Statistical Inference

🎣Statistical Inference Unit 14 – Decision Theory in Statistical Inference

Decision theory provides a framework for making optimal choices under uncertainty. It involves specifying actions, states of nature, and consequences, incorporating prior knowledge, and aiming to minimize expected loss or maximize expected utility. Statistical decision problems arise when making choices based on data. They involve selecting actions from a set of possibilities, given unknown states of nature. The goal is to make the best decision considering available information and uncertainty.

Key Concepts in Decision Theory

  • Decision theory provides a framework for making optimal decisions under uncertainty
  • Involves specifying a set of possible actions, states of nature, and consequences
  • Consequences are determined by the action taken and the true state of nature
  • Incorporates prior knowledge or beliefs about the states of nature (prior probabilities)
  • Aims to minimize expected loss or maximize expected utility
    • Expected loss is the average loss incurred over all possible states of nature
    • Expected utility is the average utility gained over all possible states of nature
  • Requires defining a loss function or utility function to quantify the consequences of actions
  • Distinguishes between two main approaches: Bayesian and frequentist decision theory

Statistical Decision Problems

  • Arise when making decisions based on statistical data or inference
  • Involve choosing an action from a set of possible actions based on observed data
  • The true state of nature is unknown but can be described probabilistically
  • Goal is to make the best decision given the available information and uncertainty
  • Examples include:
    • Hypothesis testing (deciding whether to reject or fail to reject a null hypothesis)
    • Parameter estimation (choosing an estimator for an unknown parameter)
    • Classification (assigning an object to one of several categories based on its features)
  • Requires specifying the following components:
    • Parameter space: the set of possible states of nature or true parameter values
    • Action space: the set of possible actions or decisions that can be taken
    • Loss function: a function that quantifies the loss or cost associated with each action-state pair

Loss Functions and Risk

  • A loss function L(θ,a)L(\theta, a) quantifies the loss incurred when taking action aa if the true state of nature is θ\theta
  • The choice of loss function depends on the specific problem and the consequences of different actions
  • Common loss functions include:
    • Squared error loss: L(θ,a)=(θa)2L(\theta, a) = (\theta - a)^2
    • Absolute error loss: L(θ,a)=θaL(\theta, a) = |\theta - a|
    • 0-1 loss: L(θ,a)={0if a=θ1if aθL(\theta, a) = \begin{cases} 0 & \text{if } a = \theta \\ 1 & \text{if } a \neq \theta \end{cases}
  • The risk function R(θ,δ)R(\theta, \delta) is the expected loss of a decision rule δ\delta under the true state of nature θ\theta
    • R(θ,δ)=Eθ[L(θ,δ(X))]R(\theta, \delta) = \mathbb{E}_\theta[L(\theta, \delta(X))], where XX is the observed data
  • A decision rule δ\delta is a function that maps the observed data XX to an action aa
  • The goal is to find a decision rule that minimizes the risk function over all possible states of nature

Bayesian Decision Theory

  • Incorporates prior knowledge or beliefs about the states of nature through a prior probability distribution π(θ)\pi(\theta)
  • Updates the prior distribution using the observed data XX to obtain a posterior distribution π(θX)\pi(\theta|X) via Bayes' theorem
  • The Bayes risk of a decision rule δ\delta is the expected loss averaged over both the data distribution and the prior distribution
    • r(π,δ)=Eπ[Eθ[L(θ,δ(X))]]r(\pi, \delta) = \mathbb{E}_\pi[\mathbb{E}_\theta[L(\theta, \delta(X))]]
  • The Bayes decision rule δ\delta^* minimizes the Bayes risk among all possible decision rules
  • Allows for the incorporation of subjective prior information and provides a principled way to update beliefs based on data
  • Useful when prior information is available and can lead to better decisions by leveraging this information

Frequentist Decision Theory

  • Focuses on the long-run performance of decision rules under repeated sampling
  • Does not incorporate prior distributions and relies solely on the observed data
  • Aims to find decision rules that perform well on average across all possible states of nature
  • Minimax principle: choose the decision rule that minimizes the maximum risk over all states of nature
    • δ=argminδmaxθR(θ,δ)\delta^* = \arg\min_\delta \max_\theta R(\theta, \delta)
  • Admissibility: a decision rule is admissible if no other rule has smaller or equal risk for all states of nature and strictly smaller risk for at least one state
  • Unbiasedness: a decision rule is unbiased if its risk function satisfies certain symmetry properties
  • Frequentist decision theory provides a framework for evaluating and comparing decision rules based on their long-run performance

Minimax and Admissible Decision Rules

  • Minimax decision rules aim to minimize the maximum risk over all possible states of nature
  • Useful when the goal is to protect against the worst-case scenario
  • The minimax risk is the smallest possible maximum risk that can be attained by any decision rule
    • R=minδmaxθR(θ,δ)R^* = \min_\delta \max_\theta R(\theta, \delta)
  • A decision rule δ\delta^* is minimax if it achieves the minimax risk, i.e., maxθR(θ,δ)=R\max_\theta R(\theta, \delta^*) = R^*
  • Admissible decision rules are those for which no other rule has smaller or equal risk for all states of nature and strictly smaller risk for at least one state
  • Admissible rules are Pareto optimal: cannot be improved upon without increasing the risk for some state of nature
  • Minimax rules are always admissible, but not all admissible rules are minimax
  • Admissible rules form a subset of all possible decision rules and are of interest because they cannot be universally improved upon

Applications in Statistical Inference

  • Hypothesis testing: deciding whether to reject or fail to reject a null hypothesis based on observed data
    • Loss functions can be defined to penalize Type I and Type II errors differently
    • Minimax and Bayes decision rules can be derived for various testing problems
  • Parameter estimation: choosing an estimator for an unknown parameter based on observed data
    • Loss functions such as squared error or absolute error can be used to quantify the accuracy of estimators
    • Minimax and Bayes estimators can be derived to minimize the maximum or average risk
  • Classification: assigning an object to one of several categories based on its features
    • Loss functions can be defined to penalize different types of misclassification errors
    • Bayes and minimax classifiers can be derived to minimize the expected or worst-case misclassification risk
  • Model selection: choosing the best model from a set of candidate models based on observed data
    • Loss functions can be defined to balance model fit and complexity (e.g., AIC, BIC)
    • Bayes and frequentist model selection criteria can be derived using decision-theoretic principles

Advanced Topics and Current Research

  • Robust decision theory: making decisions that are insensitive to deviations from assumed models or distributions
    • Minimax regret: minimizing the maximum regret (difference between the loss of the chosen action and the best possible action) over a set of possible models
    • Robust Bayes: incorporating uncertainty in the prior distribution and finding decision rules that perform well over a range of priors
  • Sequential decision theory: making a series of decisions over time, where each decision may depend on previous observations and actions
    • Dynamic programming: breaking down a sequential decision problem into smaller subproblems and solving them recursively
    • Multi-armed bandits: balancing exploration and exploitation when making decisions with uncertain rewards
  • Causal decision theory: making decisions based on causal relationships between variables, rather than just statistical associations
    • Causal graphs: representing the causal structure of a problem using directed acyclic graphs
    • Interventions: evaluating the effects of actions by considering their impact on the causal system
  • Algorithmic decision theory: studying the computational complexity and tractability of decision-making algorithms
    • Approximation algorithms: finding decision rules that are provably close to optimal while being computationally efficient
    • Online learning: making decisions and updating beliefs in real-time as new data becomes available


© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.

© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.