Glossary

6.1 Reconstructing past diets through archaeological evidence

7 min read•august 15, 2024

Reconstructing past diets through archaeological evidence is a complex process. Scientists use plant and animal remains, human bones, artifacts, and chemical analysis to piece together what ancient people ate. Each method has strengths and limitations, so combining multiple lines of evidence is key.

Interpreting this evidence requires considering cultural, economic, and environmental factors that shaped food choices. Researchers must also account for how time and natural processes affect the preservation of dietary clues. By carefully analyzing these remains, we can uncover fascinating insights into ancient and how they changed over time.

Archaeological Evidence for Diets

Plant Remains

Top images from around the web for Plant Remains

  • Reconstructing past climates View original

    Is this image relevant?

  • Frontiers | Phytoliths in Inflorescence Bracts: Preliminary Results of an Investigation on ... View original

    Is this image relevant?

  • Reconstructing past climates View original

    Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Plant Remains

  • Reconstructing past climates View original

    Is this image relevant?

  • Frontiers | Phytoliths in Inflorescence Bracts: Preliminary Results of an Investigation on ... View original

    Is this image relevant?

  • Reconstructing past climates View original

    Is this image relevant?

1 of 3
  • like charred seeds (maize, squash) and nuts (acorns, walnuts) provide direct evidence of plant foods consumed
  • Microbotanical remains like pollen and phytoliths offer indirect evidence of plants in the diet and environment
    • Pollen grains from agricultural crops or gathered plants can indicate their presence and importance in the diet
    • Phytoliths, microscopic silica bodies formed in plant cells, can identify specific plant taxa consumed (rice, wheat)

Animal Remains

  • such as animal bones (deer, bison), fish bones (salmon, cod), and shells (clams, oysters) indicate the types of animals hunted or gathered for food
  • Butchery marks and patterns of skeletal element representation provide clues about processing and consumption
    • Cut marks on bones suggest filleting or defleshing of meat for consumption
    • Differential representation of skeletal elements can reflect transport decisions and meat preferences (high utility parts like limbs vs. low utility parts like skulls)
  • of animal bones can reveal information about their diet and habitat, indirectly reflecting human dietary patterns

Human Remains

  • Human skeletal remains, particularly teeth and bones, contain evidence of diet through pathologies, chemical composition, and stable isotope ratios
  • Dental pathologies like caries (tooth decay) and abscesses indicate consumption of cariogenic foods high in carbohydrates and sugars (maize, honey)
  • Stable isotope ratios of carbon (δ13Cδ^{13}C) and nitrogen (δ15Nδ^{15}N) in bone collagen and tooth enamel reflect the protein sources and trophic level of the diet
    • δ13Cδ^{13}C values distinguish between C3C_3 plants (wheat, rice) and C4C_4 plants (maize, sorghum) in the diet
    • δ15Nδ^{15}N values indicate the relative contribution of plant vs. animal protein and the trophic level of animal protein (herbivores vs. carnivores)

Artifacts and Residues

  • Artifacts like grinding stones (manos, metates), pottery (jars, bowls), and cooking features (hearths, ovens) suggest food processing techniques and cooking methods
  • Use-wear patterns and residues on grinding stones can identify the plants processed (maize, acorns)
  • Lipid residues preserved in pottery matrices can be analyzed to identify specific plant and animal species cooked or stored in the vessels
  • Chemical residues in dental calculus (mineralized plaque) can provide direct evidence of plant and animal biomarkers consumed

Strengths and Limitations of Paleodietary Methods

Faunal and Botanical Analysis

  • Faunal analysis provides direct evidence of animal species consumed but is limited by differential preservation of bones and potential equifinality in interpreting processing patterns
    • Bones of larger, more robust animals are more likely to preserve than smaller, more fragile bones
    • Similar butchery patterns could reflect different processing goals or
  • Botanical analysis offers evidence of plant use but is biased towards plants with durable remains while other species may be underrepresented
    • Hard seeds, nutshells, and wood are more likely to survive than soft tissues like leaves and fruits
    • Certain plant processing techniques (grinding, boiling) may leave little archaeological trace

Isotopic and Dental Analysis

  • Stable isotope analysis of human bones and teeth reveals information about broad dietary categories and trophic level but cannot identify specific food species and is influenced by diagenesis
    • Isotopic signatures reflect an average of foods consumed over years, not specific meals or short-term diets
    • Diagenetic alteration of bone and tooth chemistry can obscure original isotopic signals
  • Dental pathology analysis indicates cariogenic foods in the diet but does not directly identify those foods and can be affected by non-dietary factors
    • High caries rates suggest consumption of carbohydrate-rich foods but do not specify which plant species
    • Oral hygiene practices, genetics, and age also influence caries development

Residue and Artifact Analysis

  • Residue analysis can detect specific biomarkers for certain plant and animal foods but only reflects the last foods cooked in a pot or the residues that survive degradation
    • Lipid profiles may be skewed towards later use of a vessel rather than its full use-life
    • Some residues are more prone to degradation or leaching than others
  • Artifact and feature analysis suggests food processing and cooking techniques but is subject to equifinality as objects can serve multiple functions
    • Grinding stones could be used to process plants or minerals, not just food
    • Cooking features like hearths could be used for non-dietary purposes (pottery firing, heat)

Interpreting Dietary Practices from Evidence

Integrating Multiple Lines of Evidence

  • Multiple lines of archaeological evidence must be integrated to develop robust interpretations of past diets, as each type of evidence has its own strengths and limitations
    • Combining faunal, botanical, human, artifactual, and chemical evidence provides a more complete picture of dietary practices
    • Concordances and discrepancies between different data sets can reveal new insights or raise interpretive questions
  • The archaeological context of dietary evidence, such as site type (village, hunting camp), depositional environment (middens, floors), and associated artifacts (pottery, tools), influences how that evidence is interpreted
    • Evidence from a residential site may reflect daily diets while evidence from a special-purpose site may reflect specific activities or events
    • Differential deposition and preservation of remains in different contexts can affect dietary interpretations

Analogical Reasoning and Experimental Archaeology

  • Ethnographic analogies and experimental archaeology can aid in interpreting the relationship between archaeological evidence and the dietary behaviors that produced it
    • Observing modern societies with similar subsistence practices can provide insights into the potential uses and meanings of archaeological food remains
    • Experimental studies that replicate past food processing and cooking techniques can help identify the material correlates and performance characteristics of those activities
  • Interpreting evidence of past diets requires considering the social, economic, and environmental factors that shape food choice, procurement, processing, and consumption
    • Cultural preferences, taboos, and identities influence what foods are considered edible, desirable, or appropriate
    • Economic systems of production, exchange, and distribution affect the availability and accessibility of different food resources
    • Environmental parameters like climate, seasonality, and resource patchiness constrain the options for subsistence strategies
  • Changes in dietary evidence over time and space can reflect shifts in subsistence strategies, environmental conditions, social organization, and cultural practices
    • Adoption of agriculture, intensification of aquatic resources, or expansion of trade networks can alter the types and proportions of foods in the diet
    • Climatic variations like droughts or temperature fluctuations can affect the abundance and distribution of plant and animal resources
    • Emergence of social hierarchies or cultural contact can lead to differential access to valued foods or the introduction of new culinary practices
  • Comparing dietary evidence from different sites, regions, and time periods allows for analysis of variability and trends in past foodways
    • Contrasting contemporary sites can reveal spatial patterning in diets related to environmental settings (coastal vs. inland) or cultural identities (ethnic groups)
    • Examining diachronic sequences can show how diets changed in response to major transitions like the origins of agriculture or the rise of complex societies

Taphonomic Processes in Dietary Analysis

Differential Preservation and Representation

  • Taphonomic processes refer to the chemical, physical, and biological factors that affect the preservation and modification of archaeological remains after their initial deposition
  • Differential preservation of plant and animal remains can skew the representation of foods in the archaeological record, as some materials are more prone to decay than others
    • Organic remains with high collagen (bone) or lignin (wood) content are more likely to survive than soft tissues (meat, fruit)
    • Charring can preserve plant remains that would otherwise degrade (seeds, nutshells), but it represents a biased sample of plant use
  • Depositional environment and burial conditions influence the survival and recovery of dietary evidence
    • Anoxic sediments (waterlogged, frozen) inhibit microbial decay and promote preservation of organic remains
    • Acidic soils accelerate the decomposition of bones and shells while alkaline soils slow it down

Post-Depositional Disturbances and Diagenesis

  • Post-depositional disturbances like bioturbation (animal burrowing, root growth), erosion (water, wind), and chemical weathering (leaching, mineral alteration) can destroy, move, or alter dietary evidence
    • Mixing of cultural deposits by natural processes can blur stratigraphic associations and complicate chronological interpretations
    • Physical and chemical degradation of organic remains can reduce their identifiability and information potential
  • Diagenesis, or post-mortem chemical alteration, can affect the stable isotope ratios and trace element composition of bones and teeth, potentially distorting paleodietary signals
    • Groundwater percolation and microbial activity can introduce or remove isotopes, altering original biological signatures
    • Absorption of minerals from the burial environment can overprint or mask dietary trace element profiles

Evaluating Evidence Integrity and Research Biases

  • Understanding the taphonomic history of a site is crucial for evaluating the integrity and representativeness of dietary evidence and identifying potential biases in the data
    • Assessing the stratigraphic context, preservation conditions, and post-depositional disturbances of dietary remains is necessary for reliable interpretations
    • Recognizing the limitations and biases of different recovery methods (flotation, sieving) and analytical techniques (microscopy, spectrometry) is important for critically examining dietary reconstructions
  • Taphonomic factors should be considered when comparing dietary evidence from different contexts, as variable preservation can create apparent differences that reflect taphonomy rather than actual dietary variation
    • Differential preservation of plant vs. animal remains or terrestrial vs. aquatic resources can create false impressions of dietary importance or neglect
    • Comparing assemblages from similar depositional environments and using robust quantitative methods can help control for taphonomic biases in dietary studies

Key Terms to Review (18)

Archaeobotany: Archaeobotany is the study of ancient plant remains and their relationship to past human societies, aiming to understand how people interacted with their environment through the cultivation, use, and consumption of plants. This field reveals insights into agricultural practices, dietary habits, and the impact of environmental changes on human settlements, making it vital for understanding past human-environment interactions.
Archaeozoology: Archaeozoology is the study of animal remains from archaeological sites to understand human-animal relationships and reconstruct past environments and diets. This field involves analyzing bones, teeth, shells, and other biological materials to provide insights into what people ate, how they hunted or domesticated animals, and how these practices affected ecosystems over time.
B. M. Fagan: B. M. Fagan is an influential archaeologist known for his contributions to understanding ancient diets and the relationship between environmental change and human adaptation. His work often emphasizes the importance of interdisciplinary approaches, integrating archaeology, ecology, and anthropology to reconstruct how past societies interacted with their environments and what they consumed.
Climate change: Climate change refers to significant and lasting alterations in temperature, precipitation patterns, and other atmospheric conditions on Earth, primarily driven by human activities such as fossil fuel burning and deforestation. This ongoing shift not only impacts natural ecosystems but also influences human societies and cultural developments throughout history.
Cooking technology: Cooking technology refers to the various tools, techniques, and methods used by past societies to prepare and transform food through heat. This term encompasses everything from basic fire usage to complex pottery designs and cooking appliances, highlighting how ancient cultures adapted their cooking methods to their environment and available resources.
Cultural Practices: Cultural practices refer to the behaviors, rituals, and traditions that are shared and transmitted within a particular group or society. These practices encompass a wide range of activities, including food preparation, agricultural methods, and social customs, all of which can provide valuable insights into how past communities interacted with their environment and shaped their diets over time.
Dietary diversity: Dietary diversity refers to the variety of different foods and nutrients consumed by individuals or populations, reflecting a range of food sources and types within their diet. A diverse diet is essential for meeting nutritional needs and can indicate the health and sustainability of food systems throughout history. Understanding dietary diversity helps in reconstructing past diets by analyzing the archaeological evidence of food remains, cooking methods, and cultural practices associated with food consumption.
Faunal remains: Faunal remains refer to the preserved bones, teeth, and other skeletal elements of animals found in archaeological sites. These remains are essential for understanding past human behavior, interactions with the environment, and dietary practices, helping to illuminate how societies adapted to changing ecological conditions.
Food storage: Food storage refers to the practices and methods used by human societies to preserve and store food for future consumption. This concept plays a crucial role in understanding how past cultures interacted with their environment, as it highlights their ability to adapt to seasonal changes, ensure food security, and develop agricultural practices. Through examining archaeological evidence of food storage techniques, researchers can gain insights into the dietary habits, social organization, and environmental conditions faced by ancient communities.
Foodways: Foodways refer to the cultural, social, and economic practices surrounding the production, distribution, preparation, and consumption of food within a community. This concept emphasizes the relationship between people and their food, highlighting how diets are influenced by environmental factors, technology, traditions, and social structures. Understanding foodways provides insights into past diets and the social dynamics that shape food systems across different cultures.
Harris Lines: Harris lines are physiological indicators of stress that appear as lines or bands on the long bones of individuals, formed during periods of nutritional deficiency or illness. These lines serve as evidence of past environmental stresses and can provide insights into the health and diet of populations throughout history.
Macrobotanical remains: Macrobotanical remains are the visible plant materials recovered from archaeological sites, such as seeds, leaves, wood, and other large plant parts. These remains provide important evidence of past human diets and agricultural practices, allowing researchers to reconstruct the types of plants that were consumed and cultivated in different environments throughout history.
Neolithic Revolution: The Neolithic Revolution refers to the significant transition from nomadic hunter-gatherer societies to settled agricultural communities, which began around 10,000 BCE. This shift led to the domestication of plants and animals, allowing humans to establish permanent settlements, cultivate crops, and develop complex societies.
Paleoethnobotany: Paleoethnobotany is the study of the relationship between ancient people and plants through the analysis of plant remains found at archaeological sites. This field helps reconstruct past human behavior, settlement patterns, land use, and agricultural practices by examining how people interacted with their environment and utilized various plant resources.
Pleistocene foraging: Pleistocene foraging refers to the subsistence strategies and dietary practices of human populations during the Pleistocene epoch, which lasted from about 2.6 million to 11,700 years ago. This period was characterized by significant climate changes and the expansion of glacial ice, influencing the availability of food resources and the mobility of human groups. Foragers adapted to their environment, relying on hunting, gathering, and fishing to meet their nutritional needs, which is crucial for understanding past diets through archaeological evidence.
Resource availability: Resource availability refers to the access and abundance of essential materials and nutrients required for human survival and cultural development. It plays a vital role in shaping dietary practices, subsistence strategies, and social organization throughout history, influencing the types of food that past populations could consume based on what was locally accessible.
Stable Isotope Analysis: Stable isotope analysis is a scientific technique used to measure the ratios of stable isotopes of elements within materials, which can provide insights into past environmental conditions, diets, and migration patterns. This method connects multiple disciplines, allowing researchers to reconstruct historical ecosystems and understand human interactions with the environment over time.
Subsistence patterns: Subsistence patterns refer to the strategies and methods that societies use to obtain food and other resources necessary for survival. These patterns are closely tied to the environment, technology, and social organization of a community. Understanding subsistence patterns is crucial for examining the ways in which different societies, such as foraging and hunting-gathering groups, adapted to their surroundings and how these practices can be reconstructed through archaeological evidence.
© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.
Back
Practice QuizGlossary
Practice QuizGlossary
Next guide