3.4 Derandomized evolution strategies

Derandomized evolution strategies are advanced evolutionary algorithms that optimize continuous, non-linear problems. They enhance traditional methods by incorporating deterministic elements, improving performance and adaptability for complex optimization tasks.

These strategies systematically remove stochastic elements while maintaining adaptive capabilities. They aim to boost convergence speed and solution quality by using information from previous generations and deterministic update rules to adjust strategy parameters.

Overview of derandomized evolution

• Derandomized evolution strategies represent an advanced class of evolutionary algorithms designed to optimize continuous, non-linear problems
• These strategies enhance traditional evolution strategies by incorporating deterministic elements to guide the search process more efficiently
• In the context of evolutionary and genetic algorithms, derandomized evolution strategies offer improved performance and adaptability for complex optimization tasks

Definition and purpose

Top images from around the web for Definition and purpose

• 

  Frontiers | Achieving Operational Excellence Through Artificial Intelligence: Driving Forces and ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Ansoff matrix - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  A Principal's Reflections: July 2016 View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Achieving Operational Excellence Through Artificial Intelligence: Driving Forces and ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Ansoff matrix - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Definition and purpose

• 

  Frontiers | Achieving Operational Excellence Through Artificial Intelligence: Driving Forces and ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Ansoff matrix - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  A Principal's Reflections: July 2016 View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Achieving Operational Excellence Through Artificial Intelligence: Driving Forces and ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Ansoff matrix - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Systematic approach to remove stochastic elements from evolution strategies while maintaining their adaptive capabilities
• Aims to improve convergence speed and solution quality by leveraging information from previous generations
• Utilizes deterministic update rules to adjust strategy parameters based on the evolutionary path

Historical development

• Originated in the 1990s as an extension of traditional evolution strategies
• Introduced by Ingo Rechenberg and Hans-Paul Schwefel to address limitations of purely random mutation operators
• Evolved through contributions from researchers like Nikolaus Hansen, who developed the Covariance Matrix Adaptation Evolution Strategy (CMA-ES)

Core components

• Derandomized evolution strategies integrate sophisticated mechanisms to guide the evolutionary process effectively
• These components work together to adapt the search distribution and control the exploration-exploitation balance
• Understanding these core elements provides insight into how derandomized evolution strategies outperform traditional methods

Covariance matrix adaptation

• Adapts the shape and orientation of the search distribution to the fitness landscape
• Updates the covariance matrix based on successful mutations from previous generations
• Enables efficient exploration of the search space by aligning with the problem structure

Step size control

• Dynamically adjusts the overall scale of mutations to balance exploration and exploitation
• Utilizes information about the evolutionary path to increase or decrease step sizes
• Prevents premature convergence and allows for rapid progress in promising directions

Selection mechanisms

• Determines which individuals survive and reproduce in each generation
• Includes strategies like (μ, λ)-selection and (μ + λ)-selection
• Balances selection pressure with population diversity to maintain evolutionary progress

Derandomization techniques

• Derandomization techniques form the core of these advanced evolution strategies
• These methods replace random elements with deterministic update rules based on accumulated information
• By leveraging historical data, these techniques improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the evolutionary process

Cumulative step size adaptation

• Tracks the evolutionary path to adjust the overall step size
• Compares the actual path length to the expected path length under random selection
• Increases step size when progress is faster than expected and decreases it when progress is slower

Rank-one update

• Updates the covariance matrix using information from a single outstanding individual
• Emphasizes the direction of successful steps to shape the search distribution
• Allows for rapid adaptation to the local fitness landscape

Rank-mu update

• Incorporates information from multiple individuals to update the covariance matrix
• Considers the weighted average of successful steps from the top μ individuals
• Provides a more robust update mechanism, especially for larger population sizes

Advantages over standard ES

• Derandomized evolution strategies offer significant improvements over traditional evolution strategies
• These advantages stem from their ability to adapt more efficiently to the problem structure
• Understanding these benefits helps explain why derandomized approaches are often preferred for complex optimization tasks

Improved convergence speed

• Achieves faster progress towards optimal solutions by leveraging information from previous generations
• Reduces the number of function evaluations required to reach a given solution quality
• Particularly effective for problems with a clear global structure or smooth fitness landscapes

Robustness to noise

• Maintains performance in the presence of noisy fitness evaluations
• Utilizes information from multiple individuals to mitigate the impact of noise
• Adapts search parameters based on long-term trends rather than short-term fluctuations

Self-adaptation capabilities

• Automatically adjusts strategy parameters without requiring manual tuning
• Adapts to changes in the fitness landscape during the optimization process
• Reduces the need for problem-specific parameter settings, making the algorithm more versatile

Applications

• Derandomized evolution strategies find use in a wide range of optimization problems
• Their ability to handle complex, non-linear problems makes them valuable in various fields
• These applications showcase the versatility and effectiveness of derandomized evolution strategies

Continuous optimization problems

• Solves high-dimensional, non-convex optimization tasks in engineering and science
• Optimizes parameters in complex systems (aircraft design, chemical processes)
• Finds optimal solutions for mathematical functions with multiple local optima

Machine learning tasks

• Tunes hyperparameters of machine learning models (neural networks, support vector machines)
• Optimizes feature selection and extraction in data preprocessing
• Trains reinforcement learning agents in continuous action spaces

Engineering design

• Optimizes structural designs for improved performance and efficiency (bridge designs, aerospace structures)
• Develops optimal control strategies for robotics and autonomous systems
• Solves inverse problems in various engineering disciplines (electromagnetics, acoustics)

Algorithm variants

• Several variants of derandomized evolution strategies have been developed to address specific challenges
• These variants build upon the core principles while introducing unique features or modifications
• Understanding these variants helps in selecting the most appropriate algorithm for a given problem

CMA-ES vs CSA-ES

• CMA-ES (Covariance Matrix Adaptation Evolution Strategy) adapts both step size and covariance matrix
• CSA-ES (Cumulative Step-size Adaptation Evolution Strategy) focuses primarily on step size adaptation
• CMA-ES generally performs better on complex problems, while CSA-ES can be more efficient for simpler tasks

(1+1)-CMA-ES

• Simplified version of CMA-ES using only one parent and one offspring per generation
• Suitable for low-dimensional problems or when function evaluations are computationally expensive
• Incorporates a success-based step size adaptation mechanism

Active CMA-ES

• Extends CMA-ES by actively decreasing the variance in unpromising directions
• Utilizes information from both successful and unsuccessful mutations
• Improves performance on problems with negative correlations between variables

Implementation considerations

• Successful implementation of derandomized evolution strategies requires attention to several key factors
• These considerations impact the algorithm's performance and efficiency
• Proper implementation ensures that the algorithm can effectively solve the target optimization problem

Parameter tuning

• Adjusts population size, selection pressure, and initial step size based on problem characteristics
• Balances exploration and exploitation through careful parameter selection
• Utilizes default parameter settings provided by algorithm developers as starting points

Initialization strategies

• Selects appropriate initial population distribution to cover the search space effectively
• Considers problem-specific knowledge to guide initial population generation
• Implements restart strategies to escape local optima and improve global search capabilities

Termination criteria

• Defines stopping conditions based on convergence metrics or computational budget
• Monitors progress to detect stagnation or sufficient improvement
• Implements adaptive termination criteria that adjust based on the optimization progress

Performance analysis

• Evaluating the performance of derandomized evolution strategies is crucial for understanding their effectiveness
• Performance analysis helps in comparing different algorithms and selecting the most suitable approach
• These analyses provide insights into the strengths and limitations of derandomized evolution strategies

Convergence properties

• Studies the rate at which the algorithm approaches optimal solutions
• Analyzes the impact of problem characteristics on convergence behavior
• Investigates the ability to escape local optima and find global optimal solutions

Scaling with problem dimension

• Examines how algorithm performance changes as the number of decision variables increases
• Compares the scalability of derandomized evolution strategies to other optimization methods
• Identifies limitations and challenges in high-dimensional optimization problems

Comparison to other algorithms

• Benchmarks derandomized evolution strategies against traditional evolutionary algorithms
• Compares performance with other state-of-the-art optimization methods (gradient-based, Bayesian optimization)
• Analyzes trade-offs between solution quality, convergence speed, and computational requirements

Limitations and challenges

• Despite their advantages, derandomized evolution strategies face certain limitations and challenges
• Understanding these issues helps in identifying appropriate use cases and potential areas for improvement
• Researchers and practitioners should be aware of these limitations when applying these algorithms

High-dimensional problems

• Performance may degrade as the number of decision variables increases significantly
• Requires larger population sizes and more function evaluations in high-dimensional spaces
• Faces challenges in adapting the covariance matrix effectively for very high-dimensional problems

Multimodal landscapes

• May struggle to maintain population diversity in highly multimodal fitness landscapes
• Risks premature convergence to local optima in complex problem spaces
• Requires careful balancing of exploration and exploitation to handle multiple optima effectively

Computational complexity

• Incurs higher computational costs compared to simpler evolutionary algorithms
• Requires matrix operations that can become expensive for high-dimensional problems
• Faces challenges in real-time applications with strict time constraints

Future directions

• Ongoing research in derandomized evolution strategies aims to address current limitations and expand their capabilities
• These future directions represent potential areas for improvement and innovation
• Understanding these trends helps in anticipating the evolution of these algorithms and their applications

Hybrid approaches

• Combines derandomized evolution strategies with other optimization techniques (local search, machine learning)
• Integrates problem-specific knowledge to guide the search process more effectively
• Develops adaptive hybridization strategies that select appropriate methods based on the current search state

Parallel implementations

• Exploits parallel computing architectures to improve computational efficiency
• Develops distributed variants of derandomized evolution strategies for large-scale optimization
• Investigates asynchronous update mechanisms to handle heterogeneous computing environments

Theoretical advancements

• Deepens the mathematical understanding of derandomization techniques and their impact
• Develops new update rules and adaptation mechanisms based on theoretical insights
• Investigates the connections between derandomized evolution strategies and other optimization paradigms