Probabilistic Decision-Making

📊Probabilistic Decision-Making Unit 11 – Decision Analysis & Trees in Management

Decision analysis and trees are powerful tools for structuring complex choices under uncertainty. They help managers visualize options, assess probabilities, and calculate expected values to make informed decisions. This approach combines quantitative analysis with qualitative judgment to optimize outcomes. Key concepts include decision nodes, chance nodes, and payoffs. By constructing decision trees, managers can evaluate alternatives, incorporate risk preferences, and conduct sensitivity analyses. This systematic approach enhances decision-making across various business functions, from investments to resource allocation.

Key Concepts and Terminology

  • Decision analysis involves structuring and analyzing decisions to identify the best course of action under uncertainty
  • Decision trees visually represent the decision-making process, including decision nodes (squares), chance nodes (circles), and terminal nodes (triangles)
  • Probability assesses the likelihood of an event occurring, expressed as a value between 0 and 1
    • Joint probability is the likelihood of two or more events occurring simultaneously
    • Conditional probability is the likelihood of an event occurring given that another event has already occurred
  • Expected value (EV) is the weighted average of all possible outcomes, calculated by multiplying each outcome's probability by its value and summing the results
  • Payoff is the outcome or reward associated with a particular decision path
  • Utility represents the decision-maker's preferences and risk attitude, assigning a value to each possible outcome
  • Sunk costs are irrelevant past expenditures that should not influence future decisions
  • Opportunity cost is the value of the best alternative foregone when making a decision

Decision-Making Process Overview

  • Identify the decision problem and objectives, clearly defining the issue at hand and the desired outcomes
  • Generate alternatives by brainstorming potential courses of action
  • Gather relevant information, including probabilities, costs, and benefits associated with each alternative
  • Structure the decision using a decision tree or other appropriate tool
  • Evaluate alternatives by calculating expected values and considering risk preferences
  • Make a decision based on the analysis and implement the chosen course of action
  • Monitor and adapt the decision as new information becomes available or circumstances change
  • Conduct a post-decision evaluation to assess the outcome and learn from the experience

Types of Decision Trees

  • Single-stage decision trees involve a single decision point followed by chance events and outcomes
  • Multi-stage decision trees include multiple sequential decision points, with each decision leading to chance events and subsequent decisions
  • Asymmetric decision trees have different numbers of branches emanating from chance nodes, reflecting varying possible outcomes
  • Symmetric decision trees have the same number of branches emanating from each chance node
  • Deterministic decision trees contain only decision nodes and known outcomes, without any chance events
  • Stochastic decision trees incorporate chance nodes and probabilistic outcomes
  • Continuous decision trees involve decision variables that can take on a continuous range of values
  • Discrete decision trees feature decision variables with a finite set of possible values

Constructing Decision Trees

  • Begin with a decision node, represented by a square, indicating the initial decision to be made
  • Draw branches from the decision node, each representing a possible course of action or alternative
  • For each alternative, consider the possible outcomes and their associated probabilities
    • If the outcome is uncertain, add a chance node (circle) and draw branches for each possible outcome
    • If the outcome is certain, add a terminal node (triangle) and assign the associated payoff value
  • Continue adding decision nodes, chance nodes, and terminal nodes until all possible paths have been explored
  • Assign probabilities to each branch emanating from a chance node, ensuring they sum to 1
  • Assign payoff values to each terminal node, representing the outcome of that particular path

Probability and Expected Value Calculations

  • To calculate the expected value (EV) of a chance node, multiply each possible outcome's probability by its associated payoff and sum the results
    • EV=i=1n(probabilityi×payoffi)EV = \sum_{i=1}^{n} (probability_i \times payoff_i)
  • For decision nodes, calculate the EV of each branch and choose the alternative with the highest EV
  • Rollback the tree by working backward from the terminal nodes, calculating EVs at each chance node and selecting the best alternative at each decision node
  • The overall expected value of the decision tree is the EV at the initial decision node after rollback
  • To calculate the expected value of perfect information (EVPI), subtract the EV of the best alternative without additional information from the EV with perfect information
    • EVPI=EVperfectinformationEVbestalternativeEVPI = EV_{perfect\,information} - EV_{best\,alternative}

Risk Assessment and Sensitivity Analysis

  • Conduct a sensitivity analysis to determine how changes in probabilities or payoffs affect the decision
    • One-way sensitivity analysis varies a single parameter while holding others constant
    • Two-way sensitivity analysis varies two parameters simultaneously
  • Use tornado diagrams to visualize the sensitivity of the decision to changes in each parameter
  • Assess the decision-maker's risk attitude using utility functions or risk profiles
    • Risk-averse decision-makers prefer certainty and have concave utility functions
    • Risk-neutral decision-makers focus on expected values and have linear utility functions
    • Risk-seeking decision-makers prefer uncertainty and have convex utility functions
  • Incorporate the decision-maker's risk attitude by using certainty equivalents or risk-adjusted payoffs in the decision tree

Applications in Management

  • Investment decisions, such as evaluating projects or acquisitions based on expected returns and risks
  • Resource allocation, determining the optimal distribution of limited resources among competing projects or departments
  • Pricing strategies, analyzing the impact of different pricing options on demand, revenue, and profitability
  • Capacity planning, deciding on the optimal level of production capacity based on demand forecasts and associated costs
  • Marketing campaigns, evaluating the potential success of different marketing strategies and their associated costs and benefits
  • Hiring decisions, assessing the value of different candidates based on their expected contributions and the costs of recruitment and training
  • Supply chain management, selecting suppliers and transportation options based on costs, reliability, and lead times
  • Risk management, identifying and mitigating potential risks in various business functions

Advanced Techniques and Software Tools

  • Influence diagrams combine decision trees with Bayesian networks to model complex relationships among variables
  • Monte Carlo simulation involves generating random samples from probability distributions to estimate the distribution of possible outcomes
  • Markov decision processes (MDPs) model sequential decision-making problems with uncertain outcomes and state transitions
  • Dynamic programming is a recursive optimization technique for solving complex decision problems by breaking them down into smaller subproblems
  • Decision support systems (DSS) are software tools that assist decision-makers by providing data analysis, visualization, and scenario testing capabilities
    • Examples of DSS include Palisade's @RISK, TreeAge Pro, and Vanguard Studio
  • Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is a structured technique for organizing and analyzing complex decisions based on pairwise comparisons of criteria and alternatives
  • Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) methods, such as ELECTRE and PROMETHEE, help decision-makers evaluate alternatives based on multiple, often conflicting, criteria


© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.

© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.