1.2 Ethical Decision-Making Models
3 min read•august 6, 2024
Ethical decision-making models provide structured approaches for navigating complex moral dilemmas in accounting and finance. These frameworks, like the PLUS model and Blanchard and Peale's checklist, help professionals systematically evaluate the legal, ethical, and personal implications of their choices.
Factors such as , , and play crucial roles in shaping ethical decisions. By considering these elements, finance professionals can make more informed and ethically sound choices, balancing the interests of various stakeholders and minimizing potential harm.
Ethical Decision-Making Frameworks
PLUS Ethical Decision Making Model
Top images from around the web for PLUS Ethical Decision Making Model
3.3 The Individual Approach to Ethics – Foundations of Business View original
Is this image relevant?
The La Trobe Support for Decision Making Practice Framework Learning Resource - ABOUT View original
Is this image relevant?
The Decision Making Process | Organizational Behavior and Human Relations View original
Is this image relevant?
3.3 The Individual Approach to Ethics – Foundations of Business View original
Is this image relevant?
The La Trobe Support for Decision Making Practice Framework Learning Resource - ABOUT View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Top images from around the web for PLUS Ethical Decision Making Model
3.3 The Individual Approach to Ethics – Foundations of Business View original
Is this image relevant?
The La Trobe Support for Decision Making Practice Framework Learning Resource - ABOUT View original
Is this image relevant?
The Decision Making Process | Organizational Behavior and Human Relations View original
Is this image relevant?
3.3 The Individual Approach to Ethics – Foundations of Business View original
Is this image relevant?
The La Trobe Support for Decision Making Practice Framework Learning Resource - ABOUT View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
- Developed by Dr. at Santa Clara University
- 5-step process for making ethical decisions
- Policies: Identify relevant policies, laws, and
- Legal: Ensure the decision is legal and aligns with relevant regulations
- Universal: Consider whether the decision is universally applicable and fair to all stakeholders
- Self: Reflect on and whether the decision aligns with one's moral principles
- Situation: Assess the specific context and unique factors of the situation
- Encourages a systematic approach to ethical decision-making, balancing various considerations (legal, personal, situational)
Blanchard and Peale's Ethical Checklist
- 3-question framework for evaluating the ethics of a decision
- Is it legal? Ensure compliance with relevant laws and regulations
- Is it balanced? Consider and whether all stakeholders are treated equitably
- How will it make me feel about myself? Reflect on personal values and integrity
- Emphasizes the importance of , fairness, and personal moral standards in decision-making
- Encourages individuals to consider the emotional and psychological impact of their choices
Ethical Frameworks and the Potter Box Model
- Ethical frameworks provide structured approaches for moral reasoning
- : Focuses on the outcomes and consequences of actions
- : Emphasizes adherence to moral rules and duties
- Virtue ethics: Prioritizes the development of moral character and virtues
- The integrates various ethical frameworks into a decision-making process
- Define the situation: Gather relevant facts and identify
- Identify values: Recognize the values and principles at stake for different stakeholders
- Identify principles: Consider applicable ethical principles from various frameworks
- Choose loyalties: Determine which stakeholders and values take priority in the decision
- Combines elements of different ethical theories to provide a comprehensive approach to moral reasoning
Factors Influencing Ethical Decisions
Stakeholder Analysis and Cost-Benefit Analysis
- Stakeholder analysis involves identifying and considering the interests of all parties affected by a decision
- Primary stakeholders: Directly impacted by the decision (employees, customers, shareholders)
- Secondary stakeholders: Indirectly affected or have an interest in the decision (communities, regulators, media)
- weighs the potential positive and negative consequences of a decision
- Quantifies and compares the expected costs and benefits to determine the net impact
- Considers financial, social, and environmental factors
- Both tools help decision-makers understand the broader implications and trade-offs of their choices
Moral Intensity and Ethical Blindness
- Moral intensity refers to the perceived ethical importance of a decision based on its characteristics
- : The severity and scale of potential harm or benefit
- : The degree of agreement about the morality of the issue
- : The likelihood that the predicted consequences will occur
- : The time between the decision and its consequences
- : The perceived social, cultural, or psychological nearness to those affected
- : The number of people impacted by the decision
- Higher moral intensity typically leads to greater ethical awareness and scrutiny
- occurs when individuals fail to recognize the moral dimensions of a situation
- Caused by cognitive biases, organizational pressures, or desensitization to ethical issues
- Can lead to unintentional unethical behavior and decision-making
Moral Imagination
- The ability to envision and evaluate alternative courses of action from an ethical perspective
- Involves creativity, empathy, and the capacity to consider novel solutions to moral dilemmas
- Enables decision-makers to move beyond conventional thinking and identify innovative, ethically sound options
- Cultivating moral imagination can enhance ethical decision-making by expanding the range of possibilities considered
Key Terms to Review (23)
Blanchard and Peale's Ethical Checklist: Blanchard and Peale's Ethical Checklist is a practical tool designed to assist individuals in making ethical decisions by evaluating the potential impact of their actions on various stakeholders. The checklist consists of three key questions that encourage individuals to consider the ethical implications of their choices, promoting greater accountability and transparency in decision-making processes.
Concentration of Effect: Concentration of effect refers to the extent to which an ethical decision impacts a particular group or individual more than others. This concept is significant because it highlights how certain decisions can disproportionately affect specific stakeholders, raising important ethical considerations in decision-making processes. Understanding concentration of effect helps to analyze the broader implications of actions and how they align with principles of fairness and justice.
Consequentialism: Consequentialism is an ethical theory that determines the rightness or wrongness of actions based on their outcomes or consequences. It emphasizes that the moral value of an action is contingent upon its ability to produce favorable results, often linked to the greatest good for the greatest number. This approach significantly influences ethical decision-making frameworks and aligns closely with utilitarianism, which is a specific form of consequentialism that focuses on maximizing overall happiness.
Cost-Benefit Analysis: Cost-benefit analysis is a systematic approach to estimating the strengths and weaknesses of alternatives in order to determine the best option by comparing costs with benefits. This method helps in decision-making by quantifying the economic and social impacts, ensuring that choices lead to the greatest overall benefit. By assessing these trade-offs, it connects closely with ethical decision-making and frameworks that prioritize outcomes.
Deontology: Deontology is an ethical theory that emphasizes the importance of duty and rules in guiding moral behavior. It posits that actions should be judged based on their adherence to established principles, rather than their consequences. This focus on duty makes it relevant in discussions about ethical decision-making, the application of ethical frameworks in financial contexts, and navigating cross-cultural ethical challenges.
Ethical blindness: Ethical blindness is a phenomenon where individuals fail to recognize the ethical implications of their actions or decisions, often leading to morally questionable outcomes. This lack of awareness can stem from various factors, including cognitive biases, social pressures, and personal motivations. Understanding ethical blindness is crucial as it highlights the importance of ethical decision-making models that aim to provide a structured approach to identifying and addressing moral dilemmas.
Ethical Decision-Making Model: An ethical decision-making model is a structured approach that helps individuals and organizations identify, analyze, and resolve ethical dilemmas. This model provides a systematic framework that guides decision-makers through the process of evaluating options and their consequences, ensuring that ethical considerations are taken into account while making choices.
Ethical dilemmas: Ethical dilemmas arise when individuals face situations where they must choose between two or more conflicting ethical principles, making it difficult to determine the right course of action. These conflicts often involve competing values or obligations, leading to moral uncertainty. Understanding ethical dilemmas is crucial for navigating complex decision-making processes, especially when applying ethical decision-making models and evaluating consequences in the context of utilitarianism and consequentialism.
Fairness: Fairness refers to the equitable treatment of individuals and the impartial distribution of resources, opportunities, and responsibilities. In various contexts, it emphasizes the importance of justice and equality, ensuring that decisions and actions are made without bias or favoritism. Fairness is essential in promoting trust and integrity, particularly within frameworks that govern ethical decision-making, corporate governance, and financial practices.
Legal Compliance: Legal compliance refers to the adherence to laws, regulations, and ethical standards set by governing bodies that organizations must follow in their operations. It ensures that businesses conduct their activities within the boundaries of the law, thus avoiding legal penalties and fostering trust among stakeholders. This concept is crucial for ethical decision-making, as it requires individuals and organizations to evaluate their actions against established legal frameworks.
Magnitude of Consequences: Magnitude of consequences refers to the significance or impact of the outcomes resulting from a particular decision or action. In ethical decision-making, understanding the magnitude of consequences helps evaluate how a choice will affect individuals, communities, and organizations. This concept is essential for assessing both the positive and negative effects of a decision, allowing individuals to weigh their options carefully before acting.
Markkula Center for Applied Ethics: The Markkula Center for Applied Ethics is a prominent research center based at Santa Clara University, focusing on the application of ethical principles across various fields, including business, technology, and healthcare. It aims to provide resources, training, and guidance for ethical decision-making, making it relevant to the understanding of frameworks that help individuals navigate complex moral dilemmas.
Moral Imagination: Moral imagination is the ability to envision the various possibilities of moral action in complex situations, allowing individuals to consider the ethical implications of their decisions. This concept involves empathizing with others and recognizing the impact of choices on all stakeholders, enabling better ethical decision-making. By fostering moral imagination, individuals can move beyond conventional thinking and generate creative solutions that align with ethical principles.
Moral Intensity: Moral intensity refers to the degree to which an ethical issue is perceived to be important and requires attention. It encompasses factors such as the magnitude of consequences, social consensus, and the potential impact on those involved. This concept helps to clarify how individuals evaluate ethical dilemmas and influences the decision-making process in a moral context.
Personal Values: Personal values are the individual beliefs, principles, and standards that guide a person's behavior and decision-making. They are shaped by various factors such as culture, upbringing, experiences, and personal reflection, influencing how one perceives right and wrong and what is deemed important in life. Understanding personal values is essential as they form the foundation for ethical decision-making models, enabling individuals to navigate complex moral dilemmas by aligning choices with their core beliefs.
Potter Box Model: The Potter Box Model is an ethical decision-making framework that helps individuals analyze complex ethical dilemmas by providing a systematic approach. This model encourages users to consider four key components: facts, values, principles, and loyalties, which together guide them in making informed ethical decisions. By breaking down the situation into these elements, the model promotes critical thinking and clarity in evaluating moral choices.
Probability of Effect: The probability of effect refers to the likelihood that a particular action or decision will lead to a specific outcome or consequence. This concept is crucial in ethical decision-making models, as it helps individuals assess the potential risks and benefits of their choices, guiding them towards more informed and responsible actions.
Professional Standards: Professional standards are the principles and guidelines that govern the behavior and practices of professionals in specific fields, ensuring accountability, integrity, and ethical conduct. They serve as benchmarks for evaluating professional performance and help maintain public trust by ensuring that individuals adhere to high levels of quality and ethics in their work. These standards are particularly crucial in fields like accounting and finance, where ethical dilemmas often arise and decision-making models play a key role in navigating complex situations.
Proximity: Proximity refers to the nearness or closeness of individuals or situations in ethical decision-making processes. This concept plays a crucial role in how individuals relate to ethical dilemmas, as decisions can be influenced by the physical, emotional, or psychological closeness one feels towards the affected parties. Understanding proximity helps clarify how personal connections can impact moral judgments and the weight given to different stakeholders in financial and accounting decisions.
Social consensus: Social consensus refers to the general agreement among members of a society about what is considered acceptable behavior and moral standards. This shared understanding plays a crucial role in shaping ethical norms, influencing decision-making processes and creating a framework for evaluating actions within various contexts, including ethical dilemmas. Understanding social consensus helps in recognizing how collective beliefs can guide individuals and organizations in making ethical choices.
Stakeholder Analysis: Stakeholder analysis is a process used to identify, assess, and prioritize the interests and influence of various stakeholders in a given situation or decision-making process. This tool helps in understanding the potential impacts of decisions on different parties involved, which is crucial for ethical decision-making and ensuring that the needs and concerns of all stakeholders are considered. By mapping out stakeholders and their interests, organizations can better navigate complex ethical dilemmas and foster trust in their operations.
Temporal immediacy: Temporal immediacy refers to the perceived closeness in time between an action and its consequences, influencing how individuals evaluate ethical dilemmas. This concept emphasizes that decisions with immediate outcomes tend to weigh more heavily on a person's conscience, affecting their moral reasoning and ethical decision-making process. As individuals consider the potential consequences of their actions, the immediacy can alter their perception of responsibility and ethical obligation.
Universal Applicability: Universal applicability refers to the principle that ethical standards or rules should be applied consistently across all individuals, situations, and contexts. This concept emphasizes that moral judgments and ethical decisions must have a uniform application, ensuring fairness and justice in decision-making processes regardless of personal circumstances or specific cases.