11.3 Higher-Order Newton-Cotes Formulas

Higher-order Newton-Cotes formulas take numerical integration to the next level. They use more points to approximate integrals, offering better accuracy but with increased complexity. These formulas build on simpler methods like the trapezoidal rule.

Understanding these formulas is crucial for tackling tougher integrals. They're part of a bigger toolkit for numerical integration, balancing accuracy and computational cost. Knowing when to use them can make a huge difference in solving real-world problems.

Higher-order Newton-Cotes formulas

Formula Derivation and Characteristics

Top images from around the web for Formula Derivation and Characteristics

• 

  Python program for integration using simpsons 1/3 - Rule View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  numerical methods - Do I have the right formula for the Composite Simpson's 3/8 Rule ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Identifying Characteristics of Polynomials | Mathematics for the Liberal Arts Corequisite View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Python program for integration using simpsons 1/3 - Rule View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  numerical methods - Do I have the right formula for the Composite Simpson's 3/8 Rule ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Formula Derivation and Characteristics

• 

  Python program for integration using simpsons 1/3 - Rule View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  numerical methods - Do I have the right formula for the Composite Simpson's 3/8 Rule ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Identifying Characteristics of Polynomials | Mathematics for the Liberal Arts Corequisite View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Python program for integration using simpsons 1/3 - Rule View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  numerical methods - Do I have the right formula for the Composite Simpson's 3/8 Rule ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Newton-Cotes formulas approximate definite integrals using polynomial interpolation
• Higher-order formulas utilize more interpolation points for increased accuracy
• General form expresses integral of Lagrange interpolation polynomial over interval [a,b]
• Derivation requires calculation of weights (coefficients) for each interpolation point
• Closed formulas include interval endpoints, open formulas do not
• Degree of precision represents highest degree polynomial for which formula is exact
• Specific higher-order formulas include Simpson's 3/8 rule (3rd order) and Boole's rule (4th order)

Mathematical Representation and Properties

• Integral approximation expressed as $\int_{a}^{b} f(x) dx \approx \sum_{i=0}^{n} w_i f(x_i)$
• Weights $w_i$ determined by integrating Lagrange basis polynomials
• Degree of precision for n-point closed formula $2n-1$ for odd n, $2n-2$ for even n
• Error term for n-point formula proportional to $(b-a)^{n+2}f^{(n+1)}(\xi)$, where $\xi$ is in [a,b]
• Simpson's 3/8 rule formula: $\int_{a}^{b} f(x) dx \approx \frac{b-a}{8}[f(a) + 3f(\frac{2a+b}{3}) + 3f(\frac{a+2b}{3}) + f(b)]$
• Boole's rule formula: $\int_{a}^{b} f(x) dx \approx \frac{2(b-a)}{45}[7f(a) + 32f(\frac{3a+b}{4}) + 12f(\frac{a+b}{2}) + 32f(\frac{a+3b}{4}) + 7f(b)]$

Stability and convergence of formulas

Stability Analysis

• Stability refers to sensitivity to small perturbations in input data or rounding errors
• Higher-order formulas tend to be less stable due to oscillatory behavior (Runge's phenomenon)
• Even-order closed formulas generally have better stability than odd-order formulas
• Composite rules improve stability by dividing integration interval into smaller subintervals
• Condition number of weight matrix provides measure of formula stability
• Relative error in integration result bounded by condition number times relative error in function values

Convergence Properties

• Convergence approaches true integral value as number of subintervals increases
• Order of convergence related to degree of precision of formula
• Error bounds derived using Taylor series expansions and properties of divided differences
• Convergence rate for n-point closed formula $O(h^{2n})$ for even n, $O(h^{2n+2})$ for odd n, where h is subinterval width
• Composite rules typically have convergence rate $O(h^4)$ for Simpson's rule, $O(h^6)$ for Boole's rule
• Adaptive quadrature techniques can achieve faster convergence for functions with varying smoothness

Implementing Newton-Cotes formulas

Algorithm Design and Optimization

• Implementation requires consideration of interpolation points and subintervals
• Adaptive quadrature adjusts number of points based on function's behavior
• Efficient algorithms reuse function evaluations from lower-order approximations
• Composite rules apply chosen formula to each subinterval and sum results
• Error estimation techniques (Richardson extrapolation) improve accuracy and provide error bounds
• Special care needed for functions with singularities or discontinuities within integration interval
• Parallel computing speeds up evaluation, especially for composite rules

Code Implementation and Numerical Considerations

• Basic implementation of Simpson's 3/8 rule:

  def simpsons_3_8_rule(f, a, b, n):
      h = (b - a) / n
      x = [a + i * h for i in range(n+1)]
      return 3*h/8 * sum((f(x[i]) + 3*f(x[i+1]) + 3*f(x[i+2]) + f(x[i+3])) for i in range(0, n-2, 3))
  

• Adaptive quadrature implementation example:

  def adaptive_quadrature(f, a, b, tol):
      def quad(a, b):
          c = (a + b) / 2
          I1 = (b - a) / 6 * (f(a) + 4*f(c) + f(b))
          I2 = (b - a) / 12 * (f(a) + 4*f((a+c)/2) + 2*f(c) + 4*f((c+b)/2) + f(b))
          if abs(I2 - I1) < 15 * tol:
              return I2
          return quad(a, c) + quad(c, b)
      return quad(a, b)
  

• Use of arbitrary precision arithmetic libraries (mpmath) for high-order formulas
• Handling of roundoff errors through compensated summation algorithms

Accuracy vs Computational complexity

Performance Analysis

• Higher-order formulas increase accuracy at cost of greater computational complexity
• Number of function evaluations increases with formula order, affecting overall cost
• Accuracy gains may be offset by increased round-off errors and stability issues
• Choice of formula order considers integrand smoothness and desired accuracy level
• Composite rules using lower-order formulas often balance accuracy and efficiency better than single higher-order applications
• Optimal choice depends on specific problem and available computational resources
• Adaptive quadrature methods automatically balance accuracy and cost by adjusting formula order and subinterval size

Comparative Study of Different Formulas

• Trapezoidal rule: $O(h^2)$ convergence, 2 function evaluations per interval
• Simpson's rule: $O(h^4)$ convergence, 3 function evaluations per interval
• Boole's rule: $O(h^6)$ convergence, 5 function evaluations per interval
• Computational cost increases linearly with number of subintervals for fixed-order formulas
• Higher-order formulas require fewer subintervals for given accuracy, but more function evaluations per interval
• Example: integrating $\sin(x)$ from 0 to $\pi$ with error tolerance $10^{-6}$
  • Trapezoidal rule: 1000 subintervals, 2001 function evaluations
  • Simpson's rule: 14 subintervals, 43 function evaluations
  • Boole's rule: 4 subintervals, 21 function evaluations
• Adaptive methods often achieve desired accuracy with fewer total function evaluations