Fair use is a crucial legal principle that allows limited use of copyrighted material without permission. It balances the interests of copyright owners with the public's need for wider distribution and use of creative works. The doctrine is determined case-by-case using four main factors.
is key in fair use analysis. It involves altering the original work's message, context, or purpose significantly. Transformative uses are more likely to be considered fair use as they promote creativity and enrich public knowledge by adding new expression or meaning.
Fair use doctrine
The is a legal principle that allows limited use of copyrighted material without permission from the rights holder
It aims to balance the interests of copyright owners with the public interest in the wider distribution and use of creative works
Fair use is determined on a case-by-case basis by considering four main factors
Four factors of fair use
Top images from around the web for Four factors of fair use
Fair Use and Blurred Lines Between Common Law and Civil Law Countries | infojustice View original
Is this image relevant?
Demystifying Fair Use: Our New Guide, FAQs, and More! | Authors Alliance View original
Is this image relevant?
Fair Use Guidelines - Copyright Laws and Guidelines - Library Guides at Garrett-Evangelical ... View original
Is this image relevant?
Fair Use and Blurred Lines Between Common Law and Civil Law Countries | infojustice View original
Is this image relevant?
Demystifying Fair Use: Our New Guide, FAQs, and More! | Authors Alliance View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Top images from around the web for Four factors of fair use
Fair Use and Blurred Lines Between Common Law and Civil Law Countries | infojustice View original
Is this image relevant?
Demystifying Fair Use: Our New Guide, FAQs, and More! | Authors Alliance View original
Is this image relevant?
Fair Use Guidelines - Copyright Laws and Guidelines - Library Guides at Garrett-Evangelical ... View original
Is this image relevant?
Fair Use and Blurred Lines Between Common Law and Civil Law Countries | infojustice View original
Is this image relevant?
Demystifying Fair Use: Our New Guide, FAQs, and More! | Authors Alliance View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
of the use (commercial vs non-profit, transformative vs derivative)
Nature of the copyrighted work (factual vs creative, published vs unpublished)
of the portion used in relation to the whole work
Effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the original work
Purpose and character of use
Examines whether the use is commercial or non-profit educational
Considers if the use is transformative, adding new meaning or expression to the original
Non-profit educational uses are more likely to be considered fair use
Transformative uses that repurpose or add new insights to the original are favored
Nature of copyrighted work
Assesses whether the original work is factual or creative in nature
Factual works (news articles, historical accounts) receive less protection than creative works (novels, films)
Published works are more likely to be considered fair use than unpublished works
Use of factual portions of a work is more likely to be fair than using creative expressions
Amount and substantiality used
Analyzes both the quantity and quality of the portion used in relation to the whole work
Using a smaller portion of the original work is more likely to be considered fair use
However, even using a small portion can be infringement if it constitutes the "heart" of the work
Courts consider whether the amount used is reasonable and necessary for the purpose
Effect on potential market
Examines the impact of the use on the potential market or value of the original work
Uses that serve as a substitute for the original and deprive the owner of revenue are less likely to be fair
Criticism, , or transformative uses are less likely to have a negative market effect
Courts consider whether the use could potentially become widespread and impact the market
Transformative use
Transformative use is a key concept in fair use analysis, focusing on whether the use adds new expression, meaning, or insight to the original work
It involves altering the original work's message, context, or purpose in a significant way
Transformative uses are more likely to be considered fair use, as they further the goals of copyright law in promoting creativity and enriching public knowledge
Altering original work's meaning
Transformative use often involves changing the meaning or message of the original work
This can be achieved by using the work in a different context, medium, or for a new purpose
Examples include using a song in a film soundtrack to convey a different mood or critiquing a political speech by juxtaposing it with contrasting imagery
Adding new expression or meaning
Transformative uses add new creative expression, insights, or commentary to the original work
This can involve combining the original with new material, using it as a starting point for a new creation, or providing a fresh perspective on the work
Examples include creating a collage that incorporates elements of an artwork or writing a critical analysis of a literary text
Parody vs satire
Parody and satire are two forms of transformative use that are often protected under fair use
Parody directly mimics and comments on the original work itself, using humor or criticism to expose its flaws or absurdities
Satire, on the other hand, uses the original work to comment on broader social or political issues, not directly targeting the work itself
Courts have generally been more protective of parody as a transformative fair use than satire
Transformative use examples
Google Books project, which scans and indexes book content for search purposes (Authors Guild v. Google)
Artwork incorporating photographs to comment on consumerism and popular culture (Cariou v. Prince)
Fan-made Harry Potter encyclopedia providing additional insights and analysis (Warner Bros. v. RDR Books)
Parody rap song using elements of Roy Orbison's "Oh, Pretty Woman" (Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music)
Fair use in journalism
Journalists often rely on fair use to report the news, provide commentary, and critique works
Fair use allows journalists to use copyrighted material in ways that inform the public and enrich public discourse
However, journalists must carefully consider the four factors of fair use and ensure their use is transformative and does not infringe on the rights of copyright holders
News reporting and commentary
Journalists can use copyrighted material in news reporting and commentary under fair use
This includes quoting from sources, reproducing images or video clips, and incorporating excerpts from documents
The use should be limited to what is necessary to convey the news story or provide context for commentary
Proper attribution to the original source is essential
Criticism and reviews
Fair use allows journalists to use portions of copyrighted works for criticism and reviews
This can include quoting from a book in a book review, showing clips from a film in a movie critique, or analyzing lyrics in a music review
The use should be limited to what is necessary to support the critical analysis and not serve as a substitute for the original work
Proper attribution and context are important to ensure the use is fair
Use of quotes and excerpts
Journalists can use quotes and excerpts from copyrighted works under fair use
The amount used should be reasonable and justified by the purpose of the reporting or commentary
Quotes should be properly attributed to the original source and context should be provided
Journalists should avoid using extensive quotes or excerpts that could substitute for the original work
Attribution and ethical considerations
Proper attribution is essential when using copyrighted material under fair use in journalism
Journalists should clearly identify the source of the material and provide context for its use
Ethical considerations, such as respecting the integrity of the original work and not misrepresenting its meaning, are important in fair use
Journalists should also consider the potential impact of their use on the rights and interests of the copyright holder
Limitations of fair use
While fair use provides flexibility for using copyrighted material, it is not a blanket permission and has limitations
Several factors can weigh against a finding of fair use and increase the risk of infringement
Commercial vs non-profit use
Commercial uses of copyrighted material are less likely to be considered fair use than non-profit educational uses
If the use is primarily intended for commercial gain, it may be harder to justify as fair use
However, commercial uses can still be fair if they are sufficiently transformative and do not harm the market for the original work
Unpublished vs published works
Unpublished works receive greater protection under copyright law than published works
Using portions of unpublished works is less likely to be considered fair use, as it can interfere with the author's right to control the first publication
However, if the use is highly transformative and serves a compelling public interest, it may still be fair
Fictional vs factual works
Fictional works, such as novels and films, receive stronger copyright protection than factual works like news articles and historical accounts
Using portions of fictional works is less likely to be fair use, especially if the use is not transformative
Factual works have a thinner layer of copyright protection, and using facts and ideas from these works is more likely to be fair
Avoiding market substitution
Fair use should not serve as a substitute for the original work in the market
If the use could potentially replace sales or licensing of the original work, it is less likely to be fair
Uses that are transformative and do not compete directly with the original in the market are more likely to be fair
Defending fair use claims
When faced with a claim of , those relying on fair use can take steps to defend their use
Demonstrating a good faith belief in fair use, documenting the transformative purpose, and considering all four factors can support a fair use defense
Good faith and reasonable belief
Showing that the use was made in good faith and with a reasonable belief that it was fair can support a fair use defense
This involves demonstrating an understanding of fair use principles and how they apply to the specific use
Documenting the decision-making process and reasoning behind the use can help establish good faith
Documenting transformative purpose
Clearly articulating and documenting the transformative purpose of the use is important in defending fair use claims
This involves explaining how the use adds new expression, meaning, or insight to the original work
Providing evidence of the transformative nature of the use, such as through commentary, criticism, or new creative expression, can support a fair use defense
Considering all four factors
When defending fair use, it is important to consider and address all four factors in the analysis
Demonstrating that the use aligns with the factors of purpose and character, nature of the work, amount used, and market effect can strengthen the defense
Providing a balanced and reasoned analysis of the factors, rather than relying on a single factor, can help support fair use
Responding to cease-and-desist letters
If a copyright holder sends a cease-and-desist letter alleging infringement, those relying on fair use can respond by asserting their fair use defense
The response should explain the basis for the fair use claim, addressing the four factors and the transformative nature of the use
It is important to be respectful and professional in the response while firmly asserting fair use rights
Seeking legal advice from an attorney experienced in copyright and fair use can be helpful in crafting an appropriate response
Key Terms to Review (16)
AAUP Fair Use Guidelines: The AAUP Fair Use Guidelines are a set of principles established by the American Association of University Professors to help educators and researchers understand how to apply the doctrine of fair use in their work. These guidelines provide clarity on the use of copyrighted materials, particularly in educational settings, by outlining factors that influence whether a particular use can be considered fair, especially in relation to transformative works.
Amount and substantiality: Amount and substantiality refers to the quantitative and qualitative aspects of how much of a copyrighted work is used in another work, particularly in the context of fair use. This concept assesses not only the volume of the material used but also its significance or centrality to the original work. Both factors are essential in determining whether the use qualifies as fair use, especially when it comes to transformative works, which aim to add new expression or meaning.
Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc.: Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc. is a landmark Supreme Court case decided in 1994 that addressed the doctrine of fair use in copyright law. The case involved a dispute over whether 2 Live Crew's parody of Roy Orbison's song 'Oh, Pretty Woman' constituted fair use, ultimately ruling that transformative works can qualify for fair use even when the new work is commercial in nature. This case is essential in understanding how parody and commentary can coexist with copyright protections, especially for journalists navigating the complexities of fair use and transformative works.
CML Fair Use Checklist: The CML Fair Use Checklist is a practical tool designed to help individuals determine whether the use of copyrighted material qualifies as fair use under U.S. copyright law. This checklist focuses on various factors, such as the purpose of the use, the nature of the copyrighted work, the amount used, and the effect on the market value, which are critical in assessing whether a specific use can be deemed transformative or fair.
Commercial Purpose: Commercial purpose refers to the intention of using a work for financial gain or profit, as opposed to personal, educational, or non-profit reasons. This concept is crucial in determining whether the use of copyrighted material qualifies as fair use, particularly when assessing transformative works that might compete with the original for market value or audience. Understanding the commercial nature of use helps clarify the balance between creators' rights and the public's access to creative works.
Copyright infringement: Copyright infringement occurs when a copyrighted work is used without permission from the copyright holder, violating their exclusive rights. This can involve reproducing, distributing, or displaying the work without authorization. Understanding copyright infringement is essential as it intersects with fair use and transformative works, the challenges of online publishing, and issues related to piracy and illegal file sharing.
Derivative Work: A derivative work is a new creation that is based on or incorporates significant elements of a pre-existing work, such as adaptations, translations, or modifications. This type of work must add something new or alter the original in a meaningful way to be considered transformative and can affect copyright claims regarding the original content. Understanding derivative works is crucial for navigating legal aspects related to creative expressions and their protections.
Educational purpose: Educational purpose refers to the use of copyrighted material in a way that is intended for teaching, scholarship, or research. This concept is a critical component of the fair use doctrine, which allows limited use of copyrighted content without permission under specific conditions, particularly when the use enhances understanding and knowledge acquisition.
Ethical reporting: Ethical reporting refers to the practice of gathering and presenting news in a manner that is fair, accurate, and responsible, respecting the rights and dignity of individuals involved. It emphasizes transparency, accountability, and adherence to professional standards to ensure that information is conveyed truthfully while minimizing harm. This concept intersects with important principles like public access to information and the respectful use of copyrighted material.
Fair use doctrine: The fair use doctrine is a legal principle that allows limited use of copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder, primarily for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, or research. This doctrine is crucial in balancing the rights of creators with the public's interest in accessing and using creative works. It emphasizes the transformative nature of the use, evaluating factors like purpose, nature, amount used, and effect on the market value of the original work.
Journalistic integrity: Journalistic integrity refers to the ethical standards and principles that guide journalists in their work, emphasizing accuracy, fairness, and accountability in reporting. This concept is essential in building trust with audiences and ensuring the credibility of news organizations, influencing how journalists navigate various ethical dilemmas.
Parody: Parody is a creative work that imitates the style of another work, often in a humorous or satirical manner. It takes the original material and exaggerates or distorts elements of it to create a new context or meaning, which can be used to comment on the original work itself. Parody is significant in discussions about fair use because it can transform the original content, providing a strong argument for its protection under copyright law.
Public Domain: Public domain refers to a collection of creative works, inventions, and ideas that are free for anyone to use without seeking permission or paying royalties. This status can occur when copyright expires, when works are never eligible for copyright, or when creators voluntarily place their works in the public domain. Understanding public domain is crucial as it influences how hidden recordings can be shared, the transformative use of works, the basics of copyright law for journalists, the issues surrounding piracy and file sharing, and the implications of Creative Commons licensing.
Purpose and Character: Purpose and character refer to the intent behind the use of a work and the nature of that use, especially when determining fair use in copyright law. This concept is crucial in assessing whether the use of copyrighted material is justified under fair use provisions, particularly when evaluating if the work has been transformed or used for a different purpose than originally intended.
Sony Corp. v. Universal City Studios, Inc.: Sony Corp. v. Universal City Studios, Inc. is a landmark Supreme Court case decided in 1984 that addressed the legality of home video recording and its implications for copyright law. The ruling determined that the use of a VCR to record television programs for personal use was considered fair use, highlighting the balance between copyright protection and the public's right to engage in transformative practices with media content.
Transformative use: Transformative use refers to a legal concept in copyright law where a work is altered or added to in such a way that it adds new expression, meaning, or message, making it fundamentally different from the original. This concept is crucial in determining whether a work qualifies as fair use, particularly when considering how much the new work transforms the original and whether it serves a different purpose or audience.