scoresvideos
Advanced Wastewater Treatment
Table of Contents

Anammox reactors come in various configurations, each with unique advantages. Sequencing Batch Reactors offer flexibility, Moving Bed Biofilm Reactors provide high biomass retention, and Granular Sludge Reactors enable efficient nitrogen removal. These systems help treat wastewater more effectively than traditional methods.

Key design factors for Anammox reactors include hydraulic retention time, sludge retention time, and dissolved oxygen control. Real-world examples from the Netherlands, Austria, and Singapore show how these reactors can be successfully implemented in different climates, achieving high nitrogen removal rates.

Reactor Configurations for Anammox

Anammox reactor configurations

  • Sequencing Batch Reactors (SBRs)
    • Operate in a batch mode with alternating cycles of feeding, reaction, settling, and decanting enables flexibility in operation and control
    • Require less space compared to continuous flow systems (activated sludge)
  • Moving Bed Biofilm Reactors (MBBRs)
    • Utilize suspended carriers (plastic media) for biofilm attachment allows for high biomass retention and long sludge retention times
    • Provide a large surface area for microbial growth enhances treatment efficiency
    • Require less space compared to conventional activated sludge systems
  • Granular Sludge Reactors
    • Utilize self-immobilized microbial aggregates (granules) for wastewater treatment enables high biomass retention and excellent settling properties
    • Enable simultaneous nitrification and denitrification within the granules improves nitrogen removal efficiency
    • Require a smaller footprint compared to flocculent sludge systems (conventional activated sludge)

Pros and cons of reactor types

  • SBRs
    • Advantages: Operational flexibility adapts to varying influent conditions, good biomass retention, and efficient nitrogen removal
    • Disadvantages: Requires precise timing and control to optimize performance, potential for nitrite accumulation during feeding phase can inhibit Anammox bacteria
  • MBBRs
    • Advantages: High biomass retention minimizes sludge production, resistance to shock loads (industrial discharges), and reduced sludge production
    • Disadvantages: Potential for carrier clogging requires regular maintenance, higher energy consumption for carrier mixing increases operational costs
  • Granular Sludge Reactors
    • Advantages: Excellent biomass retention enables high volumetric loading rates, high volumetric loading rates reduce reactor size, and good effluent quality meets discharge standards
    • Disadvantages: Requires a long start-up period for granulation (2-3 months), sensitive to influent fluctuations (pH, temperature) can disrupt granule stability

Design parameters for Anammox reactors

  • Hydraulic Retention Time (HRT)
    • Determines the contact time between wastewater and Anammox bacteria affects substrate removal efficiency
    • Typically ranges from 1 to 4 hours depending on the reactor configuration (SBR, MBBR) and influent characteristics (nitrogen load)
  • Sludge Retention Time (SRT)
    • Determines the average time that biomass remains in the reactor impacts microbial community structure
    • Anammox bacteria require long SRTs (>20 days) due to their slow growth rates (doubling time of 11-20 days)
  • Dissolved Oxygen (DO) control
    • Anammox bacteria are sensitive to high DO concentrations inhibits their activity
    • Maintain DO levels below 0.2 mg/L to prevent inhibition of Anammox activity ensures optimal nitrogen removal
  • Substrate ratio ($NO_2^-$-N/$NH_4^+$-N)
    • Optimal ratio ranges from 1.0 to 1.3 for efficient Anammox process balances nitrite and ammonium consumption
    • Excess nitrite can lead to Anammox inhibition disrupts nitrogen removal efficiency
  • Temperature
    • Anammox process is sensitive to temperature fluctuations affects bacterial growth and activity
    • Optimal temperature range is between 30-40°C mesophilic conditions

Case studies of Anammox implementation

  • Dokhaven WWTP, Rotterdam, Netherlands
    • Utilized a granular sludge reactor for Anammox treatment first full-scale application
    • Achieved nitrogen removal rates up to 10 kg N/m³/day one of the highest reported values
    • Demonstrated stable operation and good effluent quality over long-term operation (>10 years)
  • Strass WWTP, Austria
    • Implemented a two-stage SBR system for partial nitritation and Anammox enables separate optimization of each process
    • Achieved nitrogen removal rates up to 0.6 kg N/m³/day under low temperature conditions
    • Showcased the feasibility of Anammox process in cold climates (12-15°C) expands applicability
  • Changi WRP, Singapore
    • Utilized a single-stage nitritation-Anammox MBBR simplifies process control
    • Achieved nitrogen removal rates up to 0.5 kg N/m³/day under high temperature conditions
    • Demonstrated successful Anammox application in tropical climates (30-35°C) highlights versatility of the process