Control theories explain why people don't commit crimes. They focus on social bonds and self-control as key factors. Strong connections to family, school, and society, along with high self-control, make criminal behavior less likely.
These theories highlight the importance of early childhood experiences and parenting. They suggest that crime prevention should focus on strengthening social ties and developing self-control in young people, while also reducing opportunities for criminal acts.
Control Theories
Types of control theories
- Social bonding theory developed by Travis Hirschi focuses on the strength of an individual's bonds to society
- Four elements of social bonds: attachment (emotional connections to others like family and friends), commitment (investment in conventional activities such as education and career), involvement (time spent on conventional activities leaving less time for criminal behavior), and belief (acceptance of societal norms and values)
- Stronger social bonds lead to less likelihood of engaging in criminal behavior (school attendance, stable employment)
- Self-control theory proposed by Michael Gottfredson and Travis Hirschi emphasizes the role of individual self-control in determining criminal behavior
- Low self-control is the primary cause of criminal behavior developed during childhood due to ineffective parenting practices (lack of supervision, inconsistent discipline)
- Individuals with low self-control tend to be impulsive, risk-taking, and short-sighted (substance abuse, reckless driving)
- General theory of crime integrates elements of social bonding and self-control theories
- Argues that low self-control, combined with opportunity, leads to criminal behavior
- Individuals with low self-control are more likely to engage in criminal behavior when presented with the opportunity to do so (unattended valuables, easy targets)
Role of social bonds
- Social bonds refer to the connections and attachments individuals have to conventional society
- Four elements of social bonds act as protective factors against criminal behavior:
- Attachment: Emotional connections to significant others, such as family and friends, lead to greater conformity to societal norms (positive parent-child relationships, close friendships)
- Commitment: Investment in conventional activities, such as education and career, increases the potential costs of engaging in criminal behavior (pursuing higher education, building a successful career)
- Involvement: More time spent on prosocial activities, such as extracurricular activities and volunteering, leaves less time for criminal behavior (participating in sports teams, community service)
- Belief: Stronger belief in the legitimacy of societal norms reduces the likelihood of violating them (respecting laws, valuing honesty)
- Weaker or broken social bonds increase the risk of engaging in criminal behavior (dysfunctional family relationships, lack of educational and employment opportunities)
Self-control and criminal behavior
- Gottfredson and Hirschi's general theory of crime integrates elements of social bonding and self-control theories
- Low self-control is the primary cause of criminal behavior developed during childhood due to ineffective parenting practices (lack of supervision, inconsistent discipline)
- Opportunity plays a crucial role in the manifestation of criminal behavior
- Individuals with low self-control are more likely to engage in criminal behavior when presented with the opportunity to do so (unsecured property, vulnerable victims)
- Opportunities for crime can vary across situations and contexts (urban areas, high-crime neighborhoods)
- The interaction between low self-control and opportunity determines the likelihood of criminal behavior
- Individuals with low self-control are more likely to take advantage of criminal opportunities when they arise (shoplifting, burglary)
Evidence for control theories
- Empirical support for social bonding theory:
- Studies have found that stronger social bonds, particularly attachment and commitment, are associated with lower levels of criminal behavior (higher academic achievement, stable employment)
- Research has shown that family attachment and school commitment are important protective factors against delinquency (positive parent-child communication, school engagement)
- Empirical support for self-control theory:
- Studies have consistently found a significant relationship between low self-control and various forms of criminal and deviant behavior (substance abuse, violent offenses)
- Longitudinal research has provided evidence for the stability of self-control over time and its influence on criminal behavior in adulthood (childhood self-control predicts adult criminal behavior)
- Empirical support for the general theory of crime:
- Research has supported the interactive effect of low self-control and opportunity on criminal behavior (increased crime rates in areas with more criminal opportunities)
- Studies have found that individuals with low self-control are more likely to engage in criminal behavior when opportunities are present (theft in unsupervised settings, assault in high-conflict situations)
- Implications for crime prevention strategies:
- Strengthening social bonds through family support programs and school-based interventions can help prevent criminal behavior (parent education, mentoring programs)
- Early childhood interventions aimed at improving parenting practices and promoting self-control development may be effective in reducing future criminal behavior (parent training, self-regulation skills)
- Situational crime prevention strategies that focus on reducing opportunities for crime can be effective in preventing criminal behavior among individuals with low self-control (increased surveillance, target hardening)