5.1 Relative sizing and story points
5 min read•august 13, 2024
and are key tools in Agile estimation. They help teams quickly assess work complexity without getting bogged down in time-based guesses. This approach fosters collaboration and adaptability, essential for effective project planning.
Story points represent effort and complexity, not time. By comparing tasks to each other, teams can estimate more accurately and flexibly. This method aligns with Agile's focus on iterative planning and continuous improvement throughout a project.
Relative Sizing in Agile Estimation
Concept and Technique
Top images from around the web for Concept and Technique
ProductTeam/User Stories - OpenStack View original
Is this image relevant?
Free Agile Methodology PowerPoint Template - Free PowerPoint Templates - SlideHunter.com View original
Is this image relevant?
Agile User stories and Domain-Driven Design (DDD) View original
Is this image relevant?
ProductTeam/User Stories - OpenStack View original
Is this image relevant?
Free Agile Methodology PowerPoint Template - Free PowerPoint Templates - SlideHunter.com View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Top images from around the web for Concept and Technique
ProductTeam/User Stories - OpenStack View original
Is this image relevant?
Free Agile Methodology PowerPoint Template - Free PowerPoint Templates - SlideHunter.com View original
Is this image relevant?
Agile User stories and Domain-Driven Design (DDD) View original
Is this image relevant?
ProductTeam/User Stories - OpenStack View original
Is this image relevant?
Free Agile Methodology PowerPoint Template - Free PowerPoint Templates - SlideHunter.com View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
- Relative sizing estimates the size and complexity of user stories or work items in relation to other items, rather than using absolute units of time
- The (1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21) commonly assigns relative sizes to user stories, with each number representing a progressively larger size or complexity
- Relative sizing allows teams to estimate work more quickly and accurately by comparing items to one another, without the need for detailed analysis or breaking down tasks into smaller units
- The relative sizes assigned to user stories calculate the team's , which is the amount of work completed in a given iteration or sprint (2-week sprint)
Benefits of Relative Sizing
- Enables faster and more accurate estimation by comparing user stories to each other
- Avoids the need for detailed analysis or breaking down tasks into smaller units, saving time and effort
- Provides a high-level understanding of the relative size and complexity of user stories
- Helps teams identify and prioritize the most valuable and feasible user stories for each sprint
- Facilitates better communication and collaboration among team members during the estimation process
Purpose and Benefits of Story Points
Representing Effort and Complexity
- Story points are a unit of measure used in Agile estimation to represent the relative size, complexity, and effort required to complete a user story or work item
- The purpose of using story points is to provide a high-level estimate of the work involved in a user story, enabling better planning, prioritization, and forecasting of the project
- Story points help teams to abstract away from time-based estimates, which can be inaccurate due to varying skill levels, interruptions, and other factors that affect productivity (team members' experience, availability)
- By using story points, teams can more easily compare the relative size and complexity of different user stories, even if they involve different types of work or require different skills (front-end development vs. database design)
Fostering Collaboration and Consensus
- Story points foster collaboration and consensus among team members, as they collectively estimate and agree on the size of each user story during planning sessions ()
- The process of assigning story points encourages team members to discuss and clarify requirements, share knowledge, and reach a common understanding of the work involved
- Collaborative estimation using story points helps to reduce individual biases and improves the accuracy and reliability of estimates
- Story points promote a shared sense of ownership and commitment to the project goals among team members
Assigning Story Points to User Stories
Collaborative Estimation Process
- Assigning story points to user stories typically involves a collaborative estimation process, such as Planning Poker, where team members independently estimate the size of each story and then discuss their estimates to reach a consensus
- The team selects a well-understood user story as a baseline or reference story, assigning it a specific story point value (2 points for a simple login feature)
- When estimating a user story, team members consider factors such as complexity, effort, uncertainty, and potential risks involved in completing the work (integrating with a third-party API, handling complex business logic)
- If there is a significant discrepancy in the estimates provided by team members, they discuss the reasons behind their estimates and share knowledge to reach a common understanding and agreement
Factors to Consider
- Complexity: The inherent difficulty or intricacy of the work involved in the user story (complex algorithms, multiple system integrations)
- Effort: The amount of work required to complete the user story, considering the skills and resources available within the team
- Uncertainty: The level of ambiguity or unknowns associated with the user story, which may require further clarification or research (unclear requirements, new technology)
- Risks: The potential obstacles or challenges that may impact the completion of the user story (dependencies on external teams, technical debts)
- Size: The overall scope and magnitude of the user story compared to other stories in the backlog
- Once a consensus is reached, the agreed-upon story point value is assigned to the user story, and the process is repeated for the remaining stories in the backlog
Story Points vs Time-Based Estimates
Differences in Representation
- Story points represent the relative size, complexity, and effort of a user story, while traditional time-based estimates (hours or days) represent the actual time expected to complete the work
- Story points are unit-less and do not directly correspond to a specific amount of time, whereas time-based estimates are expressed in units of time and aim to predict the actual duration of the work
- Story points are estimated relatively by comparing user stories to one another, while time-based estimates are often based on individual judgment and historical data
Accounting for Uncertainty and Complexity
- Story points take into account the complexity and uncertainty of the work, whereas time-based estimates often assume ideal conditions and do not explicitly account for these factors
- Story points are more stable and less likely to change over time, as they are relative measures, while time-based estimates can vary significantly based on the individual performing the work and external factors affecting productivity (team member's experience, interruptions)
- Story points accommodate the inherent uncertainty in software development, where requirements may change, and unexpected challenges may arise
- Time-based estimates can create a false sense of precision and may not accurately reflect the true effort required, especially for complex or novel tasks
Impact on Team Dynamics
- Story points foster team collaboration and consensus, while time-based estimates are often provided by individuals and may not involve team discussion or agreement
- The use of story points encourages team members to focus on the relative size and complexity of the work, rather than getting bogged down in debating specific time estimates
- Story points promote a more collaborative and adaptive approach to planning and estimation, allowing the team to adjust and respond to changes more effectively
- Time-based estimates can lead to pressure and stress on individual team members to meet specific deadlines, potentially compromising quality and team morale
Key Terms to Review (17)
Burn-down chart: A burn-down chart is a visual tool used in Agile project management to track the amount of work remaining in a project over time, typically displayed in a graph format. It helps teams monitor their progress toward completing work within a sprint or project and provides insights into whether they are on track to meet deadlines.
Complexity Scaling: Complexity scaling refers to the method of assessing and adjusting the relative size of tasks based on their complexity rather than just their duration or effort. This approach helps teams understand that some tasks, while smaller in size, may involve greater intricacies that require more consideration, which is especially important when assigning story points and prioritizing work in an Agile environment.
Customer collaboration: Customer collaboration is a key principle in Agile methodologies that emphasizes working closely with customers and stakeholders throughout the project to gather feedback, understand needs, and ensure that the delivered product meets their expectations. This ongoing partnership is essential for creating value and fostering adaptability in response to changing requirements.
Effort Estimation: Effort estimation is the process of predicting the amount of work required to complete a task or project, often expressed in units such as hours, days, or story points. This estimation is crucial for planning and helps teams allocate resources, set timelines, and manage expectations effectively. By using techniques like relative sizing and story points, teams can better understand the complexity and effort involved in various tasks.
Estimation Workshops: Estimation workshops are collaborative sessions where team members come together to discuss and estimate the effort required to complete tasks or user stories in a project. These workshops leverage techniques like relative sizing and story points to encourage team engagement and ensure a shared understanding of the work involved. They aim to enhance the accuracy of project planning while promoting communication and collaboration among team members.
Fibonacci Sequence: The Fibonacci sequence is a series of numbers where each number is the sum of the two preceding ones, usually starting with 0 and 1. This mathematical pattern is often used in Agile project management for relative sizing and story points, as it helps teams estimate effort and complexity in a more manageable way. By utilizing this sequence, teams can quickly communicate the relative sizes of tasks without getting bogged down in exact estimates.
Ideal Hours: Ideal hours refer to the optimal amount of time a team would need to complete a specific task or set of tasks without interruptions or distractions. This concept helps teams estimate effort more accurately and provides a benchmark for understanding workload and productivity, making it easier to measure progress and performance against planned work. Understanding ideal hours is crucial for effectively managing resources and setting realistic deadlines.
Kanban: Kanban is a visual workflow management method that helps teams visualize their work, limit work in progress, and maximize efficiency. It encourages a continuous flow of work by using a Kanban board to display tasks, allowing teams to manage and optimize their processes effectively.
Planning Poker: Planning Poker is an agile estimation technique used to reach a consensus on the size and complexity of user stories, by allowing team members to assign story points through a card-based voting system. This method encourages collaboration and discussion among team members, leading to a more accurate understanding of the work involved. It connects closely with relative sizing and story points, helps refine estimation techniques, and plays a key role in measuring velocity and planning for future capacity.
Product Owner: The Product Owner is a key role in Agile project management, specifically within the Scrum framework, responsible for maximizing the value of the product resulting from the work of the development team. This role acts as a bridge between stakeholders and the development team, ensuring that the product backlog is prioritized and that user stories reflect the needs and expectations of users and stakeholders.
Relative sizing: Relative sizing is a technique used in Agile project management to estimate the effort required to complete tasks or user stories by comparing them to one another. This approach emphasizes understanding the size and complexity of tasks relative to each other rather than providing absolute estimates in hours or days. It allows teams to prioritize and plan their work more effectively by assessing the relative effort involved in different tasks, which can lead to better forecasting and resource allocation.
Responding to Change: Responding to change refers to the ability of a project team to adapt and adjust their plans, processes, and deliverables in reaction to evolving circumstances, requirements, or feedback. This flexibility is a core principle of Agile methodologies, allowing teams to embrace uncertainty and capitalize on new opportunities throughout the project lifecycle.
Scrum: Scrum is an Agile framework used for managing and completing complex projects, emphasizing iterative progress, teamwork, and accountability. This approach divides work into small, manageable increments called sprints, enabling teams to adapt quickly to changes and continuously improve their processes.
Scrum Master: A Scrum Master is a facilitator and servant leader for a Scrum team, responsible for ensuring that the team adheres to Agile practices and principles while helping to remove any obstacles that may impede progress. This role is crucial in fostering an environment of collaboration, accountability, and continuous improvement within the team.
Story Points: Story points are a unit of measure used in Agile project management to estimate the relative effort required to complete a user story. They help teams gauge the complexity and workload associated with specific tasks, allowing for better planning and resource allocation. By using story points, teams can communicate more effectively about work, prioritize tasks, and track progress over time.
T-shirt sizing: T-shirt sizing is an estimation technique used in Agile project management to categorize the relative size and complexity of user stories using simple, relatable labels like 'small', 'medium', 'large', and 'extra-large'. This approach helps teams quickly gauge the effort required for tasks without getting bogged down in precise numerical values, promoting faster decision-making and collaboration. By leveraging familiar concepts from clothing sizes, teams can communicate more effectively about project requirements and priorities.
Velocity: Velocity is a key metric in Agile project management that measures the amount of work a team completes in a given iteration, typically expressed in story points. This measurement allows teams to gauge their productivity and predict future performance, making it an essential tool for planning and improving efficiency in Agile practices.