scoresvideos

🤔intro to philosophy review

key term - Active Euthanasia

Citation:

Definition

Active euthanasia refers to the deliberate act of ending a terminally ill person's life in order to relieve them of their suffering. It involves the direct administration of lethal substances or interventions to cause the patient's death.

5 Must Know Facts For Your Next Test

  1. Active euthanasia is considered more controversial than passive euthanasia, as it involves a direct, intentional act to end a person's life.
  2. The legality of active euthanasia varies widely around the world, with some countries and regions allowing it under specific circumstances.
  3. Proponents of active euthanasia argue that it can alleviate unbearable suffering, while opponents cite concerns about the potential for abuse and the sanctity of life.
  4. Ethical debates surrounding active euthanasia often center on the principles of autonomy, beneficence, and the potential for unintended consequences.
  5. Palliative care and hospice services have become increasingly important in providing end-of-life care that focuses on comfort and quality of life, rather than hastening death.

Review Questions

  • Explain the key differences between active euthanasia and passive euthanasia.
    • The primary difference between active and passive euthanasia lies in the level of intervention. Active euthanasia involves the direct administration of lethal substances or interventions to cause the patient's death, while passive euthanasia involves withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining treatment, allowing the patient to die naturally from their underlying condition. Active euthanasia is generally considered more controversial, as it requires a deliberate, intentional act to end the patient's life, whereas passive euthanasia is seen as a more passive, less direct approach to end-of-life care.
  • Discuss the ethical considerations surrounding the practice of active euthanasia.
    • The ethical debate around active euthanasia centers on the principles of autonomy, beneficence, and the potential for unintended consequences. Proponents argue that individuals should have the right to choose to end their own suffering, and that active euthanasia can be a compassionate act that alleviates unbearable pain. Opponents, however, cite concerns about the slippery slope of euthanasia, the potential for abuse, and the sanctity of human life. There are also questions about whether active euthanasia can truly be considered a voluntary choice, given the vulnerability of terminally ill patients. These ethical dilemmas continue to be a major point of contention in the ongoing discussions around active euthanasia.
  • Analyze the role of palliative care in the context of end-of-life decisions and the debate surrounding active euthanasia.
    • Palliative care has become increasingly important in providing comprehensive, compassionate end-of-life care that focuses on relieving suffering and improving quality of life, rather than hastening death. By addressing the physical, emotional, and spiritual needs of terminally ill patients and their families, palliative care can often alleviate the type of unbearable suffering that may lead some to consider active euthanasia. Proponents of palliative care argue that it can serve as an alternative to active euthanasia, providing a humane and ethical approach to end-of-life care. However, critics contend that palliative care may not always be sufficient to address the unique circumstances and personal preferences of every terminally ill individual, and that active euthanasia should remain an option in certain cases. The interplay between palliative care and the active euthanasia debate is a complex and nuanced issue that continues to be a central focus in the broader bioethical discussions surrounding end-of-life decision-making.