3.3 Language and power

Language and power are deeply intertwined. Words can assert dominance, maintain hierarchies, and exclude others. But language can also challenge power structures through counter-narratives and reclaiming stigmatized varieties.

Language ideologies shape social hierarchies. The belief in a "standard" language often leads to discrimination against non-standard dialects. This intersects with other forms of prejudice, compounding marginalization for certain groups.

Language and Power Relations

Asserting Dominance and Maintaining Power Imbalances

Top images from around the web for Asserting Dominance and Maintaining Power Imbalances

• 

  Frontiers | Plasticity, Variability and Age in Second Language Acquisition and Bilingualism View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Language Can be an Obstacle to Communication – Communication for Business Professionals View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Gender inequalities in the workplace: the effects of organizational structures ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Plasticity, Variability and Age in Second Language Acquisition and Bilingualism View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Language Can be an Obstacle to Communication – Communication for Business Professionals View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Asserting Dominance and Maintaining Power Imbalances

• 

  Frontiers | Plasticity, Variability and Age in Second Language Acquisition and Bilingualism View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Language Can be an Obstacle to Communication – Communication for Business Professionals View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Gender inequalities in the workplace: the effects of organizational structures ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Plasticity, Variability and Age in Second Language Acquisition and Bilingualism View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Language Can be an Obstacle to Communication – Communication for Business Professionals View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Language can be used as a tool to assert dominance, establish hierarchy, and maintain power imbalances between individuals or groups in various social contexts
• The use of specialized jargon, technical terms, or elite language varieties can serve to exclude or marginalize those who lack access to such linguistic resources, reinforcing power disparities
  • For example, the use of legal jargon in courtrooms can disadvantage defendants who are not familiar with the terminology
  • The use of academic language in educational settings can create barriers for students from non-traditional backgrounds
• The choice of language or language variety in multilingual settings can reflect and influence power dynamics, with the dominant language often associated with prestige, authority, and social mobility
  • In colonial contexts, the imposition of the colonizer's language as the official language has often led to the marginalization of indigenous languages and the perpetuation of power inequalities
  • In the workplace, the expectation to use the dominant language can limit opportunities for speakers of minority languages and reinforce linguistic hierarchies

Challenging Power Structures through Language

• Language can be employed to challenge existing power structures through the use of counter-narratives, resistance discourse, and the reclamation of stigmatized language varieties by marginalized communities
  • The use of African American Vernacular English (AAVE) in hip-hop music has served as a form of resistance against linguistic marginalization and a celebration of cultural identity
  • The reclamation of slurs by LGBTQ+ communities (queer) has been a strategy to subvert their derogatory power and assert pride in one's identity
• The ability to control or regulate language use through institutional policies, media representation, or social norms can be a means of exercising power and shaping public discourse
  • Language policies that mandate the use of a particular language in education or government can limit the linguistic rights of minority language speakers and reinforce power hierarchies
  • Media representations that privilege standard language varieties and stigmatize non-standard varieties can influence public perceptions and perpetuate linguistic discrimination

Language Ideologies and Inequality

Standard Language Ideology and Linguistic Prejudice

• Language ideologies are beliefs, attitudes, and value systems about language that can contribute to the justification and reproduction of social hierarchies and discrimination
• The standard language ideology, which privileges a particular language variety as the norm, can lead to the stigmatization and devaluation of non-standard varieties, often associated with marginalized groups
  • The perception of standard English as the "correct" or "proper" form of the language can lead to the discrimination against speakers of regional or ethnic dialects
  • The devaluation of indigenous languages in favor of colonial languages has contributed to the erosion of linguistic diversity and the marginalization of indigenous communities
• Linguistic prejudice, such as accent discrimination or the perception of certain languages as inferior, can limit opportunities for speakers of stigmatized language varieties in education, employment, and social mobility
  • Studies have shown that job applicants with non-standard accents are often perceived as less competent or suitable for high-status positions, regardless of their qualifications
  • The stereotype of certain languages (Spanish) as "unsophisticated" or "uneducated" can lead to the social and economic exclusion of their speakers

Intersection of Language Ideologies and Social Discrimination

• The belief in the superiority of monolingualism or the dominant language can result in the suppression of minority languages and the assimilation of linguistic minorities, perpetuating social and cultural inequalities
  • The "English-only" movement in the United States has been criticized for its discriminatory impact on non-English speaking communities and its role in reinforcing linguistic and cultural hegemony
  • The forced assimilation of indigenous children in residential schools, where they were prohibited from speaking their native languages, has had long-lasting traumatic effects on indigenous communities and their linguistic heritage
• Language ideologies can intersect with other forms of social discrimination, such as racism, classism, or sexism, compounding the marginalization experienced by individuals or communities
  • The association of certain language varieties (AAVE) with racial stereotypes can lead to the criminalization and racial profiling of their speakers
  • The perception of women's speech as less assertive or authoritative than men's speech can reinforce gender inequalities and limit women's access to positions of power

Linguistic Strategies in Power Struggles

Dominant Group Strategies

• Dominant groups may use language to assert their authority, legitimize their position, and maintain the status quo through strategies such as the use of formal language, technical jargon, or the appropriation of minority language elements
  • The use of Latin in legal and medical contexts has historically served to maintain the exclusivity and prestige of these professions
  • The appropriation of African American slang by white mainstream culture can be seen as a form of cultural exploitation and a means of neutralizing the subversive potential of these linguistic innovations
• The choice of language or language variety in public discourse, such as political speeches or media representations, can be a strategic tool for dominant groups to advance their interests and shape public opinion
  • The use of euphemisms (collateral damage) in military discourse can serve to sanitize the reality of war and justify the actions of those in power
  • The framing of social issues in mainstream media through the lens of the dominant group's perspective can marginalize alternative voices and reinforce existing power structures

Marginalized Group Strategies

• Marginalized groups can employ linguistic strategies to resist domination, assert their identity, and challenge power structures, such as the use of code-switching, the creation of alternative language varieties, or the reappropriation of derogatory terms
  • The use of code-switching between standard and non-standard varieties by African American students can be a form of resistance against linguistic assimilation and a means of asserting cultural identity
  • The development of Pidgin and Creole languages in colonial contexts can be seen as a creative response to linguistic oppression and a means of forging new identities and communities
• The use of linguistic subversion, such as irony, satire, or parody, can be employed by marginalized groups to challenge dominant narratives and expose the contradictions or absurdities of power structures
  • The use of satirical news programs (The Daily Show) to critique political discourse and media bias can be a powerful tool for marginalized perspectives to enter the public sphere
  • The parodic appropriation of dominant language styles by marginalized artists (drag queens) can subvert traditional gender norms and challenge the authority of linguistic conventions
• The use of linguistic accommodation or divergence can signal solidarity, distance, or power relations between interlocutors, depending on the social context and the goals of the interaction
  • The choice to use a minority language with fellow speakers can be a means of asserting in-group solidarity and resisting linguistic assimilation
  • The refusal to accommodate to the dominant language or variety can be a form of linguistic resistance and a challenge to the authority of the dominant group

Language Policies and Power Dynamics

Official Language Recognition and Resource Allocation

• Language policies and planning decisions, such as the official recognition of languages, the allocation of resources for language education, or the regulation of language use in public domains, can have significant consequences for power relations in multilingual societies
• The prioritization of a single official language or the marginalization of minority languages through language policies can reinforce the dominance of the majority group and limit the access of linguistic minorities to political, economic, and social opportunities
  • The designation of English as the sole official language in many African countries has often led to the neglect of indigenous languages in education and public life, perpetuating colonial power structures
  • The lack of resources for bilingual education or the inadequate provision of translation services in healthcare settings can disadvantage linguistic minorities and reinforce social inequalities
• Language education policies that favor the dominant language or restrict the use of minority languages in schools can contribute to the erosion of linguistic diversity and the assimilation of minority language speakers
  • The ban on the use of minority languages in schools during the Franco regime in Spain led to the suppression of Basque, Catalan, and Galician languages and the forced assimilation of their speakers
  • The "No Child Left Behind" policy in the United States, which emphasized English-only instruction, has been criticized for its negative impact on the academic achievement and cultural identity of English language learners

Language Rights and Linguistic Equality

• The implementation of language rights, such as the provision of translation and interpretation services or the recognition of linguistic minorities' right to use their language in public settings, can help to mitigate power imbalances and promote linguistic equality
  • The European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages provides a framework for the protection and promotion of minority languages in Europe, recognizing them as an integral part of the continent's cultural heritage
  • The provision of bilingual ballots and voting materials in the United States has been a crucial step in ensuring the political participation of linguistic minorities and reducing barriers to democratic representation
• The effectiveness of language policies and planning in addressing power inequalities depends on factors such as the socio-historical context, the political will of decision-makers, and the agency and resistance of affected language communities
  • The success of language revitalization efforts, such as the revival of Hebrew in Israel or the promotion of Māori in New Zealand, has been influenced by the mobilization of community resources and the support of political institutions
  • The resistance of linguistic minorities to assimilationist policies, such as the Deaf community's advocacy for the recognition of sign languages, has been crucial in challenging dominant language ideologies and asserting linguistic rights
• The unintended consequences of language policies, such as the emergence of new linguistic hierarchies or the exacerbation of social tensions, highlight the complex interplay between language, power, and identity in multilingual societies
  • The promotion of Swahili as a national language in Tanzania has led to the emergence of new linguistic elites and the marginalization of other indigenous languages
  • The language policy in Belgium, which has institutionalized the linguistic division between Dutch-speaking Flanders and French-speaking Wallonia, has contributed to political tensions and debates over national identity