3.1 Parallel algorithms design principles

Parallel algorithm design principles are crucial for harnessing the power of modern computing systems. These principles guide developers in creating efficient, scalable solutions that can tackle complex problems by distributing work across multiple processors.

This topic explores key concepts like problem decomposition, load balancing, and communication optimization. Understanding these principles helps developers create algorithms that maximize performance and resource utilization in parallel computing environments.

Decomposition of problems

• Decomposition involves breaking down a large problem into smaller, more manageable subproblems that can be solved independently or with minimal dependencies
• Effective decomposition is crucial for designing efficient parallel algorithms as it enables the distribution of work across multiple processing elements and minimizes communication overhead
• The choice of decomposition strategy depends on the characteristics of the problem, such as data dependencies, communication patterns, and computational requirements

Domain vs functional decomposition

Top images from around the web for Domain vs functional decomposition

• 

  Introduction to parallel & distributed algorithms View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | AI Meets Exascale Computing: Advancing Cancer Research With Large-Scale High ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Study on the calculational framework development of the advanced numerical reactor ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Introduction to parallel & distributed algorithms View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | AI Meets Exascale Computing: Advancing Cancer Research With Large-Scale High ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Domain vs functional decomposition

• 

  Introduction to parallel & distributed algorithms View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | AI Meets Exascale Computing: Advancing Cancer Research With Large-Scale High ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Study on the calculational framework development of the advanced numerical reactor ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Introduction to parallel & distributed algorithms View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | AI Meets Exascale Computing: Advancing Cancer Research With Large-Scale High ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Domain decomposition partitions the problem based on the input data, dividing it into smaller subdomains that can be processed independently (spatial decomposition in computational fluid dynamics)
• Functional decomposition breaks down the problem based on the tasks or operations to be performed, assigning different functions to different processing elements (pipeline stages in video encoding)
• Domain decomposition is suitable for problems with regular data structures and localized dependencies, while functional decomposition is beneficial for problems with distinct computational stages or tasks

Data dependencies

• Data dependencies occur when the computation of one subproblem depends on the results of another subproblem, requiring communication or synchronization between processing elements
• Identifying and analyzing data dependencies is crucial for determining the parallelization potential and designing efficient parallel algorithms
• Dependencies can be classified as true dependencies (read-after-write), anti-dependencies (write-after-read), or output dependencies (write-after-write)
• Minimizing data dependencies through careful decomposition and data partitioning can reduce communication overhead and improve parallel performance

Communication vs computation

• Parallel algorithms involve a trade-off between communication and computation, as communication between processing elements introduces overhead and can limit scalability
• Minimizing communication and maximizing computation per processing element is essential for achieving high parallel efficiency
• Communication-to-computation ratio is a key metric for evaluating the balance between communication and computation in a parallel algorithm
• Techniques such as data replication, ghost cells, and communication hiding can be employed to reduce communication overhead and overlap communication with computation

Parallel algorithm paradigms

• Parallel algorithm paradigms provide high-level strategies and approaches for designing parallel algorithms based on common patterns and characteristics
• These paradigms offer a structured way to think about parallelism and guide the development of efficient parallel algorithms for various problem domains
• Understanding and applying appropriate parallel algorithm paradigms is crucial for designing scalable and performant parallel solutions

Divide and conquer

• Divide and conquer is a paradigm that recursively divides a problem into smaller subproblems, solves them independently, and then combines the results to obtain the final solution (merge sort, quick sort)
• It is well-suited for problems that exhibit a recursive structure and can be efficiently divided into subproblems of similar size
• Divide and conquer algorithms often exhibit good load balancing and can be easily parallelized by assigning subproblems to different processing elements
• The efficiency of divide and conquer algorithms depends on the cost of dividing the problem, solving the subproblems, and combining the results

Recursive vs iterative approaches

• Recursive approaches express the solution to a problem in terms of smaller instances of the same problem, using recursive function calls (depth-first search, quicksort)
• Iterative approaches solve a problem by repeatedly applying a set of operations until a certain condition is met, using loops or iterations (breadth-first search, bubble sort)
• Recursive algorithms can be more concise and easier to understand, but they may incur additional overhead due to function calls and stack management
• Iterative algorithms often have better performance and are more memory-efficient, but they may require more complex control flow and data structures
• The choice between recursive and iterative approaches depends on the problem characteristics, available resources, and performance requirements

Speculative execution

• Speculative execution is a technique where tasks are executed optimistically before their dependencies are fully resolved, with the assumption that the dependencies will be satisfied (branch prediction, thread-level speculation)
• It allows for better utilization of processing elements by overlapping the execution of tasks that may have unresolved dependencies
• Speculative execution requires mechanisms to detect and handle dependency violations, such as rollback or commit protocols
• It is particularly useful in scenarios with unpredictable or complex dependencies, where waiting for all dependencies to be resolved can lead to significant idle time

Nondeterministic algorithms

• Nondeterministic algorithms introduce randomness or probabilistic decisions into the computation, leading to different execution paths or results across runs (Monte Carlo methods, simulated annealing)
• They are often used for problems with large search spaces or when exact solutions are computationally expensive or infeasible
• Nondeterministic algorithms can explore multiple solutions in parallel and converge towards good approximate solutions
• Ensuring the correctness and reproducibility of nondeterministic algorithms requires careful design and analysis, as well as statistical techniques for result validation

Load balancing techniques

• Load balancing aims to distribute the workload evenly across processing elements to maximize resource utilization and minimize idle time
• Effective load balancing is crucial for achieving high parallel efficiency and scalability, especially in the presence of heterogeneous or dynamic workloads
• Load balancing techniques can be classified based on various criteria, such as static vs dynamic, centralized vs distributed, and data-driven vs task-driven approaches

Static vs dynamic partitioning

• Static partitioning assigns tasks or data to processing elements before the execution begins, based on a predetermined distribution scheme (block distribution, cyclic distribution)
• Dynamic partitioning adjusts the workload distribution during runtime based on the actual performance and load of processing elements (work stealing, load shedding)
• Static partitioning is simpler to implement and has lower runtime overhead, but it may lead to load imbalance if the workload is not known a priori or varies over time
• Dynamic partitioning can adapt to changing workload characteristics and achieve better load balance, but it incurs additional overhead for monitoring and redistribution

Centralized vs distributed strategies

• Centralized load balancing strategies rely on a central entity (master node, load balancer) to collect workload information and make load balancing decisions
• Distributed load balancing strategies allow processing elements to make local decisions based on their own workload and the workload of their neighbors (diffusive load balancing, hierarchical load balancing)
• Centralized strategies provide a global view of the system and can make informed load balancing decisions, but they may suffer from scalability limitations and single points of failure
• Distributed strategies are more scalable and fault-tolerant, but they may require more complex coordination and may not achieve optimal load balance due to limited local information

Data-driven vs task-driven methods

• Data-driven load balancing methods distribute the workload based on the partitioning and distribution of input data across processing elements (domain decomposition, data parallelism)
• Task-driven load balancing methods assign tasks or computations to processing elements based on their availability and capabilities (task pools, work queues)
• Data-driven methods are suitable for problems with regular data structures and localized dependencies, where the workload can be easily partitioned based on data
• Task-driven methods are more flexible and can handle irregular or dynamic workloads, where tasks may have different computational requirements or dependencies

Data locality optimization

• Data locality refers to the proximity of data accessed by a computation to the processing element performing the computation
• Exploiting data locality is crucial for achieving high performance in parallel algorithms, as it minimizes data movement and reduces communication overhead
• Data locality optimization techniques aim to improve the spatial and temporal locality of data accesses and reduce cache misses and memory latency

Temporal vs spatial locality

• Temporal locality refers to the reuse of recently accessed data items, where a data item is likely to be accessed again in the near future (loop iteration variables, frequently used data structures)
• Spatial locality refers to the proximity of data items accessed together, where accessing one data item increases the likelihood of accessing nearby data items (array elements, struct members)
• Improving temporal locality involves techniques such as loop tiling, data reuse, and cache-conscious algorithms that maximize the reuse of data in cache
• Improving spatial locality involves techniques such as data layout transformations, array of structs (AoS) to struct of arrays (SoA) conversion, and cache line alignment

Data layout transformations

• Data layout transformations involve modifying the organization and arrangement of data in memory to improve spatial locality and cache utilization
• Common data layout transformations include array padding, structure splitting, and data transposition
• Array padding adds unused elements between array elements to avoid cache line sharing and false sharing, improving cache utilization and reducing contention
• Structure splitting separates frequently accessed fields from rarely accessed fields, allowing better cache utilization and reducing memory bandwidth
• Data transposition rearranges multi-dimensional arrays to improve access patterns and optimize for cache line utilization

Cache-oblivious algorithms

• Cache-oblivious algorithms are designed to achieve good cache performance without explicit knowledge of cache parameters, such as cache size and line size
• They rely on recursive divide-and-conquer approaches and self-similar memory access patterns to automatically exploit locality at multiple levels of the memory hierarchy
• Cache-oblivious algorithms are portable across different cache architectures and do not require platform-specific tuning
• Examples of cache-oblivious algorithms include cache-oblivious matrix multiplication, cache-oblivious sorting, and cache-oblivious search trees

Synchronization mechanisms

• Synchronization mechanisms are used to coordinate the execution of parallel tasks and ensure the correctness of shared data accesses
• They are necessary to prevent data races, maintain data consistency, and enforce ordering constraints between parallel operations
• Synchronization introduces overhead and can impact the performance and scalability of parallel algorithms, so it should be used judiciously and efficiently

Barrier vs point-to-point synchronization

• Barrier synchronization is a collective operation that requires all participating threads or processes to reach a specific point before proceeding further (global barrier, phase barrier)
• Point-to-point synchronization involves synchronization between pairs of threads or processes, typically using primitives like locks, semaphores, or message passing (pairwise synchronization, producer-consumer synchronization)
• Barrier synchronization is useful for dividing parallel execution into distinct phases or ensuring global consistency at specific points
• Point-to-point synchronization is more fine-grained and allows for more localized coordination between specific threads or processes

Lock-based vs lock-free synchronization

• Lock-based synchronization uses locks (mutexes, spinlocks) to protect shared data and ensure exclusive access by a single thread at a time
• Lock-free synchronization avoids the use of locks and instead relies on atomic operations and clever data structures to achieve synchronization (compare-and-swap, load-linked/store-conditional)
• Lock-based synchronization is simpler to reason about and ensures strict mutual exclusion, but it can suffer from lock contention, deadlocks, and priority inversion
• Lock-free synchronization can provide better scalability and progress guarantees, but it is more complex to design and implement correctly and may have higher overhead for small critical sections

Implicit vs explicit synchronization

• Implicit synchronization is achieved through language constructs or runtime mechanisms that automatically handle synchronization on behalf of the programmer (parallel loops, synchronized methods)
• Explicit synchronization requires the programmer to manually insert synchronization primitives (locks, barriers) to coordinate parallel execution
• Implicit synchronization is easier to use and less error-prone, as the programmer does not need to worry about the details of synchronization
• Explicit synchronization provides more control and flexibility to the programmer, allowing for fine-grained synchronization and optimization
• The choice between implicit and explicit synchronization depends on the programming model, language support, and the specific requirements of the parallel algorithm

Communication optimization

• Communication optimization aims to minimize the overhead and latency of data movement between processing elements in parallel algorithms
• Efficient communication is crucial for achieving high performance and scalability, especially in distributed memory systems and large-scale parallel applications
• Communication optimization techniques focus on reducing the volume and frequency of communication, overlapping communication with computation, and exploiting the characteristics of the communication network

Latency vs bandwidth considerations

• Latency refers to the time taken for a message to travel from the source to the destination, including the time for initiating the communication and propagating the message through the network
• Bandwidth refers to the amount of data that can be transferred per unit time, determining the maximum throughput of the communication channel
• Latency-sensitive applications require minimizing the number of communication operations and the distance traveled by messages, using techniques like message aggregation and topology-aware mapping
• Bandwidth-sensitive applications require maximizing the utilization of available bandwidth, using techniques like message pipelining, data compression, and communication scheduling

Message aggregation

• Message aggregation involves combining multiple small messages into fewer larger messages to amortize the overhead of communication and reduce the number of communication operations
• It is particularly effective in reducing the impact of communication latency, as the cost of initiating a communication operation is incurred once for the aggregated message
• Message aggregation can be achieved through techniques like message coalescing, message batching, and collective communication operations (gather, scatter, reduce)
• The effectiveness of message aggregation depends on the trade-off between the reduced communication overhead and the additional memory and computation required for aggregation

Overlapping communication and computation

• Overlapping communication and computation involves strategically arranging the communication and computation operations to minimize idle time and maximize resource utilization
• It allows processing elements to perform useful computation while communication operations are in progress, hiding the latency of communication
• Techniques for overlapping communication and computation include non-blocking communication, asynchronous communication, and double buffering
• Non-blocking communication allows the initiation of communication operations without waiting for their completion, enabling the overlap of communication with computation
• Asynchronous communication uses separate communication threads or hardware support to handle communication operations independently of the computation threads
• Double buffering uses multiple buffers to alternate between communication and computation, allowing one buffer to be used for communication while the other is used for computation

Scalability analysis

• Scalability analysis evaluates the ability of a parallel algorithm or system to handle increasing problem sizes and numbers of processing elements efficiently
• It helps in understanding the performance characteristics, limitations, and potential bottlenecks of parallel algorithms and guides the design and optimization decisions
• Scalability analysis involves measuring and modeling the performance metrics, such as speedup, efficiency, and scalability, under different scaling scenarios

Strong vs weak scaling

• Strong scaling refers to the ability of a parallel algorithm to solve a fixed-size problem faster by increasing the number of processing elements
• Weak scaling refers to the ability of a parallel algorithm to solve larger problems by increasing both the problem size and the number of processing elements proportionally
• Strong scaling is limited by the sequential portion of the algorithm and the overhead of communication and synchronization, as described by Amdahl's law
• Weak scaling is affected by the ability to maintain a constant workload per processing element and the efficiency of communication and load balancing, as described by Gustafson's law

Amdahl's law

• Amdahl's law states that the speedup of a parallel algorithm is limited by the sequential portion of the algorithm that cannot be parallelized
• It provides an upper bound on the speedup that can be achieved by parallelization, given the fraction of the algorithm that must be executed sequentially
• The speedup according to Amdahl's law is given by: $Speedup = \frac{1}{(1-P) + \frac{P}{N}}$, where $P$ is the fraction of the algorithm that can be parallelized and $N$ is the number of processing elements
• Amdahl's law emphasizes the importance of identifying and minimizing the sequential portions of an algorithm to achieve better scalability

Gustafson's law

• Gustafson's law provides an alternative view of scalability, focusing on the ability to solve larger problems with more processing elements
• It states that the speedup of a parallel algorithm can scale linearly with the number of processing elements if the problem size is increased proportionally
• The scaled speedup according to Gustafson's law is given by: $Scaled Speedup = N + (1-N)s$, where $N$ is the number of processing elements and $s$ is the fraction of the algorithm that must be executed sequentially
• Gustafson's law suggests that parallel algorithms can achieve good scalability by exploiting the additional computational power to solve larger problems

Performance modeling

• Performance modeling involves developing mathematical or computational models to predict and analyze the performance of parallel algorithms and systems
• It helps in understanding the behavior, identifying bottlenecks, and guiding the optimization and tuning of parallel algorithms
• Performance models can be classified into analytical models, which use mathematical equations and abstractions, and empirical models, which are based on measurements and observations

Analytical vs empirical models

• Analytical models use mathematical equations and theoretical analysis to predict the performance of parallel algorithms based on system parameters and algorithm characteristics
• Empirical models are based on actual measurements and observations of the performance of parallel algorithms on real systems or simulations
• Analytical models provide insights into the fundamental behavior and scaling properties of parallel algorithms, but they may make simplifying assumptions and may not capture all the complexities of real systems
• Empirical models are more accurate and reflect the actual performance characteristics of parallel algorithms, but they require extensive measurements and may be specific to a particular system or configuration

Roofline model

• The roofline model is an analytical performance model that provides an upper bound on the performance of a parallel algorithm based on the balance between computation and memory bandwidth
• It plots the performance (in FLOPS) against the arithmetic intensity (FLOPS per byte of memory traffic) and shows the maximum attainable performance for a given memory bandwidth and peak computational performance
• The roofline model helps in identifying whether a parallel algorithm is compute-bound or memory-bound and guides optimization efforts towards the most critical resource
• It provides insights into the potential performance improvements that can be achieved by increasing computational intensity or memory bandwidth

LogP model

• The LogP model is an analytical performance model that captures the key parameters affecting the performance of message-passing parallel systems
• It considers four parameters: L (latency), o (overhead), g (gap), and P (number of processors), which represent the communication and computation characteristics of the system
• The LogP model provides a simple yet effective way to analyze and predict the performance of parallel algorithms on message-passing systems