8.6 News media bias and framing
12 min read•august 20, 2024
News media bias and framing shape how we perceive events and issues. Different types of bias, from partisan to implicit, influence story selection and presentation. Understanding these biases is crucial for critically analyzing news content and recognizing its impact on public opinion.
The causes of media bias stem from ownership structures, editorial policies, and individual journalist biases. Framing techniques, like story selection and language use, further shape audience perceptions. Recognizing these factors helps us navigate the complex media landscape and evaluate news more critically.
Types of news media bias
- News media bias refers to the tendency of media outlets to present information in a way that favors one perspective or ideology over others
- Bias can manifest in various forms, such as the selection of stories, the framing of issues, and the use of language and imagery
- Understanding the different types of media bias is crucial for critically analyzing news content and recognizing how it may shape public opinion and discourse
Partisan vs non-partisan bias
Top images from around the web for Partisan vs non-partisan bias
Category:Media literacy - Wikimedia Commons View original
Is this image relevant?
Information Sources: Bias – Introduction to College Research View original
Is this image relevant?
Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2018-12-24/Discussion report - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
Category:Media literacy - Wikimedia Commons View original
Is this image relevant?
Information Sources: Bias – Introduction to College Research View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Top images from around the web for Partisan vs non-partisan bias
Category:Media literacy - Wikimedia Commons View original
Is this image relevant?
Information Sources: Bias – Introduction to College Research View original
Is this image relevant?
Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2018-12-24/Discussion report - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
Category:Media literacy - Wikimedia Commons View original
Is this image relevant?
Information Sources: Bias – Introduction to College Research View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
- occurs when a media outlet consistently favors one political party or ideology over others
- For example, a news channel that primarily features conservative commentators and perspectives may be seen as having a partisan bias towards the Republican party
- , on the other hand, refers to biases that are not explicitly tied to a particular political party or ideology
- These biases can stem from factors such as journalistic practices, cultural norms, or the personal beliefs of individual journalists
- It is important to note that even non-partisan media outlets can exhibit biases in their coverage, albeit not explicitly aligned with a specific political party
Bias by omission vs bias by commission
- occurs when a media outlet selectively leaves out certain information or perspectives that may be relevant to a story
- For instance, a news report on a political scandal may omit key details that could provide context or nuance to the situation
- , in contrast, involves the inclusion of information or perspectives that may distort or misrepresent the truth
- This can include the use of loaded language, cherry-picking facts, or presenting opinion as fact
- Both types of bias can have significant impacts on how audiences perceive and understand news events and issues
Implicit vs explicit bias
- refers to the subtle, often unconscious ways in which media outlets may favor certain perspectives or groups over others
- This can include the use of stereotypical imagery, the framing of issues in ways that reinforce dominant cultural narratives, or the of marginalized voices
- , on the other hand, involves more overt and intentional forms of favoritism or discrimination
- Examples include the use of hate speech, the promotion of conspiracy theories, or the deliberate exclusion of certain perspectives or communities
- While explicit bias may be easier to identify and call out, implicit bias can be more pervasive and challenging to address, as it is often deeply ingrained in societal norms and practices
Causes of news media bias
- Media bias can stem from a variety of factors, including the ownership and funding structures of media outlets, the editorial policies and practices they employ, and the individual biases of journalists and editors
- Understanding the root causes of media bias is essential for recognizing how it may shape the news content we consume and for advocating for more diverse, inclusive, and accountable media systems
Ownership and funding sources
- The ownership and funding structures of media outlets can have a significant impact on the types of stories they cover and the perspectives they promote
- For example, a news organization owned by a large corporation may be less likely to report on issues that could harm the company's financial interests
- Advertising revenue can also influence media content, as outlets may be hesitant to publish stories that could offend or alienate their advertisers
- Government funding or political affiliations can also shape media bias, particularly in countries with state-controlled media or strong partisan divides
Editorial policies and practices
- The editorial policies and practices of media outlets can contribute to bias in various ways
- For instance, the use of anonymous sources or the reliance on official statements without additional verification can lead to one-sided or incomplete reporting
- The selection of which stories to cover and how much prominence to give them can also reflect editorial biases
- A news outlet that consistently prioritizes sensational or controversial stories over more substantive issues may be seen as having a bias towards
- The lack of diversity in newsrooms and editorial boards can also perpetuate biases, as the perspectives and experiences of marginalized groups may be underrepresented in news coverage
Individual journalist biases
- Individual journalists and editors bring their own biases and perspectives to their work, which can shape the way they report on and interpret news events
- These biases can stem from factors such as personal background, education, political beliefs, and cultural norms
- While journalistic ethics call for objectivity and impartiality, it is impossible for individuals to completely separate their biases from their work
- However, being aware of one's biases and striving to minimize their impact on reporting is an important aspect of responsible journalism
- The lack of diversity in the journalism industry can also contribute to individual biases, as the perspectives and experiences of certain groups may be underrepresented in newsrooms and editorial boards
Framing techniques in news media
- Framing refers to the way in which media outlets present and contextualize news stories, shaping how audiences interpret and understand them
- Framing techniques can be used to highlight certain aspects of a story, promote particular perspectives, or influence public opinion on an issue
- Recognizing and analyzing framing techniques is crucial for critically evaluating news content and understanding how it may shape public discourse and attitudes
Selection of stories and angles
- The selection of which stories to cover and which angles to emphasize can have a significant impact on how audiences perceive and understand news events
- For example, a news outlet that consistently focuses on crime and violence in a particular community may contribute to negative stereotypes and perceptions of that community
- The prominence given to certain stories, such as their placement on a website or newspaper front page, can also reflect framing biases
- Stories that are deemed more newsworthy or sensational may receive more attention, even if they are less substantive or representative of broader issues
Use of language and imagery
- The language and imagery used in news reporting can also frame stories in particular ways and influence audience perceptions
- For instance, the use of loaded or emotionally charged terms (thugs, terrorists) can create negative associations and reinforce stereotypes
- The selection of images and visuals to accompany news stories can also reflect framing biases
- The repeated use of certain types of images (protests, violence) can create a distorted or one-dimensional portrayal of a community or issue
- The use of language and imagery that reinforces dominant cultural narratives or stereotypes can contribute to the marginalization and misrepresentation of certain groups in news media
Inclusion vs exclusion of information
- The inclusion or exclusion of certain information or perspectives in news reporting can also be a powerful framing technique
- For example, a story about a political policy may focus primarily on its potential benefits while minimizing or omitting discussion of its drawbacks or criticisms
- The exclusion of certain voices or perspectives can also contribute to biased or incomplete reporting
- A news story about a community issue that only includes quotes from official sources (police, government officials) may lack the perspectives and experiences of those most directly impacted by the issue
- The selective inclusion or exclusion of information can shape how audiences understand and interpret news events, and can contribute to the reinforcement of certain narratives or ideologies
Impact of news media bias and framing
- News media bias and framing can have significant impacts on public opinion, discourse, and behavior
- By shaping how audiences perceive and understand news events and issues, media bias and framing can influence political attitudes, reinforce stereotypes and prejudices, and contribute to social and cultural divides
- Recognizing and mitigating the impacts of media bias and framing is crucial for promoting a more informed, inclusive, and democratic society
Shaping public opinion and discourse
- Media bias and framing can have a powerful influence on public opinion and discourse surrounding news events and issues
- For example, the framing of a political candidate in a negative light can shape public perceptions of their character and qualifications, potentially impacting their electoral success
- The repetition of certain narratives or frames in news media can also contribute to the normalization or reinforcement of particular ideologies or perspectives
- The consistent framing of certain communities as dangerous or criminal, for instance, can contribute to public support for punitive policies or discrimination against those communities
- Media bias and framing can also shape the terms and boundaries of public debate on an issue, influencing which perspectives are considered valid or legitimate
Reinforcing stereotypes and prejudices
- Media bias and framing can also contribute to the reinforcement of stereotypes and prejudices about certain groups or communities
- The underrepresentation or misrepresentation of marginalized groups in news media can perpetuate negative stereotypes and contribute to their social and cultural marginalization
- The use of stereotypical language or imagery in news reporting can also reinforce prejudicial attitudes and beliefs
- For instance, the repeated portrayal of immigrants as criminals or threats to public safety can contribute to xenophobic attitudes and support for anti-immigrant policies
- The lack of diverse perspectives and voices in news media can also contribute to the reinforcement of dominant cultural narratives and the marginalization of alternative viewpoints
Influencing political attitudes and behaviors
- Media bias and framing can have significant impacts on political attitudes and behaviors, shaping how audiences perceive and engage with political issues and candidates
- The framing of a political issue in a particular way can influence public support for or opposition to certain policies or initiatives
- Media coverage of political campaigns and elections can also shape voter perceptions and decision-making
- The amount and tone of coverage given to different candidates can influence their public image and electoral success
- The repetition of certain political narratives or frames in news media can also contribute to the polarization of public opinion and the entrenchment of partisan divides
- The consistent framing of political opponents as enemies or threats, for example, can contribute to a more hostile and divided political climate
Identifying and analyzing media bias
- Developing the skills and strategies to identify and analyze media bias is crucial for being an informed and critical consumer of news content
- Media literacy, fact-checking, and comparative analysis are all important tools for recognizing and evaluating bias in news reporting
- By cultivating these skills and practices, individuals can be better equipped to navigate the complex and often biased landscape of modern news media
Media literacy skills and strategies
- Media literacy refers to the ability to access, analyze, evaluate, and create media content in various forms
- This includes the ability to recognize and critically assess media bias, framing, and other techniques used to shape audience perceptions and opinions
- Developing media literacy skills involves learning to ask critical questions about the sources, perspectives, and motivations behind news content
- For example, considering who owns or funds a particular media outlet, or whose voices and experiences are included or excluded from a news story
- Media literacy also involves being aware of one's own biases and how they may shape our interpretation and understanding of news content
- Cultivating self-awareness and reflexivity is an important aspect of being a critical and informed media consumer
Fact-checking and source verification
- Fact-checking and source verification are essential practices for identifying and analyzing media bias and misinformation
- This involves verifying the accuracy and credibility of claims made in news reporting, and seeking out additional sources to corroborate or challenge those claims
- Fact-checking can involve consulting multiple reputable sources, such as academic or government databases, to verify statistical claims or historical events
- It can also involve investigating the credibility and reliability of sources cited in news stories, such as examining their expertise, track record, or potential conflicts of interest
- Developing a habit of fact-checking and source verification can help individuals identify and counter media bias and misinformation, and make more informed judgments about the news content they consume
Comparing coverage across outlets
- Comparing news coverage of the same event or issue across multiple outlets can be a powerful tool for identifying and analyzing media bias and framing
- This involves examining how different outlets select, prioritize, and present information about a particular story, and considering how those choices may reflect certain biases or perspectives
- Comparing coverage can also help individuals identify patterns or trends in how certain groups, issues, or events are portrayed across different media outlets
- For example, noticing that certain communities are consistently depicted in a negative or stereotypical light across multiple news sources
- By seeking out a diverse range of news sources and comparing their coverage, individuals can gain a more comprehensive and nuanced understanding of news events and issues, and be better equipped to recognize and critique media bias and framing
Addressing and mitigating media bias
- Addressing and mitigating media bias requires a multifaceted approach that involves efforts by media organizations, journalists, and consumers alike
- Promoting diversity and inclusion in newsrooms, transparency in reporting and editing practices, and accountability and feedback mechanisms are all important strategies for reducing bias and improving the quality and accuracy of news content
- By working towards a more diverse, transparent, and accountable media landscape, we can create a more informed and engaged public discourse that reflects the complexity and diversity of our society
Diversity and inclusion in newsrooms
- Promoting diversity and inclusion in newsrooms is a crucial step towards reducing media bias and improving the representation of marginalized voices and perspectives in news content
- This involves recruiting and retaining journalists from diverse backgrounds, including different racial, ethnic, gender, and socioeconomic groups
- Diversity in newsrooms can help bring a wider range of experiences, perspectives, and expertise to bear on news reporting and decision-making
- It can also help challenge dominant cultural narratives and assumptions that may contribute to biased or incomplete reporting
- Creating inclusive and equitable newsroom cultures is also important for fostering diversity and reducing bias
- This involves addressing issues of discrimination, harassment, and marginalization within media organizations, and creating supportive environments for journalists from underrepresented groups
Transparency in reporting and editing
- Promoting transparency in reporting and editing practices is another important strategy for addressing media bias and building public trust in news content
- This involves being open and honest about the sources, methods, and decision-making processes behind news reporting, and providing clear explanations for editorial choices and judgments
- Transparency can also involve disclosing potential conflicts of interest or biases that may influence news content
- For example, acknowledging the ownership or funding sources of a media outlet, or the personal or political affiliations of journalists or editors
- By being transparent about their practices and motivations, media organizations can help audiences make more informed judgments about the credibility and reliability of news content, and can be held accountable for any biases or inaccuracies in their reporting
Accountability and feedback mechanisms
- Establishing accountability and feedback mechanisms is another important strategy for addressing media bias and improving the quality and accuracy of news content
- This involves creating channels for audiences to provide feedback, criticism, and corrections to news organizations, and ensuring that those concerns are taken seriously and addressed in a timely and transparent manner
- Accountability can also involve the use of independent fact-checking and verification processes to ensure the accuracy and credibility of news reporting
- This can include collaborations with academic or non-profit organizations that specialize in fact-checking and media analysis
- Encouraging media literacy and critical engagement among news audiences is also an important aspect of accountability
- By empowering individuals to identify and analyze media bias and misinformation, and to hold media organizations accountable for their reporting, we can create a more informed and engaged public discourse that values accuracy, transparency, and diversity in news content
Key Terms to Review (22)
Agenda-setting theory: Agenda-setting theory is the concept that the media doesn't just report the news but also plays a significant role in shaping public perception by highlighting certain issues while downplaying others. This theory suggests that the media can influence which topics become prioritized in public discourse, affecting how audiences think about issues, particularly regarding race and gender. Through ownership dynamics, bias, and framing, media organizations can steer societal focus toward specific agendas, ultimately impacting how information is processed and consumed by the public.
Bias by commission: Bias by commission occurs when a news outlet actively distorts or fabricates information, leading to a misleading portrayal of events or issues. This type of bias can manifest through the inclusion of unfounded claims, selective reporting, or the use of loaded language that sways audience perception. Such practices are critical to understanding how media framing can influence public opinion and contribute to the polarization of perspectives on significant social issues.
Bias by omission: Bias by omission occurs when important information or perspectives are left out of a story, leading to a skewed or incomplete understanding of the topic. This form of bias can significantly influence public perception and discourse by shaping narratives that exclude certain voices, data, or context, thereby framing the issue in a specific way that may not represent the full reality.
Clickbait: Clickbait refers to content, typically online articles or videos, designed to attract attention and encourage users to click on a link by using sensationalized or misleading headlines. This tactic is often employed to drive traffic to websites and increase advertising revenue, but it can also contribute to the spread of misinformation and skew public perception.
Critical Race Theory: Critical Race Theory (CRT) is an intellectual movement and framework that examines the relationship between race, law, and power, emphasizing that racism is embedded in legal systems and policies. It seeks to understand how systemic racism affects individuals and communities, promoting the idea that experiences of marginalized groups should inform legal and social practices.
Cultivation Theory: Cultivation theory posits that long-term exposure to media content shapes viewers' perceptions and beliefs about reality, often aligning them with the messages presented in the media. This theory suggests that heavy consumers of media, particularly television, are more likely to adopt the viewpoints and norms portrayed, leading to a shared cultural understanding that can reinforce existing stereotypes and social roles.
Discourse Analysis: Discourse analysis is a qualitative research method used to study the way language is used in texts and spoken communication. It focuses on how language constructs meaning, reflects social norms, and influences power dynamics in society. By examining the language within various contexts, it provides insights into the ways in which social movements, gender roles, disability representation, media bias, and media literacy are shaped and understood.
Explicit Bias: Explicit bias refers to the conscious and intentional attitudes or beliefs that individuals hold about specific groups, often leading to overt discrimination or prejudice. This type of bias is clearly articulated and can be easily measured through self-reporting or direct observation. Understanding explicit bias is crucial when analyzing how it manifests in various social contexts, including the portrayal of different groups in media.
Framing Effect: The framing effect refers to the way information is presented and how it influences people's perceptions and decisions. By highlighting certain aspects of an issue while downplaying others, the framing effect can significantly shape opinions and reactions, particularly in media coverage. This can lead to biased interpretations, where the same information is perceived differently based on its presentation.
George Gerbner: George Gerbner was a prominent communications scholar known for his work on media effects, particularly regarding television and its influence on audience perceptions of reality. His research led to the development of the cultivation theory, which posits that long-term exposure to media content shapes viewers' attitudes and beliefs about the world, thereby influencing social norms and perceptions of issues such as race and gender.
Implicit Bias: Implicit bias refers to the unconscious attitudes or stereotypes that affect our understanding, actions, and decisions about others. These biases can influence a variety of social issues, affecting how individuals perceive and interact with people of different races, genders, or backgrounds without even realizing it.
Intersectionality: Intersectionality is a framework for understanding how various social identities such as race, gender, sexuality, class, and ability intersect and create overlapping systems of discrimination or privilege. It highlights the complexity of individuals' experiences and challenges the notion that social categories operate independently.
Media activism: Media activism refers to efforts aimed at influencing media content and policies to promote social change and address issues of public concern. This form of activism often involves challenging the representation of marginalized communities, advocating for diversity in media narratives, and utilizing various platforms to raise awareness about social justice issues. By engaging in media activism, individuals and groups work to counteract biases in news coverage and push for more equitable framing of stories.
Media framing: Media framing refers to the way information and events are presented by the media, influencing how audiences perceive and interpret these messages. It plays a significant role in shaping public opinion, as the framing of issues can emphasize certain aspects while downplaying others, ultimately affecting the discourse surrounding social movements, identity politics, representation in media, and biases within news coverage.
Non-partisan bias: Non-partisan bias refers to a form of bias in media coverage that is not explicitly aligned with a particular political party or ideology but still influences the portrayal of events or issues in a way that shapes public perception. This type of bias often manifests through selective emphasis, framing, or the omission of certain facts, leading to an incomplete or skewed understanding of the subject matter without taking sides. The impact of non-partisan bias can be significant, as it can perpetuate stereotypes, misinform the public, and hinder critical discourse.
Partisan bias: Partisan bias refers to the tendency of news media to favor one political party or ideology over others, which can influence how news is reported and perceived. This bias can manifest through selective coverage, language choice, and framing of issues that align with the interests of a particular group, ultimately shaping public opinion and reinforcing existing political divides.
Racialization: Racialization is the process through which certain groups are assigned specific racial characteristics, often based on perceived differences such as skin color, culture, or ethnicity. This concept highlights how society constructs racial identities and attributes social meanings to those identities, influencing interpersonal interactions, systemic structures, and cultural representations.
Sensationalism: Sensationalism is a style of reporting that aims to provoke strong emotional reactions, often by exaggerating or dramatizing events and issues. This approach is commonly seen in media coverage where stories are presented in a way that emphasizes shocking details or controversies, sometimes at the expense of accuracy and depth. Sensationalism can distort public perception by framing issues in a biased manner, leading to misinterpretations of facts and events.
Shanto Iyengar: Shanto Iyengar is a prominent political scientist known for his work on the influence of media on public opinion, especially regarding news media bias and framing. His research highlights how the way news is presented can significantly shape audience perceptions and attitudes toward political issues and events. By focusing on the framing of news stories, Iyengar's work sheds light on how certain narratives can dominate public discourse and influence political behavior.
Social mobilization: Social mobilization is the process by which individuals and groups come together to promote social change, often addressing issues of inequality and injustice. This can involve organizing communities, raising awareness, and advocating for policy changes to create a more equitable society. The dynamics of social mobilization can be influenced by various factors such as media representation and systemic discrimination.
Stereotyping: Stereotyping is the process of attributing specific traits, behaviors, or characteristics to individuals based solely on their membership in a particular group, often leading to oversimplified and generalized perceptions. This can result in discrimination and prejudice, affecting how individuals are treated and represented across various societal contexts.
Underrepresentation: Underrepresentation refers to the inadequate representation of certain groups in various contexts, such as media, politics, and social institutions, where their numbers and experiences do not reflect their actual presence in society. This concept is crucial for understanding how marginalized communities are often depicted or excluded, affecting perceptions, narratives, and policies surrounding race, gender, and other identities.