scoresvideos
Indian Philosophy
Table of Contents

🦚indian philosophy review

1.3 Classification of Indian philosophical schools (Astika and Nastika)

Citation:

Indian philosophy is divided into Astika and Nastika schools. Astika schools accept Vedic authority, while Nastika schools reject it. This classification reflects the diversity of thought in ancient India and the central role of the Vedas in shaping philosophical discourse.

The Astika-Nastika divide goes beyond mere acceptance of scripture. It encompasses differing views on key concepts like atman, karma, and moksha. This classification helps us understand the rich tapestry of Indian philosophical thought and its evolution over time.

Astika vs Nastika Schools

Definition and Authority

  • Astika schools accept Vedic authority while Nastika schools reject or do not rely on it
  • Astika means "there is, there exists" in Sanskrit indicating belief in soul and afterlife
  • Nastika means "there is not, there does not exist"
  • Classification based on acceptance or rejection of Vedic authority rather than belief in God
  • Astika schools considered orthodox within Hindu tradition
  • Nastika schools viewed as heterodox or non-conformist

Key Concepts

  • Astika schools generally accept atman (self), karma, and moksha
  • Nastika schools may reject or reinterpret these concepts
  • Atman refers to the eternal soul or self in Hindu philosophy
  • Karma denotes the principle of cause and effect governing actions and their consequences
  • Moksha signifies liberation from the cycle of rebirth and suffering

Examples and Distinctions

  • Astika example Samkhya accepts atman but posits dualistic reality of Purusha (consciousness) and Prakriti (matter)
  • Nastika example Buddhism denies eternal self (anatta) but accepts karma and nirvana (similar to moksha)
  • Astika schools often incorporate theistic elements (Vedanta's concept of Brahman)
  • Nastika schools like Charvaka embrace materialism and reject supernatural entities

Astika and Nastika Schools

Major Astika Schools

  • Six main Astika schools known as Shad Darshanas
    • Samkhya emphasizes dualism of Purusha and Prakriti
    • Yoga focuses on meditation and control of mind
    • Nyaya specializes in logic and epistemology
    • Vaisheshika proposes atomic theory and categorization of reality
    • Mimamsa concentrates on proper interpretation of Vedic rituals
    • Vedanta explores nature of ultimate reality (Brahman)
  • Each school has sub-schools and interpretations developed over time
    • Vedanta includes Advaita (non-dualism), Vishishtadvaita (qualified non-dualism), and Dvaita (dualism)

Major Nastika Schools

  • Primary Nastika schools include Buddhism, Jainism, and Charvaka
  • Some scholars include Ajivika as fourth major Nastika school
  • Buddhism founded by Siddhartha Gautama emphasizes Four Noble Truths and Eightfold Path
  • Jainism focuses on non-violence (ahimsa) and self-discipline
  • Charvaka (also known as Lokayata) promotes materialism and skepticism
  • Ajivika taught determinism and cosmic order

Classification Variations

  • Classification of schools may vary among different scholars and traditions
  • Some consider Yoga as part of Samkhya rather than separate school
  • Debates exist about including certain schools like Shaivism or Tantra in classification
  • Modern scholars sometimes critique traditional classification as oversimplification

Tenets of Astika and Nastika Schools

Epistemological Approaches

  • Schools differ in acceptance of pramanas (means of valid knowledge)
  • Nyaya accepts four pramanas perception, inference, comparison, and testimony
  • Charvaka only accepts perception as valid means of knowledge
  • Buddhism recognizes perception and inference as primary pramanas
  • Mimamsa adds verbal testimony (shabda) as crucial pramana for understanding Vedas

Metaphysical Views

  • Significant differences regarding nature of reality and existence of supreme being
  • Samkhya posits dualistic reality of Purusha (consciousness) and Prakriti (matter)
  • Advaita Vedanta proposes non-dualistic Brahman as ultimate reality
  • Buddhism teaches concept of emptiness (shunyata) and dependent origination
  • Jainism presents theory of multiple aspects of reality (anekantavada)

Ethical and Soteriological Goals

  • Various paths proposed for liberation or enlightenment
  • Yoga emphasizes meditation and control of mind through eight-limbed path (ashtanga yoga)
  • Mimamsa focuses on correct performance of Vedic rituals for dharma
  • Buddhism teaches Noble Eightfold Path for achieving nirvana
  • Jainism promotes rigorous asceticism and non-violence for liberation of soul

Significance of Astika-Nastika Classification

Historical Context

  • Provides framework for understanding diverse philosophical landscape of ancient and medieval India
  • Reflects central importance of Vedas in Indian intellectual history
  • Showcases responses to Vedic authority ranging from acceptance to rejection
  • Highlights dynamic nature of Indian philosophy demonstrating continuity and change in thought

Philosophical Development

  • Interaction and debates between Astika and Nastika schools refined philosophical arguments
  • Contributed to development of key concepts like karma, moksha, and nature of reality
  • Stimulated critical thinking and logical analysis across different traditions
  • Led to creation of sophisticated systems of logic and epistemology (Nyaya and Buddhist logic)

Social and Cultural Impact

  • Influenced social and religious structures of Indian society
  • Determined acceptance or rejection of ideas within mainstream Hinduism
  • Shaped development of various religious and philosophical movements
  • Impacted artistic and literary traditions reflecting philosophical themes

Modern Perspectives

  • Crucial for comprehending historical development of Indian philosophical schools
  • Helps understand interconnections and shared concepts among various traditions
  • Some modern scholars critique classification as oversimplifying complex relationships
  • Remains important framework for studying Indian philosophy while acknowledging limitations