in the European Union
- Companies operating in multiple jurisdictions must navigate complex and sometimes conflicting regulatory landscapes when designing executive compensation plans
Cultural influences
- Cultural values and norms can shape attitudes towards executive compensation and the acceptability of certain pay practices
- In more egalitarian societies (Scandinavia), large pay disparities between executives and average workers may be viewed as socially unacceptable
- Collectivist cultures (Asia) may place greater emphasis on group harmony and seniority-based rewards, while individualistic cultures (U.S.) may prioritize individual performance and achievement
- Companies must be sensitive to cultural differences when designing and communicating executive compensation plans to ensure alignment with local expectations and values
Controversies and criticisms
- Executive compensation has been a topic of intense public scrutiny and criticism, particularly in the wake of corporate scandals and growing
Excessive pay levels
- Critics argue that executive pay has grown disproportionately compared to average worker wages, contributing to widening income gaps and social inequality
- High-profile cases of executives receiving outsized pay packages despite poor company performance have fueled public outrage and calls for reform
- Concerns have been raised about the potential for excessive pay to incentivize short-term risk-taking and undermine long-term value creation
- Policymakers and investors have advocated for greater transparency, accountability, and alignment between executive pay and company performance
Pay for performance debate
- There is ongoing debate about the effectiveness of models in aligning executive interests with shareholder value
- Some studies have found weak or inconsistent relationships between executive pay and company performance, suggesting that other factors may influence compensation levels
- Critics argue that performance targets can be manipulated or set too low, allowing executives to receive generous payouts even when company performance is subpar
- Proponents contend that well-designed pay-for-performance plans can effectively motivate executives and drive long-term value creation, but careful target setting and monitoring are essential
Shareholder activism
- Shareholder activists have increasingly targeted executive compensation practices as a key area for corporate governance reform
- Activist investors may use public campaigns, proxy battles, or engagement with management to push for changes in executive pay arrangements
- Common demands include greater transparency, stronger pay-for-performance alignment, and more rigorous performance targets
- Companies must be prepared to engage constructively with shareholders on compensation issues and demonstrate responsiveness to valid concerns while balancing the need to attract and retain top talent
Trends and developments
- Executive compensation practices continue to evolve in response to changing business environments, regulatory developments, and stakeholder expectations
Performance-based vesting
- There is a growing trend towards the use of performance-based vesting conditions for equity awards, as opposed to traditional time-based vesting
- Performance-based vesting ties the vesting of stock options, RSUs, or performance shares to the achievement of specific performance targets (TSR, EPS growth)
- This approach aims to strengthen the link between executive pay and company performance and to ensure that rewards are earned based on measurable results
- Performance-based vesting can help align executive interests with long-term shareholder value creation, but setting appropriate targets and avoiding unintended consequences is crucial
Deferred compensation arrangements
- Deferred compensation plans allow executives to defer a portion of their income (salary, bonus, equity awards) to a later date, often retirement
- These arrangements can provide tax benefits for executives by postponing income tax liability until funds are withdrawn
- Deferred compensation plans can also serve as a retention tool by encouraging executives to remain with the company long-term to access deferred funds
- However, deferred compensation arrangements are subject to complex tax rules (IRC Section 409A in the U.S.) and must be carefully designed to ensure compliance and avoid adverse tax consequences
ESG-linked compensation
- There is growing interest in incorporating environmental, social, and governance (ESG) metrics into executive compensation plans to promote sustainable business practices
- ESG-linked compensation ties a portion of executive pay to the achievement of specific ESG targets (carbon emissions reduction, diversity and inclusion, ethical sourcing)
- This approach recognizes the importance of non-financial factors in driving long-term value creation and responds to increasing stakeholder demands for corporate responsibility
- However, measuring and verifying ESG performance can be challenging, and companies must ensure that ESG targets are meaningful, achievable, and aligned with overall business strategy
- Integrating ESG considerations into executive compensation requires careful planning, stakeholder engagement, and clear communication of the rationale and expected benefits
Key Terms to Review (19)
ASC 718: ASC 718 refers to the Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, which governs the accounting for share-based payment arrangements, specifically equity and liability awards. This standard requires companies to recognize the cost of share-based compensation in their financial statements, impacting executive compensation structures significantly by ensuring transparency in how these costs are reported.
Bonus: A bonus is a financial incentive given to employees, often based on performance, to encourage and reward exceptional work. In the context of executive compensation, bonuses can significantly influence the overall pay package for top executives, aligning their interests with the company's performance and shareholder value. This type of compensation can take various forms, including cash, stock options, or other financial rewards.
CEO Pay Study: A CEO pay study analyzes the compensation packages of chief executive officers, examining the components such as salary, bonuses, stock options, and other benefits. This type of study often compares CEO compensation across various companies and industries to assess trends, disparities, and the alignment of pay with company performance. It helps stakeholders understand how executive compensation correlates with corporate governance, performance metrics, and investor expectations.
Clawback provisions: Clawback provisions are contractual agreements that allow a company to reclaim compensation already paid to executives or employees under certain conditions. These conditions typically arise from misconduct, financial restatements, or failure to meet performance targets. The purpose of these provisions is to promote accountability and ethical behavior in executive compensation practices.
Compensation committees: Compensation committees are specialized groups within a company's board of directors responsible for determining and overseeing executive compensation packages. They play a critical role in aligning the interests of executives with those of shareholders, ensuring that compensation is tied to performance and strategic goals. By evaluating salary structures, bonuses, and other incentives, these committees help maintain transparency and accountability in the decision-making process regarding executive pay.
Dodd-Frank Act: The Dodd-Frank Act is a comprehensive piece of financial reform legislation enacted in 2010 in response to the 2008 financial crisis. Its primary aim is to increase transparency in the financial system, protect consumers, and prevent future economic collapses by regulating financial institutions and enhancing oversight of financial markets.
Executive pay gap: The executive pay gap refers to the significant disparity between the compensation of top executives and the average pay of their employees within an organization. This gap often highlights the increasing trend of high salaries, bonuses, and stock options awarded to executives, while employee wages have not kept pace with these increases. The concept raises important questions about equity, company performance, and the broader implications for income inequality in society.
IFRS 2: IFRS 2 is an international financial reporting standard that governs the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the costs incurred when an entity receives goods or services in exchange for equity instruments. This standard aims to provide transparency and consistency in the recognition of expenses related to share-based payments, thereby impacting executive compensation strategies and their financial implications.
Income inequality: Income inequality refers to the unequal distribution of income within a population, where a small percentage of people hold a large share of total income while others earn significantly less. This disparity can create social and economic tensions, leading to debates about fairness and justice in economic systems. Understanding income inequality is essential as it impacts economic growth, social mobility, and the overall quality of life for individuals in society.
Pay ratio disclosure rules: Pay ratio disclosure rules require publicly traded companies to disclose the ratio of their CEO's compensation to the median compensation of their employees. This regulation aims to provide transparency in executive pay and to help shareholders and the public understand income inequality within organizations.
Pay-for-performance: Pay-for-performance is a compensation strategy where employees' salaries and bonuses are directly linked to their individual or organizational performance. This approach aims to motivate employees to achieve higher levels of productivity and align their goals with those of the organization. By connecting pay to performance metrics, organizations hope to attract, retain, and encourage high-performing talent while driving overall business success.
Performance shares: Performance shares are a form of equity compensation awarded to executives and employees based on the achievement of specific performance targets over a set period. These shares align the interests of the executives with those of the company's shareholders, as they typically vest only when predetermined performance metrics, such as earnings growth or total shareholder return, are met. This type of compensation encourages executives to focus on long-term value creation and aligns their goals with the overall financial health of the company.
Proxy Statements: Proxy statements are formal documents that companies provide to their shareholders, which contain important information about matters that will be voted on at the company's annual or special meetings. These statements are crucial for shareholder engagement, as they outline executive compensation packages, board member nominations, and other significant corporate actions requiring shareholder approval.
Return on Equity (ROE): Return on Equity (ROE) is a financial performance measure that calculates how effectively a company uses its equity to generate profits. It is expressed as a percentage and indicates the return that shareholders can expect on their investment in the company. A higher ROE signifies greater efficiency in managing equity, often making it an important metric for assessing a company's financial health and management performance.
Salary: A salary is a fixed regular payment made by an employer to an employee, typically expressed on an annual basis, and is often associated with professional roles or positions of responsibility. Unlike hourly wages, salaries are not directly tied to the number of hours worked, which can provide employees with a sense of financial stability. Salaries often come with additional benefits and may be influenced by factors like job performance, experience, and market demand.
Say on Pay: Say on Pay refers to a corporate governance mechanism that gives shareholders the right to vote on the compensation packages of top executives. This process allows shareholders to express their opinions on executive pay, which can influence corporate decisions and promote transparency in compensation practices. Say on Pay is typically conducted through non-binding votes at annual shareholder meetings, providing a way for investors to hold companies accountable for their executive compensation policies.
Stakeholder Theory: Stakeholder theory is a framework that posits that the interests of all stakeholders in a business, including employees, customers, suppliers, communities, and shareholders, should be considered in decision-making processes. This theory emphasizes the interconnectedness of stakeholders and suggests that businesses have a responsibility to balance these interests to achieve long-term sustainability and success.
Stock options: Stock options are contracts that give an employee the right, but not the obligation, to buy shares of the company's stock at a predetermined price within a specified period. They serve as a key component of executive compensation, aligning the interests of executives with those of shareholders by providing a potential financial reward tied to the company's performance.
Total Shareholder Return (TSR): Total Shareholder Return (TSR) is a financial performance metric that reflects the total return an investor receives from owning a company's stock over a specified period. It combines both capital gains and dividends paid to shareholders, providing a comprehensive measure of investment performance and the effectiveness of management in maximizing shareholder value. TSR is often used as a benchmark for evaluating executive compensation plans, as it aligns the interests of executives with those of shareholders.