Social Psychology

study guides for every class

that actually explain what's on your next test

Risk of harm

from class:

Social Psychology

Definition

Risk of harm refers to the potential for physical or psychological injury that participants might experience as a result of their involvement in social psychological research. This concept is crucial for ethical considerations, as researchers must balance the pursuit of knowledge with the responsibility to protect participants from harm. Ethical guidelines require researchers to minimize any risks and ensure that participants are fully informed about potential dangers before agreeing to take part in studies.

congrats on reading the definition of Risk of harm. now let's actually learn it.

ok, let's learn stuff

5 Must Know Facts For Your Next Test

  1. Researchers are required to assess the risk of harm to participants before conducting a study and take steps to mitigate any identified risks.
  2. Risk of harm can be categorized into physical, psychological, and social harms, each requiring different ethical considerations.
  3. Participants must be made aware of any risks associated with their involvement in a study during the informed consent process.
  4. Even minimal risk studies must be reviewed by an Institutional Review Board to ensure ethical compliance and participant safety.
  5. Researchers have a duty to provide appropriate support or resources to participants who may experience negative effects as a result of their participation.

Review Questions

  • How does the concept of risk of harm influence the design of social psychological research studies?
    • The concept of risk of harm significantly influences the design of research studies by compelling researchers to prioritize participant safety throughout the study process. When designing studies, researchers must carefully consider potential risks and develop protocols to minimize them. This includes ensuring informed consent is obtained, providing accurate information about risks, and implementing debriefing procedures post-study. By integrating these ethical considerations into study design, researchers can foster an environment that prioritizes participant welfare while still contributing valuable insights to social psychology.
  • Discuss the role of Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) in managing risk of harm in social psychological research.
    • Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) play a critical role in managing risk of harm by reviewing research proposals before studies can begin. They assess whether the potential benefits of the research outweigh any risks posed to participants and ensure that appropriate measures are in place to protect them. This includes evaluating informed consent processes, risk assessments, and debriefing plans. By serving as a gatekeeper for ethical research practices, IRBs help maintain high ethical standards and safeguard participants from undue harm.
  • Evaluate how the principles surrounding risk of harm can evolve with changes in societal attitudes towards ethics in research.
    • The principles surrounding risk of harm can evolve significantly due to changing societal attitudes towards ethics in research. As awareness grows regarding issues like psychological trauma and vulnerability among certain populations, ethical standards may become stricter to ensure participant protection. Researchers may need to adapt their methodologies and enhance informed consent processes based on contemporary values related to respect and autonomy. Additionally, ongoing discussions about what constitutes acceptable risk can lead to changes in regulations governing research practices, thereby shaping future studies and prioritizing participant welfare even more.
© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.
Glossary
Guides