Verified for the 2025 AP English Language exam•Citation:
In the previous guides, we covered the fundamentals of argument writing and learned how to craft strong thesis statements that take defensible positions. Now we'll focus on the heart of your argument: evidence and commentary. This component is worth up to 4 points on your essay—the most heavily weighted element of the scoring rubric. You'll learn how to select compelling evidence and explain how it supports your position.
Evidence in argument essays can include:
Strong commentary must:
Let's use this prompt about classroom participation:
Many educators and researchers argue that classroom participation should be a significant portion of students' grades, claiming it encourages engagement, develops crucial communication skills, and prepares students for future professional environments. However, critics contend that grading participation can unfairly disadvantage introverted students, those with anxiety, or students from cultural backgrounds where speaking up is not encouraged.
Write an essay that argues your position on whether classroom participation should be a required component of course grades.
0 Points (Does Not Meet Standards)
When evidence and commentary are missing or disconnected
1 Point (Basic)
When evidence and commentary begin to develop
❌ Example using participation prompt: "Some students are shy. This shows why participation grades are unfair."
2 Points (Developing)
When evidence and commentary show clear connections
✅ Example: "In my Advanced Physics class, several bright international students rarely speak up during discussions, but they consistently score highest on exams. This demonstrates how participation grades might penalize knowledgeable students who come from cultures where speaking up in class is considered disrespectful."
3 Points (Proficient)
When evidence and commentary develop a strong line of reasoning
✅ Example: "While proponents argue that participation grades prepare students for professional environments, this assumes all professional success requires verbal assertiveness. In fields like software development or research, many professionals contribute through written communication, detailed analysis, or individual problem-solving. Forcing students to develop one specific communication style actually limits their professional preparation rather than enhancing it."
4 Points (Excellent)
When evidence and commentary create compelling argument
⭐ Example: "The very students who most need support in our educational system—including English language learners, students with anxiety disorders, and those from cultures that value listening over speaking—are often the ones most harmed by mandatory participation grades. At my school, a talented Vietnamese student who wrote brilliant lab reports and scored perfectly on tests nearly failed Biology because participation was 30% of the grade. This common grading policy doesn't just disadvantage certain students; it actively undermines education's role as an equalizing force in society. While developing communication skills is crucial, we must question whether our current approach to participation actually develops these skills or simply rewards students who already possess them while punishing those who need different types of support."
Select Relevant Evidence
Develop Effective Commentary
Create a Line of Reasoning
Pitfall | Description | Common Mistakes |
---|---|---|
❌ The List Problem | When you provide evidence without analysis | • Simply listing examples • Not explaining significance • Failing to connect to thesis |
❌ The Logic Gap | When your reasoning isn't clear | • Making unsupported leaps • Assuming connections are obvious • Not explaining your thinking |
❌ The Relevance Issue | When your evidence doesn't fit | • Using unrelated examples • Straying from your argument • Missing the main point |
❌ The Depth Problem | When your analysis stays surface-level | • Stating the obvious • Not exploring implications • Avoiding complexity |
Next, we'll explore how to demonstrate sophistication in your argument, moving beyond basic analysis to show complex understanding of the issues you discuss.