scoresvideos
Ethics
Table of Contents
Unit 3 Overview: Ethical Theories
3.1 Deontological Ethics: Duty-Based Morality
3.2 Kant's Categorical Imperative
3.3 Rights-Based Ethical Theories
3.4 Critiques of Deontological Ethics

Rights-based ethical theories focus on fundamental human rights and the balance between individual freedoms and societal obligations. These theories explore how rights shape our moral duties and guide ethical decision-making in various contexts.

Applying rights-based approaches to real-world issues like healthcare, technology, and social justice reveals complex ethical dilemmas. Balancing competing rights and interests requires careful consideration of context, consequences, and nuanced moral reasoning.

Fundamental Human Rights

Defining and Justifying Human Rights

  • Fundamental human rights include the right to life, liberty, security, freedom from torture and inhumane treatment, freedom of expression, and the right to education
  • These rights are considered universal, inalienable, and inherent to all human beings regardless of nationality, race, religion, or other status
  • The philosophical justifications for human rights stem from various schools of thought
    • Natural rights theory argues that human rights are grounded in human dignity and the inherent worth of every individual
    • Social contract theory posits that human rights are part of the agreement between individuals and society
    • Deontological ethics emphasizes the moral duty to respect the autonomy and dignity of all persons
  • Critics argue that human rights are a Western construct that may not be applicable or relevant in all cultural contexts (collectivist societies)

International Human Rights Law and Challenges

  • The United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), adopted in 1948, outlines 30 articles detailing the fundamental rights to which all human beings are entitled
  • The UDHR serves as a foundation for international human rights law and has influenced many national constitutions and legal systems
  • Challenges of enforcing human rights include lack of political will, limited resources, and cultural resistance
  • Potential conflicts can arise between individual rights and collective interests (public health emergencies)
  • Critics point out the difficulty of universally defining and applying human rights standards across diverse societies and cultures

Rights and Duties in Ethics

The Relationship between Rights and Duties

  • Rights and duties are two sides of the same coin in ethical decision-making
  • When an individual has a right, it imposes a corresponding duty on others to respect and uphold that right (right to freedom of speech implies duty to refrain from censorship)
  • Positive rights, such as the right to education or healthcare, require active provision and resources from the state or society
  • Negative rights, such as the right to privacy or freedom from interference, require others to refrain from certain actions that would violate those rights

Balancing Competing Rights and Duties

  • Conflicts can arise when the rights of different individuals or groups come into tension with each other
  • Ethical decision-making involves carefully weighing and balancing competing rights and duties
    • Consideration of the specific context and consequences is crucial
    • Moral reasoning and judgment are required to prioritize and resolve conflicts
  • The concept of prima facie duties, developed by philosopher W.D. Ross, suggests a set of basic moral duties that should guide our actions (duty to keep promises, duty not to harm others)
  • These duties can sometimes conflict, requiring us to make difficult choices based on the particular situation (breaking a promise to help someone in urgent need)

Individual Rights vs Societal Obligations

The Challenge of Balancing Individual and Collective Interests

  • One central challenge in rights-based ethics is finding the appropriate balance between individual rights and the broader interests and obligations of society
  • Individual rights are important but not absolute; they may need to be limited in certain circumstances for the greater good
  • The concept of public interest or common good is often invoked to justify restrictions on individual rights (curtailing freedom of movement during a pandemic)
  • The principle of harm, articulated by philosopher John Stuart Mill, suggests that individual liberty can be justifiably limited to prevent harm to others (laws against drunk driving)

Conflicts between Individual Rights

  • The exercise of one person's rights may sometimes infringe upon the rights of others
    • The right to freedom of speech may conflict with the right to privacy or freedom from hate speech and discrimination
    • Property rights may come into tension with environmental protection or public access
  • Different societies and cultures may strike different balances between individual rights and collective responsibilities, reflecting their particular values and political systems
  • The ongoing debate over the appropriate scope and limits of individual rights is a central feature of democratic societies and an important task for ethical decision-making

Applying Rights Theories to Issues

Bioethics and Healthcare

  • Rights-based approaches in healthcare focus on issues such as:
    • The right to bodily autonomy and informed consent (refusal of treatment)
    • The right to access essential medicines and treatments (global health equity)
    • The right to be free from discrimination based on health status or disability
  • Case studies might include debates over mandatory vaccination, allocation of scarce medical resources, or the use of genetic information

Technology and Digital Rights

  • Rights-based theories can help navigate questions around data privacy, online speech, and the ethical implications of artificial intelligence
  • Case studies might include:
    • Controversies over the spread of misinformation on social media platforms (freedom of speech vs. public safety)
    • The use of facial recognition technology by law enforcement (privacy rights)
    • The impact of predictive algorithms on employment and credit decisions (fairness and non-discrimination)

Social and Economic Justice

  • Rights-based approaches can be applied to issues of social and economic justice, such as debates over the right to housing, education, and a living wage
  • Case studies might include:
    • Discussions of homelessness and eviction policies (right to shelter)
    • The funding and quality of public education (equal access to education)
    • The ethics of minimum wage laws and labor protections (workers' rights)

Contextual Considerations in Application

  • In applying rights-based theories to specific cases, it is important to consider the context and details of the situation
  • Competing rights and interests must be carefully weighed and balanced
  • Potential consequences of different courses of action should be taken into account
  • Ethical decision-making often requires nuanced reasoning and judgment rather than simply applying a single principle or rule
  • The use of case studies and real-world examples can illustrate the complexities and challenges of applying rights-based theories in practice

Key Terms to Review (21)

Immanuel Kant: Immanuel Kant was an influential German philosopher in the 18th century, known for his work in epistemology and ethics. His ideas emphasize the importance of reason and moral duty, establishing a foundation for deontological ethics, which focuses on adherence to rules and duties rather than consequences.
Justice: Justice is the concept of moral rightness based on ethics, law, and fairness, ensuring that individuals receive what they are due. It encompasses the pursuit of equity, accountability, and the protection of rights, playing a crucial role in societal structures and moral reasoning.
W.D. Ross: W.D. Ross was a British philosopher known for his work in ethics, particularly for his contributions to deontological ethics and rights-based ethical theories. He is famous for developing the concept of 'prima facie duties,' which are moral obligations that are binding unless they conflict with a more important duty. His theories emphasize the importance of context and the moral weight of various duties, connecting deeply with the notions of rights and obligations within moral philosophy.
Common good: The common good refers to the benefits or interests that are shared by all members of a community, promoting collective well-being and social harmony. This concept emphasizes the importance of community values, cooperation, and the responsibility of individuals to contribute towards a society that supports the welfare of everyone, rather than just their own personal interests.
Bill of Rights: The Bill of Rights is a collection of the first ten amendments to the United States Constitution that guarantees essential rights and civil liberties to individuals. It serves as a fundamental protection against governmental overreach, ensuring that certain freedoms, such as speech, religion, and assembly, are upheld. This document plays a critical role in rights-based ethical theories by providing a framework for understanding and defending individual rights within society.
John Locke: John Locke was an influential English philosopher in the 17th century, widely regarded as a foundational figure in modern political philosophy and rights-based ethical theories. He proposed the idea of natural rights, arguing that individuals possess inherent rights to life, liberty, and property that cannot be surrendered or transferred, forming the basis for individual freedom and the social contract. His thoughts on government emphasized that its legitimacy derives from the consent of the governed, which is crucial for understanding rights-based ethics.
Moral entitlement: Moral entitlement refers to the concept that individuals have certain rights or claims based on moral principles or ethical standards, which justify their actions or demands. This idea is often associated with rights-based ethical theories, where individuals are seen as deserving certain treatment or outcomes simply by virtue of their status as human beings. Understanding moral entitlement helps clarify the basis for human rights and social justice.
Natural rights theory: Natural rights theory posits that individuals possess inherent rights simply by virtue of being human, independent of any laws or social contracts. These rights are often seen as universal and inalienable, including the rights to life, liberty, and property. The theory is foundational in rights-based ethical frameworks, which emphasize the protection and respect for these natural rights as a central aspect of moral consideration.
Public interest: Public interest refers to the welfare or well-being of the general public and is often used to justify actions, policies, and laws that aim to benefit society as a whole. It emphasizes the collective good over individual interests, aligning with ethical considerations about the rights and responsibilities of individuals in relation to the community. This concept is crucial in evaluating how rights-based ethical theories approach the balance between personal freedoms and societal benefits.
Moral duty: Moral duty refers to the obligations that individuals have to act in ways that are considered right or just, often grounded in ethical principles or theories. This concept suggests that individuals are accountable for their actions and must adhere to certain moral standards, regardless of personal desires or consequences. In the context of ethical theories, moral duty becomes a foundation for understanding rights and responsibilities, influencing how people relate to one another and the decisions they make.
Negative Rights: Negative rights are those that require others, typically the government, to abstain from interfering with individual actions. They focus on freedom from interference and are often associated with civil liberties, emphasizing the protection of individual autonomy and the importance of non-interference in personal choices.
Legal rights: Legal rights are entitlements or permissions granted by a legal system to individuals or groups, which are enforceable by law. These rights can include civil rights, property rights, and human rights, and they establish the framework within which individuals can act and interact in society. Understanding legal rights is crucial as they often form the basis for moral and ethical considerations in rights-based ethical theories.
Harm principle: The harm principle is a philosophical concept that suggests individuals should be free to act however they wish unless their actions cause harm to others. This principle is foundational in rights-based ethical theories, emphasizing the importance of individual liberty while acknowledging the need for societal intervention when one's actions infringe upon the rights and well-being of others.
Positive Rights: Positive rights are entitlements that require action or provision from others, typically the state, to be fulfilled. These rights focus on ensuring individuals have access to basic needs and services, such as education, healthcare, and housing, highlighting the obligation of society to facilitate well-being and equality.
Informed Consent: Informed consent is a process through which individuals voluntarily agree to a medical or research procedure after being fully informed about the potential risks, benefits, and alternatives. This concept is foundational in respecting autonomy and ensuring that individuals have the right to make informed decisions regarding their own bodies and health care.
Social Contract Theory: Social contract theory is the philosophical concept that individuals agree to form a society and establish a government in order to protect their rights and maintain social order. This theory emphasizes the importance of mutual consent and the idea that political authority derives from the collective agreement of the governed, impacting views on justice, morality, and personal ethical frameworks.
Autonomy: Autonomy refers to the capacity and right of individuals to make informed decisions about their own lives and bodies, free from external control or interference. It emphasizes the importance of personal choice and self-determination, which are crucial in various ethical discussions around individual rights, moral responsibility, and consent.
Human Rights: Human rights are fundamental rights and freedoms that belong to every person, regardless of nationality, sex, ethnicity, religion, or any other status. These rights are universal and inherent, aiming to protect individuals from abuses and ensure their dignity. The concept is deeply linked to various ethical theories, global inequalities, and historical developments in moral philosophy.
Civil Rights: Civil rights are the fundamental rights and freedoms that protect individuals from discrimination and ensure equal treatment under the law. They encompass various legal protections, such as the right to vote, freedom of speech, and the right to privacy, ensuring that all individuals, regardless of their background or identity, are treated fairly and justly in society. These rights are crucial for maintaining social justice and equality, making them integral to discussions about human rights and ethical theories that focus on individual rights.
Deontological Ethics: Deontological ethics is a moral theory that emphasizes the importance of duty, rules, and obligations in determining the morality of actions. This approach asserts that certain actions are inherently right or wrong, regardless of their consequences, focusing on adherence to moral rules or principles as the foundation for ethical behavior.
Universal Declaration of Human Rights: The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) is a foundational international document adopted by the United Nations General Assembly in 1948, outlining the fundamental human rights that must be universally protected. It serves as a common standard for all nations, promoting the inherent dignity, equality, and rights of every individual. The UDHR addresses various aspects of human rights, highlighting the interconnectedness of political, civil, economic, social, and cultural rights that are essential for global justice and equality.