12.2 Ethical Fading and Moral Disengagement
3 min read•august 6, 2024
Ethical fading and are sneaky ways our brains justify bad behavior. We might not even realize we're doing something wrong as we slowly slide into unethical territory. It's like boiling a frog - the water heats up so gradually, we don't notice until it's too late.
These mental tricks help us avoid feeling guilty about our actions. We might use fancy words to make things sound better or convince ourselves we're doing it for a good reason. It's a slippery slope that can lead to some seriously messed up situations if we're not careful.
Ethical Fading and Moral Disengagement
Gradual Erosion of Ethical Behavior
Top images from around the web for Gradual Erosion of Ethical Behavior
What is Organizational Behavior? | Organizational Behavior and Human Relations View original
Is this image relevant?
Frontiers | How Ethical Leadership Shapes Employees’ Readiness to Change: The Mediating Role of ... View original
Is this image relevant?
Frontiers | How Upper/Middle Managers' Ethical Leadership Activates Employee Ethical Behavior ... View original
Is this image relevant?
What is Organizational Behavior? | Organizational Behavior and Human Relations View original
Is this image relevant?
Frontiers | How Ethical Leadership Shapes Employees’ Readiness to Change: The Mediating Role of ... View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Top images from around the web for Gradual Erosion of Ethical Behavior
What is Organizational Behavior? | Organizational Behavior and Human Relations View original
Is this image relevant?
Frontiers | How Ethical Leadership Shapes Employees’ Readiness to Change: The Mediating Role of ... View original
Is this image relevant?
Frontiers | How Upper/Middle Managers' Ethical Leadership Activates Employee Ethical Behavior ... View original
Is this image relevant?
What is Organizational Behavior? | Organizational Behavior and Human Relations View original
Is this image relevant?
Frontiers | How Ethical Leadership Shapes Employees’ Readiness to Change: The Mediating Role of ... View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
- Ethical fading occurs when individuals gradually engage in unethical behavior without realizing it
- Happens over time as small ethical transgressions are rationalized or ignored
- Can lead to a slippery slope where unethical behavior becomes normalized (Enron scandal)
- Individuals may not recognize the ethical implications of their actions due to the gradual nature of the process
- Ethical fading can be exacerbated by organizational culture that prioritizes profits over ethics (Wells Fargo fake accounts scandal)
Mechanisms of Moral Disengagement
- Moral disengagement involves using cognitive mechanisms to justify unethical behavior
- Allows individuals to engage in unethical acts without feeling guilty or self-condemnation
- uses language to make unethical actions seem more palatable ("creative accounting" instead of fraud)
- involves framing unethical behavior as serving a higher moral purpose (claiming helps support one's family)
- These mechanisms help individuals maintain a positive self-image while engaging in unethical conduct
- Moral disengagement can be contagious within organizations as it becomes part of the culture (Volkswagen emissions scandal)
Responsibility and Accountability
Displacing and Diffusing Responsibility
- occurs when individuals attribute their actions to external factors or authorities
- Allows individuals to avoid feeling personally responsible for unethical behavior
- Commonly seen in hierarchical organizations where people claim they were "just following orders" (Milgram obedience experiments)
- spreads accountability across a group, making individuals feel less culpable
- Occurs when multiple people are involved in an unethical act, leading to a "bystander effect" (Kitty Genovese murder case)
- Both mechanisms reduce the psychological barriers to engaging in unethical behavior
Blaming Others for Unethical Conduct
- involves assigning culpability for unethical actions to others
- Allows individuals to avoid taking responsibility for their role in unethical behavior
- May involve blaming victims, circumstances, or other external factors (claiming a sexual harassment victim was "asking for it")
- Helps individuals maintain a positive self-image by shifting blame away from themselves
- Can create a culture of finger-pointing and lack of accountability within organizations (Enron executives blaming subordinates)
Dehumanization
Treating Others as Less Than Human
- involves perceiving others as lacking human qualities or attributes
- Allows individuals to treat others poorly without feeling empathy or remorse
- Often involves using derogatory labels or stereotypes to describe others (referring to immigrants as "illegals")
- Dehumanization can lead to discrimination, abuse, and even genocide (Nazi persecution of Jews during the Holocaust)
- Commonly seen in contexts of power imbalances, such as prisons or conflict zones (Abu Ghraib prisoner abuse scandal)
- Dehumanization reduces the psychological barriers to engaging in unethical behavior towards others
- Can become institutionalized within organizations or societies, leading to systemic mistreatment of certain groups (apartheid in South Africa)
Key Terms to Review (21)
Albert Bandura: Albert Bandura is a prominent psychologist best known for his work on social learning theory, which emphasizes the importance of observational learning, imitation, and modeling in human behavior. His research has significant implications in understanding how individuals can morally disengage from ethical standards and engage in ethical fading, leading to questionable decisions in accounting and finance.
Attribution of blame: Attribution of blame refers to the process of assigning responsibility for an action or outcome, particularly in situations involving unethical behavior or decisions. This concept is crucial in understanding how individuals and organizations justify their actions and the subsequent moral disengagement that can occur, leading to ethical fading. By attributing blame to external factors or other parties, individuals may distance themselves from the moral implications of their choices, which can obscure the ethical dimensions of their actions.
Cognitive Dissonance: Cognitive dissonance is the psychological discomfort experienced when a person holds two or more conflicting beliefs, values, or attitudes, particularly when their actions contradict their beliefs. This discomfort often leads individuals to rationalize their behavior or alter their beliefs to align with their actions. In the context of ethical decision-making, this dissonance can lead to ethical fading and moral disengagement, where individuals downplay the importance of ethical standards or justify unethical actions to reduce the psychological tension.
Corporate Governance: Corporate governance refers to the system of rules, practices, and processes that direct and control a company, focusing on the relationships among the stakeholders. It encompasses the mechanisms through which companies are operated and controlled, ensuring accountability, fairness, and transparency in a company’s relationship with its stakeholders, including shareholders, management, customers, suppliers, financiers, government, and the community. Strong corporate governance helps build trust and promotes ethical behavior within organizations.
Dehumanization: Dehumanization is the psychological process of perceiving or treating individuals or groups as less than human, often leading to moral disengagement and ethical fading. This concept is crucial in understanding how individuals or organizations may rationalize unethical behavior, as it allows them to disconnect from the emotional and moral implications of their actions. Dehumanization can manifest in various forms, such as stereotyping, objectification, or treating people as expendable, which makes it easier for individuals to commit actions that they would normally find unacceptable.
Diffusion of Responsibility: Diffusion of responsibility is a social phenomenon where individuals in a group feel less personal accountability for their actions or decisions, believing that others will take responsibility instead. This often leads to a decreased sense of urgency in responding to ethical dilemmas and can result in unethical behaviors being overlooked or ignored, particularly when moral disengagement is at play. In situations involving ethical fading, the presence of multiple people can blur the lines of personal accountability, making it easier for individuals to justify their inaction or poor choices.
Displacement of responsibility: Displacement of responsibility refers to a psychological mechanism where individuals reduce their sense of accountability for unethical actions by attributing the responsibility to others or external circumstances. This can lead to ethical fading, as individuals become less aware of the moral implications of their choices and decisions. When people feel that they are not the primary agents of an action, they may be more likely to engage in unethical behavior without a sense of guilt or regret.
Ethical climate: Ethical climate refers to the shared perceptions of what is right and wrong within an organization, influencing employees' ethical behavior and decision-making. It shapes how individuals interpret ethical dilemmas and guides their actions in accordance with the organization's values. A strong ethical climate can lead to better whistleblowing practices, reduce ethical fading and moral disengagement, minimize groupthink, and foster a culture of integrity.
Ethics training programs: Ethics training programs are structured initiatives designed to educate employees about ethical standards, promote ethical behavior, and provide guidance on navigating moral dilemmas in the workplace. These programs are crucial in addressing issues like ethical fading and moral disengagement, as they help individuals recognize and counteract tendencies to overlook ethical considerations in decision-making. Additionally, they can mitigate groupthink by fostering an environment that encourages open discussions about ethics and ethical decision-making processes within organizations.
Euphemistic Labeling: Euphemistic labeling refers to the practice of using mild or vague terms to describe actions or behaviors that may be considered unethical or harmful, thereby reducing the emotional impact associated with those actions. This technique helps individuals distance themselves from the moral implications of their choices, which can lead to ethical fading and moral disengagement, allowing them to justify questionable decisions more easily.
Financial misreporting: Financial misreporting refers to the intentional or unintentional distortion of financial statements to mislead stakeholders about a company's financial performance or position. This can involve overstating revenues, understating expenses, or omitting important information, leading to a lack of transparency and trust. Often linked with unethical practices, financial misreporting can result from ethical fading and moral disengagement, where individuals disconnect their actions from their moral beliefs and justify dishonest behavior.
Framework for ethical decision-making: A framework for ethical decision-making is a structured approach that helps individuals and organizations evaluate their options and make choices that align with their values and ethical principles. This framework encourages critical thinking about the implications of decisions, promoting accountability and integrity in various situations, particularly in challenging contexts where ethical fading and moral disengagement may occur.
Insider Trading: Insider trading refers to the illegal practice of trading stocks or other securities based on non-public, material information about a company. This unethical behavior undermines market integrity and creates an uneven playing field, affecting investor trust and the overall financial system.
Moral disengagement: Moral disengagement refers to a psychological process where individuals distance themselves from their ethical standards, allowing them to engage in behaviors that contradict their values without experiencing guilt or shame. This process is significant in understanding how people justify unethical decisions, particularly in high-pressure environments like finance and accounting, where cognitive biases and ethical fading can cloud judgment and lead to questionable practices.
Moral Justification: Moral justification refers to the process of rationalizing unethical behavior by framing it as acceptable or necessary due to a perceived greater good. This mindset allows individuals to engage in actions that conflict with their ethical beliefs by diminishing the moral weight of those actions, often leading to ethical fading and moral disengagement, where individuals disconnect from the emotional impact of their decisions.
Professional Accountability: Professional accountability refers to the obligation of individuals in a professional setting to take responsibility for their actions, decisions, and the outcomes of their work. It emphasizes the importance of ethical behavior, transparency, and adherence to standards, ensuring that professionals are answerable to clients, employers, and regulatory bodies. This concept connects closely with understanding how ethical fading and moral disengagement can undermine this responsibility.
Richard T. DeGeorge: Richard T. DeGeorge is a prominent figure in the field of business ethics, known for his contributions to understanding ethical decision-making in corporate environments. His work emphasizes the importance of moral responsibility in business practices and highlights how ethical considerations should guide the actions of individuals and organizations in the financial sector.
Social Cognitive Theory: Social Cognitive Theory is a psychological framework that emphasizes the importance of observational learning, imitation, and modeling in the development of behaviors and attitudes. It connects individual behavior with environmental influences and cognitive processes, suggesting that people learn not only through direct experience but also by watching others and reflecting on those observations.
Stakeholder theory: Stakeholder theory is an ethical framework that suggests that organizations should consider the interests and well-being of all stakeholders—such as employees, customers, suppliers, and the community—rather than just focusing on maximizing shareholder value. This approach emphasizes the interconnectedness of various parties and highlights the moral responsibilities businesses have towards those affected by their operations.
Tone at the top: Tone at the top refers to the ethical climate and culture set by an organization’s leadership, which influences the behavior and decisions of employees throughout the organization. It is established through the actions, values, and communication of senior management and board members, impacting how ethics are perceived and prioritized at all levels. This tone plays a crucial role in preventing ethical fading and moral disengagement, guiding the characteristics of ethical leadership, and fostering an ethical organizational culture.
Whistleblower protections: Whistleblower protections refer to laws and policies designed to safeguard individuals who report unethical or illegal activities within an organization from retaliation. These protections encourage transparency and accountability by allowing employees to disclose wrongdoing without fear of losing their job or facing other negative consequences. Effective whistleblower protections can help combat ethical fading and moral disengagement, fostering an environment where ethical behavior is prioritized.