Glossary

13.2 Environmental externalities and agricultural production

5 min read•july 30, 2024

Agricultural production generates both positive and negative environmental externalities. These impacts, like and , affect third parties and the environment. Understanding these externalities is crucial for .

Economic analysis reveals how externalities lead to market inefficiencies. Policy approaches, such as and , aim to internalize these costs and benefits. Valuing agricultural externalities presents challenges in measurement, attribution, and nonmarket valuation.

Environmental Externalities in Agriculture

Types of Externalities

Top images from around the web for Types of Externalities

  • Frontiers | Climate Change and Salinity Effects on Crops and Chemical Communication Between ... View original

    Is this image relevant?

  • Source: Arvis et al. (2020). View original

    Is this image relevant?

  • Frontiers | Climate Change and Salinity Effects on Crops and Chemical Communication Between ... View original

    Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Types of Externalities

  • Frontiers | Climate Change and Salinity Effects on Crops and Chemical Communication Between ... View original

    Is this image relevant?

  • Source: Arvis et al. (2020). View original

    Is this image relevant?

  • Frontiers | Climate Change and Salinity Effects on Crops and Chemical Communication Between ... View original

    Is this image relevant?

1 of 3
  • Agricultural production generates both positive and negative environmental externalities
    • Positive externalities provide benefits to third parties (carbon sequestration, )
    • Negative externalities impose costs on others not directly involved in the production process (water pollution, )
  • Major negative externalities from agriculture:
    • Water pollution from nutrient runoff (nitrogen, phosphorus)
      • Excessive nutrient runoff from fertilizer application leads to and hypoxic "dead zones" in water bodies (Gulf of Mexico)
    • and
      • Soil erosion reduces future land productivity and causes sedimentation in waterways, impacting aquatic habitats (reduced fish populations)
    • Air pollution from livestock operations
      • Concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs) emit ammonia, hydrogen sulfide, and particulate matter, affecting local air quality (respiratory issues in nearby communities)
    • Loss of biodiversity
      • Conversion of natural habitats to cropland and excessive pesticide use contribute to (decline in pollinator populations)

Positive Externalities

  • Positive externalities from agriculture encompass :
    • Carbon sequestration in soils
      • Agricultural practices like no-till farming and cover cropping can increase soil organic carbon, mitigating greenhouse gas emissions (climate change mitigation)
    • Groundwater recharge
      • Certain agricultural landscapes, such as wetlands and riparian buffers, facilitate groundwater recharge, replenishing aquifers (improved water security)
    • Preservation of rural landscapes and open space
      • Agricultural lands provide scenic amenities and recreational opportunities, contributing to rural tourism and quality of life (agritourism, hunting, fishing)

Economic Analysis of Agricultural Externalities

Causes and Consequences

  • Environmental externalities arise when the actions of agricultural producers have unintended and uncompensated impacts on third parties or the environment
    • Occur due to incomplete property rights and missing markets for environmental goods and services (lack of prices for clean air, water)
  • (PMC) of agricultural production only includes direct costs borne by the producer
    • In the presence of negative externalities, (SMC) exceeds PMC, as it incorporates additional external costs imposed on society
  • When producers only consider PMC and ignore external costs, they tend to overproduce the good generating the compared to the socially optimal level
    • Leads to and inefficient allocation of resources (overuse of fertilizers, pesticides)
  • Positive externalities from agriculture lead to underprovision of the beneficial activity, as producers do not fully capture the social benefits
    • (SMB) exceeds (PMB) (underprovision of ecosystem services)

Coase Theorem and Transaction Costs

  • suggests that in the absence of , private bargaining between affected parties can lead to an efficient outcome, regardless of the initial allocation of property rights
    • Example: if a downstream water user has the right to clean water, they could pay an upstream farmer to reduce nutrient runoff
  • However, high transaction costs often preclude such solutions for environmental externalities
    • Large number of affected parties, information asymmetries, and free-rider problems make private bargaining infeasible (diffuse pollution from multiple agricultural sources)

Policy Approaches to Internalizing Externalities

Pigouvian Taxes and Subsidies

  • Pigouvian taxes can be imposed on activities generating negative externalities
    • Tax on fertilizer or pesticide use
      • Optimal tax rate equals marginal external cost at the socially efficient level of output, forcing producers to internalize the externality
    • Pigouvian taxes are efficient as they incentivize producers to reduce the externality-generating activity to the socially optimal level
      • However, they place the cost burden on producers and may have regressive distributional effects (small farmers disproportionately affected)
  • Subsidies can be provided for activities generating positive externalities
    • Payments for ecosystem services or conservation practices (USDA Conservation Reserve Program)
      • Optimal subsidy rate equals marginal external benefit at the socially efficient level of provision
    • Subsidies encourage the provision of positive externalities but involve a transfer from taxpayers to producers
      • May lead to inefficiencies if not properly targeted or calibrated (overcompensation, lack of additionality)

Command-and-Control Regulations and Market-Based Instruments

  • , such as technology standards or emission limits, can directly mandate the abatement of negative externalities
    • Nutrient management plans, buffer strip requirements
      • Effective in achieving specific environmental targets but may not be cost-efficient and provide little flexibility to heterogeneous producers
  • Cap-and-trade systems establish a total limit on the externality-generating activity and allocate tradable permits among producers
    • Creates a market for the right to generate the externality, leading to an efficient allocation of abatement efforts (least-cost abatement)
      • Cost-effective as it allows flexibility in achieving the overall emissions target
      • Initial allocation of permits has distributional implications, with grandfathering favoring incumbent producers and auctioning generating revenue for the regulator

Challenges in Valuing Agricultural Externalities

Measurement and Attribution

  • Quantifying the physical magnitude of environmental externalities is complex due to the diffuse and often nonpoint nature of agricultural pollution
    • Tracing the fate and transport of pollutants from multiple sources to receptors is challenging (watershed-scale modeling)
  • Establishing the causal link between agricultural practices and environmental impacts requires detailed data and sophisticated modeling approaches
    • Data and resource-intensive (field-level monitoring, remote sensing)

Nonmarket Valuation Techniques

  • Valuing environmental externalities is complicated by the lack of market prices for many environmental goods and services
  • , such as stated and , are used to estimate the monetary value of these impacts
    • , like contingent valuation and choice experiments, rely on surveys to elicit individuals' willingness to pay for environmental improvements or willingness to accept compensation for environmental degradation
      • Subject to hypothetical bias and strategic responses
    • Revealed preference methods, such as and , infer the value of environmental amenities from observed market transactions or behavior
      • Limited by omitted variable bias and the need for sufficient variation in environmental quality

Aggregation and Discounting

  • Aggregating and comparing diverse environmental impacts, potentially occurring over different spatial and temporal scales, requires normalization and discounting
    • Choice of discount rate for future environmental costs and benefits is contentious (intergenerational equity concerns)
  • Uncertainty surrounding the magnitude, valuation, and irreversibility of environmental impacts complicates the assessment and internalization of externalities in decision-making
    • Precautionary principle, safe minimum standards

Key Terms to Review (29)

Aggregation and Discounting: Aggregation and discounting are concepts used to evaluate the economic value of environmental externalities over time. Aggregation involves combining different environmental impacts and costs into a single measure, while discounting refers to the process of determining the present value of future costs or benefits. These concepts are essential in assessing how agricultural production impacts the environment and in making informed decisions about resource allocation.
Air Pollution: Air pollution refers to the presence of harmful substances in the atmosphere that can adversely affect human health, the environment, and the climate. This includes pollutants such as particulate matter, nitrogen oxides, sulfur dioxide, and volatile organic compounds that can stem from various sources, including agricultural activities. The impact of air pollution is a significant environmental externality associated with agricultural production, as it can result from practices like burning crop residues and the use of chemical fertilizers.
Biodiversity loss: Biodiversity loss refers to the decline in the variety and variability of life on Earth, including the extinction of species and the degradation of ecosystems. This phenomenon poses serious risks to ecological balance, agriculture, and food security, as diverse ecosystems contribute to resilience against pests, diseases, and climate change. Understanding biodiversity loss helps highlight the environmental externalities associated with agricultural production and the need for sustainable practices.
Cap-and-Trade Systems: Cap-and-trade systems are market-based approaches to controlling pollution by providing economic incentives for achieving reductions in the emissions of pollutants. These systems set a limit or 'cap' on the total amount of greenhouse gases that can be emitted, and companies can buy or sell allowances that permit them to emit a certain amount. This creates a financial motivation for companies to reduce their emissions, as they can profit from selling excess allowances or save costs by cutting back on emissions.
Carbon sequestration: Carbon sequestration is the process of capturing and storing atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) to mitigate or defer climate change. This process can occur naturally through ecosystems such as forests and soils, or can be enhanced through agricultural practices that improve carbon storage in the soil. Its significance lies in its potential to reduce greenhouse gas concentrations while also promoting sustainability in agricultural systems.
Coase Theorem: The Coase Theorem is an economic theory that asserts that if property rights are clearly defined and transaction costs are negligible, parties will negotiate to allocate resources efficiently, regardless of the initial allocation of rights. This theorem is particularly relevant when considering environmental externalities in agricultural production, as it suggests that private negotiations can lead to optimal outcomes without the need for government intervention.
Command-and-control regulations: Command-and-control regulations are government policies that set specific limits or standards for pollution and environmental practices, requiring compliance from industries, including agriculture. These regulations often include mandatory technological requirements and set penalties for non-compliance, aiming to directly control environmental impacts. In the context of agricultural production, such regulations address environmental externalities by requiring farmers to adopt practices that minimize negative effects on the environment.
Deadweight loss: Deadweight loss refers to the economic inefficiency that occurs when equilibrium for a good or service is not achieved or is not achievable. This can arise from various factors such as market distortions caused by taxes, subsidies, or monopolistic practices. The result is a loss of economic welfare that could have been gained if resources were allocated more efficiently, affecting how agricultural markets operate and influencing policy decisions.
Ecosystem services: Ecosystem services are the benefits that humans receive from natural ecosystems, including provisioning, regulating, cultural, and supporting services. These services are essential for human well-being and contribute to food production, climate regulation, and biodiversity maintenance. Recognizing ecosystem services helps to understand how agricultural practices impact the environment and promotes sustainable farming methods that protect these valuable resources.
Eutrophication: Eutrophication is the process by which water bodies become overly enriched with nutrients, often due to runoff from agricultural activities, leading to excessive growth of algae and depletion of oxygen in the water. This phenomenon not only disrupts aquatic ecosystems but also causes significant environmental externalities, impacting biodiversity and water quality.
Groundwater recharge: Groundwater recharge is the process by which water from precipitation or surface water infiltrates into the ground and replenishes underground aquifers. This process is vital for maintaining water supply, especially in agricultural areas where reliance on groundwater is high, and it plays a significant role in mitigating the environmental externalities associated with agricultural production.
Hedonic Pricing: Hedonic pricing is a method used to estimate the economic value of a good or service by breaking it down into its constituent characteristics, allowing for the assessment of how each feature contributes to its overall price. This approach helps to understand how various attributes, like environmental quality or land features, influence market value, making it relevant in contexts like land economics and environmental externalities. By isolating the impact of specific features, it provides insights into consumer preferences and the trade-offs they are willing to make.
Market-based instruments: Market-based instruments are tools used to encourage environmentally friendly practices by leveraging market forces, often through economic incentives or disincentives. These instruments aim to internalize environmental externalities in agricultural production by incorporating the costs of environmental impacts into market transactions, thereby promoting sustainable practices among producers and consumers.
Negative externality: A negative externality occurs when the production or consumption of a good or service imposes costs on third parties who are not directly involved in the transaction. This situation often leads to market failures, as the prices of goods do not reflect their true social costs, resulting in overproduction or overconsumption of those goods. In the context of agriculture, negative externalities can arise from activities such as pesticide use and soil degradation, impacting the environment and public health without being accounted for in the market price.
Nonmarket valuation techniques: Nonmarket valuation techniques are methods used to estimate the economic value of goods and services that are not traded in conventional markets, particularly in relation to environmental resources and public goods. These techniques help assess the benefits provided by ecosystems, such as clean air, biodiversity, and recreational opportunities, which are often overlooked in traditional economic analyses. By quantifying these values, nonmarket valuation techniques enable better decision-making regarding resource allocation and environmental policy.
Pigouvian taxes: Pigouvian taxes are taxes imposed on activities that generate negative externalities, aiming to correct market outcomes by aligning private costs with social costs. These taxes encourage producers and consumers to reduce their harmful behaviors, thus internalizing the external costs associated with environmental damage and promoting a more sustainable agricultural production system.
Positive Externality: A positive externality occurs when an economic activity benefits third parties who are not directly involved in the transaction. This concept is important because it highlights how certain actions can lead to unintended positive effects on society, agriculture, and the environment, influencing overall welfare and resource allocation.
Private marginal benefit: Private marginal benefit refers to the additional satisfaction or utility that an individual receives from consuming one more unit of a good or service. It connects to the decision-making processes of consumers in the agricultural sector, particularly when evaluating the trade-offs between food production and its environmental impacts, highlighting how personal preferences and choices can lead to environmental externalities.
Private marginal cost: Private marginal cost refers to the additional cost incurred by a producer when producing one more unit of a good or service, without considering external costs or benefits. It is essentially the cost borne by the producer and does not account for any environmental externalities associated with agricultural production. Understanding private marginal cost helps in analyzing decision-making in agriculture and the impact of production on the environment.
Revealed preference methods: Revealed preference methods are economic techniques used to infer individuals' preferences based on their observed choices and behaviors rather than their stated preferences. These methods are particularly valuable in assessing the value of non-market goods, such as environmental benefits, by analyzing how individuals allocate resources when faced with trade-offs. This approach helps economists understand the impact of agricultural production on the environment by observing how preferences manifest in decision-making related to resource use and environmental conservation.
Sedimentation: Sedimentation is the process by which solid particles settle and accumulate in a liquid medium, often resulting in the formation of layers of sediment over time. This process can lead to significant environmental externalities, particularly in agricultural production, as it affects soil quality, water quality, and ecosystem health through runoff and erosion.
Social marginal benefit: Social marginal benefit refers to the additional benefit gained by society as a whole from the consumption or production of one more unit of a good or service. It encompasses not just the private benefits enjoyed by the individual consumer or producer but also the external benefits that affect other members of society, particularly in cases where environmental externalities are involved. Understanding this concept is crucial in evaluating agricultural production and its impact on environmental sustainability.
Social marginal cost: Social marginal cost refers to the total cost of producing one additional unit of a good or service, considering both the private costs incurred by the producer and the external costs imposed on society. This concept is crucial in understanding how agricultural production can impact the environment, as it highlights the discrepancy between private costs and societal impacts, especially when negative environmental externalities are involved.
Soil erosion: Soil erosion is the process by which the top layer of soil is worn away, primarily due to wind, water, and human activities. This phenomenon can lead to significant loss of soil fertility and negatively impact agricultural productivity, resulting in broader environmental issues such as habitat destruction and increased sedimentation in water bodies.
Stated preference methods: Stated preference methods are survey-based techniques used to elicit individuals' preferences and values for non-market goods, such as environmental benefits, by asking them to express their choices or willingness to pay for specific outcomes. These methods are particularly important in assessing the value of environmental externalities associated with agricultural production, enabling researchers and policymakers to understand how agricultural practices impact ecosystem services and public well-being.
Sustainable resource management: Sustainable resource management refers to the responsible use and preservation of natural resources to meet current needs without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own. This concept encompasses practices that promote environmental health, economic viability, and social equity, ensuring that resources like land, water, and biodiversity are used efficiently and conserved for long-term sustainability.
Transaction Costs: Transaction costs are the expenses incurred during the process of buying or selling goods and services, which can include search and information costs, bargaining and decision costs, and policing and enforcement costs. These costs are crucial in understanding market behaviors and the efficiency of economic transactions, as they can influence the structure of industries, the feasibility of exchanges, and the overall coordination within agricultural systems.
Travel Cost Analysis: Travel cost analysis is an economic valuation method used to estimate the value of recreational sites by examining the costs incurred by visitors to travel to those sites. This approach not only accounts for the direct expenses of travel, such as transportation and lodging, but also considers the time and opportunity costs associated with visiting these locations. It's particularly relevant when assessing environmental externalities and agricultural production, as it helps quantify the benefits of preserving natural resources and recreational spaces that may be impacted by agricultural practices.
Water pollution: Water pollution refers to the contamination of water bodies, such as rivers, lakes, and oceans, caused by harmful substances or pollutants. This issue can arise from agricultural runoff, industrial discharges, and improper waste disposal, leading to detrimental effects on ecosystems, human health, and the economy. Understanding water pollution is crucial as it often represents an environmental externality of agricultural production and other industrial activities.
© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.
Back
Practice QuizGlossary
Practice QuizGlossary
Next guide