crams
Adaptive and Self-Tuning Control
Table of Contents

Model Reference Adaptive Control (MRAC) systems use key design parameters to shape their behavior. Adaptation gain, reference models, and adaptive laws work together to create a system that can adapt to changing conditions and uncertainties.

Performance analysis of MRAC systems looks at both short-term and long-term behavior. Metrics like overshoot and settling time help evaluate transient performance, while tracking error and parameter convergence assess steady-state performance. Robustness and improvement techniques further enhance MRAC designs.

Design Parameters and Performance Analysis

Key design parameters for MRAC

  • Adaptation gain determines parameter adaptation speed higher values enable faster adaptation but may induce oscillations while lower values yield slower adaptation with improved stability
  • Reference model defines desired closed-loop system behavior affects tracking performance and transient response (step response, overshoot)
  • Adaptive law structure employs gradient-based methods or least squares algorithms to update controller parameters
  • State feedback gains influence closed-loop system dynamics affect stability and transient response (settling time, rise time)
  • Input signal characteristics include persistence of excitation frequency content and amplitude impact parameter convergence and overall system performance

Performance analysis of MRAC systems

  • Transient performance metrics evaluate system response during adaptation overshoot rise time and settling time quantify dynamic behavior
  • Steady-state performance metrics assess long-term system behavior tracking error measures difference between actual and desired output parameter convergence indicates stability of adapted values
  • Lyapunov stability analysis ensures bounded signals and asymptotic stability guarantees system convergence to desired equilibrium
  • Learning curve describes adaptation process over time illustrates how system improves performance as it learns
  • Convergence rate affected by adaptation gain and input signal properties determines how quickly system reaches desired performance

Robustness of MRAC designs

  • Parametric uncertainties arise from mismatched or time-varying plant parameters challenge adaptive controller's ability to maintain performance
  • Unmodeled dynamics include high-frequency dynamics and neglected nonlinearities can lead to instability if not accounted for
  • External disturbances such as step inputs or sinusoidal variations test controller's ability to reject unwanted influences
  • Noise sensitivity considers impact of measurement noise and process noise on controller performance and stability
  • Stability margins including gain margin and phase margin quantify system's tolerance to variations in loop gain and phase

Techniques for MRAC improvement

  • Normalization prevents parameter drift in presence of noise improves robustness to input signal variations (amplitude changes, frequency shifts)
  • Dead-zones reduce parameter adaptation when tracking error is small prevent unnecessary adaptation due to noise or small disturbances
  • $\sigma$-modification adds leakage term to adaptive law improves robustness to disturbances and unmodeled dynamics
  • e-modification alters adaptive law based on tracking error enhances transient performance and convergence speed
  • Projection algorithm constrains parameter estimates within known bounds prevents parameter drift and improves stability
  • Composite adaptation combines direct and indirect adaptive control improves convergence speed and robustness to uncertainties