13.1 Conceptual Foundations of Environmental Justice
7 min read•july 30, 2024
is all about fairness in how we deal with environmental issues. It's about making sure everyone, no matter their background or income, has a say in decisions that affect their surroundings and health.
This topic digs into the core ideas behind environmental justice. It looks at how some communities face more environmental risks than others and explores ways to balance the scales. It's a key part of understanding how environmental issues and social equality are connected.
Environmental justice and its principles
Definition and key principles
Top images from around the web for Definition and key principles
Environmental Justice ⋆ CoAct View original
Is this image relevant?
Frontiers | Situating the Scientist: Creating Inclusive Science Communication Through Equity ... View original
Is this image relevant?
Environment + Justice | Evidence & Influence Micromagazine View original
Is this image relevant?
Environmental Justice ⋆ CoAct View original
Is this image relevant?
Frontiers | Situating the Scientist: Creating Inclusive Science Communication Through Equity ... View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Top images from around the web for Definition and key principles
Environmental Justice ⋆ CoAct View original
Is this image relevant?
Frontiers | Situating the Scientist: Creating Inclusive Science Communication Through Equity ... View original
Is this image relevant?
Environment + Justice | Evidence & Influence Micromagazine View original
Is this image relevant?
Environmental Justice ⋆ CoAct View original
Is this image relevant?
Frontiers | Situating the Scientist: Creating Inclusive Science Communication Through Equity ... View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
- Environmental justice is the fair treatment and meaningful involvement of all people, regardless of race, color, national origin, or income, in the development, implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and policies
- Aims to address the disproportionate environmental harms and risks borne by marginalized communities (low-income communities, communities of color)
- Equitable distribution of environmental benefits and burdens across all communities is a key principle
- Ensures that no community bears an undue share of environmental hazards (polluting industries, hazardous waste facilities)
- Promotes equal access to environmental benefits (clean air, water, green spaces)
- Meaningful participation and self-determination of affected communities in environmental decision-making processes is essential
- Empowers communities to have a voice in decisions that impact their environment and health
- Recognizes the local knowledge and expertise of affected communities
- Recognition and respect for the cultural and ecological diversity of communities is crucial
- Acknowledges the unique relationships that communities have with their environment
- Protects the cultural practices and livelihoods that depend on healthy ecosystems
- The right to a safe, healthy, and sustainable environment for all individuals and communities is a fundamental principle
- Emphasizes the importance of environmental quality as a basic human right
- Calls for the protection of vulnerable populations from environmental hazards (children, elderly, low-income communities)
Advocacy and protection
- Environmental justice advocates for the protection of vulnerable populations from environmental hazards
- Campaigns against the disproportionate siting of polluting industries and hazardous waste facilities in marginalized communities
- Supports community-led efforts to monitor and address environmental contamination
- Promotes equal access to environmental benefits and resources
- Advocates for the equitable distribution of green spaces, public transportation, and clean energy infrastructure
- Works to ensure that marginalized communities have access to healthy food, clean water, and other environmental necessities
- Builds coalitions and partnerships to advance environmental justice goals
- Collaborates with social justice organizations, labor unions, and other allies to address intersecting forms of inequality
- Engages in policy advocacy and legal action to promote environmental justice at the local, state, and federal levels
History of the environmental justice movement
Origins and early struggles
- The environmental justice movement emerged in the United States during the 1970s and 1980s
- Communities of color and low-income communities began to organize against the disproportionate siting of polluting industries and hazardous waste facilities in their neighborhoods
- Recognized the unequal distribution of and the need for community-led resistance
- Early environmental justice struggles brought national attention to the issue of
- Warren County PCB Landfill protest in North Carolina (1982) opposed the siting of a hazardous waste landfill in a predominantly African American community
- Love Canal disaster in New York (1978) revealed the health impacts of industrial pollution on a low-income community
- These early struggles highlighted the intersection of environmental degradation and social inequality
- Demonstrated how race, class, and political power shape the distribution of environmental hazards
- Challenged the mainstream environmental movement's focus on wilderness preservation and conservation, which often overlooked the concerns of marginalized communities
Expansion and policy achievements
- The First National People of Color Environmental Leadership Summit (1991) was a significant milestone in the development of the environmental justice movement
- Brought together activists from across the country to share experiences and develop a common agenda
- Issued the Principles of Environmental Justice, which outlined the movement's key goals and values
- The environmental justice movement has since expanded its focus to include a wide range of issues
- Climate justice recognizes the disproportionate impacts of climate change on marginalized communities and advocates for equitable solutions
- Food justice seeks to ensure equal access to healthy, affordable, and culturally appropriate food
- Transportation justice advocates for accessible, affordable, and sustainable transportation options for all communities
- Green jobs initiatives aim to create employment opportunities in the clean energy sector, particularly for marginalized communities
- In 1994, President Bill Clinton signed Executive Order 12898, which directed federal agencies to address environmental justice concerns in their policies and programs
- Marked a significant policy achievement for the environmental justice movement
- Required federal agencies to identify and address disproportionate environmental impacts on marginalized communities
- Established an Interagency Working Group on Environmental Justice to coordinate federal efforts
Environmental degradation vs social inequality
Disproportionate burdens and limited access
- Marginalized communities often bear a disproportionate burden of environmental harms and have limited access to environmental benefits
- Low-income communities and communities of color are more likely to be located near polluting industries (refineries, factories), hazardous waste sites, and other sources of environmental contamination
- Proximity to environmental hazards leads to higher rates of exposure to toxins and associated health risks (respiratory illnesses, cancer, developmental disorders)
- Limited access to clean air, water, and green spaces can negatively impact health and well-being
- Social inequality can exacerbate the impacts of environmental degradation
- Marginalized communities often have fewer resources (financial, political) to advocate for environmental protections and remediation
- Lack of political clout can make it difficult for affected communities to influence environmental decision-making processes
- Limited access to healthcare and other social services can compound the health impacts of environmental exposures
Perpetuation of inequality
- Environmental degradation can perpetuate social inequality by disproportionately impacting the livelihoods and cultural practices of marginalized communities
- Contamination of water sources can harm communities that rely on fishing or agriculture for subsistence
- Destruction of ecosystems can disrupt traditional cultural practices and spiritual connections to the land
- Displacement of communities due to environmental hazards or development projects can lead to loss of social networks and cultural heritage
- The unequal distribution of environmental benefits can reinforce existing social inequalities
- Lack of access to green spaces and recreational opportunities can limit opportunities for physical activity and social interaction
- Unequal access to clean energy and energy-efficient housing can lead to higher energy burdens for low-income households
- Limited transportation options can restrict access to employment, education, and healthcare services
Challenges to environmental justice
Power imbalances and limited resources
- Entrenched power imbalances between marginalized communities and the corporations and government agencies responsible for environmental decision-making pose a significant challenge
- Corporations often have greater financial resources and political influence than affected communities
- Government agencies may prioritize economic development over environmental protection and community well-being
- Limited access to information, resources, and legal representation can hinder the ability of affected communities to effectively participate in environmental decision-making processes and advocate for their rights
- Technical language and complex regulatory processes can be barriers to meaningful participation
- Lack of financial resources can limit access to legal and scientific expertise needed to challenge environmental decisions
- The lack of diverse representation in environmental organizations and government agencies can lead to a failure to prioritize and address the concerns of marginalized communities
- Predominantly white, middle-class composition of many environmental organizations can result in a narrow focus on conservation and preservation issues
- Underrepresentation of marginalized communities in government agencies can lead to policies that overlook or exacerbate environmental injustices
Complexity and intersectionality
- The complex and often slow-moving nature of environmental policymaking and regulation can make it difficult to address environmental justice concerns in a timely and effective manner
- Environmental impact assessments and permitting processes can take years to complete
- Enforcement of environmental regulations can be inconsistent or inadequate
- The intersection of multiple forms of inequality (race, class, gender) can create compounding barriers to achieving environmental justice
- Women of color, for example, may face unique challenges in advocating for environmental justice due to the combined effects of racism, sexism, and economic marginalization
- Addressing environmental injustices requires a holistic approach that recognizes the interconnectedness of social, economic, and environmental inequalities
- The global nature of many environmental problems (climate change, deforestation) can make it challenging to address environmental justice concerns at the local level
- Global economic forces and political decisions can have disproportionate impacts on marginalized communities
- International cooperation and solidarity among environmental justice movements is necessary to address transboundary environmental issues
- Resistance from industries and political actors with vested interests in maintaining the status quo can hinder efforts to promote environmental justice through policy and regulatory changes
- Fossil fuel companies, for example, may oppose efforts to transition to clean energy sources that would benefit marginalized communities
- Political leaders may prioritize short-term economic gains over long-term environmental sustainability and social equity
Key Terms to Review (19)
Access to resources: Access to resources refers to the ability of individuals and communities to obtain necessary goods, services, and opportunities essential for their well-being and development. This concept is crucial in understanding environmental justice as it highlights disparities where marginalized groups may lack equitable access to clean air, water, healthy food, and natural spaces, contributing to broader social inequalities.
Clean Air Act: The Clean Air Act is a comprehensive federal law that regulates air emissions from stationary and mobile sources to ensure that all Americans have access to clean and healthy air. It establishes national air quality standards, outlines enforcement mechanisms, and emphasizes state involvement in pollution control, thereby playing a critical role in the broader framework of environmental protection and public health.
Distributive justice: Distributive justice refers to the ethical principle that concerns the fair allocation of resources, benefits, and burdens among individuals and groups within society. This concept emphasizes how wealth, opportunities, and privileges should be distributed equitably to ensure that all individuals have access to necessary resources, particularly in relation to social and environmental issues. It plays a critical role in shaping policies that address disparities and seeks to promote fairness in how environmental benefits and harms are shared across different communities.
Ecofeminism: Ecofeminism is a philosophical and social movement that links the exploitation of women and nature, arguing that both are subjected to similar patterns of domination and oppression. It emphasizes the interconnectedness of ecological issues and feminist concerns, advocating for a holistic approach to environmental ethics that recognizes the value of both gender equality and ecological sustainability. This perspective highlights how patriarchal structures contribute to environmental degradation, promoting the idea that addressing social inequalities is crucial for achieving environmental justice.
Environmental Burdens: Environmental burdens refer to the negative impacts and stressors that certain communities face as a result of environmental hazards, including pollution, toxic waste, and resource depletion. These burdens are often disproportionately distributed, affecting marginalized groups and low-income communities more severely than others, thereby raising significant concerns in the context of social equity and justice.
Environmental Justice: Environmental justice refers to the fair distribution of environmental benefits and burdens, ensuring that all communities, especially marginalized and vulnerable groups, have equal access to a healthy environment and protection from environmental hazards. This concept emphasizes the intersection of social justice and environmental policy, highlighting how systemic inequalities often lead to disproportionate exposure to pollution and other environmental risks among disadvantaged populations.
Environmental Racism: Environmental racism refers to the practice of placing environmentally hazardous facilities and waste sites in or near communities predominantly inhabited by people of color. This term highlights how marginalized groups disproportionately bear the burden of environmental hazards and are often excluded from decision-making processes related to environmental policies.
Grassroots activism: Grassroots activism refers to the efforts of ordinary people to bring about social or political change at a local level, often driven by community engagement and mobilization. This type of activism emphasizes direct participation and collective action, making it a vital component in shaping policies and advocating for environmental justice. Grassroots movements often operate independently from large organizations, relying on the power of community voices and local organizing to influence decision-makers and promote sustainable practices.
Green New Deal: The Green New Deal is a comprehensive policy proposal aimed at addressing climate change and economic inequality by promoting a transition to renewable energy and sustainable practices. It combines efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, create green jobs, and ensure social justice, thereby addressing the interconnected issues of environmental degradation and economic disparity.
Institutional racism: Institutional racism refers to the systematic discrimination and disadvantage that individuals from racial or ethnic minorities experience within societal structures, policies, and institutions. This type of racism is often ingrained in the practices and procedures of organizations, leading to unequal opportunities and outcomes based on race. It underscores the broader patterns of inequality and how they manifest in various societal domains, including environmental policies.
Intergenerational equity: Intergenerational equity refers to the principle of fairness in the distribution of resources, opportunities, and environmental benefits between current and future generations. This concept emphasizes the moral obligation to ensure that future generations inherit a planet that is sustainable and capable of supporting their needs, while also addressing the challenges posed by climate change and environmental degradation. It underlines the importance of responsible decision-making today, considering its impacts on those who will come after us.
Just Sustainability: Just sustainability refers to the concept of creating a fair and equitable approach to sustainability that addresses both environmental integrity and social justice. It emphasizes the need to consider the rights and needs of marginalized communities in the pursuit of sustainable development, ensuring that environmental benefits and burdens are distributed fairly across all segments of society. This approach seeks to connect ecological sustainability with social equity, promoting a more inclusive understanding of what it means to be sustainable.
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA): The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) is a landmark piece of environmental legislation enacted in 1969 that requires federal agencies to assess the environmental effects of their proposed actions before making decisions. This act laid the groundwork for an environmental review process that includes the preparation of Environmental Assessments (EAs) and Environmental Impact Statements (EISs), ensuring that environmental factors are considered alongside economic and technical considerations. NEPA has been a crucial tool in promoting environmental justice by allowing public participation and transparency in the decision-making process, especially for marginalized communities often disproportionately affected by environmental degradation.
Participatory Research: Participatory research is an approach that actively involves community members in the research process, allowing them to contribute to the formulation of research questions, data collection, analysis, and dissemination of results. This method emphasizes collaboration between researchers and participants, ensuring that the perspectives and experiences of marginalized communities are central to the research outcomes, particularly in areas related to social justice and environmental issues.
Power asymmetries: Power asymmetries refer to the unequal distribution of power among individuals or groups, often resulting in one party having greater influence or control over decisions, resources, and opportunities. This concept is crucial for understanding how marginalized communities are disproportionately affected by environmental policies, as those in power often prioritize their interests over those of vulnerable populations.
Robert Bullard: Robert Bullard is known as the 'father of environmental justice' and is a prominent scholar and activist who has focused on the intersection of race, class, and environmental issues. His work highlights how marginalized communities often face greater exposure to environmental hazards, which raises critical questions about equity and policy responses aimed at ensuring fair treatment for all citizens in environmental decision-making.
Social ecology: Social ecology is a theoretical framework that examines the interconnections between environmental issues and social hierarchies, asserting that ecological problems arise from social inequality and the domination of nature. It emphasizes the need for a holistic approach that integrates ecological concerns with social justice, viewing the exploitation of both people and the environment as linked phenomena. This perspective can enhance discussions around green political theories and ecofeminism, as well as contribute to the foundational understanding of environmental justice movements.
Standing Rock Protests: The Standing Rock protests were a series of demonstrations that took place in 2016-2017 against the construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL), which aimed to transport crude oil from North Dakota to Illinois. These protests became a significant movement highlighting environmental justice and the rights of Indigenous peoples, particularly the Sioux Tribe, who opposed the pipeline due to its potential impact on their water supply and sacred lands.
Van Jones: Van Jones is an American environmental and civil rights advocate known for his work in promoting environmental justice and addressing climate change in marginalized communities. He emphasizes the interconnectedness of social equity and environmental policy, advocating for inclusive approaches that prioritize the needs of underserved populations. His work highlights the importance of empowering communities of color and low-income groups in shaping policies that affect their environments and health.