💸Principles of Economics Unit 10 – Monopolistic Competition & Oligopoly

Monopolistic competition and oligopoly are market structures that fall between perfect competition and monopoly. These models explain how firms compete when they have some control over prices but face competition from rivals. In monopolistic competition, many firms sell differentiated products with low entry barriers. Oligopolies feature a few dominant firms with high entry barriers. Both involve strategic behavior, non-price competition, and varying levels of long-term profitability.

Key Concepts

  • Monopolistic competition involves many firms selling differentiated products with low barriers to entry and exit
  • Oligopoly consists of a few large firms dominating a market with high barriers to entry
  • Product differentiation enables firms to have some control over price in monopolistic competition
  • Strategic behavior and interdependence among firms characterize decision-making in oligopolies
    • Firms consider the potential reactions of rivals when making decisions
  • Non-price competition, such as advertising and product innovation, is common in both market structures
  • Long-run equilibrium differs between monopolistic competition (zero economic profit) and oligopoly (sustained economic profit)

Market Structures Comparison

  • Perfect competition: many firms, homogeneous products, price takers, free entry/exit
  • Monopolistic competition: many firms, differentiated products, some control over price, free entry/exit
  • Oligopoly: few large firms, either differentiated or homogeneous products, strategic behavior, high barriers to entry/exit
  • Monopoly: single firm, unique product, significant control over price, very high barriers to entry
  • Key differences across market structures include the number of firms, product differentiation, degree of price control, and ease of entry/exit
  • The level of competition and efficiency varies across market structures (perfect competition is most efficient, monopoly is least efficient)

Characteristics of Monopolistic Competition

  • Large number of firms in the industry, each with a small market share
  • Differentiated products that are close substitutes for one another (fast food chains, clothing retailers)
  • Firms have some control over price due to product differentiation
    • Downward-sloping demand curve, but relatively elastic
  • Low barriers to entry and exit, allowing new firms to enter the market if economic profits exist
  • Non-price competition is prevalent, such as advertising and product innovation
  • Excess capacity in the long run, as firms operate below the minimum efficient scale

Characteristics of Oligopoly

  • Few large firms dominate the market, each with a significant market share
  • Products can be either differentiated (automobiles) or homogeneous (steel)
  • High barriers to entry, such as economies of scale, legal barriers, or significant capital requirements
  • Interdependence among firms leads to strategic behavior and decision-making
    • Firms consider the potential reactions of rivals when setting prices or output levels
  • Tendency towards collusion, either explicit (illegal) or tacit (legal), to reduce competition and increase profits
  • Non-price competition, such as advertising and product differentiation, is common

Firm Behavior and Strategies

  • In monopolistic competition, firms maximize profit by setting marginal revenue equal to marginal cost
    • Firms have some market power, but face highly elastic demand due to close substitutes
  • Oligopolistic firms engage in strategic decision-making, considering the actions and reactions of rivals
  • Collusive behavior, such as price fixing or market sharing, can occur in oligopolies to reduce competition and increase profits
    • Cartels are formal collusive agreements (OPEC)
  • Non-collusive oligopoly models include Cournot (quantity competition), Bertrand (price competition), and Stackelberg (leader-follower)
  • Price leadership, where one firm sets the price and others follow, is common in oligopolies
  • Limit pricing and predatory pricing are strategies used to deter entry or drive out competitors

Short-Run vs. Long-Run Equilibrium

  • In monopolistic competition, firms can earn economic profits in the short run by differentiating their products
    • Short-run equilibrium occurs where marginal revenue equals marginal cost (MR = MC)
  • In the long run, entry of new firms drives economic profits to zero (P = ATC)
    • Firms operate with excess capacity, as the demand curve is tangent to the average total cost curve
  • Oligopolistic firms can maintain economic profits in the long run due to high barriers to entry
    • The long-run equilibrium depends on the specific oligopoly model and the degree of collusion
  • In both market structures, firms engage in non-price competition to differentiate their products and maintain market share

Real-World Examples

  • Monopolistic competition examples include restaurants, hair salons, and clothing retailers
    • Differentiation through location, quality, service, and branding
  • Oligopoly examples include automobiles (GM, Ford, Toyota), airlines (Delta, American, United), and wireless carriers (Verizon, AT&T, T-Mobile)
    • High concentration ratios and strategic behavior
  • Collusive behavior has been observed in industries such as airlines (price fixing) and LCD panels (price fixing and market allocation)
  • Non-price competition is evident in the advertising expenditures of firms in industries like soft drinks (Coca-Cola and Pepsi) and fast food (McDonald's and Burger King)

Economic Impact and Efficiency

  • Monopolistic competition results in some deadweight loss due to excess capacity and prices above marginal cost
    • However, product differentiation can increase consumer choice and satisfaction
  • Oligopolies can lead to higher prices and reduced output compared to perfect competition, resulting in deadweight loss
    • Collusive behavior exacerbates these inefficiencies
  • Non-price competition in both market structures can lead to socially excessive expenditures on advertising and product differentiation
  • However, non-price competition can also drive innovation and improve product quality
  • The overall impact on social welfare depends on the specific industry and the extent of competition or collusion
  • Government intervention, such as antitrust laws and regulation, can help promote competition and efficiency in these market structures


© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.

© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.