Space Debris Mitigation

🛰️Space Debris Mitigation Unit 9 – Post–Mission Disposal Strategies

Post-mission disposal strategies are crucial for managing space debris and ensuring the sustainability of orbital activities. These strategies involve safely removing spacecraft from orbit at the end of their operational life, mitigating risks to other space assets and Earth's population. Key disposal methods include direct re-entry, controlled re-entry, orbital decay, and graveyard orbits. Implementing these strategies requires careful planning, technical expertise, and adherence to international guidelines. Effective post-mission disposal is essential for preserving Earth's orbital environment for future space exploration and utilization.

Key Concepts and Definitions

  • Post-mission disposal (PMD) involves the safe and responsible removal of spacecraft from orbit at the end of their operational lifetime
  • Space debris consists of non-functional spacecraft, abandoned launch vehicle stages, mission-related debris, and fragmentation debris
  • Orbital lifetime refers to the amount of time an object remains in orbit before re-entering the Earth's atmosphere
  • Deorbit is the process of intentionally maneuvering a spacecraft to re-enter the Earth's atmosphere and burn up or crash into the ocean
  • Graveyard orbit is a disposal orbit above the operational orbit where spacecraft are moved at the end of their mission to reduce the risk of collisions
    • Typically used for geostationary orbit (GEO) satellites
  • Passivation involves removing stored energy from a spacecraft, such as depleting propellant and discharging batteries, to reduce the risk of explosions
  • End-of-life (EOL) disposal planning is the process of determining the appropriate PMD strategy for a spacecraft during its design and development phase

Importance of Post-Mission Disposal

  • Mitigates the growth of space debris in Earth's orbit, which poses risks to operational spacecraft and future space activities
  • Reduces the likelihood of collisions between defunct spacecraft and operational assets, preventing the generation of additional debris
  • Ensures the long-term sustainability of space activities by preserving the orbital environment for future generations
  • Complies with international guidelines and regulations, such as the Inter-Agency Space Debris Coordination Committee (IADC) guidelines and the United Nations Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space (COPUOS) guidelines
  • Demonstrates responsible behavior and stewardship of the space environment by spacecraft operators and space-faring nations
  • Minimizes the risk of uncontrolled re-entry of large spacecraft, which could pose a threat to human life and property on Earth
  • Enables the efficient use of limited orbital resources, particularly in highly congested regions like low Earth orbit (LEO) and GEO

Types of Post-Mission Disposal Strategies

  • Direct re-entry involves maneuvering a spacecraft to re-enter the Earth's atmosphere at the end of its mission, ensuring complete destruction
    • Suitable for spacecraft in LEO with sufficient propellant and control capabilities
  • Controlled re-entry is a type of direct re-entry where the spacecraft is guided to a specific location (usually over an ocean) to minimize risks to human life and property
  • Orbital decay relies on natural atmospheric drag to gradually lower the spacecraft's altitude until it re-enters the atmosphere
    • Appropriate for spacecraft in LEO without sufficient propellant for direct re-entry
  • Graveyard orbits are used for spacecraft in GEO, where they are raised to a higher altitude (typically 300 km above GEO) to reduce the risk of collisions
  • Lunar disposal involves sending a spacecraft to a collision course with the Moon, effectively removing it from Earth's orbit
  • Solar disposal is a theoretical strategy where a spacecraft is sent into a heliocentric orbit or to collide with the Sun, but it requires significant propellant and is not yet practical

Technical Requirements and Challenges

  • Spacecraft design must incorporate PMD considerations, such as sufficient propellant reserves, robust control systems, and the ability to passivate
  • Accurate orbital lifetime prediction is necessary to plan PMD strategies and ensure compliance with guidelines (25-year rule for LEO)
  • Re-entry survivability analysis is required to assess the risk of debris reaching the Earth's surface during uncontrolled re-entry
  • Passivation procedures must be reliable and effective in preventing post-mission explosions or fragmentation events
    • Includes depleting propellant, discharging batteries, and venting pressurized systems
  • Collision avoidance maneuvers may be necessary during the PMD phase to prevent impacts with other objects
  • Tracking and monitoring of disposed spacecraft is essential to verify the success of PMD operations and update orbital debris models
  • International cooperation and data sharing are crucial for effective PMD planning and execution, particularly for spacecraft in shared orbital regions

Regulatory Framework and Guidelines

  • The Inter-Agency Space Debris Coordination Committee (IADC) provides a set of international guidelines for space debris mitigation, including PMD
    • IADC Space Debris Mitigation Guidelines (2002, updated 2007) serve as the foundation for many national and international regulations
  • The United Nations Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space (COPUOS) has adopted the Space Debris Mitigation Guidelines (2007), which are based on the IADC guidelines
  • National space agencies and regulatory bodies have developed their own space debris mitigation standards and requirements, often aligned with the IADC and COPUOS guidelines
    • Examples include NASA's Technical Standard 8719.14 and the European Space Agency's (ESA) Space Debris Mitigation Policy
  • The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) has developed a series of standards related to space debris mitigation and PMD, such as ISO 24113:2019 (Space systems - Space debris mitigation requirements)
  • Compliance with PMD guidelines and regulations is increasingly becoming a prerequisite for obtaining launch licenses and operating permits from national authorities

Implementation and Best Practices

  • Incorporate PMD planning early in the spacecraft design and development process to ensure compatibility with mission objectives and regulatory requirements
  • Conduct regular spacecraft health monitoring and orbit determination to inform PMD decision-making and ensure the availability of necessary resources
  • Develop and test robust passivation procedures to minimize the risk of post-mission explosions or fragmentation events
  • Plan for contingencies and fault scenarios that may affect PMD operations, such as loss of communication or control
  • Engage in international collaboration and data sharing to improve the accuracy of orbital debris models and facilitate the coordination of PMD activities
  • Implement a comprehensive space situational awareness (SSA) program to track and monitor disposed spacecraft and validate PMD success
  • Regularly review and update PMD plans and procedures to incorporate lessons learned and adapt to evolving best practices and regulatory changes

Case Studies and Examples

  • Iridium 33 and Cosmos 2251 collision (2009) highlighted the importance of PMD and the risks posed by non-functional spacecraft in LEO
  • ESA's GOCE satellite successfully performed a controlled re-entry in 2013, demonstrating the feasibility of direct re-entry for LEO spacecraft
  • The Mir space station was deorbited through a controlled re-entry in 2001, setting a precedent for the PMD of large, complex spacecraft
  • Intelsat 901, a GEO communications satellite, was successfully moved to a graveyard orbit in 2020 using Northrop Grumman's Mission Extension Vehicle (MEV-1)
  • The Chinese Tiangong-1 space station experienced an uncontrolled re-entry in 2018, raising concerns about the risks posed by unplanned PMD events
  • NASA's Cassini spacecraft was intentionally disposed of through a controlled descent into Saturn's atmosphere in 2017, preventing post-mission contamination of potentially habitable moons
  • Development of advanced propulsion technologies, such as electric propulsion and solar sails, to enable more efficient and cost-effective PMD strategies
  • Increased adoption of on-orbit servicing and active debris removal (ADR) technologies to extend spacecraft lifetimes and remove non-compliant objects
    • Examples include the ESA's ClearSpace-1 mission and the ELSA-d (End-of-Life Services by Astroscale) demonstration
  • Integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning techniques to optimize PMD planning, monitoring, and execution
  • Establishment of international frameworks for space traffic management (STM) to coordinate PMD activities and ensure the safe and sustainable use of Earth's orbits
  • Development of new materials and designs for spacecraft to minimize the generation of debris during PMD operations and improve re-entry survivability
  • Increased focus on the development of space sustainability rating systems and incentives to encourage responsible PMD practices among spacecraft operators
  • Growing recognition of the importance of PMD in the context of the long-term sustainability of space activities and the preservation of the space environment for future generations


© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.

© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.