Undecidable Problems in Computer Science to Know for Incompleteness and Undecidability

Undecidable problems in computer science reveal the limits of computation, showing that not all questions can be answered algorithmically. Key examples like the Halting Problem and Rice's Theorem highlight the boundaries between what is computable and what isn't.

  1. The Halting Problem

    • Proves that there is no general algorithm to determine whether a given program will halt or run indefinitely.
    • Introduced by Alan Turing in 1936, it is foundational in the study of computability.
    • Demonstrates the limits of what can be computed, establishing a clear boundary between decidable and undecidable problems.
  2. Post's Correspondence Problem

    • Involves matching sequences of strings based on a set of pairs, with no algorithm to determine if a solution exists.
    • Introduced by Emil Post in 1946, it serves as a classic example of an undecidable problem.
    • Highlights the complexity of combinatorial problems in formal language theory.
  3. Rice's Theorem

    • States that all non-trivial properties of the languages recognized by Turing machines are undecidable.
    • Provides a framework for understanding the limits of what can be determined about computational problems.
    • Emphasizes that any property that is not trivial (true for all or false for all) cannot be algorithmically decided.
  4. The Entscheidungsproblem (Decision Problem)

    • Asks whether there exists a definitive procedure to determine the truth of any mathematical statement.
    • Demonstrated to be undecidable by Turing and Alonzo Church in the 1930s.
    • Serves as a critical historical point in the development of logic and computability theory.
  5. Tiling Problem

    • Concerns whether a given set of tiles can cover a plane without gaps or overlaps, with no general solution algorithm.
    • Introduced by Hao Wang in the 1960s, it illustrates the complexity of spatial reasoning in computation.
    • Connects to various areas in mathematics, including combinatorics and geometry.
  6. The Word Problem for Groups

    • Asks whether two words (strings of symbols) represent the same element in a given group, with undecidability established for certain groups.
    • First posed by Max Dehn in 1911, it has implications in algebra and topology.
    • Highlights the challenges in determining equivalence in algebraic structures.
  7. Hilbert's Tenth Problem

    • Seeks an algorithm to determine whether a given Diophantine equation has an integer solution, proven undecidable by Yuri Matiyasevich in 1970.
    • Connects number theory with computability, showing limits in solving polynomial equations.
    • Illustrates the intersection of logic, mathematics, and computer science.
  8. The Busy Beaver Problem

    • Involves finding the maximum number of steps a Turing machine can take before halting, given a specific number of states.
    • Proven to be non-computable, as no algorithm can determine the Busy Beaver function for all inputs.
    • Serves as an example of how growth rates in computation can lead to undecidable questions.
  9. The Universality Problem

    • Asks whether a given Turing machine can simulate any other Turing machine, with undecidability established.
    • Highlights the concept of universality in computation, linking to the Church-Turing thesis.
    • Important for understanding the capabilities and limitations of computational models.
  10. The Equivalence Problem for Context-Free Grammars

    • Concerns whether two context-free grammars generate the same language, proven undecidable.
    • Illustrates the complexities in formal language theory and the limitations of grammar-based computation.
    • Important for understanding the boundaries of decidability in programming languages and compilers.


© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.

© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.