Constitutional principles and civil liberties form the bedrock of American democracy. These concepts, rooted in Enlightenment philosophy and English common law, shape the relationship between government and citizens, protecting individual rights and limiting state power.
The U.S. Constitution establishes key principles like , , and . The further safeguards personal freedoms, including speech, religion, and . Over time, these protections have expanded through legislation and court rulings.
Origins of constitutional principles
Understanding the origins of constitutional principles provides a foundation for studying the U.S. Constitution and its impact on American government and society
The principles that shaped the Constitution emerged from Enlightenment-era political philosophies and legal traditions
Natural rights philosophy
Top images from around the web for Natural rights philosophy
File:John Locke by Herman Verelst.png - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
File:John Locke by Michael Dahl.jpg - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia View original
Is this image relevant?
File:John Locke by Herman Verelst.png - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
File:John Locke by Michael Dahl.jpg - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 2
Top images from around the web for Natural rights philosophy
File:John Locke by Herman Verelst.png - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
File:John Locke by Michael Dahl.jpg - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia View original
Is this image relevant?
File:John Locke by Herman Verelst.png - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
File:John Locke by Michael Dahl.jpg - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 2
Asserts that individuals have inherent, inalienable rights that exist independently of government
Influenced by the ideas of John Locke, who argued that people have natural rights to life, liberty, and property
Holds that the purpose of government is to protect these natural rights and that government derives its legitimacy from the consent of the governed
Social contract theory
Suggests that individuals agree to surrender some of their natural rights to a government in exchange for the protection of their remaining rights
Developed by philosophers such as Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau
Emphasizes the idea that government authority is based on the consent of the governed and that people have the right to alter or abolish government if it fails to fulfill its obligations
Influence of English common law
The English legal system, based on precedent and the protection of individual rights, heavily influenced American legal thought
Key documents such as the (1215) and the English Bill of Rights (1689) established principles like due process and the rule of law
The American colonists drew upon English common law traditions when developing their own legal systems and constitutions
Constitutional principles
The U.S. Constitution is built upon several key principles that define the structure and function of American government
These principles aim to create a balanced, limited government that protects individual rights and freedoms
Popular sovereignty
The idea that ultimate political power resides with the people, who have the right to create, alter, or abolish their government
Reflected in the Constitution's opening phrase, "We the People," and in the provision for amending the Constitution
Ensures that government derives its authority from the consent of the governed
Limited government
The concept that government power is restricted by the Constitution and the rule of law
The Constitution grants specific, to the federal government, reserving all other powers to the states or the people
Protects individual rights by preventing government overreach and abuse of power
Separation of powers
The division of government authority among three distinct branches: legislative, executive, and judicial
Each branch has its own specific powers and responsibilities, as outlined in Articles I, II, and III of the Constitution
Prevents the concentration of power in any single branch, reducing the risk of tyranny
Checks and balances
A system in which each branch of government has the ability to limit or "check" the power of the other branches
Examples include the president's veto power, Congress's power to override a veto, and the judiciary's power to review the constitutionality of laws
Ensures that no single branch becomes too powerful and helps maintain a balance of power
Federalism
The division of power between the national (federal) government and state governments
The Constitution grants specific powers to the federal government (enumerated powers), while reserving other powers to the states (reserved powers)
Allows for a balance between national unity and state-level diversity and experimentation
Judicial review
The power of the courts, particularly the Supreme Court, to review and invalidate laws and government actions that violate the Constitution
Established by the Supreme Court in Marbury v. Madison (1803)
Serves as a crucial check on the legislative and executive branches, ensuring that they act within the bounds of the Constitution
Bill of Rights
The first ten amendments to the U.S. Constitution, added in 1791 to protect individual rights and limit government power
Reflects the influence of natural rights philosophy and the social contract theory
Includes protections for , religion, and the press, as well as due process rights and protections against unreasonable searches and seizures
First Amendment freedoms
Protects freedom of religion, speech, press, assembly, and petition
Prevents government from establishing an official religion or prohibiting the free exercise of religion
Ensures that individuals can express their opinions, criticize the government, and gather peacefully to advocate for change
Second Amendment rights
Protects the right to keep and bear arms
Subject to ongoing debate about the scope of this right and the government's ability to regulate firearms
Often discussed in the context of self-defense, hunting, and the role of an armed citizenry in preventing tyranny
Fourth Amendment protections
Guards against unreasonable searches and seizures by the government
Requires probable cause and a warrant for most searches, with some exceptions (exigent circumstances, plain view)
Helps protect individual privacy and prevents arbitrary government intrusion into people's lives and property
Fifth Amendment rights
Provides several due process protections for individuals accused of crimes
Includes the right to remain silent (protection against self-incrimination), the right to a grand jury indictment for capital crimes, and protection against double jeopardy
Prohibits the government from taking private property for public use without just compensation
Sixth Amendment rights
Guarantees a speedy and public trial, an impartial jury, and the assistance of counsel for criminal defendants
Ensures that the accused are informed of the charges against them and have the opportunity to confront witnesses
Helps protect against arbitrary or abusive prosecution and ensures fair criminal proceedings
Eighth Amendment protections
Prohibits excessive bail, fines, and cruel and unusual punishments
Reflects the principle of proportionality in criminal justice, ensuring that punishments are not excessively harsh or disproportionate to the crime
Helps prevent abuses in the criminal justice system and protects the dignity of those accused or convicted of crimes
Incorporation of the Bill of Rights
The process by which the Supreme Court has applied the protections of the Bill of Rights to state governments through the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause
Initially, the Bill of Rights was interpreted as applying only to the federal government, not to the states
Incorporation has expanded civil liberties protections and ensured that states must also respect individual rights
Barron v. Baltimore (1833)
Supreme Court ruled that the Bill of Rights applied only to the federal government, not to state governments
Set the stage for later debates about the application of the Bill of Rights to the states
Reflected the concept of dual citizenship, in which individuals were citizens of both their state and the United States, with each level of government having its own set of rights and protections
Selective incorporation
The process by which the Supreme Court has gradually applied specific provisions of the Bill of Rights to the states on a case-by-case basis
Began in the early 20th century and has continued to the present day
Has resulted in most, but not all, of the Bill of Rights being applied to the states
Gitlow v. New York (1925)
The Supreme Court ruled that the 's protection of freedom of speech applied to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause
Marked the beginning of the process
Expanded free speech protections and limited states' ability to restrict individual expression
Near v. Minnesota (1931)
The Supreme Court applied the First Amendment's protection of freedom of the press to the states
Struck down a Minnesota law that allowed for the prior restraint of publications deemed "malicious, scandalous, and defamatory"
Reinforced the importance of a free press in maintaining democratic accountability and informed public discourse
Mapp v. Ohio (1961)
The Supreme Court applied the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and seizures to the states
Established the exclusionary rule, which prohibits the use of evidence obtained through unconstitutional searches in state criminal proceedings
Strengthened individual privacy protections and deterred police misconduct
Freedom of religion
The First Amendment protects the free exercise of religion and prohibits the government from establishing an official religion
Ensures that individuals can practice their faith without government interference or favoritism
Reflects the Founders' commitment to religious pluralism and the separation of church and state
Establishment Clause
Prohibits the government from establishing an official religion or favoring one religion over others
Prevents the government from providing direct financial support to religious institutions or endorsing religious beliefs
Ensures government neutrality in matters of religion and protects against the entanglement of church and state
Free Exercise Clause
Protects the right of individuals to practice their religion without government interference
Prevents the government from singling out specific religious practices for prohibition or punishment
Ensures that individuals can follow their religious beliefs and engage in religious practices, subject to certain limitations (compelling state interest, general applicability)
Separation of church and state
The principle that government and religion should be kept separate to ensure religious freedom and prevent government favoritism or entanglement
Derived from the Establishment Clause and the writings of Thomas Jefferson and James Madison
Helps maintain government neutrality in matters of religion and protects the autonomy of religious institutions
Religious accommodations
Government efforts to accommodate religious practices and beliefs, particularly when general laws or policies may burden religious exercise
Examples include allowing religious exemptions to general laws (conscientious objectors, religious dress in the workplace) and providing alternative options for religious minorities (kosher meals in prisons)
Reflects a balance between the Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise Clause, ensuring that the government does not unduly burden religious practice while maintaining neutrality
Freedom of speech
The First Amendment protects the right to express opinions, ideas, and beliefs without government censorship or punishment
Ensures that individuals can engage in public discourse, criticize the government, and advocate for change
Subject to certain limitations, such as speech that incites imminent lawless action or defames others
Protected vs unprotected speech
Some forms of speech are protected by the First Amendment, while others are not
Protected speech includes political speech, artistic expression, and most forms of peaceful advocacy
Unprotected speech includes obscenity, defamation, fighting words, and speech that incites imminent lawless action
Content-based restrictions
Government regulations that restrict speech based on its content or subject matter
Generally presumed unconstitutional, as they target the message or idea being expressed
Must be narrowly tailored to serve a compelling government interest to be upheld (strict scrutiny)
Time, place, and manner restrictions
Government regulations that restrict when, where, or how speech can occur, but not the content of the speech itself
Examples include noise ordinances, permit requirements for public demonstrations, and restrictions on speech in specific locations (schools, courtrooms)
Must be content-neutral, narrowly tailored to serve a significant government interest, and leave open alternative channels of communication
Symbolic speech
Nonverbal actions or displays that convey a political message or idea
Examples include burning the American flag, wearing armbands to protest a war, and displaying controversial symbols
Protected by the First Amendment, subject to the same limitations as verbal speech
School speech
Student speech in public schools is protected by the First Amendment but subject to greater restrictions than adult speech in other contexts
Schools can regulate speech that substantially disrupts the educational process or infringes upon the rights of others (Tinker v. Des Moines, 1969)
Schools have more leeway to regulate school-sponsored speech (Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier, 1988) and speech that promotes illegal drug use (Morse v. Frederick, 2007)
Freedom of the press
The First Amendment protects the right of the media to gather and publish news and information without government censorship or interference
Ensures that the press can serve as a watchdog on government activity and inform the public about matters of public concern
Subject to certain limitations, such as defamation, privacy, and national security concerns
Prior restraint
Government censorship or suppression of speech before it is published or broadcast
Presumed unconstitutional, as it prevents speech from occurring rather than punishing it after the fact
Permitted only in exceptional circumstances, such as to prevent the publication of troop movements during wartime
Libel and defamation
False statements that harm an individual's reputation or standing in the community
Libel refers to written defamation, while slander refers to spoken defamation
Public figures must prove "actual malice" (knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard for the truth) to prevail in a defamation lawsuit (New York Times v. Sullivan, 1964)
Reporter's privilege
The right of journalists to refuse to disclose their confidential sources or information in court proceedings
Not explicitly protected by the First Amendment, but recognized by some states through shield laws
Helps maintain the independence of the press and encourages sources to come forward with information of public importance
Access to information
The ability of the press and the public to obtain government records and attend government proceedings
Supported by freedom of information laws, such as the federal Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)
Ensures government transparency and accountability, though subject to exceptions for national security, privacy, and other concerns
Right to privacy
The concept that individuals have a fundamental and autonomy in their personal lives
Not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution but derived from the penumbras and emanations of various constitutional provisions (, 1965)
Protects intimate decisions and activities from government interference, such as those related to marriage, procreation, and child-rearing
Griswold v. Connecticut (1965)
The Supreme Court struck down a Connecticut law prohibiting the use of contraceptives, recognizing a constitutional right to privacy in the context of marriage
Established the concept of "penumbras" and "emanations" of privacy rights stemming from various constitutional provisions
Laid the foundation for future privacy rights cases, such as those related to abortion and same-sex relationships
Roe v. Wade (1973)
The Supreme Court recognized a constitutional right to abortion as part of the right to privacy under the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause
Established a trimester-based framework for balancing a woman's right to privacy with the state's interest in protecting potential life
Sparked ongoing controversy and debate about the scope and nature of abortion rights
Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992)
The Supreme Court reaffirmed the core holding of but modified the legal framework for evaluating abortion regulations
Replaced the trimester-based approach with the "undue burden" standard, which asks whether a regulation places a substantial obstacle in the path of a woman seeking an abortion
Allowed for greater state regulation of abortion, particularly in later stages of pregnancy
Same-sex marriage
The Supreme Court recognized a constitutional right to same-sex marriage as part of the fundamental right to marry (, 2015)
Built upon earlier cases that struck down laws criminalizing same-sex intimacy (Lawrence v. Texas, 2003) and federal non-recognition of same-sex marriages (United States v. Windsor, 2013)
Reflected evolving social attitudes and the growing recognition of LGBTQ+ rights as civil rights issues
Rights of the accused
The Constitution provides various protections for individuals accused of crimes, particularly in the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Eighth Amendments
These rights ensure fair treatment, due process, and protection against arbitrary or abusive government action in the criminal justice system
Reflect the principle that individuals are innocent until proven guilty and that the government bears the burden of proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt
Search and seizure
The Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable searches and seizures by the government
Generally requires probable cause and a warrant for searches, with exceptions for exigent circumstances, plain view, and searches incident to arrest
Exclusionary rule prohibits the use of evidence obtained through unconstitutional searches in criminal proceedings (, 1961)
Miranda rights
The requirement that police inform suspects in custody of their right to remain silent and Sixth Amendment right to an attorney before interrogation (, 1966)
Designed to protect against coerced or involuntary confessions and ensure that suspects are aware of their rights
Statements obtained in violation of Miranda are generally inadmissible in court, subject to certain exceptions (public safety, impeachment)
Right to counsel
The Sixth Amendment guarantees the right to the assistance of counsel in criminal proceedings
Requires the government to provide an attorney for indigent defendants in felony cases (, 1963) and misdemeanor cases resulting in imprisonment (Argersinger v. Hamlin, 1972)
Ensures that defendants have access to legal representation and a fair opportunity to present a defense
Cruel and unusual punishment
The Eighth Amendment prohibits cruel and unusual punishments, reflecting the principle of proportionality in criminal sentencing
Prohibits punishments that are excessively harsh, degrading, or disproportionate to the offense
Has been invoked to challenge the constitutionality of the death penalty, life sentences for juveniles, and prison conditions
Expanding civil liberties
Civil liberties have been expanded over time through constitutional amendments, legislation, and judicial interpretation
These expansions have sought to protect the rights of marginalized or disadvantaged groups and ensure equal treatment under the law
Reflect evolving social norms and the ongoing struggle to realize the Constitution's promise of liberty and justice for all
Civil Rights Act of 1964
Landmark legislation that prohibited discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin in various contexts, including employment, education, and public accommodations
Strengthened federal enforcement of civil rights and provided remedies for victims of discrimination
Reflected the goals of the and the growing recognition of the need for federal action to address racial inequality
Americans with Disabilities Act
Legislation that prohibits discrimination against individuals with disabilities in employment, public accommodations, transportation, and telecommunications
Requires reasonable accommo
Key Terms to Review (29)
Affirmative action: Affirmative action refers to policies and practices designed to promote equal opportunities for historically marginalized groups in areas like education and employment. It aims to address the effects of past discrimination and create a more diverse and inclusive environment by considering factors such as race, gender, and ethnicity in decision-making processes.
Bill of Rights: The Bill of Rights is the collective name for the first ten amendments to the United States Constitution, ratified in 1791, which guarantee fundamental rights and civil liberties to individuals. It serves as a crucial safeguard against government overreach, ensuring that citizens have essential freedoms such as speech, religion, and assembly. These amendments lay the groundwork for the protection of personal liberties in American democracy, influencing the way individual rights are viewed within the legal framework.
Brown v. Board of Education: Brown v. Board of Education was a landmark Supreme Court case decided in 1954 that declared state laws establishing separate public schools for black and white students unconstitutional. This case effectively overturned the 'separate but equal' doctrine established in Plessy v. Ferguson, emphasizing that racial segregation in public education violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The decision was a significant step towards ending racial segregation and promoting civil rights in the United States.
Checks and balances: Checks and balances is a system that ensures no single branch of government becomes too powerful by providing each branch with the authority to limit the powers of the others. This principle is fundamental to maintaining a separation of powers within a government, allowing for cooperation and conflict between branches, which serves to protect democratic governance and individual liberties. The system aims to prevent any one entity from dominating the political process, thereby safeguarding against tyranny.
Civil disobedience: Civil disobedience is the intentional act of breaking certain laws, regulations, or commands of a government to protest against policies or actions considered unjust. This form of nonviolent resistance aims to bring about social or political change by highlighting the moral shortcomings of those laws and appealing to the conscience of the public and lawmakers alike.
Civil Rights Movement: The Civil Rights Movement was a social and political movement in the United States aimed at ending racial segregation and discrimination against African Americans, primarily during the 1950s and 1960s. This movement sought to secure equal rights under the law, promote social justice, and ensure that all citizens could participate fully in American society, which connects to broader themes of equality, justice, and human rights across various contexts.
Due Process: Due process is a legal principle that ensures fair treatment through the judicial system, safeguarding individuals' rights against arbitrary denial of life, liberty, or property. It is rooted in the Constitution and guarantees that legal proceedings will be conducted fairly and that individuals will receive notice and an opportunity to be heard before any governmental action is taken against them.
Enumerated powers: Enumerated powers are specific powers granted to Congress by the Constitution, primarily outlined in Article I, Section 8. These powers include the authority to levy taxes, regulate commerce, and declare war, among others. Enumerated powers establish the legal framework for federal authority while also delineating the limits of governmental power, highlighting the principles of federalism and separation of powers.
Federalism: Federalism is a political system in which power is divided between a central authority and smaller political units, like states or provinces. This structure allows for a balance of power, ensuring that governance can be more responsive to local needs while maintaining a unified national policy. Federalism plays a crucial role in the distribution of powers and responsibilities, influencing the protection of civil liberties within the framework of constitutional principles.
Fifth Amendment: The Fifth Amendment is a part of the United States Constitution that protects individuals from self-incrimination and ensures due process of law. It establishes critical rights, such as the right to remain silent, the right to a grand jury, and protection against double jeopardy, which collectively safeguard civil liberties and uphold the principle of justice within the legal system.
First Amendment: The First Amendment to the United States Constitution protects several fundamental rights, including freedom of speech, religion, press, assembly, and petition. It establishes a critical foundation for civil liberties in the United States, ensuring that individuals can express their thoughts and beliefs without fear of government retaliation. This amendment is vital in maintaining a democratic society where diverse ideas can be shared and debated.
Freedom of speech: Freedom of speech is the right to express one's opinions and ideas without fear of government retaliation or censorship. This fundamental principle is essential for a democratic society, as it allows for open debate, the exchange of ideas, and the ability to challenge authority. It serves as a cornerstone of civil liberties and is vital for the protection of human rights globally.
Gideon v. Wainwright: Gideon v. Wainwright is a landmark Supreme Court case decided in 1963 that established the right to counsel for defendants in criminal cases who cannot afford an attorney. This decision reinforced the principle that legal representation is a fundamental right under the Sixth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, ensuring that justice is accessible to all individuals, regardless of their financial status.
Gitlow v. New York: Gitlow v. New York is a landmark Supreme Court case from 1925 that established the principle of selective incorporation, applying the First Amendment's protections of free speech to state laws through the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause. This case set a precedent for how states must respect civil liberties and illustrated the growing importance of the Bill of Rights in protecting individual freedoms from government interference.
Griswold v. Connecticut: Griswold v. Connecticut was a landmark Supreme Court case decided in 1965 that established the right to privacy in marital relations, ruling that a Connecticut law banning the use of contraceptives violated the Constitution. This case is crucial in understanding the balance between governmental authority and individual rights, especially regarding personal and family matters.
Implied powers: Implied powers are those powers not explicitly stated in the Constitution but are understood to be granted based on the necessary and proper clause. This allows the government to carry out actions that are deemed essential for executing its enumerated powers, thus ensuring flexibility in governance. The concept of implied powers plays a critical role in interpreting the Constitution, as it reflects how the government can adapt to changing circumstances while remaining within the boundaries set by the document.
Judicial review: Judicial review is the power of courts to examine laws and actions of the legislative and executive branches, determining whether they are in accordance with the Constitution. This principle serves as a crucial check on governmental power, ensuring that no law or action can violate the fundamental rights and liberties protected by the Constitution.
Limited government: Limited government is a political principle that restricts governmental power, ensuring that it cannot infringe upon the rights and freedoms of individuals. This concept emphasizes the importance of a governing body that operates within defined legal limits, protecting citizens from arbitrary authority. It promotes the idea that government should only exercise powers that are explicitly granted to it, often enshrined in a constitution or legal framework, thereby safeguarding civil liberties and encouraging democratic governance.
Magna Carta: The Magna Carta, also known as the Great Charter, is a foundational document in the history of democracy and constitutional law, originally issued in 1215. It established the principle that everyone, including the king, is subject to the law, and it laid the groundwork for future legal and civil rights. This charter influenced the development of limited government and individual liberties, serving as a critical stepping stone toward modern democratic systems.
Mapp v. Ohio: Mapp v. Ohio was a landmark Supreme Court case decided in 1961 that established the exclusionary rule, which prevents illegally obtained evidence from being used in state courts. This case connected the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and seizures to state-level proceedings, reinforcing the principle of civil liberties and ensuring that evidence collected in violation of an individual's rights could not be admitted in court.
Miranda v. Arizona: Miranda v. Arizona is a landmark Supreme Court case from 1966 that established the requirement for law enforcement to inform individuals of their rights before interrogation, including the right to remain silent and the right to an attorney. This decision underscored the importance of protecting individual rights and ensuring that confessions or statements made during custodial interrogation are voluntary and informed, solidifying the principle that no one should be compelled to incriminate themselves.
Near v. Minnesota: Near v. Minnesota is a landmark Supreme Court case from 1931 that ruled against prior restraint, protecting the freedom of the press under the First Amendment. The decision established that state laws imposing prior restraints on publications violate the Constitution, reinforcing the principle that the government cannot censor or suppress information before it is published. This case set a crucial precedent in defining civil liberties related to freedom of speech and press.
Obergefell v. Hodges: Obergefell v. Hodges is a landmark Supreme Court case decided in 2015 that ruled same-sex marriage is a constitutional right under the Fourteenth Amendment, specifically through the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses. This decision established that states could not deny marriage licenses to same-sex couples, thus legalizing same-sex marriage nationwide and reinforcing the principle of equality under the law. The ruling was a significant step in the fight for LGBTQ+ rights and changed the landscape of civil liberties in America.
Popular Sovereignty: Popular sovereignty is the principle that the authority of a government is created and sustained by the consent of its people, typically expressed through elected representatives. This concept is foundational to democratic governance, emphasizing that ultimate power rests with the citizens rather than a ruling elite. It connects deeply to ideas of democracy, individual rights, and civic responsibility, highlighting that the legitimacy of governmental power relies on the active participation and will of the populace.
Right to privacy: The right to privacy refers to the fundamental right of individuals to keep their personal information and private affairs away from public scrutiny and government interference. This concept has evolved through various court rulings, establishing a legal framework that protects personal autonomy and confidentiality in both private and public life.
Roe v. Wade: Roe v. Wade is a landmark Supreme Court case decided in 1973 that established a woman's legal right to have an abortion under the constitutional right to privacy. This decision significantly impacted laws regarding reproductive rights, shaping the national conversation on abortion and civil liberties, as it reinforced the idea that personal decisions about one's body should be protected from government interference.
Selective incorporation: Selective incorporation is the legal doctrine that ensures that certain protections granted by the Bill of Rights are applied to state governments through the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause. This process means that while the federal government must respect specific civil liberties, states are also required to uphold these liberties, creating a uniform standard of rights across the United States.
Separation of Powers: Separation of powers is a foundational principle in governance that divides the responsibilities of government into distinct branches: legislative, executive, and judicial. This system is designed to prevent the concentration of power and ensure that each branch functions independently while also providing checks and balances on one another. By doing so, it promotes accountability and protects individual liberties within a democratic society.
Women’s suffrage movement: The women’s suffrage movement was a social and political campaign aimed at securing the legal right to vote for women, primarily in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. This movement was crucial in challenging existing gender roles and advocating for civil liberties, ultimately leading to the ratification of the 19th Amendment in 1920, which granted women the right to vote in the United States.