11.1 Linda Nochlin and her essay 'Why Have There Been No Great Women Artists?'
6 min read•august 19, 2024
's essay '' shook up the art world in 1971. She argued that social and institutional barriers, not lack of talent, kept women from achieving artistic greatness.
Nochlin challenged the idea of the "great artist" as a male construct. She called for a reevaluation of art history, pushing for more inclusive approaches that consider social contexts and expand the canon to include diverse voices.
Linda Nochlin's background
Education and career
Top images from around the web for Education and career
Studied at Vassar College, where she earned her bachelor's degree in Philosophy
Pursued graduate studies at Columbia University, earning her master's degree and PhD in Art History
Taught at Vassar College, Yale University, and the Graduate Center of the City University of New York (CUNY)
Served as the Lila Acheson Wallace Professor of Modern Art at the Institute of Fine Arts, New York University
Feminist art historian
Pioneered the field of feminist art history in the late 1960s and early 1970s
Challenged traditional art historical narratives that excluded or marginalized women artists
Argued for a more inclusive and diverse approach to studying and understanding art history
Encouraged a critical examination of the social, cultural, and institutional factors that shaped the production and reception of art
Overview of 'Why Have There Been No Great Women Artists?'
Publication and impact
Essay first published in ARTnews magazine in 1971
Widely read and discussed within the art world and beyond
Considered a groundbreaking work in feminist art history
Challenged long-held assumptions about women artists and their place in the art historical canon
Central argument and thesis
Questions the absence of women artists in the art historical canon
Argues that the lack of "great" women artists is not due to a lack of talent or creativity
Asserts that social, cultural, and institutional barriers have prevented women from achieving the same level of recognition as their male counterparts
Emphasizes the need to examine the underlying structures and biases that have shaped the art world
Challenging the "greatness" concept
Interrogates the notion of artistic "greatness" as a social construct
Argues that the idea of the "great artist" is heavily influenced by gender, class, and race
Suggests that the criteria for artistic greatness have been defined by and for men
Calls for a reevaluation of the standards by which artists are judged and celebrated
Historical context of the essay
Second-wave feminism
Essay published during the height of the second-wave feminist movement in the United States
Women's liberation movement challenged gender inequalities in various aspects of society (education, workplace, politics)
Feminist scholars began to critically examine the representation and treatment of women in various academic disciplines
State of art history in 1971
Art history was largely dominated by white, male scholars and focused on the achievements of white, male artists
Women artists were often overlooked, marginalized, or dismissed as inferior to their male counterparts
Few women held positions of power or influence within art institutions (museums, galleries, universities)
Prevailing assumptions about women artists
Women were considered to be naturally inferior to men in terms of artistic ability and creativity
Women's art was often seen as decorative, domestic, or sentimental, rather than serious or intellectually rigorous
Women artists were expected to prioritize their roles as wives and mothers over their artistic careers
The idea of the "great artist" as a solitary, masculine genius was deeply entrenched in art historical discourse
Nochlin's critique of art institutions
Male-dominated art world
Art institutions (museums, galleries, art schools) were largely controlled by men
Men held most positions of power and influence, including directors, curators, and professors
Male artists were more likely to receive institutional support, funding, and recognition
Institutional barriers for women
Women faced discrimination and bias in the art world, both overt and subtle
Women were often excluded from important social networks and professional opportunities
Women's art was less likely to be collected, exhibited, or studied by major institutions
Limited access to art education
Women had limited access to formal art education, particularly in the 19th and early 20th centuries
Art academies and schools often barred women from attending or relegated them to separate, inferior programs
Women were discouraged from pursuing careers in art and were instead expected to focus on domestic duties
Debunking the "Great Artist" myth
Genius vs opportunity and education
Nochlin challenges the idea that artistic genius is an innate, masculine trait
Argues that artistic achievement is heavily influenced by access to education, resources, and opportunities
Suggests that the lack of "great" women artists is not due to a lack of talent, but rather a lack of support and encouragement
Social and economic factors
Women artists often faced social and economic barriers that limited their ability to pursue their art
Women were expected to prioritize their roles as wives and mothers, leaving little time or resources for artistic pursuits
Women artists were less likely to have access to financial support, studio space, or professional networks
Examples of overlooked women artists
Nochlin cites examples of talented women artists who were overlooked or marginalized in their lifetime (, )
Argues that these women achieved remarkable things despite the barriers they faced
Suggests that many more women artists may have achieved greatness if given the same opportunities as their male counterparts
Nochlin's proposed solutions
Reevaluating art historical methodologies
Calls for a reevaluation of the methods and assumptions of traditional art history
Argues for a more inclusive, interdisciplinary approach that considers the social, cultural, and political contexts of art production
Suggests that art historians should look beyond the traditional canon and consider a wider range of artists and art forms
Expanding the art historical canon
Advocates for the inclusion of more women artists in the art historical canon
Argues that the canon should be expanded to include artists from diverse backgrounds and perspectives
Suggests that this expansion would lead to a richer, more nuanced understanding of art history
Supporting women in the arts
Calls for greater support and opportunities for women artists, both in education and in the professional art world
Suggests that art institutions should actively seek out and promote the work of women artists
Argues that women artists should be given the same resources, funding, and recognition as their male counterparts
Responses and reactions to the essay
Praise and endorsement
Essay was widely praised by feminist scholars and activists for its groundbreaking insights and arguments
Many saw it as a crucial intervention in the field of art history and a call to action for greater gender equality in the arts
Essay helped to inspire a new generation of feminist art historians and artists
Criticisms and counterarguments
Some critics argued that Nochlin's essay was too narrowly focused on the Western art tradition
Others suggested that her arguments were overly simplistic or reductive
Some defended the idea of artistic genius and argued that women artists had simply not produced work of the same caliber as their male counterparts
Influence on feminist art history
Essay helped to establish feminist art history as a legitimate field of study
Inspired new research and scholarship on women artists and the social, cultural, and institutional factors that shaped their careers
Contributed to a broader movement to challenge and transform the male-dominated art world
Nochlin's legacy and impact
Pioneering feminist art historian
Nochlin is widely regarded as one of the most important and influential feminist art historians of the 20th century
Her work helped to challenge and transform traditional art historical narratives and methodologies
She played a crucial role in establishing feminist art history as a legitimate and vital field of study
Inspiring new generations of scholars
Nochlin's essay and broader body of work have inspired countless scholars, artists, and activists
Her ideas continue to be studied, debated, and built upon by new generations of feminist art historians
Her legacy has helped to create a more inclusive, diverse, and equitable art world
Continuing relevance of her ideas
Many of the issues and challenges that Nochlin identified in her essay continue to be relevant today
Women artists still face significant barriers and inequalities in the art world, despite progress in recent decades
Nochlin's call for a more inclusive, contextual approach to art history remains an important goal for the field
Her ideas continue to inspire and inform ongoing efforts to create a more just and equitable art world for all
Key Terms to Review (20)
Androcentrism: Androcentrism is the practice of placing male human beings or the masculine point of view at the center of one's worldview, often leading to the marginalization or exclusion of women and their perspectives. This term highlights how art history and cultural narratives have traditionally prioritized male artists and their experiences, reinforcing gender biases and shaping societal perceptions of art and creativity.
Berthe Morisot: Berthe Morisot was a French painter and a key figure in the Impressionist movement, known for her delicate brushwork and ability to capture the nuances of light and color. As one of the few prominent female artists of her time, she challenged societal norms and became a significant voice in a male-dominated art world, making important contributions to discussions about women in art.
Cynthia Freeland: Cynthia Freeland is an influential art historian and philosopher known for her contributions to feminist art criticism and theory. Her work often examines the intersection of gender, art, and culture, and she is recognized for challenging traditional narratives in art history, particularly concerning women artists. Freeland's analysis emphasizes the importance of understanding the societal contexts in which art is created, making her insights relevant to discussions about representation and inclusivity in the art world.
Female subjectivity: Female subjectivity refers to the unique perspective and experience of women as individuals, shaped by their gender and societal roles. It emphasizes the importance of women's voices, feelings, and viewpoints in understanding art and culture, challenging traditional representations that often marginalized or misrepresented women. This concept is crucial in examining how women artists navigate their identities within a male-dominated art world.
Feminist art movement: The feminist art movement emerged in the late 1960s and early 1970s, aiming to address and challenge the historical exclusion and misrepresentation of women in art. It sought to redefine artistic practices and the art world itself by promoting female perspectives and experiences, ultimately reshaping how art is created, viewed, and interpreted.
Frida Kahlo: Frida Kahlo was a Mexican painter known for her deeply personal and symbolic self-portraits that explore themes of identity, postcolonialism, gender, class, and race in Mexican society. Her work challenges traditional representations of women and engages with issues of feminism, making her a significant figure in both art history and activist movements.
Gendered gaze: The gendered gaze refers to the way visual culture is influenced by gender, shaping how subjects are represented and how viewers perceive them. This concept highlights the power dynamics in art and visual media, where women are often objectified and depicted through a male lens, reinforcing traditional gender roles and societal expectations.
Georgia O'Keeffe: Georgia O'Keeffe was an influential American artist known for her contributions to modern art, particularly in painting flowers, landscapes, and abstract forms that emphasize color and form. Her work symbolizes the rise of female artists who established their presence in the art world, reflecting the changing roles of women in society and their fight for recognition.
Intersectionality: Intersectionality is a framework that examines how various social identities such as race, gender, sexuality, and class intersect and create overlapping systems of discrimination or disadvantage. This concept highlights that individuals can face multiple forms of oppression simultaneously, and it is essential for understanding the unique experiences of marginalized groups in society.
Linda Nochlin: Linda Nochlin was a prominent feminist art historian known for her critical examination of the representation and history of women in art. Her influential essay 'Why Have There Been No Great Women Artists?' questioned the systemic barriers that have prevented women from achieving recognition in the art world, igniting discussions about gender and art that reshaped the field.
National Museum of Women in the Arts: The National Museum of Women in the Arts (NMWA) is a unique institution dedicated exclusively to celebrating the achievements of women in the visual arts. It serves as a vital platform for recognizing female artists and their contributions, while also influencing the art market, artistic styles, and social narratives through exhibitions and educational programs.
Objectification: Objectification is the process of treating a person as an object or a thing rather than as a human being with thoughts, feelings, and agency. This concept is often discussed in the context of how women have been represented and perceived in art and culture, highlighting the reduction of women to mere visual spectacles or symbols, rather than acknowledging their individuality and contributions.
Patriarchy: Patriarchy is a social system where men hold primary power and dominate in roles of political leadership, moral authority, social privilege, and control of property. This structure often marginalizes women and enforces gender roles that limit their participation in cultural and artistic spheres. Throughout history, patriarchy has influenced the way women artists are recognized or excluded, shaping their experiences and expressions in various art forms.
Rosa Bonheur: Rosa Bonheur was a pioneering French painter and sculptor known for her realistic depictions of animals and rural life, making her one of the most successful female artists of the 19th century. She broke through gender barriers to gain professional recognition, becoming an inspiration for future generations of women artists who aspired to be recognized in a male-dominated art world.
Second-wave feminism: Second-wave feminism refers to the feminist movement that emerged in the 1960s and continued into the 1980s, focusing on a wide range of issues including gender equality, reproductive rights, and workplace discrimination. This wave of feminism built upon the foundations laid by first-wave feminists by addressing social and cultural inequalities, rather than just legal barriers, leading to a significant impact on art and culture.
The Dinner Party: The Dinner Party is an iconic installation artwork created by Judy Chicago, first exhibited in 1979. It consists of a triangular table set for 39 women who have made significant contributions to history, art, and culture. This piece emphasizes the often overlooked achievements of women, connects to the influence of women patrons, and marks a pivotal moment in the rise of feminist art and the recognition of women's roles in artistic professions.
The feminist critique of art: The feminist critique of art is an analytical approach that examines how gender influences artistic expression, representation, and the production of art. This critique challenges traditional narratives in art history that often overlook or marginalize women's contributions while questioning the portrayal of women in artworks created by both male and female artists. It seeks to expose the power dynamics and societal structures that have shaped artistic production and perception.
Why have there been no great women artists?: This question challenges the historical narrative that has often excluded women from the ranks of recognized great artists. It interrogates the social, cultural, and institutional barriers that have prevented women's contributions to art from being acknowledged and celebrated on the same level as their male counterparts. By questioning this perceived absence, discussions around feminist art and scholarship have emerged, leading to a reevaluation of art history through a more inclusive lens.
Womanhouse: Womanhouse was a groundbreaking feminist art installation created in 1972 by a collective of female artists known as the Feminist Art Program at California State University, Fresno. This project transformed a derelict house into a space that explored women's roles and experiences, making it a pivotal moment in the rise of feminist art during the 1960s and 1970s.
Women’s Caucus for Art: The Women’s Caucus for Art is an organization founded in 1972 that advocates for the inclusion and recognition of women artists in the art world. It aims to address gender discrimination in the arts, promote women's art, and support feminist scholarship. The organization has played a significant role in raising awareness about the challenges faced by women artists and has been influential in initiatives that connect artists, scholars, and educators.